Nuclear Issues

ANSTO attendance at Berri Barmera Council meeting

Question | Spokesperson Scott Ludlam
Friday 19th August 2011, 12:13pm

QUESTION NUMBER: 841

SENATOR LUDLAM asked the Minister for Innovation, Industry, Science and Research, upon notice, on 21 July 2011:

Senator Ludlam: To ask the Minister for Innovation, Industry, Science and Research-In regard to the attendance of Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation (ANSTO) personnel at the Berri Barmera Council meeting held in Berri, South Australia on 19 April 2011:
(1) Were the representatives from ANSTO invited by the council or did the department offer or request a place on the council meeting agenda.
(2) Have any other councils in any state or territory been given similar deputations; if so, when and where did these occur.
(3) Are there plans or has there been discussion regarding similar presentations to be given to other councils; if so, when and where.
(4) Since the 19 April 2011 meeting in Berri, has there been any further correspondence between ANSTO and the Berri Barmera Council; if so, can a copy of this correspondence be provided.
(5) Can a copy of the notes or presentations used by the ANSTO representatives to address the Berri Barmera Council be provided.
(6) Can a copy of the report given to the Minister following the deputation be provided.

Depleted Uranium use by coalition partners in Afghanistan

Question | Spokesperson Scott Ludlam
Friday 19th August 2011, 11:57am

QUESTION No. 577

Senator Ludlam: To ask the Minister representing the Minister for Defence-

With reference to the use of depleted uranium (DU) in Afghanistan by coalition partners and the answer to a question taken on notice during the 2009-10 Supplementary Budget Estimates of the Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade Legislation Committee on DU use in Afghanistan by our coalition partners, which states that ‘Coalition partners have not provided any information on their use of depleted uranium munitions': Has the Australian Government asked our coalition partners whether they have used DU in Afghanistan.

Public has right to know about plans to use Western Australia as US military base

Media Release | Spokesperson Scott Ludlam
Friday 12th August 2011, 1:31pm

Western Australians have the right to full disclosure about any plans to establish bases for the US military, the Australian Greens said today.
Senator for Western Australia Scott Ludlam said the Australian American Leadership Dialogue currently underway includes talks on US warships and other military hardware being based in WA.



"Defence Minister Stephen Smith and senior US defence officials will be holding further discussions on using our state as a military base for the United States. The Western Australian public has a right to know the details of these plans and a right to be consulted," said Senator Ludlam.


Government nuclear policy

Estimates Transcripts | Spokesperson Scott Ludlam
Friday 5th August 2011, 5:26pm

Senate Standing Committee on Economics
Resources, Energy and Tourism Portfolio
Budget Senate Estimates
Question: BR5

Senator Ludlam asked:
Senator LUDLAM: If you could check that for us; I think that is next week. In recent correspondence to national environment groups and other stakeholders, Minister Martin Ferguson referred to himself as the minister with the portfolio responsibility for nuclear policy. Is this correct and can you confirm-I do not know if I should throw to you, Minister-whether there has been a change of portfolio or a restructure?
Ms Constable: Uranium is the area that the department considers, of course. Uranium is a very important part of the nuclear fuel cycle. Consideration of uranium mining is always in the context of a full nuclear fuel cycle. The department has particular areas of responsibility within that nuclear fuel cycle, starting from the exploration and mining activities of uranium, out to radioactive waste issues. What we do not have responsibility for, because we do not have nuclear energy in Australia, is nuclear power, nuclear energy.

ANSTO Dismissal

Question | Spokesperson Scott Ludlam
Friday 5th August 2011, 4:31pm

QUESTION NUMBER: 728

SENATOR SCOTT LUDLAM asked the Minister for Innovation, Industry, Science and Research, upon notice, on 5 July 2011:
In regard to former Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation (ANSTO) employee,
Mr David Reid:
(1) Was Mr Reid dismissed on 17 June 2011.
(2) Was Mr Reid's letter of dismissal hand delivered to him in a local pub.
(3) Does ANSTO management consider this an appropriate means of conducting human resources business.
(4) Did ANSTO management televise a copy of this dismissal letter over the internal network at the Lucas Heights facility on 23 June 2011, and was that the vision showing in the cafeteria in Building 23 during a staff meeting; if so, what was the intention of ANSTO management and has ANSTO management breached Mr Reid's privacy.

ARPANSA review

Question | Spokesperson Scott Ludlam
Friday 22nd July 2011, 3:31pm

QUESTION NUMBER: 653

SENATOR LUDLUM asked the Minister representing the Minister for Health and Ageing, upon notice, on 5 May 2011:

With reference to the Audit and Fraud Control Branch and the department's current review of the Australian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Agency (ARPANSA):

(1) What are the terms of reference for this review?
(2) Who is leading and serving on the panel?
(3) With whom has the panel conducted interviews?
(4) At what locations has the panel conducted inspections?
(5) When did the review commence and when will it be completed?
(6) Will the review report be made public?

As British Fukushima cover-up exposed, our own Government still ducks questions

Media Release | Spokesperson Scott Ludlam
Friday 1st July 2011, 3:35pm

Revelations that British officials conspired with the nuclear industry to downplay the scale of the Fukushima nuclear disaster raise more questions about what the Australian Government knows and is not disclosing, the Australian Greens said today.


Greens spokesperson for nuclear issues Senator Scott Ludlam said the Australian Government had gone weeks without answering questions on when it first knew the full extent of the Fukushima disaster.


"On June 1st Japanese authorities revealed they had suppressed the truth about Fukushima for more than two months. I asked our own government to explain when they knew this disaster was twice as bad as the Japanese government had initially claimed. One month later there has been no answer."


"Last week Labor and the Opposition voted against a motion that simply called on the government to maintain the interdepartmental emergency task force and publicly reveal information gleaned from Australian nuclear experts and equipment. Why? What are they hiding?"


It was revealed yesterday that British officials approached nuclear companies to co-ordinate a public relations campaign to down-play the Fukushima nuclear accident just two days after the March 11th earthquake and tsunami in Japan. Internal emails seen by the Guardian newspaper show how the British business and energy departments worked closely with multinational companies EDF Energy, Areva and Westinghouse to try to ensure the crisis did not derail their plans for a new generation of nuclear stations in the UK.


"Instead of full-disclosure on this issue, what we do see from the Australian Government is a senior Minister - Martin Ferguson - speaking at endless uranium forums and backing the uranium industry to the hilt with funds as well as rhetoric," said Senator Ludlam.


"One month ago I asked the Australian Government what it knew about Fukushima and when it knew it. It's time for the whole truth to be heard."



Media Contact: Giovanni Torre 0417 174 302


 

Fukushima 3 Months On - Still a Matter of Public Importance

Speech | Spokesperson Scott Ludlam
Wednesday 15th June 2011, 9:09pm

Senator LUDLAM (Western Australia) (13:10): I rise to express my concern, the concern of my colleagues and the concern of people all over the world for the people of Japan, including our friends and colleagues whose lives changed on 11 March this year, when the triple disaster of an earthquake, a tsunami and a nuclear plant accident occurred. I am continually moved by the strength, ingenuity and improvisation of the Japanese people and by their remarkable capacity for efficient and large-scale organisation. They have endured through the crisis and trauma stages and are now continuing into the long-term recovery and clean-up phases.

When did the Australian Government know the full extent of the Fukushima crisis?

Media Release | Spokesperson Scott Ludlam
Wednesday 15th June 2011, 1:58pm

The Government must reveal when it first knew that radiation impacts from the Fukushima meltdown were twice as bad as first claimed by Japanese authorities, the Australian Greens said today.


Senator Scott Ludlam raised the issue as a matter of public importance today in the Senate while honouring the victims of the tsunami that struck Japan on March 11th.


"On June 1st, the world learned that Japanese authorities had suppressed detection of radioactive tellurium 6km from Fukushima since March 12th. The presence of this isotope indicates that the temperature of the fuel rods was over 1000 degrees, indicating that 24 hours after the crisis, Japanese authorities knew a meltdown had started.


"Did the Australian interdepartmental emergency task force set up by DFAT as a result of the emergency know this? Did ARPANSA? If not, why not? Did the Australian Government assist in suppressing this information, or was it not passed on at all by Japanese authorities?

Uranium industry still pushes nuclear as Fukushima revealed to be twice as bad as first claimed

Media Release | Spokesperson Scott Ludlam
Thursday 9th June 2011, 3:54pm

The nuclear industry and its chief supporter Martin Ferguson are in a state of denial as they continue to promote nuclear power in the shadow of the Fukushima disaster, the Australian Greens said today.


A day after the Japanese Government admitted the radiation leaked from the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant was twice that originally claimed, the Australian Uranium Association called for a nuclear power sector in Australia.


At a debate between Greens spokesperson for nuclear issues Senator Scott Ludlam and AUA CEO Michael Angwin, Senator Ludlam described the nuclear industry's climate credentials as "commercial self-interest masquerading as energy policy".