Skip to content
Archive of entries posted on April 2011

Breaking the Trance

The idea, put briefly, is to be able to see through the illusionary world we’re living in. You are already connected to the True Source, and when you realize that, you will have found the higher self, the slasher of veils, you will exhale God’s breath, and you will be living in the real world.

The first guys to write about Gnosticism were Ancient Greeks. That was a long time ago. Maybe they would have expressed it differently if they saw how the world looks today. So what do these old ideas mean in our strange new post-modern times?

Charles Tart offers us a way of understanding gnostic epiphany through a modern psychological model: hypnotic trance (& a tip of the hat to thirtyseven). He conceptualizes our contemporary state of consciousness as “consensus trance”, a sort of permanent hypnotic state which we all maintain by talking to each other and reenforcing it.  (You can read Tart’s essay here and more of his stuff there.)

This trance is consciousness running on autopilot, reacting to expectations and in turn creating new expectations. I think it is a consequence of living in one’s reactive mind. In The Gods Must Be Crazy, when a coke bottle (read: capitalism) falls from the sky, the peaceful collectivist tribe is introduced to the idea of property, and the logical consequences tear them apart. It’s like they’re in an altered state of consciousness. If only they could snap out of it!

The consensus trance is s a pattern of living. It keeps us focused on illusions, it makes us treat symbolic things like real things. Some Discordians describe this as The Machine – here’s one account of it from the Chao Te Ching, a Discordian reinterpretation of the Tao Te Ching:

Chapter 23
The Machine™ is built by our behaviors;
Our unconscious desires,
our conscious schemes.
Built by the expectations we create through our expectations,
the action we create through our actions,
the jobs we create with our jobs,
the world we create with our world.

But as a traffic jam does not last all morning,
nor a bad day lasts a lifetime,
a good mood is often fleeting,
and fortune does not always smile.
The Machine™ contains more than is apparent.

I wonder if there’s a way to snap people out of their trance, like how a hypnotist says “When I snap my fingers, you will be fully awake and alert.” I like this model for gnostic awakening. We have dispensed with the metaphors, we are talking concretely about how to transcend the illusion and see the world through fewer filters. Tart suggests that the cure to the trance is Mindfulness (vipassana, to the Buddhists). There are other ways too, like ego death, but that’s harder to practice.

This is what the Situationist International was on about. If we find new ways to relate to the space we live in, we divorce ourselves from our grayfaced culture and become new people. This is Project PosterGASM‘s goal too, to create a surprising, funny moment which snaps people out of autopilot and into a creative, humorous state of consciousness.

For now, the best shortcut to a gnostic awakening is merely awareness.  Be aware of the present moment. Be aware of your breath, of the thoughts in your head, the sensations you are experiencing, and the maddening cacophony of competing signals present inside you.

Visspana
Share

The Religion of What Now?

If religion is worth a good god damn, then it’s able to help us make sense of these crazy contradictory strange times we’re living in.

All those old books – the Bhagavad Gita, the Tao Te Ching, the Nag Hammadi Texts, the Bible – were written for a slice of humanity which lived at a specific moment in time. They have a few pieces of timeless human wisdom (that’s why we kept those smelly old things), but they’re not able to explain the stuff going on at the edge right now–except for in very general ways.

The conflicts many of us experience in our day to day lives, as well as the spiritual trials we are facing, are unique to 2011. For example: how can we balance privacy and membership in a community? (You need communities to transcend individuality and effect things on a larger-than-individual scale, but you have to sacrifice some of your anonymity / autonomy to do it) How do we escape the consensus trance of modern living – and should we? Ancient man thought of deities as personifications of universal forces, but now we think of the universe in different terms – what is a deity in this context? What is the relationship between capitalism and spirituality? Is an identity made of market-determined capitalist choices a real identity? How do we pick which tragedy of the commons to rally against? Consumerism, by its nature, creates suffering elsewhere in the world – how do we balance our desires and our compassion for rain forests, sea creatures, and those poor spags in sweat shops? How can you relate to a guru who is also selling something,  as most are? Is politics capable of healing our world, or is it a distraction from the forces we should be focusing on? What is nature, and are we inside or outside of it?

These are the things I wonder about as I read stuff like the Gospel of Thomas and Zhuangzi and the Principia Discordia and other spiritual ravings. Religious writings can suggest answers to most of these questions, but we are a new people now, we are in need of new myths.

The best way to use religion is not a matter of perfectly internalizing the lessons some dead people left behind. You should figure out how those writings uniquely explain the world you’re living in right now. If it seems intangible and you can’t relate to it, you might be reading it wrong, but there’s also a good chance it’s no longer relevant. I mean, Jehovas Witnesses are prohibited from receiving blood transfusionseven in times of emergency. How does this help them master the period they live in now? We live in a dangerous world, and refusing surgery is not going to save you from it. The Buddha says we should not harm living things, but what about when some crazy dictator is gunning down his people en mass? If somebody was about to gun you down for speaking out against their regime, wouldn’t you want somebody to intercede on your behalf?

We live in the information age. Few religions have successfully described it. I think we live in increasingly syncretic times. We have to take the contradictory inputs and synthesize them into something new, something personally relevant. This is an active process, it takes critical thought and self-reflection. I don’t have the answers. I’m just some spag trying to make sense of things for myself. There is no true wisdom, no really-real model which beats the other models, they all suck in certain ways.

In Hesse’s novel Siddhartha, the titular character seeks wisdom from the Gotama Buddha and discovers that he has to create this wisdom on his own.

“You have found salvation from death. It has come to you in the course of your own search, on your own path, through thoughts, through meditation, through realizations, through enlightenment. It has not come to you by means of teachings! And—thus is my thought, oh exalted one,—nobody will obtain salvation by means of teachings! You will not be able to convey and say to anybody, oh venerable one, in words and through teachings what has happened to you in the hour of enlightenment! The teachings of the enlightened Buddha contain much, it teaches many to live righteously, to avoid evil. But there is one thing which these so clear, these so venerable teachings do not contain: they do not contain the mystery of what the exalted one has experienced for himself, he alone among hundreds of thousands. This is what I have thought and realized, when I have heard the teachings. This is why I am continuing my travels—not to seek other, better teachings, for I know there are none, but to depart from all teachings and all teachers and to reach my goal by myself or to die. But often, I’ll think of this day, oh exalted one, and of this hour, when my eyes beheld a holy man.”

The Buddha’s eyes quietly looked to the ground; quietly, in perfect equanimity his inscrutable face was smiling.

Siddhartha gets it – you have to choose to captain your ship. Don’t let yourself get subsumed by the forces that guide you. This is the lifestyle I aspire to.

Militant Subjectivism? Fundamental Post-modernism? Ecstatic Pragmatism? I don’t know what to call it. Maybe it’s best to not ossify it by naming it. It’s a constant battle to make sense of the ever-changing world. Nobody can do it for you. We should reinterpret our traditions before perpetuating them. The new humanity is being born this year, let’s raise that kid right.

Share

Twenty Percent Cooler

Limited Edition Late Release!

3177 (2011) Discordian Calendar: My Little Pony: Friendship is ChaosMagick

All Hail Saint Lauren Faust!

Share

In Awe of Con-Fusion

When these two metals are combined, we say that they are ‘con-fused‘.” – Eliza, “The Confusion” (The Baroque Cycle)

What does it mean to be confused? Most often we likely consider it to mean that someone is bewildered or dealing with conflicting information that brings about a negative state of mind. However, this sort of confusion is only one aspect to the word. Confusion, in fact, may well be useful, beneficial and even desirable… in some sense.

In cryptography we use the term confusion to describe an important operation of a secure cipher. Confusion is the relationship between the encryption ‘key’ and the ‘ciphertext’ (the encrypted message). Particularly, good cryptography requires strong Confusion… or a strong, complex relationship between these two elements of the cipher. In fact, the more complex the relationship, the better the cipher. We ‘confuse’ the key and the data, so that the entire key is used to encrypt every part of the message AND that specific parts of the key are used on specific parts of the message as well. The goal is to create non-uniformity throughout the ciphertext, so that if an attacker has several samples of ‘plaintext’ they still cannot guess the correct key that was used. In a properly ‘confused’ algorithm changing one bit in the key, or changing one bit in the plaintext should result in a completely different output. Thus we can say that online banking, credit cards, debit cards, health records, sensitive business documents and secret Discordian cabal discussions are all secure, because of Confusion.

Confusion may also make things stronger. If we take metal along with other compounds and liquefy them with heat, we can con-fuse them together to create a metal alloy. If this is done correctly, the compounds become completely intermingled AND if the correct compounds are used, the resulting metal may be far more valuable than the original metals. For example, we may place Iron Ore, Charcoal (carbon) and glass (sillica) into a crucible, seal it and heat it in a furnace. This process takes three useful elements and transforms them into the ‘wootz steel’, a harder, better steel that holds its edge and exhibits a toughness beyond most other steel alloys of its time. “Damascus Steel” is still a sought after product today… the product of ‘confusion’.

Confusion often gets a bum rap, as does Chaos, Discord, Bureaucracy and Aftermath. Yet, these are not always, or necessarily negative things. Chaos can be creative. Discord can force confrontation and resolution. Without Bureaucracy the Internet, hospitals, government, your place of employment and most of reality as we know it couldn’t exist. But, Confusion, marvelous, wondrous, alchemical Con-Fusion can take many disparate things and combine them into something new, something better, something more valuable than the sum of its parts.

How better to describe the ideas, debates, metaphors and models discussed by Discordians, than a ‘con-fusion’ of ideas. The new concepts that come out of our discussions are products of multiple sources; the sciences from those of us who have studied science, the philosophies from those who have studied that. Political science, psychology, personal experiences and absurdity all placed in the crucible of Discordianism, heated, combined, forged and Con-Fused into O:MF’s, Rants, GASMS, parables and whatever else happens to come out of the fire.

So I exhort all Discordians; Steal ideas, steal metaphors, steal it all and Con-fuse it together, because that is truly the way to Think For Yourself, Schmuck!

Hail Eris, All Hail Discordia!

Ratatosk, Squirrel of Discord
Chatterer of the Words of Eris
Muncher of the ChaoAcorn
POEE of the Great Googlie Mooglie Cabal

Share

Open Question

Share