Experts who advise regulators on alternative medicine need to take a rational and objective view of risks. Practitioners, themselves, are not the right people.
It would appear to be a common mistake in the regulation of alternative medicine to assume that those trained in the subject, and who practice it, can be considered experts in the subject. And that those experts can help formulate good regulatory practices.
The nature of expertise has plagued philosophers since the time of Plato,...
Read more »