Romanization of Japanese

The romanization of Japanese is the application of the Latin alphabet to write the Japanese language. This method of writing is known as (), less strictly romaji, literally "Roman letters", sometimes incorrectly transliterated as romanji or rōmanji. There are several different romanization systems. The three main ones are Hepburn romanization, Kunrei-shiki Rōmaji (ISO 3602), and Nihon-shiki Rōmaji (ISO 3602 Strict). Variants of the Hepburn system are the most widely used.

Japanese is normally written in logographic characters borrowed from Chinese (kanji) and syllabic scripts (kana) which also ultimately derive from Chinese characters. Rōmaji may be used in any context where Japanese text is targeted at non-Japanese speakers who cannot read kanji or kana, such as for names on street signs and passports, and in dictionaries and textbooks for foreign learners of the language. It is also used to transliterate Japanese terms in text written in English (or other language that uses the Roman alphabet) on Japanese topics such as linguistics, literature, history, and culture. Rōmaji is the most common way to input Japanese into word processors and computers, and may also be used to display Japanese on devices that do not support the display of Japanese characters.

All Japanese who have attended elementary school since World War II have been taught to read and write romanized Japanese. Therefore, almost all Japanese are able to read and write Japanese using rōmaji.

History

The earliest Japanese romanization system was based on the Portuguese orthography. It was developed around 1548 by a Japanese Catholic named Yajiro. Jesuit presses used the system in a series of printed Catholic books so that missionaries could preach and teach their converts without learning to read Japanese orthography. The most useful of these books for the study of early modern Japanese pronunciation and early attempts at romanization was the Nippo jisho, a Japanese-Portuguese dictionary written in 1603. In general, the early Portuguese system was similar to Nihon-shiki in its treatment of vowels. Some consonants were transliterated differently: for instance, the /k/ consonant was rendered, depending on context, as either c or q, and the consonant (now pronounced /h/) as f, so Nihon no kotoba ("The language of Japan") was spelled Nifon no cotoba. The Jesuits also printed some secular books in romanized Japanese, including the first printed edition of the Japanese classic The Tale of the Heike, romanized as Feiqe no monogatari, and a collection of Aesop's Fables (romanized as Esopo no fabulas). The latter continued to be printed and read after the suppression of Christianity in Japan (Chibbett, 1977).

Following the expulsion of Christians from Japan in the late 1590s and early 17th century, rōmaji fell out of use, and was only used sporadically in foreign texts until the mid-19th century, when Japan opened up again. The systems used today all developed in the latter half of the 19th century.

From the mid-19th century several systems were developed, culminating in the Hepburn system, named after James Curtis Hepburn who used it in the third edition of his Japanese–English dictionary, published in 1887. The Hepburn system included representation of some sounds that have since changed. For example, Lafcadio Hearn's book shows the older kw- pronunciation; in modern Hepburn romanization, this would be written Kaidan (lit., ghost tales.)

As a replacement for Japanese writing system

In the Meiji era (1868-1912), some Japanese scholars advocated abolishing the Japanese writing system entirely and using rōmaji instead. The Nihon-shiki romanization was an outgrowth of that movement. Several Japanese texts were published entirely in rōmaji during this period, but it failed to catch on. Later, in the early 20th century, some scholars devised syllabary systems with characters derived from Latin (rather like the Cherokee syllabary); these were even less popular, because they were not based on any historical use of the Latin alphabet. Today, the use of Nihon-shiki for writing Japanese is advocated by the Oomoto sect and some independent organizations.

Modern systems

Hepburn

generally follows English phonology with Romance vowels. It is an intuitive method of showing Anglophones the pronunciation of a word in Japanese. It was standardized in the USA as American National Standard System for the Romanization of Japanese (Modified Hepburn), but this status was abolished on October 6, 1994. Hepburn is the most common romanization system in use today, especially in the English-speaking world.

The Revised Hepburn system of romanization uses a macron to indicate some long vowels, and an apostrophe to note the separation of easily confused phonemes (usually, syllabic n ん from a following naked vowel or semivowel). For example, the name じゅんいちろう, is written with the kana characters ju-n-i-chi-ro-u, and romanized as Jun'ichirō in Revised Hepburn. Without the apostrophe, it would not be possible to distinguish this correct reading from the incorrect ju-ni-chi-ro-u. This system is widely used in Japan and among foreign students and academics.

Nihon-shiki

, which predates the Hepburn system, was originally invented as a method for the Japanese to write their own language in Latin characters. It follows the Japanese syllabary very strictly, with no adjustments for changes in pronunciation. It is therefore the only major system of romanization that allows lossless mapping to and from kana. It has also been standardized as ISO 3602 Strict. Also known as Nippon-shiki, rendered in the Nihon-shiki style of romanization the name is either Nihon-siki or Nippon-siki.

Kunrei-shiki

is a slightly modified version of Nihon-shiki which eliminates differences between the kana syllabary and modern pronunciation. For example, when the words kana かな and tsukai つかい are combined, the result is written in kana as かなづかい with a dakuten (voicing sign) ゛on the つ (tsu) kana to indicate that the tsu つ is now voiced. The づ kana is pronounced in the same way as a different kana, す (su), with dakuten, ず. Kunrei-shiki and Hepburn ignore the difference in kana and represent the sound in the same way, as kanazukai, using the same letters "zu" as are used to romanize ず. Nihon-shiki retains the difference, and romanizes the word as kanadukai, differentiating the づ kana from the ず kana, which is romanized as zu, even though they are pronounced identically. Similarly for the pair じ and ぢ, which are both zi in Kunrei-shiki and both ji in Hepburn romanization, but are zi and di respectively in Nihon-shiki. See the table below for full details.

Kunrei-shiki has been standardized by the Japanese Government and the International Organisation for Standardisation as ISO 3602. Kunrei-shiki is taught to Japanese elementary school students in their fourth year of education.

Written in Kunrei-shiki, the name of the system would be rendered Kunreisiki.

Other variants

It is possible to elaborate these romanizations to enable non-native speakers to pronounce Japanese words more correctly. Typical additions include tone marks to note the Japanese pitch accent and diacritic marks to distinguish phonological changes, such as the assimilation of the moraic nasal /n/ (see Japanese phonology).

JSL

JSL is a romanization system based on Japanese phonology, designed using the linguistic principles used by linguists in designing writing systems for languages that do not have any. It is a purely phonemic system, using exactly one symbol for each phoneme, and marking pitch accent using diacritics. It was created for Eleanor Harz Jorden's system of Japanese language teaching. Its principle is that such a system enables students to better internalize the phonology of Japanese. Since it does not have any of the advantages for non-native speakers that the other rōmaji systems have, and the Japanese already have a writing system for their language, JSL is not widely used outside the educational environment.

Non-standard romanization

In addition to the standardized systems above, there are many variations in romanization, used either for simplification, in error or confusion between different systems, or for deliberate stylistic reasons.

Notably, the various mappings that Japanese input methods use to convert keystrokes on a Roman keyboard to kana often combine features of all of the systems; when used as plain text rather than being converted, these are usually known as wāpuro rōmaji. (Wāpuro is a blend of wādo purosessā word processor.) Unlike the standard systems, wāpuro rōmaji requires no characters from outside the ASCII character set.

While there may be arguments in favour of some of these variant romanizations in specific contexts, their use, especially if mixed, leads to confusion when romanized Japanese words are indexed. Note that this confusion never occurs when inputting Japanese characters with a word processor, because inputted roman alphabets are transcribed into Japanese kana characters as soon as IME decides what character is input.

The following variant romanizations are common:

Japanese words and names that have established English spellings, such as kudzu and jiu jitsu, or loanwords such as kyatto for "cat", are sometimes written as they are in English, without regard for the rules of romanization.

Jya for じゃ, which is ja in Hepburn and zya in Nihon-shiki and Kunrei-shiki, and similarly jyu for じゅ and jyo for じょ. The extraneous y seems to be the result of confusion between the romanization systems.

Cchi for っち (Hepburn tchi) and so on. This is wāpuro rōmaji, but is often used for stylistic reasons when rendering nicknames (for example, あきこ Akiko becoming あっちゃん Acchan rather than Atchan).

La for ら (Hepburn ra) and so on. The Japanese consonant has a sound (IPA ) that is near, but not identical to, both of English "r" and "l". "R" and "l" are both transcribed into Japanese using the Japanese . Examples of "l" in romanized Japanese include Japanese children's doll リカ, romanized as Licca.

Nn for ん (Hepburn n). This is also an example of wāpuro rōmaji (although many Japanese input methods also accept the Hepburn n'). This leads to ambiguity with the more widespread Hepburn system. For example, the cluster nna, which is んな in Hepburn, represents んあ in this system. The double n is sometimes seen in names.

Long vowels

The most common variant romanization is to omit the macrons or circumflexes used to indicate a long vowel. This is extremely common in the romanized version of Japanese words used in English. For example the capital city of Japan, correctly written Tōkyō in romanized Japanese, is universally written as Tokyo. In Japan, since romanized Japanese is seen mostly as a convenience for foreigners to be able to read signs easily, macrons and circumflexes are usually omitted for simplification.

Many typewriters, word processors, and computerized systems cannot easily deal with the macron used in Hepburn romanization. Nihon-shiki and Kunrei-shiki use a circumflex accent (thus, Tôkyô). This may allow for easier input, since all of â, î, û, ê, and ô are in the ISO-8859-1 character set, and may be easily input on a variety of systems.

In addition, the following three methods of representing long vowels are authorized by the Japanese Foreign Ministry for use in passports.

Oh for おお or おう (Hepburn ō).

Oo for おお or おう. This is valid JSL and modified Hepburn.

Ou for おう. This is also an example of wāpuro rōmaji.

Anglicization

Japanese words borrowed into English may have their spelling Anglicized to accord with English spelling conventions. This is done in various ad hoc ways – one example is adding a terminal -h as in bokeh (from boke) or butoh (from butō), so that the vowels are pronounced as monophthongs. Other Japanese words borrowed into English, such as karate, do not have such spelling modifications.

Archaic variants

In older texts, other variant romanizations which are now no longer used are sometimes seen. Some of them have survived to the present day, although few of them are still actively used. Examples include:

The vowel i plus o was sometimes used to represent the Japanese yōon sound: hence Tokyo becomes "Tokio" and Kyoto becomes "Kioto". This romanization can still be seen in the species name "mioga" of the Japanese vegetable myōga.

The kana え and ゑ were rendered as ye. The actual pronunciations of these kana were once e and we, but the w of we had already been lost by the time that (e.g.) ゑど "Edo" was first romanized as Yedo, "Iyeyasu" instead of "Ieyasu", "Inouye" instead of "Inoue", and "yen" instead of "en". This usage reflects the older pronunciation of e as ye. This pronunciation was lost sometime in the late 19th to early 20th centuries.

The kana づ (Nihon-shiki du) was romanized as dzu, as seen in the plant names adzuki and kudzu. This enjoys some currency even today as Hepburn-like wāpuro rōmaji, and has a phonetic value distinct from zu in many dialects of Japanese.

Romanization of Japanese names

Names can be subject to even more variation, with spellings depending on the individual's preference. For example, the manga artist Yasuhiro Nightow's family name would be more conventionally written in Hepburn romanization as Naitō.

Other variations seen in names include the substitution of k with c, as in the name of television celebrity Ricaco or the snack food Jagarico.

Example words written in each romanization system

{| class=wikitable |- !rowspan="2"|English !rowspan="2"|Japanese !rowspan="2"|Kana spelling !colspan="3"|Romanization |- !Revised Hepburn !Kunrei-shiki !Nihon-shiki |- style="vertical-align:top; text-align:center;" |Roman characters |ローマ字 |ローマじ |rōmaji |rômazi |rômazi |- style="vertical-align:top; text-align:center;" |Mount Fuji |富士山 |ふじさん |Fujisan |Huzisan |Huzisan |- style="vertical-align:top; text-align:center;" |tea |お茶 |おちゃ |ocha |otya |otya |- style="vertical-align:top; text-align:center;" |governor |知事 |ちじ |chiji |tizi |tizi |- style="vertical-align:top; text-align:center;" |to shrink |縮む |ちぢむ |chijimu |tizimu |tidimu |- style="vertical-align:top; text-align:center;" |to continue |続く |つづく |tsuzuku |tuzuku |tuduku |}

Differences among romanizations

This chart shows in full the three main systems for the romanization of Japanese: Hepburn, Nihon-shiki and Kunrei-shiki:

This chart shows the significant differences among them.

{| class=wikitable ! Kana !! Revised Hepburn !! Nihon-shiki !! Kunrei-shiki |- style="text-align: center;" | うう || ū || colspan="2" | û |- style="text-align: center;" | おう, おお || ō || colspan="2" | ô |- style="text-align: center;" | し || shi || colspan="2" | si |- style="text-align: center;" | しゃ || sha || colspan="2" | sya |- style="text-align: center;" | しゅ || shu || colspan="2" | syu |- style="text-align: center;" | しょ || sho || colspan="2" | syo |- style="text-align: center;" | じ || ji || colspan="2" | zi |- style="text-align: center;" | じゃ || ja || colspan="2" | zya |- style="text-align: center;" | じゅ || ju || colspan="2" | zyu |- style="text-align: center;" | じょ || jo || colspan="2" | zyo |- style="text-align: center;" | ち || chi || colspan="2" | ti |- style="text-align: center;" | つ || tsu || colspan="2" | tu |- style="text-align: center;" | ちゃ || cha || colspan="2" | tya |- style="text-align: center;" | ちゅ || chu || colspan="2" | tyu |- style="text-align: center;" | ちょ || cho || colspan="2" | tyo |- style="text-align: center;" | ぢ || ji ||di || zi |- style="text-align: center;" | づ || zu ||du || zu |- style="text-align: center;" | ぢゃ || ja ||dya || zya |- style="text-align: center;" | ぢゅ || ju ||dyu || zyu |- style="text-align: center;" | ぢょ || jo ||dyo || zyo |- style="text-align: center;" | ふ || fu || colspan="2" | hu |- style="text-align: center;" | ゐ || i || wi || i |- style="text-align: center;" | ゑ || e || we || e |- style="text-align: center;" | を || o || wo || o |- style="text-align: center;" | ん || n-n'(-m) || colspan="2" | n-n' |}

Kana without standardised forms of romanization

There is no universally accepted style of romanization for the smaller versions of the y kana (ゃ/ャ, ゅ/ュ and ょ/ョ) when used outside the normal combinations (きゃ,　きょ etc.), nor for the sokuon or small tsu kana っ/ッ when it is not directly followed by a consonant. Although these are usually regarded as merely phonetic marks or diacritics, they do sometimes appear on their own, such as at the end of sentences, in exclamations, or in some names. The detached sokuon is sometimes represented as an apostrophe or as t; for example, あっ might be written as a' or at.

Full-sized kana combined with smaller versions of the vowel kana ぁ/ァ, ぃ/ィ, ぅ/ゥ, ぇ/ェ and ぉ/ォ, mostly used to write loanwords, can be romanized in the "obvious way", reflecting the sound that they are meant to represent. For example, ディ, consisting of katakana de and small i, would typically be romanized as di. Sometimes this may create potential conflicts; for example if トゥ (katakana to and small u, used to represent sounds as in the English word "too") is romanised as tu, it may be confused with the Nihon-shiki and Kunrei-shiki romanizations of the kana ツ, also written tu. However, ツ is romanized as tsu in the Hepburn scheme, and since Hepburn is dominant among three systems, this kind of confusion is less likely to occur.

On a computer or word processor, smaller kana may be produced in various ways. For example, an "x" or an "l" preceding the romanization of the full-sized kana produces a small version on some systems, thus xtu gives "っ" on Microsoft Windows. However this is not standardized, and these forms are restricted to use in input systems; they are never used to represent the smaller kana in romanized Japanese.

Historical romanizations

:1603: Vocabvlario da Lingoa de Iapam (1603) :1604: Arte da Lingoa de Iapam (1604–1608) :1620: Arte Breve da Lingoa Iapoa (1620)

{| class=wikitable |- ! || あ || い || う || え || お || || || || |- | 1603 || rowspan=3 | a || i, j, y || v, u || rowspan=3 | ye || vo, uo || || || || |- | 1604 || i || rowspan=2 | v || rowspan=2 | vo || || || || |- | 1620 || y || || || || |- ! || か || き || く || け || こ || きゃ || || きょ || くゎ |- | 1603 || rowspan=2 | ca || qi, qui || rowspan=2 | cu, qu || qe,que || rowspan=3 | co || qia || || qio, qeo || rowspan=3 | qua |- | 1604 || qui || que || quia || || quio |- | 1620 || ca, ka || ki || cu, ku || ke || kia || || kio |- ! || が || ぎ || ぐ || げ || ご || ぎゃ || ぎゅ || ぎょ || ぐゎ |- | 1603 || rowspan=2 | ga || rowspan=2 | gui || gu, gv || rowspan=2 | gue || rowspan=2 | go || guia || rowspan=2 | guiu || rowspan=2 | guio || rowspan=3 | gua |- | 1604 || gu || |- | 1620 || ga, gha || ghi || gu, ghu || ghe || go, gho || ghia || ghiu || ghio |- ! || さ || し || す || せ || そ || しゃ || しゅ || しょ || |- | 1603 || rowspan=3 | sa || rowspan=3 | xi || rowspan=3 | su || rowspan=3 | xe || rowspan=3 | so || rowspan=3 | xa || rowspan=3 | xu || rowspan=3 | xo || |- | 1604 || |- | 1620 || |- ! || ざ || じ || ず || ぜ || ぞ || じゃ || じゅ || じょ || |- | 1603 || rowspan=3 | za || ii, ji || rowspan=3 | zu || ie, ye || rowspan=3 | zo || ia, ja || iu, ju || io, jo || |- | 1604 || rowspan=2 | ji || || rowspan=2 | ia || ju || jo || |- | 1620 || ie || iu || io || |- ! || た || ち || つ || て || と || ちゃ || ちゅ || ちょ || |- | 1603 || rowspan=3 | ta || rowspan=3 | chi || rowspan=3 | tçu || rowspan=3 | te || rowspan=3 | to || rowspan=3 | cha || rowspan=3 | chu || rowspan=3 | cho || |- | 1604 || |- | 1620 || |- ! || だ || ぢ || づ || で || ど || ぢゃ || ぢゅ || ぢょ || |- | 1603 || rowspan=3 | da || rowspan=3 | gi || zzu || rowspan=3 | de || rowspan=3 | do || rowspan=3 | gia || rowspan=3 | giu || rowspan=3 | gio || |- | 1604 || rowspan=2 | dzu || |- | 1620 || |- ! || な || に || ぬ || ね || の || にゃ || にゅ || にょ || |- | 1603 || rowspan=3 | na || rowspan=3 | ni || rowspan=3 | nu || rowspan=3 | ne || rowspan=3 | no || nha || nhu, niu || nho, neo || |- | 1604 || rowspan=2 | nha || rowspan=2 | nhu || rowspan=2 | nho || |- | 1620 || |- ! || は || ひ || ふ || へ || ほ || ひゃ || ひゅ || ひょ || |- | 1603 || rowspan=3 | fa || rowspan=3 | fi || rowspan=3 | fu || rowspan=3 | fe || rowspan=3 | fo || fia || fiu || fio, feo || |- | 1604 || || || rowspan=2 | fio || |- | 1620 || || || |- ! || ば || び || ぶ || べ || ぼ || びゃ || びゅ || びょ || |- | 1603 || rowspan=3 | ba || rowspan=3 | bi || rowspan=3 | bu || rowspan=3 | be || rowspan=3 | bo || bia || biu || bio, beo || |- | 1604 || || || || |- | 1620 || bia || biu || || |- ! || ぱ || ぴ || ぷ || ぺ || ぽ || ぴゃ || ぴゅ || ぴょ || |- | 1603 || rowspan=3 | pa || rowspan=3 | pi || rowspan=3 | pu || rowspan=3 | pe || rowspan=3 | po || pia || || pio || |- | 1604 || || || || |- | 1620 || pia || || || |- ! || ま || み || む || め || も || みゃ || || みょ || |- | 1603 || rowspan=3 | ma || rowspan=3 | mi || rowspan=3 | mu || rowspan=3 | me || rowspan=3 | mo || mia, mea || || mio, meo || |- | 1604 || || || || |- | 1620 || || || mio || |- ! || や || || ゆ || || よ || || || || |- | 1603 || rowspan=3 | ya || || rowspan=3 | yu || || rowspan=3 | yo || || || || |- | 1604 || || || || || || |- | 1620 || || || || || || |- ! || ら || り || る || れ || ろ || りゃ || りゅ || りょ || |- | 1603 || rowspan=3 | ra || rowspan=3 | ri || rowspan=3 | ru || rowspan=3 | re || rowspan=3 | ro || ria, rea || riu || rio, reo || |- | 1604 || || || rowspan=2 | rio || |- | 1620 || || riu || |- ! || わ || ゐ || || ゑ || を || || || || |- | 1603 || va, ua || || || || vo, uo || || || || |- | 1604 || rowspan=2 | va || rowspan=2 | y || || rowspan=2 | ye || rowspan=2 | vo || || || || |- | 1620 || || || || || |- ! || colspan=9 | ん |- | 1603 || colspan=9 | n, m, ~ (tilde) |- | 1604 || colspan=9 | n |- | 1620 || colspan=9 | n, m |- ! || colspan=9 | っ |- | 1603 || colspan=9 | -t, -cc-, -cch-, -cq-, -dd-, -pp-, -ss-, -tt, -xx-, -zz- |- | 1604 || colspan=9 | -t, -cc-, -cch-, -pp-, -cq-, -ss-, -tt-, xx- |- | 1620 ||colspan=9 | -t, -cc-, -cch-, -pp-, -ck-, -cq-, -ss-, -tt-, -xx- |}

Alphabet letter names in Japanese

The list below shows how to spell Latin character words or acronyms in Japanese. For example, NHK is spelled enu-eichi-kei, (エヌエイチケイ). The following pronunciations are based on English letter names; otherwise, for example, A would likely be called ā (アー) in Japanese.

A; Ē or ei (エー or エイ)

B; Bī (ビー, alternative pronunciation bē, ベー)

C; Shī (シー, sometimes pronounced sī, スィー)

D; Dī (ディー, alternative pronunciation dē, デー)

E; Ī (イー)

F; Efu (エフ)

G; Jī (ジー)

H; Eichi or Etchi (エイチ or エッチ)

I; Ai (アイ)

J; Jē or Jei (ジェー or ジェイ)

K; Kē or Kei (ケー or ケイ)

L; Eru (エル)

M; Emu (エム, alternative pronunciation en(em), エン)

N; Enu (エヌ, sometimes pronounced en, エン)

O; Ō (オー)

P; Pī (ピー, alternative pronunciation pē, ペー)

Q; Kyū (キュー)

R; Āru (アール)

S; Esu (エス)

T; Tī (ティー, though sometimes pronounced chī, チー, and alternatively pronounced tē, テー)

U; Yū (ユー)

V; Vi (ヴィ, though often pronounced bui, ブイ)

W; Daburyū (ダブリュー)

X; Ekkusu (エックス)

Y; Wai (ワイ)

Z; Zetto, zeddo, or zī (ゼット, ゼッド, or ズィー, though sometimes pronounced jī, ジー)

See also

Cyrillization of Japanese

List of ISO romanizations

Japanese writing system

References

External links

Rōmaji sōdan shitsu contains an extremely extensive and accurate collection of materials relating to rōmaji, including standards documents and HTML versions of Hepburn's original dictionaries.

The rōmaji conundrum by Andrew Horvat contains a discussion of the problems caused by the variety of confusing romanization systems in use in Japan today.

Say no to romaji!, a resource promoting the use of kana in the Japanese learning industry, contains a discussion between students and teachers of Japanese on the subject of rōmaji.

Category:Japanese romanization Category:Phonetic guides Category:Romanization