Showing newest posts with label real science. Show older posts
Showing newest posts with label real science. Show older posts

Friday, July 16, 2010

Real science: Some very interesting tidbits about space

Rachel Swirsky has been blogging from an event called Launch Pad - NASA folks interacting with science fiction community, as I understand.

I've read only one of the several reports she's filed so far - Day 3: Kevin R Grazier.

  1. How dense is space?
  2. Will you freeze/pop if exposed to space?
  3. Our Sol is inside a dust buuble which is inside another dust bubble.
  4. ...

Thursday, July 15, 2010

Real science: Moon map (1829)

Map  in multiple resolutions at Boing Boing.

Thursday, July 8, 2010

Real science: The first step towards "The Proud Robot"!

Recall Henry Kuttner & C L Moore's hilarious story, "The Proud Robot" (download).

Someone seems to have actually built a rather primitive version of Joe - a beer delivering robot for folks hard at work! Here is the 2:47 minutes video ("Beer Me, Robot") of robot in action , & the project description.

[via lal_truckee@rasfw]

Sunday, June 27, 2010

Real science: Africa in the process of physically splitting into 2 pieces!

Link.

Saturday, June 26, 2010

Real science: 1958 version of an IBM "hard disk"

IBM "350 Disk Storage Unit" with a capacity of 5MB, dimensions "60 inches long, 68 inches high and 29 inches deep", & contains "50 magnetic disks"!

Actually, its probably 6- or 7-bit bytes (to hold English alphanumeric characters) rather than modern 8-bit ones. About one MP3 song in a 5 feet by 5.5 feet by 2.5 feet unit weighting may be a few hundred kg.

Link includes a picture too.

[via Boing Boing]

Saturday, June 5, 2010

Some nightmare pictures of birds caught in BP's current oil spill

A Brown Pelican is seen on the beach at East Grand Terre Island along the Louisiana coast on Thursday, June 3, 2010. AP Photo by Charlie Riedel.
Photo gallery at Boston Globe. [via Boing Boing]

Tuesday, May 11, 2010

Real science: Some optical illusions, courtesy of Scientific American

Link. [via Boing Boing]

A couple of them I could not see & another one or two were already familiar. But most are very cool: how we perceive color & depth, how sexual maturity affects what we see, ...

Tip: Read the text underneath the picture too.

Tuesday, May 4, 2010

Stephen Hawking's "How to build a time machine" (non-fiction, free)

In Mail Online. [via Boing Boing]

He discusses 3 things in currently known physics that could be used to time travel to future (but not to past):

  1. "wormholes" - tiny theoretical constructs at quantum level that are thought to link two desperate places in time & space. They're unstable, & involve paradoxes.
  2. Black holes. Really big ones are far away, & they don't move us too far in time really fast.
  3. The most practical method: If you can somehow travel very very fast, so time slows down for you.

Quotes.

"sadly, it looks like time travel to the past is never going to happen."

"This doesn't make all time travel impossible. I do believe in time travel. Time travel to the future." "time is like a river in another way. It flows at different speeds in different places and that is the key to travelling into the future."

"time runs faster in space than it does down on Earth. Inside each spacecraft [of GPS system] is a very precise clock. But despite being so accurate, they all gain around a third of a billionth of a second every day."

"The problem doesn't lie with the clocks. They run fast because time itself runs faster in space than it does down below. And the reason for this extraordinary e ffect is the mass of the Earth. Einstein realised that matter drags on time and slows it down like the slow part of a river. The heavier the object, the more it drags on time. And this startling reality is what opens the door to the possibility of time travel to the future."

"A black hole like this one [at Galactic center] has a dramatic effect on time, slowing it down far more than anything else in the galaxy. That makes it a natural time machine."

"I like to imagine how a spaceship might be able to take advantage of this phenomenon, by orbiting it. If a space agency were controlling the mission from Earth they'd observe that each full orbit took 16 minutes. But for the brave people on board, ... time would be slowed down by half. For every 16-minute orbit, they'd only experience eight minutes of time."

"Around and around they'd go, experiencing just half the time of everyone far away from the black hole... Imagine they circled the black hole for five of their years. Ten years would pass elsewhere."

Related: Time travel fiction.

Friday, April 16, 2010

Next generation lawn mowers!

From Google Blog: "in our quest to minimize our carbon footprint", "More than 200 goats from California Grazing have once again arrived at our Mountain View headquarters where they’ll stay for over a week chomping away on grassy goodness. The cost of bringing in the goats is comparable to hiring lawn mowers for the same job and the green benefits are clear: the goats eliminate mower emissions, reduce noise pollution, restore plant species and fertilize while grazing."

Related.

  1. Google in fiction.
  2. Howard L Myers' "Questor" (download): Uplifted goats hope to inherit earth, now that man has left for the stars!

Thursday, April 8, 2010

Real science: We acquire our senses in a specific order

Link.

"Across the animal kingdom, senses come online in a very specific order that doesn't vary much from one vertebrate to another. The first sense fetuses experience is touch. Then come the chemical-based senses—taste and smell. The ability to hear develops fourth. And finally, so late that many animals are born lacking it, comes sight."

Wednesday, March 31, 2010

Real science: Firewall of China briefly controlling computers in US & Chile!

This is very curious.

Recently, for a brief period, internet users in US & Chile too were being filtered by the censorship firewall of Chinese government!

Apparently, TLD DNS tables were polluted by a hacker.

Thursday, March 18, 2010

Real science: Our bacterial fingerprints!

Illustration accompanying the story at Wired that human use of computer keyboards leaves personally identifiable bacterial fingerprintsAlexis Madrigal's "You’re Leaving a Bacterial Fingerprint on Your Keyboard" at Wired. [via Boing Boing]

"The bacterial communities that live on human skin may form a bacterial fingerprint on the items that you touch."

"researchers swabbed three different keyboards and nine mice for bacteria, then compared the genomic variation between the communities to deduce whose hands had been touching what. The people were clearly identifiable from the bacterial communities they’d transferred to their computer input devices."

That's not quite good enough for forensic evidence yet because "researchers will need a lot more evidence that human microbiomes don’t change rapidly in time — and that bacterial communities transferred to keyboards endure with few changes." "in real-world forensics, ... evidence is often collected long after contact with a keyboard or other surface would have ceased."

However, "Even identical twins harbor substantially different microbial communities, suggesting that the collective genomes of our microbial symbionts may be more personally identifying than our own human genomes".

Wednesday, March 3, 2010

Real science: Large quantities of water ice on moon

This post is based on a front page story in Bombay "Late City" edition of The Indian Express newspaper today, quoting multiple ISRO & NASA sources.

"New analysis of scientific data from" a NASA instrument called "Mini-SAR" "that flew aboard India's Chandrayaan-1 spacecraft" "found more than 40 small craters (2-15 km in diameter) with sub-surface water ice located at their base. The interior of these craters is in permanent sun shadow".

These craters are all located "in the lunar north pole". "there could be more than 600 million metric tons of water ice in the craters."

While previous investigations by ISRO & NASA have detected water on moon, "this is the first time that evidence has emerged of the presence of large quantities of lunar water."

Real science: How fish can "rain" from the sky!

From "Raining fish in Australia" in Boing Boing: "The phenomenon has been documented around the world and is believed to be cause by small twisters or waterspouts.

As they pass over water small fish can be sucked up into the clouds and kept there as the cloud moves over land.

Eventually they fall from the cloud to the ground, inevitably surprising any people who see them."

What I don't understand is "kept there". The moment twister gives way, I would expect it to fall. Or are clouds less flimsy than I thought?

Saturday, February 27, 2010

Real science: "Antarctic spits out iceberg the size of Luxembourg"

From Times Online: "The 985 sq mile (2,550 sq km) block of ice was knocked off the Mertz Glacier Tongue, a spit of floating ice protruding from eastern Antarctica, on February 12 or 13." "and could disrupt global ocean patterns and weather systems for decades".

[via Boing Boing]

Saturday, February 13, 2010

Real science: Bill Gates on clean energy

Link.

Related: Arthur Clarke's "The Shining Ones": Generating electricity by exploiting the difference in temperature of sea at different depths.

Wednesday, February 10, 2010

Optical illusion: "A simple yet effective levitation"

Link (stare a moment at the picture there; dark patch is wet ground).

[via Boing Boing]

Sunday, February 7, 2010

Real science: Global warming

From the lead story on front page of today's paper edition of Sunday Times, Bombay:

  1. "2009 was India's hottest yr ever". "almost a degree warmer than usual." usual = "long term annual average" = 24.64 C for the country.
  2. "of the 12 hottest years in the 108 years since 1901, when the Met department started maintaining temperature records, 8 have been in the past decade."
This December/January also happens to be the only one I remember when I didn't have to take a sweater out. While Bombay never really sees winter, late nights/early mornings during these two months tend to be chilly enough to need a sweater. Not this year.

Related: Fiction about global warming.

Thursday, February 4, 2010

Real science: Rare picture of possible asteroid-asteroid collision

Image of an asteroid-asteroid collision in inner solar system taken by Hubble Telescope in January 2010Picture: Has links to image in 3 different resolutions, plus some commentary.

Details of the Hubble-photographed image & its possible interpretation at HubbleSite.

Object in photograph is called "P/2010 A2" - looks like a comet but isn't. First seen on 6 January 2010.

"If this interpretation is correct, two small and previously unknown asteroids recently collided, creating a shower of debris that is being swept back into a tail from the collision site by the pressure of sunlight".

"At the time of the Hubble observations, the object was approximately 180 million miles (300 million km) from the Sun and 90 million miles (140 million km) from Earth."

[via James Nicoll]

Related: Ross Rocklynne's "Time Wants a Skeleton": A group of adventurers unwittingly time travel to the "fifth planet" days before it is to be impacted by a large body from space - an impact that would create the current asteroid belt between Mars & Jupiter from their debris.

Thursday, January 21, 2010

Real science: Physical differences between earth dust & that of moon & Mars

Link. [via Boing Boing]

'Dust is one of the biggest obstacles for long-term lunar and Martian space colonies. On the moon, there’s no atmosphere and no water, so the dust particles don’t get moved around, worn down and rounded like they do on Earth.

Consequently, dust kicked up by rovers and astronauts is “very abrasive and sharp, like freshly broken glass”...

Electrostatic charging from solar winds and UV radiation on the moon makes this sharp dust cling to everything, including astronaut suits where it can work its way through the glove air locks. It also sticks to the solar panels that power rovers and other instruments.

On Mars, which has a thin atmosphere, dust devils scour the surface and keep the soil from being as sharp, but it’s still got plenty of static cling.'

See also.

  1. Hal Clement's "Dust Rag": One of the classics of hard sf, dealing with static charge on Moon dust.

Wednesday, January 13, 2010

Real science: Picture of a curious Martian landscape

A picture of Martian dunes, showing curious tendril-like growths that look like vegetation & an avalancheClick image to enlarge to original size.

Explanation of weird tendrils is in Discover Magazine (but went over my head). You can actually see a few seconds old avalanche-in-progress in the picture too (bottom left quadrant, third tendrils from bottom, a little red cloud above right half with smaller growths).

[via Boing Boing]

Saturday, January 9, 2010

Real science: Antikythera device

io9 has a story about the very complex manually-powered Greek machine from some 150 BC, recovered from a shipwreck. "Devices with this level of complexity were not seen again for almost 1,500 years, and the Antikythera mechanism's compactness actually bests the later designs."

Saturday, January 2, 2010

Real science: Magnetized interstellar cloud just outside Sol

Link.

I'm not qualified to judge its significance, but some people think the finding (via Voyager 2 data) sheds new light on interstellar gas clouds.

Related.

  1. Fred Hoyle's "The Black Cloud": An interstellar dust cloud has entered Sol. And it's sentient!

Tuesday, December 29, 2009

Real science: A visual aid to comprehend relative gravity of different worlds in Sol

At XKCD.

Corresponding texts are not very legible on my screen, but others seem to be able to read it well. A usenet discussion suggests there are some errors in numbers.

Tuesday, December 1, 2009

Real science: A first step towards "Ambrosia Plus"!

Arthur Clarke has written a famous farce called "The Food of Gods". A reader reports a real-life lab version of the edible at the heart of this story.

Sunday, November 15, 2009

Real science: NASA finds water ice on moon's south pole

Data from last month's LCROSS probe has confirmed what was till now a suspicion.

[via SF Signal]

Monday, November 2, 2009

Real science: Earth is uninhabitable!

Charles Stross tells us why aliens looking for an earth-like world are far more likely to conclude that earth is uninhabitable than otherwise, in this rather longish article. Or why our search for earth like worlds is even more complex than intuition suggests.

[via Bibliophile Stalker]

Saturday, September 26, 2009

Real science: "Coldest spot in the solar system"

From New Scientist, 26 September 2009: On moon, "shadows cast by crater margins keep some regions in permanent darkness." The measurements by "instruments on NASA's Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter" "revealed they stay at a chilly -240C, just 33C above absolute zero. Pluto was measured at -230C in 2006."

Catch probably is: Pluto's temperature quoted is average, rather than on its coldest spot. But New Scientist doesn't mention it.

Real science: "Round trip to the edge of cosmos"

From an article of this title by Rachel Courtland in New Scientist, 26 September 2009:

"How far could an astronaut travel in a lifetime? Billions of light years, it turns out."

"The furthest that the light emitted from our sun could reach ... currently lies at about 15 billion light years away." Traveling in "a super-advanced rocket" at "a comfortable 1g", this journey would be made "in only 30 years" in "astronaut's reference frame, because time would pass slower than on Earth due to relativity", according to "a paper to appear in Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia" authored by "Kwan & her colleagues".

"But ... returning home presents its own challenges... Beginning deceleration just a second too late could cause you to overshoot the Milky Way". "even if you did stop in the right place, you would be disappointed. Some 70 billion years would have elapsed back home, so the sun would long, long since have expired, taking Earth with it".

Real science: "Water on moon" papers

The announcement from NASA, later confirmed by ISRO, has 4 relevant papers, all published on 24 September 2009 online in Science magazine, outlining the find. Only abstracts are available without payment.

  1. "Character and Spatial Distribution of OH/H2O on the Surface of the Moon Seen by M3 on Chandrayaan-1" by C. M. Pieters, J. N. Goswami, R. N. Clark, M. Annadurai, J. Boardman, B. Buratti, J.-P. Combe, M. D. Dyar, R. Green, J. W. Head, C. Hibbitts, M. Hicks, P. Isaacson, R. Klima, G. Kramer, S. Kumar, E. Livo, S. Lundeen, E. Malaret, T. McCord, J. Mustard, J. Nettles, N. Petro, C. Runyon, M. Staid, J. Sunshine, L. A. Taylor, S. Tompkins, and P. Varanasi. Abstract. Water signature "appears strongest at cooler high latitudes and at several fresh feldspathic craters. ...suggests that the formation and retention of OH and H2O is an ongoing surficial process."
  2. "Detection of Adsorbed Water and Hydroxyl on the Moon" by Roger N. Clark. Abstract. "The amounts of water ... could be 10 to 1,000 parts per million and locally higher."
  3. "Temporal and Spatial Variability of Lunar Hydration as Observed by the Deep Impact Spacecraft" by Jessica M. Sunshine, Tony L. Farnham, Lori M. Feaga, Olivier Groussin, Frederic Merlin, Ralph E. Milliken, and Michael F. A'Hearn. Abstract. "Deep Impact spacecraft found the entire surface to be hydrated during some portions of the day. ... strongest near the North Pole ... Hydration varied with temperature, rather than cumulative solar radiation ... comparisons between data collected one week (a quarter lunar day) apart show a dynamic process with diurnal changes in hydration that were greater for mare basalts (~70%) than for highlands (~50%). This hydration loss and return to steady state occurred entirely between local morning and evening, requiring a ready daytime source of water group ions, which is consistent with a solar wind origin."
  4. "A Lunar Waterworld" by Paul G Lucey. Abstract.
I'm, sort of, disappointed. Must pay Science to access taxpayer-funded research!

Thursday, September 24, 2009

Real science: Water on moon?

Times Now, a TV news channel here, is reporting the NASA instrument aboard Chandrayaan-1 has found evidence of water.

Google News, however, is picking up conflicting reports: NASA about to officially make announcement today, ISRO chairman refusing to confirm the find, evidence of water moving around on moon, ...! Hopefully, next few weeks or months should clarify the picture.

Tuesday, September 15, 2009

Real science: Seas of Venus!

@CBC News: Preliminary interpretation of data from Venus Express probe hints at ancient ocean there, 4 billion years ago - back when sun was a bit cooler!

[via James Nicoll]

Related: Venus in fiction.

Saturday, August 29, 2009

Real science: First "direct" pictures of an individual molecule

A directly taken picture of pentacene, an organic molecule consisting of five benzene rings.From MacGregor Campbell's "Microscopes zoom in on molecules at last" in New Scientist:

  1. "Thanks to specialised microscopes, we have long been able to see the beauty of single atoms. But strange though it might seem, imaging larger molecules at the same level of detail has not been possible".
  2. Image alongside accompanies the article & is a directly taken picture with the new technique of "pentacene, an organic molecule consisting of five benzene rings".
[via io9]

Tuesday, July 21, 2009

Real science: How Helium was discovered & named, & the element's Indian connection

Krishnan at Musings & Miscelleny offers an interesting tidbit.

Friday, July 17, 2009

Real science: 12 mile long Arctic monster?

Link. [via Boing Boing]

Reminds me of land dwelling & pre-biological goo with far more voracious appetite in Hal Clement's "Half-Life".

Update 20 July 2009: Some more information on the original story.

Tuesday, June 30, 2009

Real science: Inca handwoven (grass) suspension bridge!

Inca bridge, somewhere in Americas, handwoven from grassAt Atlas Obscura. [via Boing Boing]

Thursday, June 18, 2009

Real science: Some lunar imagery, courtesy of Chandrayaan-1

An image of rolling terrain on the surface of moon, taken by Indian vessel Chandrayaan-1Both ISRO & NASA have posted lunar pictures taken by instruments on-board Chandrayaan-1, including some of lunar surfaces never seen before. ISRO's pictures aren't well annotated, but I loved the image on the right (click to enlarge to original size).

  1. ISRO image gallery.
  2. NASA images: Lunar poles, first look inside shadowed craters.
Note: Many of these probably aren't new. It's just that I didn't check Chandrayaan-1 image gallery last several months.

Note 18 June 2009: While there appear to be several interesting images, including of deep craters, far side, & underground structures, lack of annotations ensured I didn't get their significance & had to stick to my own sense of visual aesthetic beauty!!

Related: Chandrayaan posts.

Friday, June 12, 2009

Real science: "we may well have seen our first extra-galactic planet"!

Link. [via James Nicoll]

6 times Jupiter mass, orbiting a star in Andromeda galaxy! Could be a "brown-dwarf" or a planet.

Saturday, June 6, 2009

Real science: Earth running away from Sun!

Kelly Beatty's "Why is earth moving away from the sun" in New Scientist. [via SF Signal]

I'd seen a similar, but old, article by Isaac Asimov some years back that explained how tidal interaction between earth & moon was slowing earth's rotation period (a day is now 4 times longer than at earth's birth) & why moon is running away.

I wondered why I'd not seen something similar about earth/sun - so here it is.

Thursday, May 7, 2009

Real science: A gadget from Murray Leinster's "The Skit-Tree Planet"

Well, not exactly, but ... someway to there.

How about building a house by setting up a projector that knows the 3D shape you want, & pointing it where you want the building erected? That's Leinster's story, where you can later switch off the projector to destroy the building.

The real-life version Bruce Sterling links is a 3D printer that can build - not quite the house, but parts of it at a time - in place. No force field projection, but real physical sand-like thing with the strength of reinforced concrete.

Wednesday, April 22, 2009

Real science: Exoplanets in Gliese 581 system - one twice earth mass, another in habitable zone

An artists impression of Gliese 581 solar system, about 20 light years from earth. Explanation of image at the end of link.Science Daily: Newly discovered "Gliese 581 e", fifth world to be found in "Gliese 581" solar system about 20 light years from Sol, is just 1.9 times earth mass - but too close to its sun to be inhabitable.

But a previously known world in this system, "Gliese 581 d", is now thought to be "well within the habitable zone", though it is 7 times as massive as earth. It "could even be covered by a large and deep ocean — it is the first serious 'water world' candidate".

[via 42Blips]

Saturday, April 18, 2009

Real science: No males please; producing them wastes energy!

Image accompanying the article Ants inhabit world without sex by Victoria Gill at BBC NewsVictoria Gill at BBC talks of an ant species that has gotten rid of the need to "waste" energy on having males! Reproduction by cloning the queen's genome.

"It avoids the energetic cost of producing males, and doubles the number of reproductive females produced each generation from 50% to 100% of the offspring."

[via io9]

Tuesday, April 14, 2009

Real science: Tweenbots: Will you please help this cute little lost robot reach the other end of the city?

A Tweenbot on a New York City road, being admired by & perhaps assisted by strangersIn an unusual experiment, a little toy robot navigates across New York City - with kind help from complete strangers!

"Tweenbots are human-dependent robots that navigate the city with the help of pedestrians they encounter. Rolling at a constant speed, in a straight line, Tweenbots have a destination displayed on a flag, and rely on people they meet to read this flag and to aim them in the right direction to reach their goal."

PS: Linked page has an embedded video too - of the little bot's journey & its interactions with strangers.

[via Boing Boing]

Saturday, April 11, 2009

Unbelievable time required to cover the immense distances of space

I've no idea of the origins of this document which presumably is an old one. Or may be someone is having fun.

"If man should invade space ... at the terrific speed of two miles a minute"!!!

Includes very imaginative illustrations of "spaceships" that can do the traveling & interesting computed values of time required to reach various bodies in Sol (we aren't told their location relative earth used in calculations, but may be it's the most favorable one).

[via Boing Boing]

Real science: Meteorite impact craters expose Martian ice

Picture showing two blue patches of pure ice on Mars, exposed by surface dug up by meteor imapactNature: "two blue pools of ice exposed after small impacts last summer excavated craters five or six metres across and about 70 centimetres deep. (Little impacts like this happen quite often in Mars' thin atmosphere.)"

Makes me wonder living on Mars is going to be even harder than just fighting the elements - protecting against regular impacts of this power!

PS: Nature article later talks of usefulness of meteor impacts as hammers. There is a very interesting novel that explores this idea at great length: "Utopia" by Roger McBride Allen. A badly terraformed world is dying because thermal distribution is not happening right. Someone thinks the problem can be fixed by linking up northern seas with equatorial ones - they're'nt naturally connected here. How to do it economically, & in the few years or decades before the place becomes inhabitable? Use natural meteors & guide them as hammers hitting the necessary places to aid digging!

[via Bruce Sterling]

Tuesday, April 7, 2009

Real science: Just how dense is mercury (the liquid, not the planet)?

Very interesting demonstration in the form of a half-minute YouTube video. [via Boing Boing]

Friday, April 3, 2009

Real science: Ed Yong on the rebellion of the ant slaves!

Illustration accompanying the post about rebellion of the ant slaves by Ed Yong. Click image to enlarge to original size.Link. [via Boing Boing]

Real science: Robot-tended tomato garden!

One of the pictures included in a photo slide show of robot gardeners tending their tomato plantsAnnotated picture slide show. [via Boing Boing]

Robot gardeners themselves are built over Roomba.

Wednesday, March 18, 2009

Real science: ISRO detects 3 new species of bacteria in stratosphere that are "highly resistant to ultra-violet radiation"

Link.

What caught my attention & made me write this post was the rather sensational heading a couple of hours ago in Times Now - a local TV news channel. Something to the effect that first alien species had been found by ISRO!

ISRO's press release uses saner language & details, but includes this bit of titillation: "While the present study does not conclusively establish the extra-terrestrial origin of microorganisms, ..."

Monday, March 9, 2009

Real science: Simulating human isolation conditions during travel to Mars

David Shiga's "Crew chosen for Mars isolation test" at New Scientist.

[via Bruce Sterling]

Thursday, March 5, 2009

Chinese probe crashes into moon

BBC: "The Chang'e 1 lunar satellite" "has crashed into the moon in what Beijing has called a controlled collision."

[via io9]

Sunday, February 22, 2009

Real science: Liquid water observed on the surface of Mars?

  1. David Shiga's "First liquid water may have been spotted on Mars" at New Scientist. [via 42Blips]
  2. Victoria Jaggard's "Liquid Water Recently Seen on Mars?" at National Geographic. [via James Nicoll]
But it still appears to be a controversial interpretation of pictures.

Also: "changing appearance of some crater gullies over a period of several years has hinted at the existence of subsurface aquifers that occasionally release bursts of water."

Wednesday, February 18, 2009

Real science: iPhone software acts somewhat like device in Randall Garrett's "Or Your Money Back..."

Link.

Minus magic, though.

Story: Gordan Randall Garrett's "[Or Your Money Back...]".

Tuesday, February 17, 2009

Real science: Magenta is not a real color, but an invention of our brain!

"Magenta is the evidence that the brain ... has apparently constructed a colour to bridge the gap between red and violet, because such a colour does not exist in the light spectrum. Magenta has no wavelength attributed to it, unlike all the other spectrum colours."

Quote & link at Boing Boing.

Thursday, February 5, 2009

Real science: Google Mars

Link. [via James Nicoll]

Real science: Antarctica

Some very cool amateur photography of Antarctica - particularly icebergs, but other things too; probably still an ongoing series. ToC is at the bottom of linked page.

[via Boing Boing]

Tuesday, January 20, 2009

Real science: Is space-time a grainy hologram?

Some truly weird physics in Marcus Chown's "Our world may be a giant hologram" at New Scientist.

Plus possibly some early experimental evidence of this cosmic weirdness - that space-time comprises of discrete "grains" at microscopic level that can be modeled as holographic projections of some kind of pixels written over the outer surface of the universe!! Grains with dimensions of the order of 10e-16 meters.

[via Jay Lake]

Real science: Some stunning orbital images of earth

Link. [via Jay Lake]

Sunday, January 11, 2009

Real science: How wind could move rocks on Mars?!!

A picture of Martian surface taken by one of the NASA probesEmily Lakdawalla's post titled "The wind blows rocks on Mars?" at The Planetary Society Blog.

Observed fact: Martian planes are littered with small rocks, & puzzlingly, they're about evenly spaced.

Lakdawalla's post summarizes a possible explanation of this even spacing, since neither gravity nor flowing water can help on plains there.

[via James Nicoll]

Related: Fiction set on Mars or its moons.

Friday, November 14, 2008

Real science: First pictures of exoplanets!

This is pretty much all over the web - first pictures in visible light & infrared of 4 worlds outside of Sol, in two different solar systems (as opposed to detecting them indirectly). All are several times the size of Jupiter, & farther out in their systems than Jupiter.

  1. 3 planets circling a star called HR 8799, 130 light-years away, in the constellation Pegasus.
  2. 1 planet (named "Fomalhaut b") orbiting the star Fomalhaut, 25 light-years away, in the constellation Piscis Austrinus.

    Actually, I could not see the planet in this image. It's supposed to be a white dot somewhere in the right. But others seem to be able to see it.

    I had noticed something newsworthy about the word "Fomalhaut" before I saw any reports. Google hits of Simon Petrie's story "Fomalhaut 451" (unrelated to this report) showed a major jump since sometime yesterday! But I got the answer only today morning.
Two reports I saw first: New York Times & BBC. Former is much better than BBC post.

[via manofsan@indiansciencefiction]

Friday, November 7, 2008

Real science: It's human to litter!

NASA Astronaut Clay Anderson had dumped "a tank of toxic ammonia coolant the size of a fridge" "from the International Space Station in June 2007". Of course, after a year, it was falling down to earth!

When I first read about it a few days back, the best NASA could do was to "track it". There was no way of knowing where it would fall on earth, & of course no way of preventing a major disaster should it fall on a population center. Odds are low, I know. But ask someone who gets unlucky!

Now io9 reports the debris that survived reentry has fallen "into the ocean between Australia and New Zealand". "The end result was estimated at around 15 pieces ... each one somewhere between 1.4 ounces and 40 pounds."

Only strengthens the belief that no agency, however esteemed, can be trusted to act responsibly! I mean, it must be human nature to litter - since it saves the cost & effort of safe waste disposal.

Tuesday, November 4, 2008

Chandrayaan-1 update 3: Transfer orbit; trajectory questions clarified; camera testing; mapping radioactivity, magnetic anomalies, & water ice; ...

Related: More recent Chandrayaan updates are available.

Sections of this somewhat longish post are ordered from the perspective of science fiction fans; if you are not one, interesting stuff may be down below rather than early in the post.

Mapping magnetic anomalies.

The Martian Chronicles on a Swedish instrument called SARA on board the ship: "SARA will also be able to study magnetic anomalies, presumably because the magnetic fields will change how the solar wind interacts with the surface."

"Magnetic anomaly" caught my attention because this is what begins the fuss in Arthur Clarke's famous novel "2001 A Space Odyssey". TMA it was called in the story - Tycho Magnetic Anomaly, because it was found in the Tycho region.

What's the use of "Radioactive mapping"?

Radioactive mapping is one of the things the mission will do. But what is it? And why do it?

The Martian Chronicles clarifies the purpose of the on board Bulgarian instrument that will do this job: "The whole goal is for this thing to get bombarded with radiation and see how much there is, what range of energies the particles have, and figure out how that dose might change for different locations on the moon. The Apollo astronauts were only out of Earth’s protective magnetic field for a few days, but for colonists spending months or years out there, it’s important to know how much radiation shielding they will need, and what type of radiation is the most dangerous."

Detecting water ice.

The Martian Chronicles on an on board Indian instrument called HEX: "a thick ice deposit would absorb x-rays that normally would be emitted to space, so by measuring changes in x-ray emission, HEX might be able to detect water ice."

Chandrayaan-1 Project Director answers some questions on ship's trajectory.

Technical details of trajectory to moon of Chandrayaan-1 spaceship

Via R Prasad's article titled "How Chandrayaan-1 is raised to higher orbits" in The Hindu newspaper of Madras. Article is based on correspondent's interaction with "M. Annadurai, Project Director of Chandrayaan-1". Click image above for full size original.
[Thanks for link, Dennis]

Why this multistage trajectory? Answer is, primarily, caution: "We could have done it [in] one shot, but there is a possibility of missing the moon. So we have adopted an incremental increase in the orbits’ perigee." I suppose "apogee" is meant, & "perigee" is a misquote.

Also, "There will be a need to correct the orbit once in two weeks to maintain a 100 km circular orbit" on moon. I guess at the end of its useful life - meaning propellant & fuel exhausted - it will simply fall somewhere on moon?
Related: Arthur Clarke's novel "Islands in the Sky" lightly touches upon the subject of human littering in space. A habit now when it doesn't cause much damage but a costly danger when space travel becomes common (because habits die hard). Not that ISRO is alone - everyone traveling to space seems to be doing it today.

Mr Annadurai answers several other questions too, including why fire at perigee & how moon capture will happen.

A related point: Reducing the speed - needed for capture by moon & lowering of orbit there - requires that "the orientation of the spacecraft is reversed — turned 180 degrees". This implies the craft is fitted with special orientation rockets that can fire simultaneously in more than one directions. I'd not thought of it; I guess it's needed by all craft that orbit earth too.

Chandrayaan-1 is now on "Lunar Transfer Trajectory".

Illustration accompanying the ISRO announcement that Chandrayaan spacecraft is now in Lunar Transfer Orbit after the fifth orbit raising

ISRO announcement dated 4 November 2008: "The fifth and final orbit raising manoeuvre of Chandrayaan-1 spacecraft was successfully carried out today (November 4, 2008) morning at 04:56 am IST... With this, Chandrayaan-1 entered the Lunar Transfer Trajectory". Current orbital parameters: apogee = 380,000 km. Perigee not specified in the announcement. Click image for original size picture.

"Chandrayaan-1 will approach the Moon on November 8, 2008". That's when next manoeuvre is due - to transfer it from earth orbit to moon orbit.

Camera testing: Some pictures of earth.

From ISRO announcement dated 31 October 2008: "The Terrain Mapping camera (TMC) ... was successfully operated on October 29, 2008".
Note: IST is India time. 5:30 hrs ahead of GMT, no day light saving adjustments.

Announcement provides 2 black & white pictures of earth (click pictures for original sized images):
  1. "taken at 8:00 am IST from a height of 9,000 km shows the Northern coast of Australia".

    Picture of Northern coast of Australia, taken by Chandrayaan-1 spaceship on 31 October 2008 at 0800 am IST from a height of 9000 km

  2. "taken at 12:30 pm from a height of 70,000 km shows Australia’s Southern Coast".

    Picture of south coast of Australia, taken by Chandrayaan-1 spaceship on 31 October 2008 at 1230 pm IST from a height of 70000 km

I'm puzzled why they published pictures of Australia rather than India. I assume it was engineering considerations, rather than oversight.

"The camera can take black and white pictures of an object" & "has a resolution of about 5 metres." I suppose they meant 5m from a distance of 100 km, the target lunar orbit, & that earth pictures being distributed were at far lower resolution?

Chandrayaan-2 work sharing with Russia clarified.

ISRO Chairman G Madhavan Nair: "The lander will be from Russia... The rover will be a joint development between Russia and India."

Spacecraft, of course, is Indian.

Mapping "the whole moon"!!

In the last update, I'd quoted Narendra Bhandari, a member of the Science Advisory Board for Chandrayaan-1 as saying that one of the mission objectives was "topographic mapping. That will be done for the whole moon at 5m resolution".

I assume he meant it for part of the moon visible from Chandrayaan-1 orbit around it. I mean - it cannot see "the whole moon" from a single orbit. Or do they intend to change orbits during its 2 year duty?

Gossip: Chandrayaan-3 (manned landing in 2015).

I seem to have misplaced a juicy quote from some babu or neta in Delhi that gave me a smile. It appeared in a local newspaper a few days back - I think Indian Express, but I'm not sure.

I interpreted the long winded quote as saying that: Delhi was upset that Chandrayaan-3 was announced publicly by ISRO bosses, & didn't let the neta concerned get publicity! He clarified that the project is not likely to be killed for lack of budget.

Related older report: G Madhavan Nair, Chairman of ISRO: "We are planning to carry two human beings into the space in our first manned space mission... The project outlay is Rs 120 billion".

What next?

  1. All Chandrayaan posts.
  2. All moon posts, including fiction set on moon. A-rated stories probably won't disappoint. For free fiction, search for "full text" (without quotes). Or browse through all free fiction posts, including stories unrelated to moon.
  3. Subscribe to Variety SF master feed, Chandrayaan feed, or moon posts feed.

Sunday, November 2, 2008

Real science: Why is Chandrayaan-1 trajectory so complex?

Related: More recent Chandrayaan updates are available.

US manned launches took 4 days to reach moon; some Soviet launches took two. Why are we taking3D trajectory of Chandrayaan-1 spacecraft of ISRO on its way to moon a fortnight?

While I haven't seen any official explanation from ISRO nor an analysis of Chandrayaan-1 trajectory elsewhere, my speculation is: answer might be a trade between cost & travel time. They are probably trying to get a gravity boost from earth rather than burning fuel - hence lower weight, hence lower cost. Someone better qualified at making sense of trajectory might offer a saner comment.

More (& wild) speculation - safety. By always staying in earth orbit or moon orbit - even a highly elliptical one - could you increase chances of recapturing the ship even if something went wrong during the moon-capture maneuver?

What next?

  1. All Chandrayaan posts.
  2. All moon posts, including fiction set on moon. A-rated stories probably won't disappoint. For free fiction, search for "full text" (without quotes). Or browse through all free fiction posts, including stories unrelated to moon.
  3. Subscribe to Variety SF master feed, Chandrayaan feed, or moon posts feed.

Thursday, October 30, 2008

Real science: Chandrayaan-1 update 2: Fourth orbit raising, mission objectives clarified, Russia on Chandrayaan-2, & foreign cost concerns

Related: More recent Chandrayaan updates are available.

Fourth orbit raising manoeuvre.

From ISRO Announcement dated 29 October 2008:
  1. "The fourth orbit raising manoeuvre of Chandrayaan-1 spacecraft was carried out today (October 29, 2008) morning at 07:38 am IST." Orbital parameters after this manoeuvre: apogee = 267,000 km, perigee = 465 km.
  2. "One more orbit raising manoeuvre is scheduled to send the spacecraft to the vicinity of the moon at a distance of about 384,000 km from the Earth." That will be the last orbit raising - on November 3; after that it's down, down, down in moon orbit.

Clarifying Chandrayaan-1 objectives.

Narendra Bhandari, a member of the Science Advisory Board for Chandrayaan-1 on mission objectives: "Three things will be primarily done. One is what we call topographic mapping. That will be done for the whole moon at 5m resolution which has not been done so far. The other is the mineral mapping... Third thing we are doing is chemical and radioactive mapping."

Chandrayaan-2 lander/rover is a joint project with Russia.

From elsewhere (this has appeared in local newspapers too): "Russia's Federal Space Agency (Roskosmos) is joining with ISRO for development of Chandrayaan-2 Lander/Rover... The rover will have an operating life-span of a month. It will run predominantly on solar power."

Indian spaceship, but a joint lander/rover.

Footnote.

Am I the only one puzzled? How come the comments that the Chandrayaan-1 spend is wasteful in a poor country are coming only from outside India? I'm yet to see it in an Indian newspaper. Even Indian online sources, when they talk about it (not often), seem to talk about it quoting external sources! Not to say there are no local detractors - you can never get a billion people to agree on anything. But I don't see even a hint of this sentiment in my own interactions with friends, or in local print media (I rarely watch TV news - so not sure of that).

Personally, I think the publicity alone might be worth the money. Not counting the satellite launch business that might come this way because of publicity.

What next?

  1. All Chandrayaan posts.
  2. All moon posts, including fiction set on moon. A-rated stories probably won't disappoint. For free fiction, search for "full text" (without quotes). Or browse through all free fiction posts, including stories unrelated to moon.
  3. Subscribe to Variety SF master feed, Chandrayaan feed, or moon posts feed.

Sunday, October 26, 2008

Real science: Chandrayaan-1 update: Trajectory, a cost perspective, progress, & rover/human landing schedule

Related: More recent Chandrayaan updates are available.

3D trajectory of Chandrayaan-1 spacecraft of ISRO on its way to moonISRO has this fantastic schematic of the 3D trajectory of the spacecraft on its way to moon. Click image alongside for full sized image at ISRO site. I wish they had animation showing current location of the craft too!

Rest of this post is based in three articles on the subject from today's Times of India newspaper, Bombay edition.
Note: 1 cr(ore) = 10 million. For numbers above 1000, most languages in India have words in multiples of 100 (rather than 1000 in English). So 1 lakh = 100,000; 1 crore = 100 lakh; ... These words are very commonly used in Indian variant of English.

  1. Chandrayaan-2 that puts a rover on moon: 2010. Cost Rs 500 cr, about a quarter more than Chandrayaan-1 (Rs 380 cr). I thought it was due 2011?
  2. Manned landing: 2015. At Rs 12,000 cr, it will cost a bit more than 3 times the cost of Chandrayaan-1.
  3. Chandrayaan-1 cost "about half the price of a jumbo jet".
  4. Over its 3 year development life, Chandrayaan-1 consumed about 4% of the budget of ISRO. OK - so it wasn't a major burden.
  5. "The second orbit-raising maneuver ... was carried out at 5:48 am on Saturday". Orbit parameters after the maneuver: apogee = 74,715 km, perigee = 336 km.

What next?

  1. All Chandrayaan posts.
  2. All moon posts, including fiction set on moon. A-rated stories probably won't disappoint. For free fiction, search for "full text" (without quotes). Or browse through all free fiction posts, including stories unrelated to moon.
  3. Subscribe to Variety SF master feed, Chandrayaan feed, or moon posts feed.

Real science: Why is northern hemisphere of Mars so different from southern one?

Emily Lakdawalla offers some tidbits in this post titled "Why is only half of Mars magnetized?" at The Planetary Society Blog. Her post also has elevation & magnetic maps from 70 degree N to 70S.

Observed facts.

  1. "Mars' northern hemisphere is low (in elevation) and flat, while the southern hemisphere is high and rugged."
  2. "where Mars does have a magnetic field, it's mostly in the south, not the north."

Constraint.

  1. "evidence suggests that the [magnetic] dichotomy is a truly ancient feature, that should have formed before the dynamo shut down."

Explanation.

"a Pluto-sized body may have slammed into Mars early in its history, erasing the cratering record of half the planet and leaving behind the low-lying, flat volcanic plains that now form the northern lowlands".

With the internal Martian dynamo still operating at the time of impact (now it's down), assume that "northern hemisphere core-mantle boundary hotter than the southern hemisphere core-mantle boundary, a reasonable initial condition to impose if you very suddenly remove a huge amount of crust atop that part of the planet with a giant impact." And you get something resembling the current magnetic distribution.

[via James Nicoll]

Wednesday, October 22, 2008

Real science: Chandrayaan-I: Trajectory, similarity with a Fredric Brown story, & next steps

Related: More recent Chandrayaan updates are available.

Today morning, the first spacecraft from India for a mission beyond earth's orbit took off for a 2 year orbiting job around moon - "to provide a detailed map of the mineral, chemical and topographical characteristics of the moon's surface".

I'll restrict this post to what is not said elsewhere - or, at least, not emphasized. For information on mission: There are any number of news reports on the subject on pretty much any India-centric news service, & a Google search on "Chandrayaan" 4 hours after the launch threw up a quarter million documents, not counting those on Google News.

Trajectory: some education for me.

I got some education on trajectory of moon travel - it's a very complicated, rather than a near straight line or a simple curve.

Both Heinlein's "Moon is a Harsh Mistress" & Arthur Clarke's "Maelstrom II" gave the impression of some sort of straight flight - you blast off from one at escape velocity or may be a bit more in a certain direction, & eventually enter orbit or fall down the other. May be I was not paying attention. And I never looked up the trajectories taken by previous moon missions by other countries.

Here are quotes on Chandrayaan-I trajectory "after separation ... from launch vehicle ... Expected 19 minutes after lift-off" from a data box on the front page of today's Indian Express newspaper, Bombay, Late City edition:
  1. "Will circle the earth in elliptical orbit. Will fire rockets at scheduled stages to go into progressively higher orbits until it reaches 386,000 km from the earth. Will take 11 days to go around the earth in this orbit."
  2. "In the second revolution in this elliptical orbit, spacecraft will slow down to get sucked into moon's gravitational field after which it will start orbiting."
  3. "Then begins stepwise lowering into lower & lower orbits until it reaches the targeted orbit of 100 km from the moon."
This report from Indian Express online edition has a slightly different version of trajectory parameters.

Schematic illustrating the trajectory of Chandrayaan-I spacecraft of ISRO to moon

Update 1: This picture of trajectory makes things clearer. Click image for original sized BBC picture.

3D trajectory - schematic - of Chandrayaan-1 spacecraft on its way to moon, from ISRO site

Update 2: Much better trajectory image from ISRO site. Click image to enlarge.

When in doubt, use brute force.

I'd read this advice in my early days of programming. Seems to apply to a lot of situations.

Once in target lunar orbit, the spacecraft throws down something called "Moon Impacter Probe (MIP)." Expectations from 30 kg MIP are similar to those from Mars impacter in Fredric Brown's "Earthmen Bearing Gifts" that brought doom to Martians, though Chandrayaan's is a much lower energy projectile & thrown from close range.

For Indian readers: some food for thought.

Today's Bombay edition of The Economic Times newspaper gives these cost figures for various moon missions, apparently adjusted to today's costs in US dollars:
  1. Chandrayaan-I (India) (2008) - $86m
  2. Chang'e (China) (2007) - $187m
  3. Kayuga (Japan) (2007) - $480m
  4. Apollo (NASA, US) - $135b (yes, billion)
  5. From elsewhere: "NASA's upcoming half-a-billion-dollar Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter".
While it's a genuine occasion to celebrate, I think the chest thumping on how we are the cheapest is unwarranted:
  1. I don't think comparison with Apollo is fair. That was a pioneering project in days when much less was known about the subject. And we are talking unmanned launches. I find the $0.5b upcoming NASA project a better comparison point.
  2. It will be a fair comparison when we convert $86m to purchasing power parity (PPP) numbers for local content. A locally made product costing $1 in US will likely cost you Rs 7 in India for equivalent local product, when the exchange rate is may be Rs 50/$ 47/$! Assuming Chandrayaan had a lot of imported components, I would reckon the PPP cost would be no less than $86x4 = $344m. No so cheap.
  3. I guess Chinese number would also be higher, once you look at it from purchasing power parity angle.

What next?

"landing a rover on the moon in 2011". Apparently, the budget is already approved by parliament.

May not yet be time to give up on space travel as impractical.

Related older bit from Technology Review about ISRO's scamject-based reusable launch vehicle "Avatar", due demo flight next year: "Avatar could thus deliver a 500-to-1,000-kilogram payload into orbit for about $67 per kilogram... Current launch prices range from about $4,300 per kilogram via a Russian Proton launch to about $40,000 per kilogram via a Pegasus launch."

OK - Avatar is for low-earth orbit. But still, $67/kg is about $4000 to launch me, not counting the cost of life support, radiation shielding, etc. May be space is not quite a lost frontier. What could our great-grandchildren expect 100 years from now?

And we are still in government monopoly era in this sector. If experience since early 1990s is any indication, fun in India really begins once private players enter a sector. What was it that really limited private players in the US in this sector? Was it lack of ideas on how to make money off moon or just lack of interest?

What next?

  1. All Chandrayaan posts.
  2. All moon posts, including fiction set on moon. A-rated stories probably won't disappoint. For free fiction, search for "full text" (without quotes). Or browse through all free fiction posts, including stories unrelated to moon.
  3. Subscribe to Variety SF master feed, Chandrayaan feed, or moon posts feed.