NEWS.com.au Network
news.com.au |
Fox Sports |
Newspapers |
CareerOne |
carsguide |
TrueLocal |
Real Estate |
previous pause next Network Highlights:
NEWS.com.au - home

Ask Bossy

She says I did the wrong thing by using a dating site while I was dating her.

Kate de Brito

Monday, October 25, 2010 at 08:25am
 

Dear Bossy: I need your advice and opinion to a situation I never thought I’d find myself in. Back around July a lady contacted me on Facebook after seeing my profile on the RSVP dating website. We hit it off immediately as both friends and lovers, and did all sorts of activities together. We saw each other about once per week. At the very beginning, I explicitly told her there was no long-term potential for us because I did not see us together as a couple. She said she understood. After a few weeks (still seeing each other about once per week), I reiterated again to her vocally (not via email or any electronic communication) that again, she was not my ideal, and there is going to be no long-term commitment. She acknowledged this and told me I wasn’t the man she was going to marry, and that she actually knew who she was going to marry.

Fast forward a month when we go away on a scuba trip together with a bunch of her friends. Upon returning, she sees that I still have my profile up on RSVP, and that I updated my profile with a picture that was taken of me while we were at a BBQ together. Now she’s totally upset because she feels I should have told her I still had my profile up and was looking for people. She also feels I could have been “cheating” on her. My position is I told her no less than twice over the course of the 3.5 months there was no long term commitment, or any sort of commitment, between us. I also said that because I told her she was not my ideal and she acknowledged by saying she knew the man she was going to marry and it wasn’t me, that that only confirmed we were in no way exclusive with each other.

She also feels I disrespected her because I didn’t tell her I still have my profile up on RSVP. I feel I shouldn’t have had to tell her about anything outside of what we were doing since we both acknowledged there was no commitment or anything long-term between us.

What do you and your readers think. Am I in the wrong?

Please help.

Bossy says: I don’t think you’ve done anything wrong. I just don’t think you should be surprised a woman finds it insulting you are shagging her while actively looking for another chick. Effectively you are saying: “You’re B grade baby and I am looking to move up to A”.

Also, while you were upfront about not wanting a future this woman, females have been known to misconstrue these sorts of statements, or to bloke out obvious truths. You wanted to say: “I am still on the hunt but enjoying your wares for the time being”. She heard:  “We probably will not be together in the long term but for the time being we are still together”.

Essentially she may have accepted that it wasn’t a serious relationship but she still thought it was a relationship.

It might have been clearer if you were straight up shag buddies visiting each other just for sex. But you DID have a relationship beyond that. You went out, enjoyed each others’ company and you even went away on a holiday with her friends. It makes you sound kinda like a couple.

I know you intended to be honest with this woman but in future you need to spell it out properly. Saying there is not a long term future means one thing...but it does not mean you are not exclusive.

I wouldn’t spend too much time worrying about who was wrong or right. It sounds like mixed signals and expectations. And it’s over now?

Next time remember to specifically tell the woman you will be seeing other women too.



..

Have Your Say

Show Oldest | Newest first    Page 1 of 4      1 2 3 >  Last »

You told her the situation. If she can’t handle that then too bad.

Rabbit replied to Charlie Harper
Mon 25 Oct 10 (11:49am)

/agree

She probably thought you were playing hard to get or something.

For the record women, we mean what we say, we’re not like you gals who play games or hard to get.

For the rest saying, oh dont use RSVP etc etc. Screw that. If your honest about your intentions, and there ain’t no spark. But your good friends and willing to step up to FWBs. Knock youself out.

Mistress D replied to Charlie Harper
Mon 25 Oct 10 (01:40pm)

Oh now come on Rabbit, not all men mean what they say (just like not all women play games).

ByStealth replied to Charlie Harper
Mon 25 Oct 10 (02:13pm)

I understand exactly why this woman has acted the way she did.

What I find curious is that the majority of posters imply that it is the man’s responsibility to manage the woman’s emotions for her. Eg. ‘he should man up and end things’.

Why is it his resposibility? She is an adult and by telling the OP that it’s ‘his fault’ implies that she is not equally at fault in the miscommunication and cannot manage her own emotions or take the rational action required to look after her own emotional health (eg breaking up).

This is belittling to women and its a double standard. If the guy was her friend and wanted to change the status of their relationship to something more and she didn’t, but he was getting twisted up inside, people would be telling the guy to man up and stop being friends with her.

Kimberley replied to Charlie Harper
Mon 25 Oct 10 (02:50pm)

I know and have dated men who play games.

Having said that, I agree you told her what you thought and she interpreted that in her own little way. She heard what you said but most likely thought well maybe he will just like me the more he hangs out with me, we’ll have this amazing connection and eventually he’ll realise he can’t be without me and we’ll fall in love and get married. She probably only said she agreed he wasn’t for her so she didn’t look like she was putting all her feelings into this, but there’s a good chance she is.

My current partner sort of did the same thing. He said we are together now but I’m leaving in a few months so this can’t be forever. He didn’t leave, we fell in love and 4 years later we are having a baby together. But I am the exception, not the rule and these women need to learn that 9 times out of 10, they are the rule. It sucks but you have take what these men are saying at face value.

CommodoreHarley replied to Charlie Harper
Mon 25 Oct 10 (10:06pm)

@ByStealth - give me f@#$ing a break, if you’re looking that hard for double standards you are really scraping the bottom of the barrel, which implies there isn’t anything else more important for you to worry about.
Your asserted double standard and the evidence you use to support it is a load of rot.
The responsibility is always with the person we are advising. After all, what the hell is the point telling him what other peoples obligations to him are, what other people should be doing to manage his expectations for him? He asked for the advice, so people are telling HIM ways he can try to “manage” (I know you love the condescension implicit in this term) the womans expectations. Managing her emotions? That’s your invention, no doubt appealing to you because of how invasive and presumptuous it sounds. If he were asking about a relationship with a man, we would tell him the same things. If a woman asked about a relationship with man, we would advise her about how she can “manage” her side of the relationship with this man.

Go and deal with some real issues, feminists like you make my blood boil with the convoluted and ridiculous logic you use in so many of your accusations against society and men.

Mistress D replied to Charlie Harper
Tue 26 Oct 10 (08:11am)

Yes, By Stealth, we’d tell the guy to man up if he was the one writing in. But if it was the girl writing in “Oh my friend who I only ever cuddle, we’re just friends, now wants us to get together” the majority would tell her to stop playing with the poor bloke’s feelings.

Whats wrong with designating a chick as B grade if she is cool with that bossy? I mean he has effectively said that, and she is cool with that, only to bitch and whine about this bloke trying to find someone else. Its almost part of the contract that he activelty seek someone else.

On a seperate note you are a loser for using internet dating because everybody knows real people meet their true love in DOSAs at the local RSLs and Taverns.

potatoes (Reply)
Mon 25 Oct 10 (08:34am)
Lord Squirrelson replied to potatoes
Mon 25 Oct 10 (11:13am)

Probably one of those women who thought she could win him over! haha

OP, Bossy is definately right though, she heard something completely different to what you meant! Just be honest and tell her you want a fuck buddy, if she is cool with that, great, if not, too bad so sad.

T replied to potatoes
Mon 25 Oct 10 (12:11pm)

If you were just friends with benefits, OP, you DO NOT go on a holiday with her and her friends. That’s an idicator you are in an exclusive relationship. Seriously? Fuck buddies are just that. You only have sex. Not take a scuba diving holiday with her and 20 of her closest girlfriends. Jeeeeeeeez! Mixed signals much? You aren’t in the wrong as such, because you told her what you wanted from this ‘situation’, but this is your fault because actions speak louder than words.

And if you’re looking for a shag, you don’t use RSVP - that is a dating site. Again, actions speaking louder than words. Clarify your intentions and perhaps, next time, when searching for commitment free sex, try your local brothel.

T rebutter replied to potatoes
Mon 25 Oct 10 (02:04pm)

If you were just friends with benefits, OP, you DO NOT go on a holiday with her and her friends.

T, don’t you go away on holidays with your friends?

No difference. Friends go away together with friends.

Friends do things together.

That’s the “friends” in “friends with benefits”.

Wake up.

potatoes replied to potatoes
Mon 25 Oct 10 (02:15pm)

Thanks T for replying to my post.  However next time try and make it relevant to something I’ve said rather highjacking my post because its somewhere near the top and gives you the chance to post some diatribe above everybody elses. I find it quite poor manners.  I would also appreciate no swearing in the reply posts. Bossy you need to moderate these twats - its called reply for a reason.

T replied to potatoes
Mon 25 Oct 10 (04:59pm)

Potatoes - apologies, I read Lord Squirrelson’s reply and found my thoughts to be relevant to that. (That the girl didn’t hear something different, but was gauging this ‘situation’ by his actions)I noticed that Lord S’s post is also irrelevant to yours…
I have been posting on here for months and have never highjacked anyone’s post before. Again. Apologies.

T Rebutter. No, I don’t go away on holidays with friends. We go on holidays with our partners. If I didn’t want to give someone the wrong idea and make them beleive we were something more than just casual sex partners, I wouldn’t go away with them on a holiday. You can’t have a friendship plus exclusive, commited, bonding time away with her and her friends plus sex and honestly believe she will see that as non-commital.

I found myself in a similar situation years ago...it felt like a relationship...dates, flowers etc but he made it clear he was still looking for Miss Right...i regret the fact that I was dumb enough to stick around hoping his feelings would change.

Cut her loose...don’t string her along. She might be as dumb as me in taking the hint!

Julie of Campbelltown (Reply)
Mon 25 Oct 10 (08:37am)
Chihuahua replied to Julie
Mon 25 Oct 10 (11:06am)

I’ve done this too Julie, so dont worry! I must say I am glad that I only did it once and once only. One time too many though!

Marissa replied to Julie
Mon 25 Oct 10 (11:29am)

I agree completely, women say they are cool with certain things but they often aren’t when they find out it meant something different than what they anticipated.

Julie’s done it, I’ve done it and this lady has also done it.

I think the OP did enough to make this clear to her verbally, but we have all heard that “actions speak louder than words” and by going on a holiday with this woman and her friends, plus whatever other actions you have done as well, she may have thought you were coming around to having a relationship with her.

If you’re going to continue to sleep with women you have no intention of having a relationship with, be more careful about the things you DO that given them the wrong idea instead of just relying on your verbal get-of-relationship-free clause.

Sweetheart replied to Julie
Mon 25 Oct 10 (12:00pm)

And I have done it, too. Women often just hope that the guy will fall in love after a while. Men should understand that women frequently trade sex for love or the hope of it.

Julie replied to Julie
Mon 25 Oct 10 (12:36pm)

Yep, once only for me too...now married to a guy who loves me and i realise now how crap the other idiot was.

Paul replied to Julie
Mon 25 Oct 10 (12:39pm)

Thats really confusing and its making my head hurt chihuahua.

You are glad you did it once.  Glad you did it ONLY once.  But once was too much?

ByStealth replied to Julie
Mon 25 Oct 10 (01:47pm)

So with a woman dangling sex as a carrot to get the man in a relationship and the man dangling the relationship as a carrot to get sex, who is in the wrong?

They are both working towards their own agendas and are equally at fault or in the right.

I don’t buy into this implication that men are wrong, sleazy or dirty for being honest in their pursuit of sex. Their intentions and actions are for their own benefit, but that doesn’t mean they want to hurt girls, care nothing about the girls’ feelings or that there is zero emotional affection towards them.

Some guys are just not as good at handling their partner’s emotions as some girls are. Also some girls are very very bad at keeping their own emotions in check.

Chihuahua replied to Julie
Mon 25 Oct 10 (01:54pm)

lol sorry Paul, I meant that I did it once and I am glad it was only the ONE time and not made the mistake many times more. One time too many though as I should never have let it happen in the first place! I hope that made better sense lol

BigBadWoof replied to Julie
Mon 25 Oct 10 (03:03pm)

Now this rings a bell. 

I was doing the same thing with a girl once, I kept saying that we weren’t exclusive and she kept saying I know.  Yet we went on holidays, went out to dinner with her friends and mine, etc.

I guess the difference is I married my girl, and it was me who had to win her over.

Smidgeling replied to Julie
Tue 26 Oct 10 (09:52am)

Marissa- Actions do speak louder than words. But friends with benefits are exactly that. Friends, that have the benefit of sex. Simply put, he acted like a friend.

Ladies, if a guy is open and honest about this type of thing and you agree to be in it, even though you don’t want to, you are the idiot, not him

Mate this isnt even a problem, and im surprised this actually made it up (bossy, things slow?)

Anyways, if you made it explicit, and you had no idea that you were stringing her along, you’ve done everything right, and she’s just slightly delusional.

btw bossy - lol@upgrade to A

pdaddy of the bra (Reply)
Mon 25 Oct 10 (08:38am)

Not quite right Bossy.

He needed to append “… but we are not exclusive” to the end of his original statements and all would have been sweet.

OP I think that this is a fairly important point you should have addressed. No long term prospects is one thing but playing starfish merry-go-rounds in another level… grin

Semiotic (Reply)
Mon 25 Oct 10 (08:42am)

MAte, if she’s not good enough for you to commit to, then stop rooting her.

What’s the point of what you’re doing except for you to have a convenient warm wet spot?  All you’re doing is playing with her head.

Stop being selfish, and perhaps you’ll learn that with women, what is acceptable at one time isn’t acceptable at some time in the future.

If you really must wait for Miss Right, you’d best learn to spank the monkey instead of fucking with some poor woman’s head.

Shane of Sydney (Reply)
Mon 25 Oct 10 (08:44am)
Elphaba replied to Shane
Mon 25 Oct 10 (10:59am)

Yes!  Well said.

Tash Girl replied to Shane
Mon 25 Oct 10 (11:06am)

Spot on Shane smile

Johnny replied to Shane
Mon 25 Oct 10 (11:09am)

Shane - you missed the point. It seems by her agreeing (at least at first) that they were not each other’s ideals, it clearly says, FWBs (friends with benefits). She allowed her head to be messed with.

Smidgeling replied to Shane
Mon 25 Oct 10 (11:22am)

If they’re both happy to have something not serious why is it an issue? Two people can enjoy each other’s company without committment.

The thing is, this girl is clearly after committment (despite saying she doesn’t want this guy long term). So now there is a decision to be made.

I think the “poor woman” in this case has a responsibility to be honest with herself and this guy.

Ms Manx replied to Shane
Mon 25 Oct 10 (11:32am)

Right on!

Shane replied to Shane
Mon 25 Oct 10 (12:17pm)

Johnny,

I didn’t miss the point at all.  Sure, at the beginning it was ok to be friends with benefits, but generally speaking (note the word generally, it’s not an invitation to get bagged because a few women are happy with that arrangement), women do not like to be treated as warm wet spots for very long. 

It doesn’t matter what the rules were, there’s obviously been a change of rules in her head, it doesn’t make her a bad person, it means the rules changed in her head as she formed an attachment.

She didn’t ask for her feeling s to change, but they did, she didn’t allow her head to be messed with, it just happened. 

Now it’s time for him to man up and either dump her so it doesn’t get worse for her, or stop treating her like a B Grader.

One of the unfortunate aspects to internet dating is that so many people on those sites keep looking after they have commenced dating.  It’s like they are always looking for the elusive perfect partner.

Guess what kids, that perfect partner doesn’t exist.  We are all flawed, and it’s those flaws that make us individuals.

ByStealth replied to Shane
Mon 25 Oct 10 (01:53pm)

Shane, I’m not necessarily disagreeing with you, but why is it his responsibility to end things?

Say you are friends with a girl and she’s made it clear verbally you will never be anything more. After a few too many nights sitting closely on a couch watching romantic comedies with her you realise you have feelings for her and tell her you’re in love with her. She is upset because you changed the rules in your head. Is it now her responsibility to stop seeing you and dumping you as a friend because you changed the way you looked at her?

Just a hypothetical. I think that adults are responsible for their own emotional health.

pdaddy replied to Shane
Mon 25 Oct 10 (02:05pm)

1. There is no template to life, and no template to love, so have a fuck buddy, or a casual relationship (one in which you are in love with each or not), or even marry someone, but in each one of those scenarios it is always necessary to mutually connect honestly and respectfully.

2. Perfect partner, or ‘Miss right’, will be a different partner at different times. She might be the perfect partner for you at this time, and vice versa, even if in six months it means to move on. For further information, see point 1.

3. I agree, never treat someone as better or worse, but you can always recognise, for you, better or worse compatibility and connection. For further information, see point 1.

4. Having a fuck buddy or casual relationship is not just about physical connections (or wet spots), its also about emotional and intellectual stimulation. I dont know from experience, but i dont think sex dolls come with those functions. For further information, see point 1.

5. When looking for a life partner, try to align your wants to your needs. One of the most empowering things you can ever do in life is really connect with what you need, in both your partner and in general growth, instead of letting pointless expectations and soul-destroying desires dictate your mind and your body. For more information, see point 1 tongue wink

Charlie Harper replied to Shane
Mon 25 Oct 10 (02:10pm)

Shane you have it utterly and completely backwards.

If every guy waited around for the “right woman” we’d all be virgins until our wedding night.

That is not how to do it and only sets you up for disappointment and failure because you have no clue how to handle yourself or a relationship.

Smidgeling replied to Shane
Mon 25 Oct 10 (02:29pm)

Yeah, this incident is the cause for the two of them to talk together.

But like you said- the rules changed in HER head so it is HER responsibility to communicate to him or choose to end it.

It’s not his responsibility to monitor her thoughts in case she changes her mind.

BroG replied to Shane
Mon 25 Oct 10 (02:30pm)

Wow shane, Your on almost as much crack as CTT used to be ...

So her unintentional feelings that changed towards a fuckbuddy is the guys fault, he should have seen it comming and cut her loose, you are insane, do you have a vagina by chance ? yet another one that thinks we can read minds.

Even if i could read minds i wouldnt lay down and be expected to rely on my ability to solve the worlds problems, this robotic world is full of cause and effect, action and reaction, contract and compliance.

Having said all that, being that you now know she has an issue with it you should obviously confront her about it and say you thought the relationship was just 2 people having fun together no strings and as it appears she is applying the strings its likely best you go your seperate ways.

BigBadWoof replied to Shane
Mon 25 Oct 10 (04:11pm)

It doesn’t matter whose responsibility it is who ends it.  But if one person feels something and the other doesn’t, then it should be ended by whoevers capable.  The girl might be head over heels and doesn’t want to let him go, in that case he should end it so she can heal and find somebody else.

OP - If she does feel this way and you don’t, end it.  Don’t screw up this girls head anymore for the sake of getting your dick wet.

Shane replied to Shane
Mon 25 Oct 10 (07:31pm)

It’s not necessarily his fault, nor is it necessarily his responsibility.  However, if he continues to root her knowing that she’s hanging around hoping for him to change his mind then it becomes a case of him deliberately playing with her emotions.

That isn’t fair (yeah I know, life isn’t always fair blah blah blah).

So he now has a moral responsibility not to be unfair to another human being. 

It’s not about no-one ever getting laid, personally I think chicks should, as a group of people, put out a hell of a lot more, but that doesn’t mean that it’s ok to play with someone’s head.

amazon replied to Shane
Mon 25 Oct 10 (08:56pm)

Look people, fuck buddies are just that, you have them around to sleep with and thats about it. They are the sort you wouldnt date (too old/young, to dumb, too big ego etc) but you find physically attractive. If they are meeting you friends/family thats a bit full on, I mean what do you tell people?

There is NO such thing as friends with benefits as someone already does or will end up wanting more.

So this situation that tanspired is not her fault and it is not his fault. BUT it is both their problem and they have to talk to each other about it. Which I doubt is happening since the OP is asking Bossy looking for justification to annul his sense of guilt.

OP,

Good effort at trying to explain your position, just follow Bossy’s advice next time.

One thing though; if you and this girl “hit it off immediately as both friends and lovers” what more are you looking for precisely?

I’m confused, you found someone you enjoy spending time with, and who you find attractive enough to shag and yet you’re on the hunt for something more? 

Good luck with that.

Lawyerbird of a better place (Reply)
Mon 25 Oct 10 (08:47am)
Tash Girl replied to Lawyerbird
Mon 25 Oct 10 (01:02pm)

lol, well said. I wa thinking the same thing when I read

‘Hit it of immediately as both friends and lovers’

OP what EXTRA are you waiting for ??

A tight, hot body to make it the Trifecta ??

I am older than you OP more than likely, and I can tell you now if you find someone hot enough to make you keep going back for intimate relations with them, and you are friends and feel accepted for who you are on a whole, That is what is needed to make a good, solid union .

You are looking to upgrade, hmmm maybe you already have the best grade and are about to throw it away.

The fact all this is bothering you, speaks volumes to me. Men don’t tend to get worked up about people they don’t care for, which leads me to believe your feelings ‘may’ have deepened since you last took stock of them.

Or is it really ONLY guilt talking ??
Only you know ,

Just saying ....

pdaddy replied to Lawyerbird
Mon 25 Oct 10 (01:48pm)

Hmmmm its this sort of attitude, Lawyerbird and tash girl, which is indicative of the majority of ‘unions’ ending in divorce. I’ve had several casual relationships over the years in which i was in love with the girl, but i was honest enough to myself, and my partner, that i didnt see it as for life.

You want to know, to really know, before you think about that big step. I mean its meant to be for life isn’t it? Well thats the goal i suppose. You might be attracted to them, impressed and moved by them, even love them etc, but if something deeper doesnt force you to scream your devotion to them from on top of a big fucking mountain, then you’re only fooling yourself, as well as the partner, if you settle for something that isn’t better or worse, but just not you.

Don’t get me wrong, you might have too higher expectations, or you might end up dying alone, but at least you committed to finding that true reflection, that other half. I recently overcame some silly little insecurities myself to eventually realise I had the most perfect woman in the world (for me) screaming my name from the top of that mountain. Now I’m doing the same, thank fuck, before i lost her....

Use adult friend finder if you want a F&*kbuddy, not RSVP.

Nothing worse then a forum of people looking for a genuine relationship that have to wade through profiles of immature people like you who are just looking for a shag.

Oh and another thing, if you think you got the goods to find someone better then who you are with, why don’t you try picking up outside in the real world instead of on a computer terminal. Internet dating is for the most part for people who don’t have balls to communicate with people.

There’s people out there that can’t even get a date at all, enjoy your misspent fortune with the internet ladies while it lasts pal.

Dr. Opkick of Planet Zero (Reply)
Mon 25 Oct 10 (08:51am)
AFR replied to Dr. Opkick
Mon 25 Oct 10 (10:52am)

As usual I agree with you, Doctor. I know you feel you haven’t done anything wrong, but people go on RSVP to find someone special. You’re enjoying rooting her, but that sometimes comes with consequences.

Dr Inc replied to Dr. Opkick
Mon 25 Oct 10 (12:29pm)

internet dating:  is simply a way to find, contact & potentially meet people with similar likes / dislikes / values etc to you. 

It also saves spending 20mins in a bar talking to a girl, only to see her boyfriend / husband / girlfriend roll up.  Laughs ... almost my first question now is “are you single” or something along those lines.

Once you meet in real life ... you still have to have chemistry / polite / respect and get on well for it to progress further - then who cares how you first got in contact with each other?

Dr. Opkick replied to Dr. Opkick
Mon 25 Oct 10 (02:58pm)

Being comfortable meeting and talking to women, even if only to meet a new friend, is the key to success. It keeps you on your toes, and keeps your skills fresh and up to date.

You can’t get that on a computer screen.

From the sounds of things you tried to make it clear to her but perhaps what has added insult to injury is that you have used photos from dates that you have been on.  That is quite disrepectful.

Reality Check of Sydney (Reply)
Mon 25 Oct 10 (08:58am)
Brody Swan replied to Reality Check
Mon 25 Oct 10 (12:57pm)

Yeah, I agree. That was the turning point in the story for me. That’s when she turned from FWB to partner. Even if you didn’t say anything, that’s how she read it.

Fostie replied to Reality Check
Mon 25 Oct 10 (03:20pm)

Agreed, that’s a real slap in the face!

Op,

You may have stated that you were not settling into a relationship but your actions said otherwise. You do not go on holidays with someone you are seeing on a casual basis.

Wheteher you meant to or not you have clearly given the lady mixed signals and that’s not fair.

Yeah, um well she is a woman. What do you expect? This is the price you have to pay for dealing with the opposite sex.

Kinda like how you’re a child in a religious institute, you have to cop a feel. Shouldn’t be that way, but it’s generally the accepted norm and complaining about it is pretty much an excursion into pointlesness.

As for you being in the wrong, the fact you feel sufficient guilt to write in makes me think you’re questioning yourself a bit about it, so maybe you are a little in the wrong? But who cares.

TOMATOR (Reply)
Mon 25 Oct 10 (09:03am)
Blah Blah replied to TOMATOR
Mon 25 Oct 10 (01:44pm)

You are such a tool shiner

It’s her fault for sticking around after you told her she wasn’t good enough.

I wouldn’t have stayed after being told that.  Just ask the last bloke who said “I don’t feel that intense chemistry...” to me.

I though only girls believed in that twaddle?

Anyway…

Don’t sweat it OP.  Many women (myself included) are like Aspergers kids in relationships.  We need it spelled out.  Hyperbole, metaphor etc - it’s no good.  I’ve gotten to the stage where I appreciate that, but not all women do.  Just tell them “I’m not exclusive” next time.  Don’t worry about the whole let-em-down gently rubbish - just spell it out.

If she’s dumb enough to hang around after that, it’s her business.

Elphaba of The Western Sky (Reply)
Mon 25 Oct 10 (09:07am)
Elphaba replied to Elphaba
Mon 25 Oct 10 (11:11am)

OP, after thinking a bit more about this, I can pinpoint where you went wrong.

You called her the fling, but treated her like the gf (ie, the holiday).  I had a fling do that to me once - he called me the fling, then introduced me to his friends, and his father (!) as ‘the girlfriend’.

You can imagine my confusion… like I said, relationship Aspergers.

A cousin of mine introduces every girl he meets to his parents - then they cluck and talk about how “Ooh, she’s the daughter I never had...”

They average about 6-8 ‘daughters’ a year.  Actually, 2010 was particularly fruitful.

Next time you want her to be just the fling, don’t deliberately introduce her to your mates, your family, or go on dirty weekends away.  Anyone you do accidently run into, introduce her as friend only.  If you want to ramp it up a notch and graduate her to gf, then you can start introducing these things.  Either way, keep the message clear.  VERY clear.  Either she’ll be happy to be your FB, or she’ll get pissed off by your lack of committment and move on.  Do’t look for ways to string her along though.  If you want commitment free sex buy one of those rubber vagina thingys that vibrate, from a sex shop.

ByStealth replied to Elphaba
Mon 25 Oct 10 (12:11pm)

I agree with Elphaba. He needs to be congruent between what he is telling her and what he is doing with her. Weekends away with her friends was a bit much I think for something.

I think where he went wrong is that because he had verbalised what he wanted, he thought he could give things a bit more leeway. He could do relationship-y things because ‘she knew’ where they really stood.

Logically, what he did should have worked fine. Emotionally, he’s subcommunicating that their relationship might be moving forward.

Women see it more from the emotional side and men see it more from the logical side. As usual, they were communicating on two different channels.

Elphaba replied to Elphaba
Mon 25 Oct 10 (02:01pm)

Thanks, ByStealth.

I would never ever introduce the fling to family or friends.  When it happened to me (me being introduced to his), I never had any time to prepare for it, otherwise I would have said a resounding “No”.

I’m sure the OP means well - but women will search everything he says for something to hang their hat on and justify continuing the farce.

In the case of my cousin, I think he’s just waiting for his folks to hate one of the girls he brings home - and that’ll be the one he marries.

Spell.  It.  Out.  Words to live by, OP.

BroG replied to Elphaba
Mon 25 Oct 10 (02:46pm)

I agree 99.9%

One thing though, people keep saying for example

“If you want commitment free sex buy one of those rubber vagina thingys that vibrate, from a sex shop.”

Why is it soooo unreasonable to want to have commitment free sex with a human ?

Like seriously, here i thought it was 2010. I’ll have to check the calendar.

Elphaba replied to Elphaba
Mon 25 Oct 10 (04:37pm)

BroG, there’s nothing wrong with him wanting committment free sex, so long as he doesn’t blur the lines by going on holidays with her.  We women will interpret that as things moving to another level, guaranteed. 

Whether he likes it or not, it is very hard to have both - which makes me wonder than unless he is absolutely positively clear with her and follows what I set out about, maybe sex with a toy is less messy emotionally.

Likewise, if the bloke has been honest, she can’t hope for more.  If he says no, 99.9% of the time, it will always be a no (see exception further up the page^^).

These things rarely end well - THAT is the truth.

Frances replied to Elphaba
Mon 25 Oct 10 (08:00pm)

I agree Elphaba, all I could think when I read this, was what kind of idiot woman would agree to stay with a guy that told her your not a long term prospect for me? I think women need to have a little more dignity and respect for themselves, if a man tells you to your face you are there to entertain him, tell him where to stick it. And OP don’t be shocked that she is upset its not too difficult to fall for a man that you spend so much time with. Either commit or let her go.

Must have stronger feelings for her than you realize, otherwise why do you care so much?

Az (Reply)
Mon 25 Oct 10 (09:08am)

hmmm…

for her to have seen your profile on RSVP, she would have had to go on there looking for some fresh meat herself right?

festygrrl of brisbane (Reply)
Mon 25 Oct 10 (09:31am)
Elphaba replied to festygrrl
Mon 25 Oct 10 (10:58am)

No.  I used RSVP years ago and used to look up people I was dating to see if their profile was still up…

Internet dating is bad.  It’s better to meet people organically.

Chunks replied to festygrrl
Mon 25 Oct 10 (12:07pm)

But if people never get off their electronic devices and social media, how are they going to meet people organically?

This is the crucial line:

Saying there is not a long term future means one thing...but it does not mean you are not exclusive.

At the very least she would have assumed you two were enjoying each other’s company exclusively and doing lots of nice, fun things together while you both wait for your ‘one’.

PS - You’re lucky she stuck around.

If you told me I was not your ‘ideal’ (I’m assuming you told this to her face, bright spark?) but still continued to treat me like your girlfriend and took me on scuba trips with your friends, I’d tell you to get F-ed.

Turquoise (Reply)
Mon 25 Oct 10 (09:32am)
Jen replied to Turquoise
Mon 25 Oct 10 (11:13am)

Turquoise—um, it says they went on a trip with “her” friends, not “his”. If she invited him along, and he graciously accepted, that’s her issue.

Von replied to Turquoise
Mon 25 Oct 10 (11:42am)

How would you find your “one” when you’re not putting out the feelers?

T replied to Turquoise
Mon 25 Oct 10 (12:21pm)

Jen - um, if he was seeing her just for the sex, why graciously accept any sort of invitation to spend exclusive, commited time with her and her friends? HE idicated it was a relationship. You don’t spend quality time with a casual shag. It’s his issue. Me thinks he may care about her more than he lets on. If he didn’t, why not just dump her instead of constructing an email to a blog asking for advice and people’s opinion if he’s ‘in the wrong’?
Hmmmmmmmmmmmmm.

Tim replied to Turquoise
Mon 25 Oct 10 (02:28pm)

T,
this is where women sometimes make mistakes with men.
If we say something, we mean it.
If we say we want something casual and then go on a holiday with you, it doesn’t mean we are secretly in love with you - we might just like scuba holidays.
If women used verbal communication more, a lot of these relationship problems would disappear overnight.

Smidgeling replied to Turquoise
Mon 25 Oct 10 (02:38pm)

Turquoise and T- Friends with benefits are exactly that. People who do stuff together who like to shag.

A relationship can entail whatever two people agree to. Clearly she agreed to something she couldn’t handle. No biggie- now she can end it if she’s not happy.

Turquoise replied to Turquoise
Mon 25 Oct 10 (02:53pm)

Exactly, T.

When she invited him on the scuba trip, he should have said something like,

“Look I’d like to come as it sounds like fun and you’re a nice lady, but I just want to make sure you’re asking me as a friend not a boyfriend,”

OR “I’m not sure I should come and meet your friends. You deserve to be with a guy that you can introduce as your boyfriend to your friends and I’m very sorry that I can’t give you that, so perhaps it’s best you ask someone else to go along.”

Actually, you know what your problem is OP?

You have no empathy. long face

ByStealth replied to Turquoise
Mon 25 Oct 10 (04:25pm)

If that’s the case Turquoise, I think a lot of men have no empathy.

@ T He feels bad because he can’t understand why she is acting like this when he was honest with her. Yes, he’s worried he hurt her unnecessarily and wants to know why so he doesn’t do it again.

It does NOT mean he has deep feelings for this girl and people shouldn’t try to read into things like that.

I know because I’ve been in his situation in the past. With good intentions I once told a girl ‘I’m seeing other people’ and surprise surprise it blew up in my face. I went on a fact finding mission to understand why and I felt bad, not because I liked her that much, but because I thought I’d hurt her and I don’t like hurting people.

@ Tim You’re right mate.

I find it funny that there’s an expectation that men should learn how women think and need to understand them, when women really don’t spend any time understanding us.

Empathy and subcommunication is something women are naturally born with. Men usually have to develop those skills artificially and it can take a lot of time and effort. There’s an assumption these are the REAL ways of communicating and that overt, verbal, rational language is pretty much useless in relationships.

Why don’t women take time to understand mens’ real motivations and ways of communicating? Its a two way street ladies; We will try to speak your language if you try to speak ours yeah?

T replied to Turquoise
Mon 25 Oct 10 (05:35pm)

Especially since ‘reiterating’ the fact that she was ‘not the one’ or ‘the ideal’ and the holiday, there was a whole month of seeing each other and spending time together, without another reiteration. Plus a scuba diving holiday and meeting her friends. Turquoise is right - there’s a huge difference between ‘you’re not the one and I don’t see a future for us’ and ‘you’re not the one, we are not exclusive and I will be on the prowl for other woman while we are casually sleeping together’

Well, yeah, I have to agree with Bossy. 

Obviously, a date or two doesn’t constitute a relationship, and there aren’t or shouldn’t be too many expectations. But once you get beyond that, and start spending a lot of time with one another, never mind going on trips together, you’ve moved beyond the casual stage and are into a relationship.

And, dredging up the dim memories of my dating days, I seem to recall that, unless there was some explicit agreement to the contrary, I pretty much expected a relationship to be exclusive, even if I didn’t expect it to be eternal.

So, if you want to keep looking for “the one”, I think it’s only fair to be very explicit with the other party that you are not putting your hunt on hold for her.  She can then make up her own mind as to how she wants to play it. 

I don’t think, by the way, that you did anything particularly wrong - but your definition of no commitment, and hers, were obviously slightly different.

flowerchild (Reply)
Mon 25 Oct 10 (09:33am)

or to bloke out obvious truths.

Freudian slip there, Kate?

Aussie Locust of Melbourne (Reply)
Mon 25 Oct 10 (09:33am)

Men are from Mars and Woman are from another universe about 30 odd billion light years away. It sounds like your communication was fine, but then I am a bloke. I would guess the emotional attachment is starting to take sway in her thoughts. I hope you have put an end to it, before it gets to the ‘hating’ each other part.

Best of luck,

Al.

Al of Vic (Reply)
Mon 25 Oct 10 (09:36am)
iron lady replied to Al
Mon 25 Oct 10 (01:31pm)

Women are from Earth.......

I want to know WHY you’d have a relationship with someone you don’t see a future with? I thought when you didn’t see a future with someone, that was when you dumped them.

I ask this as a genuine question, as Bossy says, why not just be friends with ‘benefits’?

And how do you explain it to a girl you’re actually interested in, down the track? “Well, yeah I was diddling this girl from the website when I met you, but the moment I knew you were better I dropped her”

I don’t think you’re a bad person, but whether or not you’re a smart one....jury is still out.

Mistress D (Reply)
Mon 25 Oct 10 (09:37am)
Chihuahua replied to Mistress D
Mon 25 Oct 10 (11:17am)

Well put Mistress D!

I had something like this once, I was seeing a guy and we agreed that we werent interested in eachother as anymore than F buddies, if someone we wanted to be serious about came along then we were to go for it, but just tell one another first.  We hung out together all the time and I spent a lot of time with the guy on a weekly basis (we shared mutual friends so we hung out a lot), I just wasnt interested in anything more.  It worked well! He met someone a few months later, he let me know and that was that.

We were very clear the whole time though with what was going on, I suppose thats why it worked out ok.

Smidgeling replied to Mistress D
Mon 25 Oct 10 (11:18am)

I think it comes down to the definition of relationship. Technically speaking, two people interacting in any capacity is a relationship. Whereas with women, often the word relationship entails ‘exclusive’.

Personally, I like the idea of two people who like to do stuff together, including but not limited to sex, even though they see no long term romantic connection.

Of course it becomes blurred if he’s looking for a serious partner as well, instead of just having fun.

Mistress D replied to Mistress D
Mon 25 Oct 10 (12:33pm)

Smidgeling, you’re right. (Bet you thought those words would never be spelled out by this Feminazi fingers, eh?)What constitutes a ‘relationship’ is really only limited by the two people in it.

Unless people are open, the way Chihuahua describes, we’re going to keep having these fall outs.

Smidgeling replied to Mistress D
Mon 25 Oct 10 (02:34pm)

Nah, Mistress, I’m confident people will agree with some of my logic sometimes.

I think the problem is that men are rarely completely open about how casual it is and women too often say casual is ok when it clearly isn’t.

mzd replied to Mistress D
Mon 25 Oct 10 (08:46pm)

I think the problem is that men are rarely completely open about how casual it is and women too often say casual is ok when it clearly isn’t.

Spot on.

Although...have been in ‘relationships’ where I would’ve happily kept it casual however the guy decided to play weird games and lines got very blurred. I don’t think it’s gender specific - some people just really like to manipulate others.

agree with bossy here. To me, people are either exclusive or shag buddies. unless you were together for sex only, you shouldnt have stayed with her regardless of what you told her. it is obvious she took it differently, maybe there was hope that you’d change your mind when you got to know her better, or simply that because you do activities together that it is some sort of relationship. if you dont want to be with her and dont see potential then leave her. or else be friends, no sex involved. maybe in the future just be a bit more clear, i guess you cant have it both ways…

questionable (Reply)
Mon 25 Oct 10 (09:39am)

told me I wasn’t the man she was going to marry, and that she actually knew who she was going to marry.

She said this and you still kept on going with your “relationship” with her?

She sounds insane, kind of like a possessive stalker. Get rid of her.

Captain Obvious (Reply)
Mon 25 Oct 10 (09:44am)
JackRussell replied to Captain Obvious
Mon 25 Oct 10 (12:24pm)

Exactly what I was thinking Captain.

Kelly replied to Captain Obvious
Mon 25 Oct 10 (12:46pm)

Yeah I thought WTF too! Does she mean ‘I know who I’m going to marry’ kinda like how my daughter knew she was going to marry George Clooney when she grew up?

She’s obviously not saving herself for this mystery man that she KNOWS she’s going to marry.

Nutter....

Show Oldest | Newest first    Page 1 of 4      1 2 3 >  Last »


Comments are submitted for possible publication on the condition that they may be edited. Please provide a name, you may use a screen name – this will be published with your comment, and a working email address – not for publication, but for verification. The suburb/location field is optional.
( Read our publication guidelines ).


Submit your comments here:

   
 

How to add a link: Enter the text you wish to be clickable, select it and click the 'Link' button to enter the link details in the popup box. Maximum of 2 links.


* Required Fields

 

Insert an emoticon Insert an emoticon



 

Profile

Kate de Brito

Kate de Brito

Got a question? Ask Bossy. No-holds-barred advice from modern-day agony aunt Kate de Brito. It's the advice your friends and relatives are probably too polite to give.


By emailing a question to Ask Bossy you accept your question may appear on the Ask Bossy blog on news.com and in The Daily Telegraph. Questions cannot be answered privately. Once a question is posted we reserve the right not to remove it.

Advertisement

Latest Articles

Article Icon - Comments
My boss kissed me. What do I do? 117
I have been pretending to be a woman online and flriting with men. How do I stop? 61
She says I did the wrong thing by using a dating site while I was dating her. 174
Is it wrong to sell stuff given to me by my ex? 99
I’m renting from a relative. Why won’t they help me more? 233
Do I tell her he’s cheating? 66
My dog bit hers. Am I responsible? 282
I’m a gold medal finisher in the sack 101
How does a skinny guy get the girls? 163
He slept with her in our bed while we were having a break. Should I try to win him back? 173

Recently Popular

Article Icon - Comments
My dog bit hers. Am I responsible? 282
I’m renting from a relative. Why won’t they help me more? 233
She says I did the wrong thing by using a dating site… 174
He slept with her in our bed while we were having a… 173
How does a skinny guy get the girls? 163
How do I deal with the office pest? 161
Do I tell him about the lapband surgery? 136
If I dump him because he’s tiny, I am shallow? 125
I can’t stand my step daughter. What should I do? 125
I signed up for internet dating and haven’t had a nibble 123
Is it ok to dump someone by email? 123

View Entries by Date

October 2010
S M T W T F S
         1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
31            

Monthly Archives

Subscribe

RSS Feed of all the latest Ask Bossy articles ATOM Feed of all the latest Ask Bossy articles
Subscribe to receive the latest from Ask Bossy

Related Links

Tools


News.com.au Blogs

Latest Icon - Comments
A fruitful journey to nowhere
My boss kissed me. What do I do?
I have been pretending to be a woman online and flriting with…
She says I did the wrong thing by using a dating site…
Is it wrong to sell stuff given to me by my ex?
Footy team holiday resort shocker
I’m renting from a relative. Why won’t they help me more?
Most Commented Icon - Comments
She says I did the wrong thing by using a dating site…
My boss kissed me. What do I do?
Is it wrong to sell stuff given to me by my ex?
I have been pretending to be a woman online and flriting with…
Footy team holiday resort shocker
A fruitful journey to nowhere
Reader Comments Icon - Comments

The Ground says: Gay marriage? Sure, why don’t we have Down syndrome marriage too? Have Down syndrome people with their own tv shows…

A gay virus

Steve says: I went to Coff’s Harbour years ago with the wife and kids and a footy trip turned up. I was…

Footy team holiday resort shocker

From around the News Blog Network

Latest Icon - Comments
Outnet latest
Noel
JB Hi-Fi stocktake sale
Why doesn’t the ABC next run a recruiting drive for al Qaeda?
The caramel latte kids
A reader, on why he quit newspapers
Cuts? What cuts? Introducing… Langbroekomics
Most Commented Icon - Comments
Shoeless idiot demonstrates failures of the Left
Labor’s descent to the bottom
Column - The shoes of a clown
Tips for Monday, October 25
Tips for Tuesday, October 26
Tips for Wednesday, October 27
Tips for Thursday, October 28
Reader Comments Icon - Comments

Jim says: This is an offer you won’t want to miss! Buy a $60 Perfume Connection voucher from http://www.cudo.com.au for only $30!…

20 per cent off men’s suits

Fatima says: Hi Paddy, Coles has a special offer on Wagon Wheels - 2 for $1.  Here is the voucher.

20 per cent off men’s suits

Email a friend

To email this article to a friend, fill in the form below

Message:

close  x