Extra!
Current Cover

What PBS Thinks You Need to Know: Replacement for Now & Moyers fails to fill their shoes
By Julie Hollar

CounterSpin

LISTEN NOW: Steve Rendall and Julie Hollar on PBS (10/22/10-10/28/10)

Podcast

on the air





FAIR Store

Sign FAIR's petition now!

Communique
PBS Responds to FAIR Studies: Ombud echoes concerns, but producers question need to broaden sources
10/25/10

The PBS ombud and representatives of the public television programs studied in FAIR's new report, "Taking the Public Out of Public TV," have responded (10/21/10) to the research that shows an elite, inside-the-Beltway slant to the programs' guestlists.

As he has in the past (10/6/06), PBS ombud Michael Getler largely agreed with FAIR's analysis. "If you keep calling the same known and comfortable suspects, you pretty much know what you will get," Getler wrote in his October 21 column.



Free CounterSpin Bumper Sticker
Click here to get your FREE sticker!

Click for FAIR's PBS report Blog Logo XML | Recent Posts:
  • Posted by Peter Hart on 10/26/10 at 1:52 pm
    On today's front page, under the headline "Deficit Divisions Likely to Grow After Election," New York Times reporter Jackie Calmes writes this lead:

    WASHINGTON -- A midterm campaign that has turned heavily on the issue of the mounting federal debt is likely to yield a government even more split over what to do about it, people in both parties say, with diminished Democrats and reinforced Republicans confronting internal divisions even as they dig in against the other side.

    It is difficult to know what to make of this; the Times recently noted that the public doesn't spend much time thinking about the deficit. ("The deficit barely registers as a topic of concern when survey respondents were asked to volunteer their worries," was how the paper put it.)  It's hard to figure how a non-issue could be so important to the campaigns--other than as a useful talking point for some Republican politicians. [...] Read more»

  • Posted by Peter Hart on 10/26/10 at 1:21 pm
    After being fired by NPR, Juan Williams made an appearance with Fox host Bill O'Reilly (10/21/10) where he explained that he wasn't likely to get support from prominent African-American leaders like Al Sharpton because "I'm a predictable black liberal."

    It's not totally clear what he means by that, but Williams does a pretty good job as a Fox News Liberal-- i.e., someone willing to attack left-liberal groups and leaders while doing very little to promote an actual left-leaning perspective. This point was echoed in a column penned by Newsmax's Ronald Kessler (10/25/10), who wrote that he's known Williams since the 1970s and "the fact is, Williams is no liberal." He adds:

    If you doubt that, read his book Enough: The Phony Leaders, Dead-End Movements and Culture of Failure That Are Undermining Black America--and What We Can Do About It. The book attacks Democrats and black leaders like Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton for promoting a "culture of failure" among blacks. [...] Read more»

  • Posted by Jim Naureckas on 10/26/10 at 12:57 pm
    Fox News must be a funny place to work. The biggest star there is constantly talking about how the Obama administration is leading us toward tyranny, slavery and dictatorship. Meanwhile, on the FoxNews.com website (10/25/10), you've got "frequent contributor" and Bush State Department alum Christian Whiton (you couldn't make these names up) complaining bitterly that Obama hasn't declared the WikiLeaks team to be "enemy combatants" and taken them out via "non-judicial actions."
    [...] Read more»
  • Posted by Jim Naureckas on 10/26/10 at 8:32 am
    USA Today typically pairs an editorial today with an opposing view--as it did with its recent editorials on redistricting and NFL rules.

    When it editorialized yesterday (10/25/10) on the need for the United States to adopt austerity measures similar to those of France and Britain, however, only one view was allowed: "The French are addressing their problems. So are the British. American leaders are not."

    It's not that other credible views aren't out there--see Mark Weisbrot (Huffington Post, 10/21/10) questioning the need for France's retirement rollbacks, and Dean Baker (Guardian, 10/25/10) and Paul Krugman (New York Times, 10/22/10) on the economic foolishness of the British cutbacks. If an opposing voice had been allowed in, they might have pointed out the twisted reasoning behind USA Today's call for Social Security benefit cuts: [...] Read more»

XML | More Blog posts