Feed on
Posts
Comments

Red October

In France, the end of the political class, set to the tune of Imagine.

(Editor’s Note: Secession Week will resume tomorrow. I’ve come across a few interesting news items that I would like to share and discuss today.)

Red America

I’ve spent the last several months building a narrative around the polarization that I see going on between Reds and Blues in America. If you have been following my commentary, you should know my position on the issue. It is in the best interests of White Nationalists to widen the gap and drive a wedge between the two camps.

The mutual loathing between Red America and Blue America could conceivably be stoked to the point where the Reds (like the Confederates before them) decide to throw in the towel on “Restoring America” and secede from the Union. With the legitimacy of the federal government crashing to record lows and ideas like nullification and state sovereignty entering the mainstream, this is no longer a far fetched scenario.

We’re not in JFK’s America anymore.

White America has lost faith in Washington. As bad as the situation is today, it will only get worse as non-Whites grow in numbers and become more assertive about crazy redistributive schemes like Obamacare, especially in the context of precipitous economic decline. A rebellion in Red America, even if its starts as a non-racial tax revolt, would inevitably become racial in tone because of the polarization between its supporters and opponents.

With that in mind, I want to take a look at a few news items, which can be interpreted as pieces of a larger historical puzzle:

Continue Reading »

Bookmark and Share

by Val Koinen
October 18, 2010

I have been asked several times over the past few months why I am so negative toward Negroes, mestizos, and Jews. Why I seem to hate them so much; why I am such a vehement racist and strident anti-Semite.

The best short answer might be, “Well, I don’t know that ‘hate’ has all that much to do with it – it’s more a matter of having a great deal of respect for nature (including genetics and evolution); caring very deeply about the well-being and future of my own people; and reverence for the truth.”

Anyway, I thought it might be appropriate if I briefly outlined the main reasons for my thinking the way I do about these matters – these issues that to me at least are such crucially all-important, life-and-death factors affecting the survival of the White race and Western Civilization. There are many more, but these are the “biggies.”

Continue Reading »

Bookmark and Share

The Long March Toward Separation

Robert T. Burnham, who blogs at The New Heretics, wrote an essay for the 2009 TOQ secession competition called “The Long March Toward Separation.” Like the Paul Kersey essay, The Long March was a close runner up, and has been included in the Fall 2010 issue of TOQ. It also resembles Kersey’s entry in that Burnham spends an inordinate amount of time on historical forecasting.

This essay can be divided into four parts: an examination of extant models of racial secession, a critique of the existing models, a prognosis of the racial future, and a sweeping conclusion.

The Existing Models

As with Michael O’Meara and Paul Kersey, Robert Burnham takes the famous exchanges on secession in the 1990s between Rabbi Mayer Schiller, Michael Hart, Richard McCulloch, and Sam Francis as his starting point. He broadly agrees with McCulloch’s critique of Hart, but generally dismisses their proposals as unviable. He also claims to find merit in several of Francis’s arguments.

Critique

Burnham doesn’t spend much time analyzing any of the essays above. Instead, he quickly launches into his critique of the existing models of secession, which goes something like this:

- The Enlightenment model of liberal capitalist democracy is collapsing. The current models of White separatism lack a philosophical, ideological, or religious basis upon which an alternative vision of Western society can be constructed.

- The models that do exist are purely negative and do not offer a positive vision of an alternative social order.

- The West is now on its death bed because of its fidelity to its own pathological philosophies.

- The postmodern future won’t be a return to pre-Enlightenment traditionalism.

- The current models of White separation are based on a utopian vision and an abstract model that would be cleanly implemented. Whatever emerges from the wreckage of the existing political order, however, is likely to evolve organically and through incremental stages.

Continue Reading »

Bookmark and Share

White Apocalypse

Just before he entered Parliament for the first time, future British Prime Minister Benjamin Disraeli wrote in his diary, “Imagination governs mankind.” What this means is that two of the imagination’s biggest products, culture and the arts, can be two of the most powerful molders of people’s thoughts and actions. Unfortunately this seems to have been willingly forgotten by many on the Right. For at least half a century they have all but handed the cultural sphere over to the Left with open arms. The results of this blunder can been seen that despite the fact that over basically the last 40 years (1968-2008) the Left had only officially 12 years of rule (4 under Carter and 8 under Clinton), America has gone leftward in ways that would have shocked dedicated Socialists a century ago. One can only reason is that this is because the Right has allowed the Left to shape our people’s imagination and emotions without any real fight.

One person who understands this is young Kyle Bristow, the notorious leader of the MSU chapter of YAF. With his debut novel White Apocalypse, Bristow tells a thrilling and intelligent story with epic ramifications. In it a mass grave of prehistoric skeletons is unearthed in Ohio. Of course the Amerindian tribes claim them as their own and demand they be handed over according to Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA). However not everyone is certain about their claim. One group is the Institute for American Historical Studies, a think tank dedicated to raising awareness of The Solutrean Hypothesis; the controversy theory that ancient white people migrated to and were living in North America before the Amerindians crossed the Bering Straight and were subsequently wiped out in a horrendous genocide when the Amerindians did. What unfolds during the fight over this finding is an epic of murder, intrigue, terrorism, corruption, and the heroic pursuit of dangerous truths that could rewrite the pages of history.

Continue Reading »

Bookmark and Share

Bristow standing against the hordes

Later today I will be posting a review of Kyle Bristow’s new novel White Apocalypse.

Here is an interview I had the pleasure of having with Kyle during which he discusses his activism, the Solutrean Hypothosis, and his new novel White Apocalypse.

Listen here…

Bookmark and Share

SBPDL: Year One

(Editor’s Note: Secession Week resumes at Occidental Dissent.)

Paul Kersey’s “Prospects for Racial Separation” was a runner up in the TOQ 2009 secession essay competition. OD readers should be somewhat familiar with his point of view. Kersey is the author of my favorite blog, Stuff Black People Don’t Like, an irreverent daily commentary on the sad chronicle of Black Run America.

Before moving into this review, I would like to plug his new book, SBPDL: Year One. Kersey has always excelled at using humor to introduce implicit Whites to an explicitly racial perspective without the albatross of extraneous issues. SBPDL is one of the few sites that I can recommend to mainstream friends who enjoy laughing at a good racial joke but are not yet completely on board with White Nationalism.

As with Michael O’Meara’s “Toward the White Republic,” I would break down Paul Kersey’s “Prospects for Racial Separation” into two parts. It is a defense of the idea of secession and a prescription for action. Both O’Meara and Kersey cast Sam Francis, an opponent of secession, in the role of Devil’s Advocate.

Defending Secession

Kersey’s response to Francis is straightforward: the demographic window is rapidly closing on the idea of “restoring” America. Whites are projected to fall to minority status by 2042, eight years earlier than previously expected, which suggests that doomsday might arrive sometime in the 2030s. White children will be a minority in American public schools by the 2020s.

America will likely experience an economic collapse long before 2042. Indeed, Kersey wrote this essay in 2009 while America was already plunging into what is now commonly being called the “Great Recession.” Meanwhile, California and dozens of other states like Illinois are in such terrible financial shape that a Greek style financial meltdown could land on our national doorstep anyday now.

In the mid-1990s, when Pat Buchanan was still a potent threat in the Republican primaries, Sam Francis could plausibly argue that a self confident White majority could reassert its dominance and reverse our national decline. In the Barack Obama era, some fifteen years later, the racial cancer is starting to look terminal and secession has become a more attractive option for racially conscious Whites.

Continue Reading »

Bookmark and Share

The Andy Griffith show is arguably THE best television program in American history. This TV show present an idealized vision of an all White, Southern American small town, Mayberry – a place where all the White residents know each other and care about each other. Sure there are problems in Mayberry, but nothing the wise Sheriff Andy Taylor can’t handle and make everything all right and Mayberry stays…

All White.

Lots of White Americans would now like to live in a place like Mayberry ~ 1958-62 and some of us WN actually try to move to White small towns, White rural areas. We try to start new lives, fit in and maybe do a bit more – try to become the leaders of these White small towns, try to educate the locals about the dangers in NW big cities, the dangers of mass immigration, the dangerous enemies they/we have in politics, the media, Wall Street, Madison Avenue, Hollywood, the Federal Reserve etc.

Continue Reading »

Bookmark and Share

German Chancellor Angela Merkel: Multiculturalism has failed.

I just want to quietly suggest that perhaps, just perhaps, we have been over-sold on the idea of “Europe as lost” by American mainstream conservatives when the Germans….the GERMANS…are shedding their guilt and saying things in the open that not even the most conservative Republican in the safest seat in the nation can say without being toast within 24 hours.

Germany’s attempts to create a multi-cultural society in which people from various cultural backgrounds live together peacefully have failed, Chancellor Angela Merkel said Saturday.

“Multikulti”, the concept that “we are now living side by side and are happy about it,” does not work, Merkel told a meeting of younger members of her conservative Christian Democratic Union (CDU) party at Potsdam near Berlin.

“This approach has failed, totally,” she said.

Continue Reading »

Bookmark and Share

Michael O'Meara's Toward The White Republic

(Editor’s Note: I received the long anticipated Fall 2010 “secession issue” of TOQ in the mail today. Over the next week, I will be reviewing the six essays on secession which are included in this volume. I plan to wrap up this series with a culminating essay on secession based on my own thoughts.

If you haven’t already done so, subscribe to TOQ and follow along the discussion. Since Kevin MacDonald took over as Editor, I have received two issues over the last six months. The venerable journal is back on track and remains a “value added” product which is well worth the small cost of subscribing to.)

Michael O’Meara’s prize winning essay “Toward the White Republic” won the 2009 TOQ competition on secession. Thus, it seems appropriate to start the reviewing process here. Last year, I had a few thoughts about “Toward the White Republic” which were largely positive. I’ve since reread the essay with a fresh pair of eyes.

At the outset of this review, I would like to emphasize that I only reviewing the essay.” “Toward the White Republic” has since been expanded into a 160 page book. I haven’t read the book (only some of the essays therein) and this review isn’t a judgement on its content. At some point, I will purchase a copy of the book (you should to) and review the complete volume, but that will have to wait until another day.

As an essay, “Toward the White Republic” can be divided into four parts: a definition of White Nationalism, a history lesson about White identity, a polemic against racial conservatives, and a prescription for action. Last August, I focused exclusively on the “mythic” aspect of this essay, which provoked a series of negative responses at Majority Rights. Today, I will reflect and expand upon the complete product.

Definition

O’Meara begins “Toward the White Republic” with the observation that a terminological change has redefined the pro-White movement. In the 1990s, pro-Whites abandoned “white supremacy” in favor of a rhetorical commitment to “White Nationalism.” Instead of attempting to recapture control of the United States, pro-Whites slowly converged on the ideal of creating a separate, autonomous White ethnostate in North America.

Continue Reading »

Bookmark and Share

Geert Wilders escapes prosecution.

Before the election, Freedom Party and anti-Islamist campaigner Geert Wilders was brought up on charges of inciting racial hatred.  It was not enough for the democratic liberal leadership of Holland that Wilders was confined to quarters, but he was also being actively prosecuted and threatened with serious jail time.

All in a day’s work for the average modern American style liberal democracy.

Wilders, however, beat them at their own game.  While employing every procedural trick in the book to delay his trial, there was an election.  And in this election, Wilders showed his strength.

And, now?

Well, let’s just say the powers that be have changed their tune.

The Dutch Public Prosecutor has sought the acquittal of anti-Islam MP Geert Wilders on all three charges against him. Earlier this week, the prosecution asked for an acquittal for the charge of insulting Muslims and asked the judges not to award damages to the plaintiffs. Today, the prosecution asked for an acquittal on the two remaining charges: inciting hatred and discrimination.

Ealier today, the prosecution said “Criticism (of religion) is allowed as long as it does not lead to incitement of hatred against people.”

Lesson: There is no substitute for power.  In any other situation, he is put away and lost.  If and when we play, we must play to win and remember that our enemies will crush us, if we do not crush them first.

Bookmark and Share

Older Posts »