- Order:
- Duration: 2:18
- Published: 31 Mar 2011
- Uploaded: 04 Sep 2011
- Author: AishVideo
The extant narrative is a product of the late exilic or the post-exilic period (6th to 5th centuries BC), but the core of the narrative is older, being reflected in the 8th to 7th century BC Deuteronomist documents. A minority of scholars assumes that the Iron Age narrative has yet older sources that can be traced to a genuine tradition of the Bronze Age collapse of the 13th century BC.
There are many well-known incidents in the story of the Exodus, including the crossing of the Red Sea (possibly more accurately, the Sea of Reeds), the revelation at Sinai, the giving of the Tablets of Law, the incident of the golden calf, the gift of manna in the desert, the miracle of the rock of Meribah, the treachery of the Amalekites, Balaam and his talking donkey, and the story of the scouting of Canaan.
The exodus from Egypt is the theme of the Jewish holiday of Passover ("pesaḥ"; the term continues to be used in the Passover Hagadah. At the beginning of the Exodus narrative the Israelites are instructed to prepare unleavened bread as they will be leaving in haste, and to mark their doors with blood of the slaughtered sheep so that the "Angel" or "the destroyer" will "pass over" them while killing the first-born of Egypt. The Hebrew name for the festival, "Pesa", refers to the "skipping over", "jumping over" or "passing over" by God over the Jewish houses while killing the first born of Egypt. (Despite the biblical story, scholars believe that the passover festival originated in a magic ritual to turn away demons from the household by painting the doorframe with the blood of a slaughtered sheep.)
The Jews have kept national and personal reminders of this momentous event, in their everyday lives. Some examples are; Putting on Tefilin (phylacteries) on their hand and on their forehead daily The wearing of Tzitzit (Fringes) all-day. Eating Matzot only, no leavened bread for Seven days, during the holiday of Pesach (Passover). Fasting of the First born a day before Passover. Redeem the first born children from God, Redeem the first born animals from God Keep the holiday of Sukkoth Seven days. Keep the Sabbath.
Despite being in the form of a retelling of the Exodus story, the Book of Deuteronomy is universally recognised as the oldest of the sources, composed in the 7th century BC. John Van Seters places the Jahwist source at about 530 BC, during the Babylonian exile. The Priestly writer or writers correspond to the final redaction of the text at around 400 BC, well within the period of Second Temple Judaism during the Persian period. The Oxford Bible Commentary follows Van Seters's approach but has a slightly different set of dates: the Jahwist material 7th-6th centuries, overlapping Deuteronomy, the Priestly author late 6th or 5th century, a little earlier than in Van Seters' view. Van Seters's approach is a modification of the documentary hypothesis called the "supplementary hypothesis", as he sees the Jahwist as a basic text which was then "supplemented" by the Priestly authors.
A third approach is known as the "fragmentary hypothesis", and is essentially a more complex version of Van Seters's approach. It sees the four books (Deuteronomy is held separate again) growing separately from each other through a process of central "blocs" which were gradually expanded with additional material until they were combined in a long drawn out and complex process. Thus the stories about the Israelites in Egypt, their flight across the Red Sea, the giving of the Law and the wanderings in the wilderness, are each seen as having their own history before being combined with each other and with the material in Genesis. This approach, like both the others, sees the Priestly writer (or writers) as the final redactor of the extant text, dated to the 5th century BC.
For example, Pharaoh's fear that the Israelites might ally themselves with foreign invaders makes little concern in the context of the New Kingdom, when Canaan was part of an Egyptian empire and Egypt faced no enemies in that direction, but does make sense in a 1st millennium context, when Egypt was considerably weaker and faced invasion first from the Persians and later from Seleucid Syria.
Other anachronisms point to a period in the mid-1st millennium: Ezion-Geber, (one of the Stations of the Exodus), for example, dates to a period between the 8th and 6th centuries BC with possible further occupation into the 4th century BC, while the place-names on the Exodus route which can be identified - Goshen, Pithom, Succoth, Ramesses and Kadesh Barnea - point to the geography of the 1st millennium rather than the 2nd.
The Torah lists the places where the Israelites rested. A few of the names at the start of the itinerary, including Ra'amses, Pithom and Succoth, are reasonably well identified with archaeological sites on the eastern edge of the Nile delta, as is Kadesh-Barnea, where the Israelites spend 38 years after turning back from Canaan, but other than that very little is certain. The crossing of the Red Sea has been variously placed at the Pelusic branch of the Nile, anywhere along the network of Bitter Lakes and smaller canals that formed a barrier toward eastward escape, the Gulf of Suez (SSE of Succoth) and the Gulf of Aqaba (S of Ezion-Geber), or even on a lagoon on the Mediterranean coast. The biblical Mt. Sinai is identified in Christian tradition with Jebel Musa in the south of the Sinai Peninsula, but this association dates only from the 3rd century AD and no evidence of the Exodus has been found there.
The most obvious routes for travelers through the region were the royal roads, the "king's highways" that had been in use for centuries and would continue in use for centuries to come. The Bible specifically denies that the Israelites went by the Way of the Philistines (purple line on the map to the right), the northerly route along the Mediterranean coast. This leaves the Way of Shur (green) and the Way of Seir (black) as probable routes, the former having the advantage of heading toward Kadesh-Barnea.
The Seder Olam Rabbah (ca. 2nd century CE) ascribes the commencement of the events of The Exodus to the year 2448 AM (1312 BCE). This date has become traditional in Rabbinic Judaism. In the first half of the 20th century the Exodus was dated on the basis of , which states that the Exodus occurred 480 years before the construction of Solomon's Temple. Equating the biblical chronology with dates in history is notoriously difficult, but Edwin Thiele's widely accepted reconciliation of the reigns of the Israelite and Judahite kings would imply an Exodus around 1450 BC, during the reign of Pharaoh Thutmose III (1479-1425 BC). By the mid-20th century it had become apparent that the archaeological record made this date impossible. The mummy of Thutmoses III had already been discovered in 1881, and Egyptian records of that period do not mention the expulsion of any group that could be identified with over 2 million Hebrew slaves, nor any events which could be identified with the Biblical plagues. In addition, digs in the 1930s had failed to find traces of the simultaneous destruction of Canaanite cities c.1400 BC - in fact many of them, including Jericho, the first Canaanite city to fall to the Israelites according to the Book of Joshua, were uninhabited at the time.
The lack of evidence led William F. Albright, the leading biblical archaeologist of the period, to propose an alternative, "late" Exodus around 1200-1250 BC. His argument was based on the many strands of evidence, including the destruction at Beitel (Bethel) and some other cities at around that period, and the occurrence from the same period of distinctive house-types and a distinctive round-collared jar which, in his opinion, was to be identified with in-coming Israelites.
Albright's theory enjoyed popularity around the middle of the 20th century, but has now been generally abandoned in scholarship. The evidence which led to the abandonment of Albright's theory include: the collar-rimmed jars have been recognised as an indigenous form originating in lowland Canaanite cities centuries earlier; while some "Joshua" cities, including Hazor, Lachish, Megiddo and others, have destruction and transition layers around 1250-1145 BC, others, including Jericho, have no destruction layers or were uninhabited during this period; and the Merneptah Stele indicates that a people called "Israel" were already known in Canaan by the reign of Merneptah (1213-1203 BC).
Modern theories on the date - all of them popular rather than scholarly - tend to concentrate on an "early" Exodus, prior to c.1440 BC. The major candidates are: The 2006 History Channel documentary The Exodus Decoded revived an idea first put forward by the 1st century AD Jewish historian Josephus, identifing the Israelites with the Hyksos, the non-Egyptian rulers of Egypt expelled by the resurgent native Eighteenth Dynasty of Egypt, c.1550-1530 BC. However, there are numerous difficulties with the theory, and it is not accepted by scholars. David Rohl's 1995 A Test of Time attempted to correct Egyptian history by shortening the Third Intermediate Period of Egypt by almost 300 years. As a by-result the synchronisms with the biblical narrative have changed, making the 13th Dynasty pharaoh Djedneferre Dudimose (Dedumesu, Tutimaos, Tutimaios) the pharaoh of the Exodus. Rohl's theory, however, has failed to find support among scholars in his field. From time to time there have been attempts to link the Exodus with the eruption of the Aegean volcano of Thera in c.1600 BC on the grounds that it could provide a natural explanation of the Plagues of Egypt and the crossing of the Red Sea - geologist Barbara J Sivertsen's 2009 book "The Parting of the Sea: How Volcanoes, Earthquakes, and Plagues Shaped the Story of the Exodus" is the most recent.
The earliest non-Biblical account of the Exodus is by Hecataeus of Abdera (late 4th century BCE): the Egyptians blame a plague on foreigners and expel them from the country, whereupon Moses, their leader, takes them to Canaan, where he founds the city of Jerusalem. More than a dozen later stories repeat the same basic theme, most of them with a marked anti-Jewish tendency. In the second story Manetho tells how 80,000 lepers and other "impure people," led by a priest named Osarseph, join forces with the former Hyksos, now living in Jerusalem, to take over Egypt. They wreak havoc until eventually the pharaoh and his son chase them out to the borders of Syria, where Osarseph gives the lepers a law-code and changes his name to Moses. Manetho differs from the other writers in describing his renegades as Egyptians rather than Jews, and in using a name other than Moses for their leader although the question remains open.
Category:Ancient Jewish Egyptian history ** Exodus Category:Evacuations Category:Moses Exodus Category:Sacred history Exodus
This text is licensed under the Creative Commons CC-BY-SA License. This text was originally published on Wikipedia and was developed by the Wikipedia community.