Saturday, October 09, 2010

Just In Time for Rapist Serial Killer Day

Columbus is no hero in Victoria:



"Celebration of a perpetrator of genocide can only be construed as advocacy or endorsement of the genocide itself." - Ward Churchill

Labels: , ,

Sunday, September 26, 2010

"Manche Menschen ändern sich nie"



The Edukators, a German film about what happens when three anti-capitalists take a rich CEO hostage, is surprisingly good. Totally never saw that ending coming, and I almost always do.

"Every heart a revolutionary cell."

Yep.

Westword Parent Company Sued For Trafficking

Trafficking in prostituted women through the Westword's "sex" ads supports the salaries of editor Patty Calhoun and blogger Michael Roberts, both of who I'd pay good money to see standing in the unemployment line. Time to put an end to the rape-financed, paycheck journalism that has left Calhoun and Roberts on the shelf way past their sell-by date.

Here's hoping the lawsuit will be the final nail in the coffin of all the drug and women trafficking creeps working for the sleazy Westword.

Follow the Rocky to annihilation, losers! I heart pink slip porn.

Westword parent sued

Village Voice Media is battling a lawsuit that alleges it had a role in a child prostitution case

Peter Marcus, DDN Staff Writer
Thursday, September 23, 2010

The parent company of Denver-based Westword is battling a lawsuit that alleges that the media giant had a role in a sex trafficking case involving a former runaway teen prostitute.

Lawyers for the unnamed 15-year-old Missouri teen filed a lawsuit last week against Village Voice Media Holdings, LLC, alleging that the Phoenix-based company aided and abetted a pimp by allowing the pimp to post sex ads for the then-14-year-old girl. The ads were posted on Village Voice Media’s classified advertising Web site Backpage.com.

Village Voice Media owns Westword, which also uses Backpage.com for Denver through Westword.Backpage.com.

The complaint, filed in a Missouri federal court, alleges that Village Voice Media “had knowledge that: explicit sexual photographs were being posted on its website; that postings on their website were advertisements for prostitution services; that minors were included in these postings for prostitution on its website; that sex trafficking of minors was prolific in the United States of America; and that the internet including their service was being used to advertise illegal sexual services, including child exploitation.”

Police and human trafficking experts in Denver say problems with Westword’s Backpage.com is increasing. The Denver Police Department says it is seeing ads for students from low-income and at-risk alternative Denver schools.

DPD spokesman Lt. Matt Murray says the Denver ads are primarily being found through Westword’s Backpage.com.

Murray says Denver investigators are constantly following Westword.Backpage.com to combat growing problems with sex ads featuring minors, as well as prostitution in general. He added that much of the activity is being created by gang members.

“The trend we’re seeing is a lot of gang members are starting to move away from drugs and guns and into this realm, and their targeting at-risk kids from alternative schools,” said Murray. “It’s definitely a problem.”

The Denver Police Department is currently seeking a grant to help it combat human trafficking, including child prostitution, according to Murray. He was not at liberty yesterday to discuss the details of the grant.

Village Voice Media is receiving pressure from 21 state attorneys general to close its adult-services section of Backpage.com. The effort is being led by Connecticut Attorney General Richard Blumenthal.

Similar pressure was placed on Craigslist earlier this month to shut down its adult-services section. The online classified-advertising Web site voluntarily agreed to close its erotic services section after receiving pressure from the attorneys general.

Colorado Attorney General John Suthers did not sign the letters from the attorneys general encouraging Backpage.com and Craigslist to answer the call. But a spokesman for Suthers said the Republican attorney general supports the effort.

“We’re part of a larger group of attorneys general that have been working with Blumenthal … we’ve been working on human trafficking issues that obviously effect all of the states in the nation,” said Mike Saccone, spokesman for Suthers. “We certainly support the efforts of Attorney General Blumenthal and all of our other peer states to combat human trafficking and child prostitution.”

Unlike Craigslist, Village Voice Media executives say they will not shut down its Backpage.com adult-services section, arguing that it has increased its efforts to crack down on the growing problem. The company points to assisting law enforcement officials with investigations and blocking ads featuring prostitution and human trafficking.

But sex ads are big money. Twelve Web sites will generate an estimated $63 million in sex-ad revenue in the U.S. this year, according to a Classified Intelligence Report study by the Advanced Interactive Media Group, LLC. With Craigslist out of the picture, many sites are “jockeying for position to capture the revenue that Craigslist bypassed,” according to the report.

Backpage.com — second to Craigslist in sex ad revenue — is expected to earn about $17.5 million online in sex ads this year, with an additional $6.9 million in print advertising revenue for sex-related services advertising, according to the AIM Group report.

Backpage.com immediately took advantage of Craigslist’s departure from the sex ad market by running an ad for AdultSearch.com, which solicited ads for “escorts” at $5 each, according to the report.

Westword editor Patricia Calhoun said yesterday that she is unable to comment on ad revenue generated from such classified ads in Denver because she does not work directly in the advertising department. Taylor Wheeler, Westword’s classified sales manager, did not return a phone call and separate e-mail by the Denver Daily News yesterday seeking revenue figures for adult entertainment, alternative healing and medical marijuana classified ads.

Calhoun also declined to comment on the specific lawsuit and the pressure from the attorneys general because she was unfamiliar with the case and the letters.

Steve Suskin, an attorney for Village Voice Media, lashed out at attorneys for filing the lawsuit on behalf of the Missouri teen. He said it is ridiculous to allege that Village Voice Media knowingly assisted the pimp, Latasha Jewell McFarland, in posting pornographic photographs of the former teen prostitute as part of the sex ad.

McFarland has since pled guilty to prostitution charges in federal court.

“The lawsuit is riddled with errors,” Suskin said in a statement. “The claim that we knowingly assisted McFarland in committing criminal acts is a lie fabricated by a trial lawyer looking for a payday. The attorney seeks to redirect blame from a convicted predator to Backpage.com, which helped prosecute the criminal.”

Suskin points out that Village Voice Media has testified in five previous underage cases, and provided the FBI with an I.P. address and credit card information in the latest case.

Village Voice Media also includes a disclaimer on its Backpage.com site, asking users to agree that they are 18 years of age or older and do not live in a community or local jurisdiction where nude pictures and explicit adult materials are prohibited. Users are also asked to agree to “report suspected exploitation of minors and/or human trafficking to the appropriate authorities.”

“Without our knowledge, the predator violated our terms of use,” states Suskin.

Amanda Finger, executive director of the Colorado-based Laboratory to Combat Human Trafficking, said that while classified sites such as Backpage.com claim to be monitoring illegal activity such as human trafficking, there really isn’t all that much monitoring going on. She said users know this and take advantage of the easy-to-use forum.

“It’s an easy venue that’s a place where people trust the source, they trust the site that they’re going to, and it becomes this normal behavior …” said Finger. “(Classified sites) claim to be working with law enforcement, but those (claims) weren’t substantiated, and they claim to be monitoring, but there was no monitoring.”

Labels: , , , ,

Friday, September 17, 2010

Say No To The Site C Dam

On September 19th, say no to the Site C Dam

Dear Friends

I am writing to you today to tell you a bit about the Peace River Valley and an upcoming rally we are organizing to stop the proposed massive Site C Dam project from destroying this beautiful place.

If you have ever been to the Peace you know what a spectacular and special place it is. Nestled in the Northeast corner of British Columbia, the Peace River Valley is home to fertile agricultural lands and farms, old growth boreal forests, and a rich and vibrant First Nation, fur trade and pioneer history. The Peace region is also one of the most important wildlife corridors in the Rocky Mountain region.

But the beautiful Peace River Valley is under threat. There are already two huge dams on the Peace and now BC Hydro wants to build a third dam, in the heart of this spectacular valley at a location BC Hydro has named "Site C". The proposed 60 meter high Site C mega dam would flood over 100 km of river valley, drowning a land area equal to 14 Stanley Parks, and causing landslides as the banks of the reservoir erode over time. The flooding of the valley bottom would destroy old growth boreal forests that store climate change-causing carbon dioxide, submerge over 7,000 acres of agricultural land, and wash away several people’s river-side homes.

BC Hydro says its necessary to do this because BC needs the energy, but their own reports say we can meet current demands through energy conservation. Site C is not about meeting the electricity demands of British Columbians.

The water behind the Site C dam would be used to help firm up the intermittent power created by private power companies from their so called run of river projects. This would make it easier for the the companies to sell their power to California, at a profit to them and at a loss to the people of BC.

Site C power would also be used to expand BC and Alberta’s oil and gas and mining industries. Site C, if built would be a $10 billion tax payer subsidy to private power operators corporations and the dirty fossil fuel industry.

This is why on Sunday September 19, First Nations and local community members from the Peace River Valley will paddle to Victoria’s inner harbour to deliver a message to the Premier- No Site C Dam!-and we’ll be there to stand beside them.

Please join us on September 19th at 10 amat the legislature to welcome the paddlers and say No to Site C! Speakers will include David Suzuki, members of the Treaty 8 Tribal Association and others.

If you have any questions or want to get involved in this campaign please call our office at 250-388-9292 or emailtria@wildernesscommittee.org

I look forward to seeing you out at event.

Khalilah Alwani | Vancouver Island Outreach Coordinator
Wilderness Committee

Thank you for supporting wilderness.

The Wilderness Committee is Canada's largest membership-based, citizen-funded wilderness preservation organization. We work for the preservation of Canadian and international wilderness through research and grassroots education. The Wilderness Committee works on the ground to achieve ecologically sustainable communities. We work only through lawful means.

You can contact the Wilderness Committee's Victoria Office at 250-388-9292.

As a Wilderness Committee member and supporter, you will be an important part of saving vital wilderness areas. You can also help us by volunteering. Find out how to become a member or if you would like to support the wilderness committee with a donation you can click this link or give us a call at 1-800-661-9453.

Friday, September 10, 2010

"By Order of the FAA..." Commemorating September 11th

Yes, it's that time of year again when Fire Witch Rising commemorates the event that most of the jingoistic chestbeaters way back in 2001 have long since forgotten. When was the last time you saw a "We will not forget" sticker on somebody's vehicle, anyway? Sometimes I look at the footage of the towers collapsing and still find it hard to believe that somebody actually pulled this off.

Even more amazing are the words that went out over air traffic control communications all across The Great Satan on that fateful day:

"By order of the FAA, and for reasons of national security, all pilots are to immediately land their aircraft at the nearest suitable airport."

My god. Every. Single. Plane. Grounded. Just about brings a tear to my eye.

But rather than tears, how about a song dedication. Now most of ya'll know I hates me some U2 with a hate few can muster, but I really couldn't find too many videos that feature airplanes in them. So. Just imagine Bono a passenger on Flight 11 as it explodes into a fiery ball against the side of the tower of power. Dusted just like the Death Star!!

"It was a beautiful day... don't let it get away."



"Great shot, kid!" That was one in a million!"



Yes, indeed. The Force will be with us. Always.

Labels: , , ,

Friday, August 27, 2010

University of Colorado's Journalism School Is Toast

Heh.

Who needs training to be a liar anyway?


It's a wrap for CU's journalism school in current form

By Tom McGhee
The Denver Post
Posted: 08/26/2010 01:00:00 AM MDT

The University of Colorado is working toward replacing its School of Journalism with a program better prepared to shepherd students into a news industry trying to keep pace in a digital age.

CU-Boulder Chancellor Phil DiStefano announced Wednesday the formation of a committee to consider how to organize a new information, communication and technology program.

In the meantime, shuttering the School of Journalism in its current form — a process called "program discontinuance" — will begin, although the committee could potentially recommend that the school remain as it is, DiStefano said. All current students will be allowed to complete their degrees, whatever the changes.

"Discontinuance" is an unfortunate legal term, said journalism-school dean Paul Voakes.

"It implies that we're shutting down, when the opposite is true. Discontinuance is the necessary legal process that would enable us to create the innovative new programs our students need," he said.

DiStefano said he doesn't know what form the school eventually will take. The committee could recommend it remain as is, or pieces of the curriculum could be folded into the Alliance for Technology, Learning and Society Institute (ATLAS), which includes programs enabled by information and communication technology.

The CU Board of Regents would decide whether to close the journalism school.

More than 30 schools, including Cornell University and the University of California, Berkeley, have revamped their journalism schools to keep up with the evolving industry, DiStefano said.

Berkeley started its Berkeley Center for New Media in 2004. In recent years, the Cronkite School at Arizona State University has launched its New Media Innovation Lab for research and development of multimedia products, and it is part of News21, an experimental program that trains students to present news in innovative ways.

"I want to make sure our students coming into the university who want to have careers and major in communications and information technology have the right curriculum and technology," DiStefano said.

The exploratory committee will make a recommendation by the end of the year, and a final decision on whether to close the J-school could be made next spring, DiStefano said.

Shutting the school could save money for the university, which is struggling at a time of declining state revenues.

"There is the possibility that some faculty and staff in the School of Journalism will be here for two or three years, and then if it is discontinued, their positions could either be absorbed for budget cuts in the future or it is likely they could be redeployed to this new entity," DiStefano said.

Voakes said he remains optimistic about his future at CU.

"Whether I am an administrator or professor, this is going to be an exciting time to be involved in journalism education," he said.

A consolidation with CU's ATLAS institute could require investment in new technology.

"Right now, we have some technology in the ATLAS program, but it could mean we will have to invest in new technology in the future. That is why we have to commit to plan for the change and see what it will cost," DiStefano said.

The news business and the role of media in a democratic society are changing at warp speed, DiStefano said.

"We must change with it," he said.

The process leading to Wednesday's announcement began in April when Doug Looney — a CU alumnus, former Sports Illustrated writer and then-chairman of the journalism school's advisory board — wrote a "white paper" to DiStefano complaining of infighting in the school.

"The SJMC (School of Journalism and Mass Communications) and its dysfunctional faculty are hopeless," Looney wrote. "Prospects for improvement are nonexistent. It should be closed."

A short time later, other members of the advisory board agreed, signing a letter to DiStefano suggesting closing the school and consolidating "our best classes, our core classes," with ATLAS in an "academic unit that is steeped in the core values of journalism and media ethics."

"This new College of News, Information and Technology would include our highly respected advertising sequence; our news writing and reporting classes; our television on-air and production classes," the letter said.

Looney applauded Wednesday's announcement, saying it is the only way forward.

"The truth is, the whole thing is dysfunctional. What they are really doing is burning it down," Looney said.

"This faculty is kind of a high-button- shoe faculty in a Nike world. They can teach looking backward great, but it's looking forward that gives them trouble," he added.

Tom McGhee: 303-954-1671 or tmcghee@denverpost.com

Friday, August 06, 2010

Robert Picton Appeal Dismissed

Fucker will rot in a cage where he belongs.
The court document.

r. v. pickton

Robert William Pickton Appellant


v.


Her Majesty The Queen Respondent



Indexed as: R. v. Pickton



2010 SCC 32



File No.: 33288.



2010: March 25; 2010: July 30.



Present: McLachlin C.J. and Binnie, LeBel, Deschamps, Fish, Abella, Charron, Rothstein and Cromwell JJ.



on appeal from the court of appeal for british columbia



Criminal law — Trial — Fair trial — Charge to jury — Accused charged with several counts of first degree murder — Crown maintaining that accused actually shot and killed victims — Trial judge instructing jury that if they had reasonable doubt whether accused shot victims they should return not guilty verdict — Trial judge subsequently instructing jury following question during their deliberations that they could find that accused was killer if he “was otherwise an active participant” in killings — Accused convicted of second degree murder — Whether trial judge’s response to jury question undermined fairness of trial and occasioned miscarriage of justice — Whether instructions as a whole, including response to jury question, adequately conveyed law on potential routes to criminal liability.



The accused was charged with several counts of first degree murder after the police found the dismembered remains of the victims on his property. Throughout the trial, the Crown maintained that the accused had actually shot and killed the women. The defence took the position that the Crown had failed to prove that the accused was the sole perpetrator, suggesting the potential involvement of others to the exclusion of the accused. On the fourth and last day of instructions to the jury, the defence requested that the trial judge specifically instruct the jury in accordance with the respective theories of the parties. The Crown consented to the request and the trial judge instructed the jury on those counts in respect of which the evidence was clear that the victim had died of a gunshot wound that, if they found that the accused had shot the victims, they should find that the Crown has proven the identity of the killer. On the other hand, if they had a reasonable doubt about whether or not he had shot the victims, they should return a verdict of not guilty. Following a question from the jury on the sixth day of deliberations, the trial judge re‑instructed the jury that they could also find that the accused was the killer if he “was otherwise an active participant” in the killings. At the conclusion of the lengthy trial, the jury returned a verdict of guilty of second degree murder on each of the counts. The accused appealed his convictions, arguing that the trial judge’s retraction of the “actual shooter” instruction on the sixth day of deliberations adversely impacted on the fairness of the trial and occasioned a miscarriage of justice. The Court of Appeal, in a majority decision, rejected the accused’s argument and upheld the convictions. The dissenting judge would have granted a new trial on the ground that the trial judge’s failure to instruct the jury on the law of aiding and abetting and how it might apply to this case amounted to a miscarriage of justice.



Held: The appeal should be dismissed.

Monday, July 26, 2010

A Guide To The Afghan War Diary

http://wardiary.wikileaks.org/

A helpful primer with extra links that make reading the Afghan War Diary easier.

Labels:

Sunday, July 25, 2010

Farewell from the Midnight Special Law Collective

Another testosterone-poisoned group implodes.

That said, my hat's off to the Midnight Special Law Collective. Some of the literature and advice they freely gave saved me more than a few times from being kidnapped and held for ransom by the state. Thank you all for all the hard work you did over the years, and please know that the fuckers that hurt your group can be found in all our activist circles.

From Denver ABC:

Farewell from the Midnight Special Law Collective
Posted on July 25, 2010 by denverabc

Midnight Special

Dear Friends,

Midnight Special has been engaging in months of discussion and critical analysis about the role of law collectives, both amongst ourselves and with other members of the law collective movement. We have also been looking at our own internal process as an anti-authoritarian collective. We have reached various conclusions: that we have been unable to break out of the service provider model; that we are dissatisfied with jumping from action to action, and leaving little infrastructure behind; that we often emulate the oppressive structures we seek to change; and that these problems are much harder to solve than we had believed.

Our final conclusion is that, because of the state of the movement and ourselves, Midnight Special will not be able to overcome those challenges. So it is with sadness and hope that we write to you today. After 10 years of work, we, the members of the Midnight Special Law Collective, are closing our doors.

We have mixed feelings about ending the collective. On the one hand, we have achieved so much over the last decade. We trained hundreds of people how to legal observe and thousands more how to use their rights to (more) safely agitate for social change. We provided legal support for some of the most significant protests of the last 10 years, from the anti-globalization demonstrations at the end of the Clinton administration to the anti-war protests of the Bush years to the protests against the financial and political bullying of the G8/G20 today. We are proud of the work we have done the the relationships that we have formed with you all over the years.

Frequently, Midnight Special has been called upon to travel and help out with radical legal support. While we are honored that the work we do is appreciated, we have found that other collectives and people doing similar work are overlooked, and their opinions are not heard. We recognized back in the year 2000 that it was crucial for us to spread our knowledge. Unfortunately, we were always better at supporting others than in organizing others to support themselves. Additionally, we have created an internal collective dynamic that validates macho behavior and has been unable to seriously address issues of gender and power within the collective. After many months of trying, we have not made meaningful progress in resolving these dynamics. That failure is what ultimately led to the demise of our collective. We state it here to encourage other political groups to take anti-oppression issues seriously.

While ending a 10 year project is never easy, this does create opportunities that did not exist before. We are now free to use what we’ve learned through Midnight Special in other work for social justice. We hope that the lessons we have learned about anti-oppression will be taken up by other projects and organizations, and into our future work. Each of us continues to believe that the movement still needs democratic and accountable legal support, for everyone who protests for social justice. Your support, as much as our work, has made that possible, and we are excited to see how legal support will grow from here. Thank you.

Yours in struggle,

The Midnight Special Law Collective

Labels: , , , , ,

Sunday, July 18, 2010

Salish Sea Naming Ceremony

How cool is that!!

Hat Tip, AK48.

Waterways off B.C.'s coast and Puget Sound get new name: Salish Sea
By KIM PEMBERTON, Vancouver Sun July 15, 2010

A body of water off Washington state and British Columbia has a new name - the Salish Sea, in recognition of the Coast Salish peoples' use of this waterway for thousands of years.

The Salish Sea encompasses inland waterways, from the south end of Puget Sound in Washington state to Desolation Sound at the northern end of the Strait of Georgia, including the Juan de Fuca Strait.

"Similar to the Great Lakes [in Eastern Canada and the U.S.], adding Salish Sea as the umbrella-name for the larger body of water will not change names already in place," stated a press release from B.C.'s Ministry of Aboriginal Relations and Reconciliation.

Minister George Abbott noted the province committed to adopting the name Salish Sea "as an act of reconciliation honouring the Coast Salish Nations and this rich and diverse marine ecosystem."

Squamish Nation Chief Gibby Jacob, speaking on behalf of member tribes of the Coast Salish, called the official naming of the waterways to Salish Sea a "historical acknowledgment of our peoples' connection to our lands and waterways since time immemorial."

Coast Salish leaders and community members met with Abbott and Lieutenant-Governor Steven Point at the Songhees waterfront for a naming ceremony Thursday. As part of the celebrations, the name Salish Sea was given to a hand-carved canoe, which was painted by the lieutenant-governor and carved by master carver Tony Hunt. Point's brother Mark also helped carve the canoe.

Steven Point is a grand chief of Sto:lo Nation and served for 15 years as the elected chief of Skowkale First Nation in the Fraser Valley.

The canoe was presented to the Canadian Navy in honour of its centennial.

kpemberton@vancouversun.com
© Copyright (c) The Vancouver Sun

Read more: http://www.vancouversun.com/news/Waterways+coast+Puget+Sound+name+Salish/3283758/story.html#ixzz0u4GB027U

Labels: , ,

Wednesday, July 14, 2010

Littwin: Got A Non-Issue? Get a Non-Tissue

Hat Tip AK48, who says "Funny how witch hunts can come back at you, sparking wildfires!"

Littwin: Got a nonissue? Get a nontissue
By Mike Littwin
Denver Post Columnist

Posted: 07/14/2010 01:00:00 AM MDT
Updated: 07/14/2010 01:38:06 AM MDT

This just in: Scott McInnis says the "Musings On Water"-gate scandal is a nonissue.

Actually, I'm not sure if he was the source here. Maybe someone else said it and then McInnis repeated it, without attribution. All I know is, I'm waiting for the moment when McInnis tells us that he is not a crook, but, hey, it's still very early in this story.

In any case, McInnis made the "non issue" statement to Adam Schrager of 9News, saying that what interests Coloradans is jobs, which is clearly true. They're interested in their jobs, and we're all interested — I promise — in seeing how you get a McInnis-style job.

In a McInnis job, you retire from Congress and then sign on for a $300,000 stipend from the Hasan Family Foundation to write a series of articles. Now, here's the good part: In writing "Musings on Water," you either copy someone else's work — making the job much easier — or you outsource the job to someone else, who then copies the work, making your job easier still.

According to McInnis, it was all a researcher's fault, even though McInnis failed to mention any researcher when he turned in the articles. Meanwhile, the researcher, Rolly Fischer, a water expert, told the Glenwood Springs Post Independent, "Scott's responsible for it."

What we know for sure is that McInnis assured the foundation in a memo that the work was "original and not from any other source." Yes, he did.

And so, it's pretty simple, really. Either McInnis cheated (plagiarizing someone's work) or he lied (getting someone else to do his work) or both, and for a neat $300,000 payoff.

And that, says the man who would be Colorado's governor, is a nonissue, even if, as The Post is reporting today, there seem to be other cases of possible McInnis plagiarism.

Lying seems to be OK to McInnis. Throwing your researcher under the bus — and then backing up over him again, just to be sure — also seems OK. It's also fair, I guess, to take $300,000 and not even check the work that you claim to be yours. McInnis won't say how much he paid the researcher. I'm guessing it was somewhere under $300,000.

And, for the record, not everyone is convinced it's a nonissue. Take the Hasan Family Foundation, which says it might want its money back, like, you know, immediately. It also says it never contracted for a researcher — but only for McInnis' actual work. The honorable thing for McInnis to do would be to return the money. But if he does give the money back, he implicitly admits that, if he were honorable, he never should have taken it in the first place.

There seems to be a slight credibility gap here — and not just for those of us who have had our doubts about McInnis' lose-the-mustache-on-a- Broncos-bet story. There's McInnis' elk-meat-for-the-poor tax story, which began when McInnis had bragged on Caplis and Silverman about how much he gave to charity — when, in fact, he would finally say that his charitable work was limited to donated elk and money given to the Republican National Committee, except, it turned out, that he hadn't given money to the RNC. His PAC had.

Meanwhile, in story after story, McInnis seems unable to remember anything inconvenient, although he did recall, and rather quickly, that someone else must have written the stuff that was stolen, under McInnis' name, from now-Colorado Supreme Court Justice Gregory Hobbs.

McInnis, who chose not to talk to Denver Post reporter Karen Crummy or, for that matter, take questions from your humble columnist, did talk to several people, including 7News' John Ferrugia.

Ferrugia asked McInnis who wrote the articles in question. McInnis said he had "assistance." When Ferrugia asked again if McInnis had written or edited the articles, McInnis dodged and feinted.

When Ferrugia asked a third time, McInnis said, "Hindsight being perfect, I would have. No, I can, I mean, the articles were written with staff assistance. Just like when I do a bill in Congress or when I did the forest plan, I had a lot of staff assistance. I had a lot of economic experts."

I defy anyone to plagiarize — or outline — the preceding paragraph. Of course, no one expects a bill written for Congress to be the work of one person. We expect a bill to be about 2,000 pages long and unreadable.

But writing $300,000 worth of articles is different. It's the $300,000 that made it seem more like a sweetheart deal than a writing assignment.

That's why this is, I'm afraid, a huge nonissue issue. Or maybe you think Ward Churchill ought to get his job back.

It's funny. Republican leaders, who are suddenly so quiet, spent all that effort to force Josh Penry out of the race and clear the way for McInnis. Now the only thing that could possibly save McInnis is the notion that if he were to drop out of the race, Dan "Mileage King" Maes would be, by default, the Republican nominee against John Hickenlooper.

That's what you call an electoral disaster. Not that you heard it here first.

Mike Littwin writes Sundays, Wednesdays and Fridays. Reach him at 303-954-5428 or mlittwin@denverpost.com.

Labels: , ,

Thursday, July 08, 2010

All Nations Skate Jam This Saturday, July 10, 2010

All Nations Skate Jam Website


Rockin out at ANSJ Denver Style – this Saturday!

Check out this awesome line-up of music at the skate jam this Saturday. Head on down to the Downtown Denver Skatepark to be a part of the action! 11:30 AM-12:30 PM Racecar Spelled Backwards (rock) 1:00-2:00 PM Gabriel YAIVA (Hip Hop) 2:30 PM – 3:30 PM Beer Boyz (SkatePunk) 4:00 PM – 5:00 PM Trickshot [...]

Labels:

Sunday, June 27, 2010

A Nation Renames Its Territory

Hat Tip, AK48, for the great news!

Giving Back The Name Ceremony

http://www.haidanation.ca/Pages/Splash/Public_Notices/PDF/Givingnameback.pdf

And a slideshow of the event:

Gallery: Giving Back the Name With Respect Ceremony
At the ceremony the Haida Nation formally returned the name Queen Charlotte Islands and restored the name Haida Gwaii during a Giving Back the Name With Respect Ceremony in Old Massett.

Read more: http://www.vancouversun.com/Giving+Back+Name+With+Respect+Ceremony/3168318/story.html#ixzz0s5VEtfxI

Labels: ,

Friday, June 18, 2010

No Price To Pay For Torture

Hat Tip AK48

No Price to Pay for Torture

Published: June 15, 2010

The Supreme Court’s refusal to consider the claims of Maher Arar, an innocent Canadian who was sent to Syria to be tortured in 2002, was a bitterly disappointing abdication of its duty to hold officials accountable for illegal acts. The Bush administration sent Mr. Arar to outsourced torment, but it was the Obama administration that urged this course of inaction.

In the ignoble history of President George W. Bush’s policies of torture and extraordinary rendition, few cases were as egregious as that of Mr. Arar, a software engineer. He was picked up at Kennedy International Airport by officials acting on incorrect information from the Royal Canadian Mounted Police. He was sent to Syria, to which the United States had assigned some of its violent interrogation, and was held for almost a year until everyone agreed he was not a terrorist and he was released.

The Bush White House never expressed regret about this horrific case. There was only then-Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice’s bland acknowledgement to a House committee in 2007 that it was not “handled as it should have been.” Since he took office, President Obama has refused to fully examine the excesses of his predecessor, but surely this case was a chance to show that those who countenanced torture must pay a price.

In Canada, the government conducted an investigation and found that Mr. Arar had been tortured because of its false information. The commissioner of the police resigned. Canada cleared Mr. Arar of all terror connections, formally apologized and paid him nearly $9.8 million. Mr. Arar had hoped to get a similar apology and damages from the United States government but was rebuffed by the court system.

Amazingly, Mr. Obama’s acting solicitor general, Neal Katyal, urged the Supreme Court not to take the case, arguing in part that the court should not investigate the communications between the United States and other countries because it might damage diplomatic relations and affect national security. It might even raise questions, Mr. Katyal wrote, about “the motives and sincerity of the United States officials who concluded that petitioner could be removed to Syria.”

The government and the courts should indeed raise those questions in hopes of preventing these practices from ever recurring. The Canadian police continue to investigate the matter, even the actions of American officials, though their counterparts here are not even trying.

The Supreme Court’s action was disgraceful, but it had stepped away twice before from cases of torture victims. There is no excuse for the Obama administration’s conduct. It should demonstrate some moral authority by helping Canada’s investigation, apologizing to Mr. Arar and writing him a check.

Labels: , ,

Monday, June 07, 2010

Israel Murders Non-Violent Protestors. So What Else Is New?

Beyond the Flotilla, the Crackdown Continues

As I read the myriad of reactions to the Gaza Freedom Flotilla tragedy last Sunday, I'm struck by one recurring theme: the sense of astonishment that these activists responded to the Israeli Navy with violence.

In other words, they didn't act according to the script. They didn't behave like proper practitioners of civil disobedience. The implication: if they had responded like the non-violent activists they were purported to be, this whole tragedy could well have been avoided.

There's only problem with this calculus: non-violent Palestinian protests have actually been ongoing throughout the Occupied Territories for years - and the Israeli military has been responding to them with much the same kind of brutality that was used against the passengers of the Mavi Marmara.

A sampling of some incidents over the past year:

- In March, 2009, Tristan Anderson, an American activist with the International Solidarity Movement (ISM) was shot in the head with a tear-gas canister during a non-violent protest, sustaining massive brain injuries.

- Bassem Ibrahim Abu-Rahma, a popular non-violent activist in Bilin, was killed when he was hit in the chest by a tear gas canister during a protest in April 2009.

- In June 2009 35 year-old Aqel Sadeq Dar Srour was shot in the chest and killed when he tried to assist Mohammad Misleh Mousa, a teenager who was shot by an Israeli soldier during a non-violent demonstration in Ni'lin. Mohammad was permanently paralyzed as a result of his injury.

- This past April, Imad Rizka was critically injured when he was shot in the head with a tear gas canister during a non-violent protest in Bi'lin

- Last Monday, Emily Henochowicz, a 21 year American ISM activist lost her eye when she was shot in the face with a tear gas canister during a peaceful protest of the flotilla incident at the Qalandiya checkpoint in the West Bank.

These are not merely isolated incidents. Indeed, they are part of a concerted Israeli military policy to crush the grassroots non-violent movements by means of lethal force, mass arrests, and detentions. As Israeli activist Jonathan Pollak observed this past December:

Over the past six months, 31 Bil'in residents have been arrested, including almost all the members of the Popular Committee that organizes the demonstrations. A similar tactic is being used against protesters in the neighboring village of Ni'ilin, which is losing over half of its land to Israel's wall and settlements. Over the past eighteen months, 89 Ni'ilin residents have been arrested.


Israeli lawyer Gaby Lasky, who represents many of Bil'in and Ni'ilin's detainees, was informed by Israel's military prosecutors that the army had decided to end demonstrations against the Wall, and that it intends to use legal procedures to do so.

The Israeli army also recently resumed the use of 22 caliber sniper fire for dispersing demonstrations, though use of the weapon for crowd control purposes was specifically forbidden in 2001 by the Israeli army's legal arm. Following the killing of unarmed demonstrator Aqel Srour in Ni'ilin last June, Brigadier General Avichai Mandelblit, the Israeli army's Judge Advocate General, reiterated the ban on the use of .22 caliber bullets against demonstrators, to no effect. In addition to Srour, since the beginning of 2009, 28 unarmed demonstrators were injured by live ammunition sniper fire in Ni'ilin alone.

Few are likely aware that non-violent protest has been ongoing within the Gaza Strip itself long before the flotilla set sail. American journalist Ashley Bates, who blogs from Gaza, has written extensively about Gaza's "Local Initiative Against the Buffer Zone" - a non-violent campaign organized by Gazan Saber Al-Zaaneen:

In July of 2008, Apache helicopters dropped fliers warning Palestinians that they were not permitted to go within 300 meters of the border. Mr. Zaaneen knew that Israeli soldiers had shot at people and destroyed farms and houses within one kilometer of the border. Feeling that Israel would continue encroaching unless Palestinians resisted, he began organizing non-violent direct actions in the buffer zones, such as accompanying farmers as they tended their fields and searching for bodies of Palestinians killed by Israeli troops and left to rot....


People of all political stripes are welcome at his demonstrations, which now occur five days per week at border areas across Gaza...Every demonstrator must not bring weapons and must commit to non-violence. "I don't resist because I want to die," he said. "I resist because I want freedom, land, education, opportunities, no occupation. This is the message of our movement. We want the whole world to know why the Palestinian people resist."

Last April, Ms. Bates reported that Hind Al-Akra, a 22 year old female protester was seriously injured when she was shot in the abdomen and seriously injured during a Buffer Zone protest. At the time, Ms. Bates wrote "it seems only a matter of time before one of the protesters gets killed."
Just five days later, her prediction came true: a protester named Ahmad Salem Deeb was shot by Israeli troops and died of blood loss shortly afterwards.

Immediately following the flotilla tragedy, Ms. Bates cited this telling observation by an ISM worker in Gaza:

I'm surprised that Israel would go this far with internationals...The reality is that they are doing this sort of thing every day with Palestinians--farmers and fishermen are killed every day.

We will likely be debating what exactly occurred aboard the Mavi Marmara for some time to come. In the meantime, similar tragedies are occurring throughout the Occupied Territories on a virtually daily basis.

They are no less worthy of our attention.

Saturday, June 05, 2010

Gaza-Bound MV Rachel Corrie Stopped, Whites Not Shot

The predominantly white-run MV Rachel Corrie has been commandeered by the pirates of the Israeli navy. Most of the activists on board are Irish. Unlike like the Turks in the flotilla on Monday, these pacifists have not been murdered.

Their white skins and slave-minded submissiveness saved them.


Navy boards, takes control of 'Rachel Corrie' off Gaza coast
By AP AND JPOST.COM STAFF
06/05/2010 15:32

PM compares quiet boarding of boat with "peace activists" to "violent extremists" of Mavi Marmara.

The boarding of the Rachel Corrie containing activists and aid for Gaza was described by Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu on Saturday as a quiet operation. Netanyahu was quick to distinguish between the boat of Irish and Malaysian activists and the Turkish-sponsored Mavi Marmara which was boarded May 31 in an incident that left nine dead and scores wounded.

"The different outcome we saw today underscores the difference between peace activists who we disagree with but respect their right to express their different opinion and flotilla participants [on the Mavi Marmara] who were violent extremist supporters of terrorists," said Netanyahu.

IDF navy forces boarded and took control of the MV Rachel Corrie Saturday afternoon. The troops did not meet any resistance from activists attempting to break the Gaza blockade, and the operation was completed without violent incidents.

The military said its forces boarded the 1,200-ton cargo ship from the sea, not helicopters. Army spokeswoman Lt. Col. Avital Leibovich said Saturday's takeover took only a few minutes and that the vessel was being taken to Ashdod port.

Prior to the takeover, three navy ships tailed the aid boat for several hours throughout the morning, a few dozen kilometers from the blockaded Strip. The army said it had contacted the boat four times and urged its passengers to divert to Ashdod, but the activists had repeatedly refused.

The IDF had said that it would have no choice but to board the ship if it did not agree to go to Ashdod.

Earlier reports had suggested that the Rachel Corrie had already been boarded in the early morning, but the army and the boat’s passenger’s later said this was not true.

The ship was trying to breach the three-year-old blockade to deliver a load of aid to the coastal territory.

"There were two warships in the back of them ... and a smaller boat was approaching," said activist Greta Berlin of the Free Gaza movement, which sent the ship. She was speaking from the movement's headquarters in Cyprus and was citing a passenger on board.

Labels: , , , ,

Monday, May 31, 2010

Peaceful Alternative To Armed Intifada Shot Off The Water

I am sure no one in Hamas is surprised to learn that Israeli thugs have shot and killed non-violent peace activists, ending the Freedom Flotilla, which was trying to bring humanitarian aid to besieged Palestinians.

Gaza Freedom Flotilla Shows Awesome Power of Nonviolent Resistance

Sometimes the Israeli occupation authorities and their allies try to project a "mad dog" image to their opponents: don't bother trying to resist our power, because we are ready to crush you by any means necessary, and no-one who matters to us will care what means we use.

But as the Israeli government reaction to the Gaza Freedom Flotilla shows, it ain't necessarily so.

Al Jazeera reports:


Some Israeli officials see the situation as potentially disastrous in terms of public relations.

"We can't win on this one in terms of PR," Yigal Palmor, a foreign ministry spokesman, said.

"If we let them throw egg at us, we appear stupid with egg on our face. If we try to prevent them by force, we appear as brutes."

You can read every word ever penned or spoken by Gandhi, King, or Thoreau, and you will never find such an eloquent expression of the power of nonviolence as the statement of the spokesman of the Israeli foreign ministry.

In the face of an effective act of nonviolent resistance, the oppressor faces two unappetizing choices: concede ground, thereby undermining the image of absolute power the oppressor wants to project, and therefore encouraging further resistance; or resist with force, thereby projecting the image of "brutes," and therefore encouraging further resistance.

You can see why the Israeli government spokesman would be irritated.

Another great power of an effective mass nonviolent resistance action is when it gives "bystanders" a choice of taking sides - whether they want the opportunity provided by that choice or not.

The government of Cyprus had the opportunity to take a side, and it decided to try to obstruct the flotilla.

This video documents how the government of Cyprus told one of the flotilla boats it wasn't welcome in the territorial waters of Cyprus. Shane Dillon, an Irishman on the Challenger 1, reports of the boat's contact with a police helicopter: "He asked us the nature of our trip, and I told him that it was part of humanitarian aid for Gaza, and he said because of this we are precluded from entering Cypriot waters...refusing us entry to the 12-mile limit of Cypriot waters is kind of strange for a European skipper ... with European parliamentarians and a lot of European people on board. It's not normal."

While the video shows how the Cyprus government kept flotilla boats from entering territorial waters, this AP story documents that the Cyprus government kept would-be flotilla passengers from reaching the boats:

In Cyprus, organizers were trying to find a way to have two dozen would-be passengers, including 19 European legislators and an elderly Holocaust survivor, join the ships anchored in international waters off the island. The Cypriot government did not allow smaller boats to carry the group to the flotilla, [organizer Greta] Berlin said.

Authorities in Cyprus said the decision was made to protect the island's "vital interests" - including economic ties with Israel.

Organizers then appealed to the Turkish government to get the group out via a Turkish-controlled northern Cyprus port. Turkish Cypriot officials have said they want to help the group as much as they can.

Given the modern political history of Cyprus, the forgoing passage is breathtakingly and bitterly ironic. Cyprus, while maintaining good relations with the Israeli government, has historically also maintained good and supportive relations with the Palestinian national independence movement. Many Greek Cypriots - the majority community on the island - have seen a parallel between the US-backed Israeli occupation of the West Bank and Gaza and the US-backed Turkish invasion and occupation of northern Cyprus in 1974, which resulted in the establishment of the "Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus," recognized only by Turkey.

It's a bitter irony for these Greek Cypriots if the "Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus" is helpful to the Gaza Freedom Flotilla while the Republic of Cyprus government bows to pressure from the Israeli government and obstructs the Flotilla. I would expect the government of Cyprus to pay some political price among Greek Cypriots for this betrayal of the Palestinians.

And that's an indication of the power of effective nonviolent resistance. Not only the oppressor, but also the "bystanders," are confronted with a choice: whether to help or allow the resisters to prevail, at least in the short-run, or whether to stand publicly on the side of brutality.

All this -- and the main confrontation between the Israeli occupation authorities and the Gaza Freedom Flotilla has not yet begun.


Follow Robert Naiman on Twitter: www.twitter.com/naiman

Labels: , , , ,

Sunday, May 30, 2010

Nobody Likes A Loser: Few Attend Denver's Memorial Day Parade

Lack of attendance at Denver's Memorial Day parade rivals its Columbus Day parade. Nobody likes bigoted baby killers who commit/celebrate genocide.

Denver's Memorial Day Parade draws small but dedicated crowd
By Annette Espinoza
The Denver Post
Posted: 05/30/2010 01:00:00 AM MDT

Shortly before 3 a.m. Saturday, eight members of the American Legion Paul C. Beck Post 23 in Aurora bowed their heads inside Fort Logan National Cemetery and prayed.

Then they put on comfortable walking shoes and carried two flags, one an American flag and the other representing American prisoners of war.

The veterans walked the distance from the cemetery to downtown, nearly 12 miles, so they could make it in time to participate in the Memorial Day Parade at 10 a.m. then participate in a flag ceremony afterward.

The veterans in the past have had a flag relay in which they would run, but many are now elderly, so they walk. They have been honoring veterans in this particular way for 15 years.

"We honor fallen heroes now and then and those who lost their lives on Sept. 11," said Richard Humphrey, 63. "We'll do this until we can't do it anymore."

Few people lined the downtown Denver streets for Saturday's annual Memorial Day Parade but many who were there would not miss it.

"It's frustrating," said Robyn Hill, whose son, Aaron Hill, 20, recently left for boot camp. "There are more people in the parade then at the parade."

Several tributes and remembrance ceremonies were held for veterans who participated in the parade, watched from the sidelines or to families who have lost loved ones.

One of those was Army Staff Sgt. Ryan Haupt, a Phoenix native who had been assigned to Fort Carson and whose last day of a tour of duty in Iraq was scheduled to be Oct. 17, 2006.

Haupt was killed that day by a roadside blast in Baqubah, Iraq.

For the past three years, his wife, Nannette Byrne-Haupt, has come to watch the Memorial Day Parade in Denver.

They had been married for only four months and the young widow was not quite sure what she was going to do after his death.

Nannette became a University of Denver graduate, then went on to earn a master's degree in sociology. She was recently hired by the Fort Carson Survivor Outreach Services to counsel other families who have gone what she's been through.

"He was my best friend in the world," Byrne-Haupt said. "We had a lot of plans. This is my way of honoring Ryan and continuing his legacy."

Annette Espinoza: 303-954-1655 or aespinoza@denverpost.com

Labels: , , ,

Friday, May 28, 2010

Illegal European Immigrants Busted

Hat Tip to an anonymous viewer, who left the link in a previous post titled "Propaganda Ad for Pro-Apartheid Arizona."



From the website joshonthestreet.com:
I already have some ideas percolating as to a follow-up video. Please stay tuned, and thanks for joining me on this journey.

In the meantime, here are a couple of my favorite comments posted on the Immigration Check Point video on Youtube:

“It’s to show us that no one is entitled to this land mass except Native Americans.

It is to remind us that this country was founded by illegal immigrants, and built by immigrants who were legal, under the laws made by the anchor babies of the illegal immigrants.

It’s really to show us how we are children on the playground, trying to kick other kids out of the sandbox that we don’t fucking own in the first place, and how weak and pathetic that is.”

Labels:

Thursday, May 27, 2010

Review: Abramoff film can't make 'pond scum' interesting

Indianz.Com. In Print.
http://www.indianz.com/News/2010/019664.asp

Review: Abramoff film can't make 'pond scum' interesting

Friday, May 7, 2010
Filed Under: Abramoff Scandal | Arts & Entertainment


"Convicted super lobbyist Jack Abramoff was so corrupt, there's no easy summary of his crimes. He and his cronies were masters of "astroturfing" -- creating phony grass-roots campaigns to hide big corporate money -- and the old-fashioned flimflam, playing one client against another. They persuaded Christian activists to fund anti-gambling campaigns against Indian tribes, who then paid Abramoff to muster congressional support in defense of their casinos. His crimes were ideally adapted to the age of complex derivatives: The web was so complicated and opaque that only when it began to collapse did its true extent become apparent.

Alex Gibney, who took home an Oscar for the 2007 documentary "Taxi to the Dark Side," struggles to get his arms around the amorphous, appalling and yet shockingly banal schemes of Abramoff in "Casino Jack and the United States of Money." Not to be confused with George Hickenlooper's fictional treatment of the same scandals (starring Kevin Spacey) scheduled for release later this year, Gibney's documentary strains to make sense of the minutiae without losing the audience's attention over its formidable, two-hour length.

Fact may be stranger than fiction, but Gibney's account comes to life only when Abramoff's bankrupt soul is revealed in strokes bold enough for satire. His e-mails, bursting with contempt for his own clients, are some of the best material in the film. And there are other golden moments, though many of them are already familiar: When we learn he committed to Orthodox Judaism after seeing "Fiddler on the Roof," that his Pennsylvania Avenue restaurant Signatures offered "liberal portions in a conservative setting," that one of his large and important-sounding front organizations was headed by a Rehoboth Beach lifeguard who charmingly confesses, "I'm not qualified to run a Baskin-Robbins."

But it's hard to assume Gibney's ironic tone and still expect to scandalize your audience into outrage. It's hard to make these dull, hollow, scheming men, who live in the perpetual testosterone-soaked locker room of adolescence, who seem to have no intellectual or spiritual depth, who take sophomoric pleasure in golf trips, sky boxes and private planes, into cinematic villains. They are pond scum -- they are Washington -- yet not quite interesting enough to be characters in a film.

So Gibney expands his focus, going for breadth when depth, at least in terms of character, is elusive. The film swells with Russian oil execs, Chinese sweatshop owners and Miami hit men. It swells in length, too, taxing the patience of even the most committed student of corruption. Ultimately, it becomes a Rorschach test of the viewer's cynicism: Does it shock you? You must not live in Washington, read the newspaper or follow politics. Are you horrified? Congratulations, and now wise up. "

Get the Story:
Movie review: 'Casino Jack' documentary centers on lobbyist Abramoff (The Washington Post 5/7)

Another Review:
Casino Jack & The United States of Money (The New York Times 5/7)

Related Stories:
Bradford: 'Casino Jack' an inaccurate account of Abramoff (5/6)
Coushatta vice chairman to attend 'Casino Jack' screening (5/4)
Indian lobbyist takes credit for taking down Abramoff (01/26)



Copyright © Indianz.Com

Wednesday, May 26, 2010

Propaganda Ad For Pro-Apartheid Arizona



Yes, Virginia. White women enable genocide, too.

Ad is from Iowapresidentialwatch.com

Labels: , , ,

Monday, May 24, 2010

Bloated Ego Breaks Bono's Back: Tour Dates Postponed

But just between you and me, I think what did the trick were the pins I've been sticking in an effigy of Bono since the day I heard U2 was coming to Denver.

Here's hoping the injury permanently sidelines this washed up, sold out, self-absorbed wanker, who really needs to give Robin Williams his face back.



Bono's Back Surgery Postpones U2 Tour
New leg of the 360 Tour was set to kick off in Salt Lake City on June 3.

By Kelley L. Carter

U2 frontman Bono has undergone emergency back surgery at a hospital in Germany, a manager for the group said. Due to the hospitalization, the first date of their tour has been postponed.

The 50-year-old singer, whose real name is Paul Hewson, was injured while preparing for the group's tour. According to a statement on U2's website, Bono is being treated by neurosurgeon Dr. Joerg Tonn and Dr. Hans-Wilhelm Mueller-Wohlfahrt.

"Bono will spend the next few days there, before returning home to recuperate,'' the statement read. "Once his condition has been assessed further, a statement will be made regarding the impact on forthcoming tour dates.''

Paul McGuinness, the band's manager, said in an MP3 posted on the website on Friday (May 21) that because of the injury, U2's 360 Tour stop on June 3 in Salt Lake City has been postponed. After that date, the band was scheduled to play in Anaheim, California, on June 6 and 7, followed by Denver on June 12 and Oakland, California, on June 16. There's no word whether other dates have been canceled.

Bono had recently told The Associated Press that sales of the group's latest album, No Line on the Horizon, have been somewhat soft, which made for U2's lowest-selling CD in more than a decade. The band also has said that the massive tour has yet to break even due to the enormous production costs of setting up and designing the 170-ton, $40 million stage.

"We hope to get things resolved as soon as possible," McGuinness said.

Update May 25, 2010:

U2 postpones US tour, including Denver stop, until 2011
By The Associated Press
Posted: 05/25/2010 08:43:02 AM MDT
Updated: 05/25/2010 08:47:36 AM MDT

Bono, of the musical group U2, performs at the opening act of the 51st Annual Grammy Awards on Sunday, Feb. 8, 2009, in Los Angeles. (AP | Mark J. Terrill)

LONDON — Concert promoters Live Nation said Tuesday that the North American leg of U2's 2010 tour will be postponed until 2011 because of lead singer Bono's back injury.

The iconic Irish band was scheduled to play a Denver show at Invesco Field at Mile High Stadium on June 12.

U2's debut gig at Britain's Glastonbury festival has also been canceled.

Bono, whose real name is Paul Hewson, underwent emergency spine surgery Friday in Munich. He has been released from hospital but doctors recommend at least two months rest.

Labels: , , , ,

Monday, May 17, 2010

An Interview with Ofelia Rivas of "O'odham Voice Against The Wall"

From solidarity-project.org. Ofelia Rivas and the Tohono O'odham people are on the front lines of the United States' and Arizona's apartheid laws and borders.
An Interview with Ofelia Rivas of "O'odham Voice Against The Wall"
Interviewed By Jeff Hendricks

Imperialism – lately this word has been re-entering debate and speech around the country. For the most part these days, the word imperialism is being used to describe the actions of the United States Government as it seeks to gain control over Middle Eastern governments and economies. The continuing occupation of Iraq by the United States is the best example of this neo-imperialism.

But imperialism is not limited to lands across the oceans, and the United States Government is currently engaged in the occupation of lands much closer to home. We must never forget that the very lands claimed by the Government of the United States in North America are claimed by nothing other than the right of conquest. The United States Government is a Government of occupation here in North America and the lands that it continues to claim and occupy are in spirit still the autonomous territories of the indigenous tribes that existed here before the first European colonists stepped foot on the continent.

Since 9-11 the United States government has ratcheted up its attacks against the indigenous residents of the United States. In southern Arizona, these attacks have come in the guise of borderland defense. The traditional O’odham residents of southern Arizona have become the victims of a joint program carried out by the Department of Homeland Security and the Border Patrol to build a border wall
across the entire 330 mile U.S / Mexico border, a 65 mile section of which will run along the southern edge of the Tohono O’odham reservation. This wall will effectively cut in half the traditional territory of the O’odham and serve to isolate O’odham villages that exist on opposite sides of the international border. To justify the building of this wall the government has once again used the fear of terrorism, as has become common since 9/11, to advance its fascistic imperialist interests.

Click here to read the entire interview in Adobe format.

Labels: , , , , ,

Sunday, May 02, 2010

Was the Gulf Oil Spill an Act of War? You Betcha

Kill, Baby, Kill.

Was the Gulf Oil Spill an Act of War? You Betcha
The Huffington Post May 2, 2010

Randall Amster
Peace educator, author, and activist

Speculation has been running rampant among certain sectors of the web-world lately about the true origins of the massive oil spill that has engulfed the Gulf and threatens marine, plant, animal, and human health in a region already beset by natural disasters and toxic industries. Unwilling to accept the mainstream media version of the story (namely that it was the result of off-shore drilling activities) and suspicious of the timing of the calamity (namely that it occurred right on the cusp of Earth Day and during a period of political contentiousness over drilling), this faction has surmised that the "trigger event" in this instance may have been (choose your favorite) either: an attack by the North Koreans; an act of homegrown eco-terrorism by leftwing environmentalists; or something to do with Venezuela, China, and/or other Communist (machi)nations. With little more than a hint from an online Russian source, the theory of a North Korean attack in particular has been gaining virulence among certain fox-trotters.

Here's a great overview of the argument from the self-avowedly conservative Dakota Voice:

"Rush Limbaugh pointed out that the explosion occurred on April 21st, the day before 'Earth Day.' He also reminded us that Al Gore had previously encouraged environmental nutjobs to engage in civil disobedience against the construction of coal plants that don't have carbon capture technology. 'Eco-terrorists' exist and have done millions of dollars worth of criminal damage. Fire is one of the main tools of their evil trade. I'm not claiming the Deep Horizon was bombed by eco-terrorists, although I don't believe it's out of the realm of possibility. But, it would take some serious money and ability to pull off an attack like that, so I would tend to think much bigger than college hippie eco-wackos with some money-backing -- a foreign government, perhaps. Of course, before I could finish writing my thoughts here, I just heard Michael Savage posing the same questions. He also said there is a theory on a Russian website that claims North Korea is behind this. The article claims that North Korea torpedoed the Deepwater Horizon, which was apparently built and financed by South Korea. Torpedoes would make sense for the results we see.... There are a number of international 'suspects' who might want to do something like this. They range from Muslim terrorists to the Red Chinese, Venezuela and beyond. Remember that China and Russia are drilling out there, as well, and they would benefit from America cutting back on our own drilling."


The article at the root of this savagery appears on the site WhatDoesItMean.com, and is titled "US Orders Media Blackout Over North Korean Torpedoing of Gulf of Mexico Oil Rig" -- which pretty much eliminates any suspense about the gist of it. The piece is attributed to one "Sorcha Faal," who either exists or does not depending upon whether you believe the link arguing a bit too strenuously that she in fact does. The article cites as its source, without further attribution, "a grim report circulating in the Kremlin today written by Russia's Northern Fleet," and argues that "the reason for North Korea attacking the Deepwater Horizon, these reports say, was to present US President Obama with an 'impossible dilemma' prior to the opening of the United Nations Review Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons set to begin May 3rd in New York. This 'impossible dilemma' facing Obama is indeed real as the decision he is faced with is either to allow the continuation of this massive oil leak catastrophe to continue for months, or immediately stop it by the only known and proven means possible, the detonation of a thermonuclear device."

In other words, all of this was designed to force Obama to use a nuclear device to seal the leak ahead of an upcoming conference on nonproliferation. Ingenious! James Bond is alive and well, apparently. Missing from the calculus (along with good sense, credibility, and verifiability) is any explanation of why the logic of this scenario will automatically result in Obama deploying a nuke, and what exactly would be gained by him doing so except (by implication) making the U.S. look like hypocrites at the negotiating table. Those dastardly cowards! Everyone knows that we don't need any help from foreign entities to hypocritically attempt to force others to hold to international standards that we will ourselves proceed to flagrantly ignore. I mean, duh.

Hey, I'm all for a good conspiracy theory as much as the next guy/gal. We certainly ought to question the "consensus reality" version of any major event communicated back to us by the corporate media. And we can logically surmise that the government keeps us on a "need to know" basis under the rubric of a closely-held "national security" ethos. So there's always reason to dig deeper, ask hard questions, check with non-U.S sources, and formulate one's opinion independent of the herd. But in this case, the impetus for the tale is so vague and thinly rendered that it strains the limits of credulity, yet it still seems to be gaining traction each day. In fact, there are even more solid reasons to suspect that this miserable episode -- which will inflict more suffering on an already-battered region -- was contributed to by the activities of a certain homegrown corporation and not any eco-nuts or commies. While the premise is thus wholly wrong, the conclusion that this was a putative act of war might actually hold water. To wit:

Oil and War: Are there any two concepts in the realm of geopolitics more closely associated than resources and warfare? Oil in particular, as the primary lubricant of the global economy, earns special status as a sine qua non of our profligate lifestyles and simultaneously as an overt security interest that triggers our military mobilizations. We know about Iraq of course, and Afghanistan to a lesser extent for its strategic pipelining location, but don't overlook places such as Venezuela, Central Africa, and the Caribbean shelf around countries like Haiti as potential sites of future conflict over Black Gold. Indeed, it might be said that wherever there's oil, there's war -- or at least the seeds of conflict over a dwindling commodity that draws the interest of governments and corporations alike. The past decade has shown, and our national security documents reflect, that the U.S. will essentially do anything in its power to control as much of the world's remaining oil supplies as it possibly can, either through direct intervention or by proxy. There's nothing light or sweet about any of this; it is almost wholly crude.

Drilling and the 'War on Terra': Without overly editorializing the point, since at least the advent of industrialization it appears that humanity has made a Faustian bargain that renders us the enemies of the earth in order to survive. Notions of complementarity and sustainability have been supplanted by consumption and separation instead. The cruel joke is that our willingness to continually flout nature's laws leaves us in a perpetual state of scarcity and requires a regular doubling-down on the very same logic that made things scarce in the first place. Thus, in order to extend the life of the petroleum economy and provide the massive energy inputs that we rely upon, we have to drill deeper and deeper to procure the substance at ever-increasing energy costs in the process. This literal sense of "diminishing returns" is compounded by the attendant toll exacted on our collective health via fossil fuels, as well as the concomitant stratification of wealth and power that subverts any pretense we still hold of democracy. Massive spills and other calamities are part and parcel of this normalization of a warlike attitude toward nature (and thus ourselves), and are blithely considered little more than business as usual by the ruling elites, as intimated in an article on care2.com: "All this is the result of dangerous and unnecessary offshore drilling, yet in a statement Friday, White House spokesman Robert Gibbs said the explosion was no reason to give up plans to expand offshore drilling. 'In all honesty I doubt this is the first accident that has happened and I doubt it will be the last,' Gibbs told reporters."

Halliburton IS the War Machine: Finally, we come to the most likely culprit in all of this, and a sure sign that indeed this is an act of war. Wherever Halliburton goes, so goes the war machine, and vice versa. From no-bid and no-account contracts in Iraq (and post-Katrina New Orleans, by the way) to a massive corporate presence in the Gulf region, these folks seem to have an acute capacity for making a buck on cataclysms of all sorts. Perhaps more to the point, they appear to be at the nexus of most disaster zones, including the erstwhile Bush Presidency and now the Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill. As a recent article in the Huffington Post notes:

"Giant oil-services provider Halliburton may be a primary suspect in the investigation into the oil rig explosion that has devastated the Gulf Coast, the Wall Street Journal reports. Though the investigation into the explosion that sank the Deepwater Horizon site is still in its early stages, drilling experts agree that blame probably lies with flaws in the 'cementing' process -- that is, plugging holes in the pipeline seal by pumping cement into it from the rig. Halliburton was in charge of cementing for Deepwater Horizon."


The Los Angeles Times subsequently reported that members of Congress have called on Halliburton "to provide all documents relating to 'the possibility or risk of an explosion or blowout at the Deepwater Horizon rig and the status, adequacy, quality, monitoring, and inspection of the cementing work' by May 7." A YouTube video (which is actually mostly audio) more bluntly asserts that "Halliburton Caused Oil Spill," and notes the fact -- confirmed by Halliburton's own press release -- that its employees had worked on the final cementing "approximately 20 hours prior to the incident." Interestingly, one commenter on the YouTube video notes how "that would conveniently explain the North Korean story; [Halliburton] may have leaked this story to the press to divert attention away from alleged negligence." Wouldn't that just be the ultimate? Halliburton spawns the calamity but pins it on North Korea, and then the nation goes to war whereby Halliburton "cleans up" through billions in war-servicing contracts. It's almost too perfect, and might be funny if it didn't seem so plausible. (The only thing funnier is picturing Dick Cheney in the role of Exxon Valdez fall guy Joseph Hazelwood.)

But hey, there's no need to get conspiratorial about all of this. And what's happening in the Gulf -- now spreading into the Atlantic -- isn't funny at all. Indeed, war hardly ever is, and that's what we've got on our collective hands here, in one form or another. As Isaac Asimov once said, "It is not only the living who are killed in war." Cherished ideals, future generations, hopefulness, the earth itself -- all are among war's many casualties. The sooner we recognize the sense of pervasive warfare in our midst, embedded in the flow of our everyday lives, the sooner we can intentionally turn that essential corner toward peace, as Martin Luther King, Jr. alluded to in his Nobel speech:

"I refuse to accept the idea that man is mere flotsam and jetsam in the river of life, unable to influence the unfolding events which surround him. I refuse to accept the view that mankind is so tragically bound to the starless midnight of racism and war that the bright daybreak of peace and brotherhood can never become a reality."


Waking up to war may in fact be the first genuine step toward peace, both among ourselves and with the environment.

Labels: ,

Saturday, May 01, 2010

May Day Fires In Greece

Happy May Day, Comrades! Resistance is Fertile.



Greek police and protesters clash as fury over economic chaos spills on to streets
By Daily Mail Reporter
Last updated at 4:59 PM on 1st May 2010

Thousands of angry protesters took to the streets of Athens today over proposed austerity measures for cash-strapped Greece.

Clashes broke out between anarchists, who threw petrol bombs towards riot police, who used tear gas to control the crowds at the May Day rallies.

Foreign Office officials were "monitoring" the situation in Greece, a popular destination for British holidaymakers. An estimated three million visited the Mediterranean country last year.

Visitors were warned they face further disruption on Wednesday, when flights in and out of Greek airports will be cancelled during a 24-hour strike.

Read more:

Labels: , , , , ,

Friday, April 30, 2010

Drill-Baby-Drill Assholes Please Report to the Gulf For Cleanup Duty

This is what corporate ecoterrorism looks like:



From Bill Maher:

"Every asshole who ever chanted 'Drill baby drill' should have to report to the Gulf coast today for cleanup duty."

Labels: ,

Thursday, April 29, 2010

U.S. Flag Recalled After Causing 143 Million Deaths



U.S. Flag Recalled After Causing 143 Million Deaths
By The Onion

April 28, 2010 "The Onion" - April 13, 2010 -- WASHINGTON—Citing a series of fatal malfunctions dating back to 1777, flag manufacturer Annin & Company announced Monday that it would be recalling all makes and models of its popular American flag from both foreign and domestic markets.

Representatives from the nation's leading flag producer claimed that as many as 143 million deaths in the past two centuries can be attributed directly to the faulty U.S. models, which have been utilized extensively since the 18th century in sectors as diverse as government, the military, and public education.

"It has come to our attention that, due to the inherent risks and hazards it poses, the American flag is simply unfit for general use," said Annin & Company president Ronald Burman, who confirmed that the number of flag-related deaths had noticeably spiked since 2003. "I would like to strongly urge all U.S. citizens: If you have an American flag hanging in your home or place of business, please discontinue using it immediately."

Added Burman, "The last thing we would want is for more innocent men and women around the world to die because of our product."

Millions of U.S. flag–related injuries and fatalities have been reported over a 230-year period in locations as far flung as Europe, Cuba, Korea, Gettysburg, PA, the Philippines, and Iraq. In addition, the company found that U.S. flag exports to Vietnam during the late 1960s and early 1970s resulted in hundreds of thousands of deaths, a clear sign that there was something seriously wrong with its product.

Despite fears about the flag's safety—especially when improperly used or manipulated in ways not originally intended—sales continued unabated over the years, potentially putting billions of unsuspecting people in danger.

"At first, we wanted one of our flags in every home in America," Burman said. "Unfortunately, the practical applications of this product are far outnumbered by the risks it presents. Millions have died needlessly, and when you ask people why, they point to the flag."

Added Burman, "Frankly, we should have pulled it off the market decades ago."

Studies conducted by the Annin & Company research and development department revealed that faulty U.S. flags have caused more than just injuries and deaths. During the mid-1950s, the flags were found to have the bizarre side effect of causing fear, paranoia, and hysterical behavior among millions of Americans. This was dismissed as an isolated event until September 2001, when similar symptoms reemerged on a massive scale.

As hazardous as the flags may be on their own, Annin & Company officials claimed the products become even more dangerous when used in conjunction with other common household items.

"When combined with alcohol, excessive patriotism, grief, or well-intentioned but ultimately misguided ideals, U.S. flags transform into ticking time bombs, just waiting to go off," Burman said.

Manufacturers are addressing the flag's unsafe and potentially lethal alignment of stars and stripes by designing a revised model that they hope will cut down on deaths in the United States and overseas, where experts say the flag is nearly 1,000 times as deadly.

In the meantime, Annin & Company is advising all Americans to either ship their flags back to the manufacturer or, if no time permits, dispose of them in an efficient manner.

"I understand that people might be reluctant to stop using a product they have found to be reliable over the years," Burman told reporters. "But I can't in good conscience allow them to use something I know to be dangerous. We'll try to make adjustments soon and come up with something that benefits everybody rather than hurting them."

Added Burman, "In the interim, I would recommend that all Americans switch to the Canadian flag, which seems to be working just fine. [as long as you are not Indigenous]

Tuesday, April 27, 2010

Jury Finds Dick Marshall Not Guilty in Annie Mae Aquash Murder

"Denise Pictou Maloney, the older of Aquash's two daughters, had said before the verdict that the case was a step toward justice, regardless of its outcome, because of the evidence that came forth.

The verdict 'was a toss, we knew that,' she said Thursday. 'But it is what it is. And in our territory, the fact that he saw my mother at his house with those people, and did nothing to help her, makes him an accessory in our eyes. And he will never be forgiven for that in our territory.'

Richard Marshall found not guilty in 1975 AIM slaying
Two defendants awaiting trial

Two other defendants in the Annie Mae Aquash case are still awaiting trial in state court. Those charges relate to incidents that allegedly happened in Rapid City before Aquash was killed on the Pine Ridge Indian Reservation.

John Graham, also known as John Boy Patton, 53, is charged with premeditated murder, felony murder committed during a kidnapping and felony murder related to rape.

Thelma Rios, 64, is charged with premeditated murder and felony murder committed during a kidnapping.

Their trial is scheduled for July 6. Both face life in prison if convicted.

Labels: , ,

Computers Seized From Home of Blogger in iPhone Inquiry

Hat tip, AK48

Computers Seized From Home of Blogger in iPhone Inquiry

By BRIAN STELTER and NICK BILTON
Published: April 26, 2010

Gawker Media said Monday that computers belonging to one of its editors, Jason Chen, were seized from his home on Friday in an apparent investigation into the sale of a next-generation Apple iPhone. Gawker suggested the action violated California’s shield law for journalists.

The technology blog Gizmodo, which Gawker owns, published articles last week about the phone after buying the device for $5,000 from a person who, according to the site, found it at a bar in California last month.

The authorities in San Mateo County are considering criminal charges in connection with the sale of the phone, which Gizmodo returned to Apple last week. Some media writers have said that Gawker Media could find itself in legal trouble if the phone was classified as stolen.

Last week, people familiar with the investigation said charges would most likely be filed against the person or people who sold the prototype iPhone, and possibly the buyer. The people were not authorized by their employers to speak on the record.

According to the warrant, officers had probable cause that Mr. Chen’s home “was used as the means of committing a felony.”

Gawker’s chief operating officer, Gaby Darbyshire, said in a letter to the authorities on Saturday that shield laws protected Mr. Chen and his computers. She said Gawker expected the immediate return of his property.

“Under both state and federal law, a search warrant may not be validly issued to confiscate the property of a journalist,” Ms. Darbyshire wrote. “Jason is a journalist who works full time for our company,” she continued, adding that he worked from home, his “de facto newsroom.”

“It is abundantly clear under the law that a search warrant to remove these items was invalid. The appropriate method of obtaining such materials would be the issuance of a subpoena,” she wrote.

Gizmodo published her letter Monday. She did not respond to a request for comment, but she wrote on Twitter that Gawker employees met “in person with the authorities” on Monday.

Stephen M. Wagstaffe, the San Mateo County chief deputy district attorney, said Mr. Chen’s computers had not yet been searched and he cited “further consideration” of the legal issues brought up by Gawker. “We are holding onto the computer; we are not searching it yet,” he said.

The investigating officer in the case, Matthew Broad, works for the Rapid Enforcement Allied Computer Team, a computer task force. Detective Broad said he had been told not to speak about the case. Apple is a member of React’s steering committee, according to a Silicon Valley / San Jose Business Journal article published last year. Officers who answered the phones at the task force’s office declined to confirm Apple’s status on the steering committee.

Gawker was clearly girding for a legal fight before the officers arrived. Ms. Darbyshire sent an e-mail message to Mr. Chen on Friday outlining shield laws for journalists.

“Are bloggers journalists? I guess we’ll find out,” Nick Denton, the founder and president of Gawker Media, wrote in an instant message Monday.

Legal experts said there was little doubt that bloggers qualified. “Of all places, California is probably the most clear that what Gizmodo does and what Jason Chen does is journalism,” said Sam Bayard, a fellow at Harvard’s Berkman Center for Internet & Society.

He said the case could hinge on whether there is an exception in the law involving a journalist committing a crime, “in this case receipt of stolen property.” He said “this seems unlikely based on the plain language of the statute.”

The dispute began early last week when Gizmodo published photos of the device.

After speculation as to the authenticity of the device, Apple’s lawyers sent Gizmodo a letter asking that the phone be returned, and the Web site did so.

Labels: , , ,

Friday, April 23, 2010

Beauty Indescribable

Yeah, that's a screen saver.


Dancing in the moonlight: The aurora borealis meets
Eyjafjallajokull's fire fountains



More pics of the Iceland volcano erupting under the Northern Lights.

Friday, April 16, 2010

Tribes Clash With Counties Over Property Taxes

Hat Tip, AK 48, who has this to say:

"Oh my goodness, nobody complains when churches or religious organizations are exempted from taxes, but when those Indians get back what is rightfully theirs, folks will holler that is unfair.

The non native folks have forgotten how they got their land in the first place, too."

Statues  depicting the various clans within the Winnebago tribe overlook a  housing development.
Nati Harnik/AP

Statues depicting the various clans within the Winnebago tribe overlook a housing development north of Winnebago, Neb., which was built on land purchased by the tribe.

April 14, 2010 from NET

Native American tribes across the country are buying back land where their ancestors lived and putting it in federal trusts. It often makes that land exempt from local and state taxes. That's leading to tensions in the counties that suddenly experience budget shortfalls as revenue streams disappear.

Acres of softly rolling farmland scattered with pools of melted snow and thick mud seem like an unlikely place for a battle. But in Thurston County, Neb., the Winnebago tribe has bought nearly 4,000 acres land, which the tribe is trying to get off the tax rolls.

And that doesn't sit well with some of the locals.

Residents Butting Heads

Farmer Teri Lamplot and her husband Joel, who are members of the National Association of Counties, say they've spent years trying to get the federal government to provide tax credits to counties that have native land in trust.

"All of the burdens are still there when you remove that tax base," says Teri, a Thurston County supervisor, while she sips coffee at Popo's Drive-in restaurant in the county seat of Pender.

She adds, "And what ends up happening is everyone else that does not have the luxury of being able to just take their land off the tax roles and not pay taxes anymore, the rest of those people have to bear the burden, and it's not right."

"All  of the burdens are still there when you remove that tax base," Teri  Lamplot says.
Nati Harnik/AP

"All of the burdens are still there when you remove that tax base," says county supervisor Teri Lamplot.

But tribal leaders disagree.

Tribes across the country have put upwards of a million acres in federal trust since 1998. Besides the Winnebago, the Pawnee tribe in Oklahoma has 1,600 acres of land in trust. Three tribes have bought land around Bear Butte in South Dakota's Black Hills.

Kenny Mallory, vice chairman for the Winnebago tribe, says thousands of acres of former tribal land are now providing taxes for the county. He says the land should have never been on the tax rolls in the first place because members of his tribe were tricked out of land ownership in the 1920s.

"A lot of times Indians owed their grocery bills -- they wouldn't pay their grocery bills. Guess what they used for collateral? Land!" he says. "And it was taken -- just like that."

He adds, "It never should have been the case, but we've had some bad agents through history. We've had bad Indian agents that were in cahoots with the farming community. We weren't educated then like we are today."

Getting Along

Leonard Peters heads the Thurston County Board of Supervisors. While three Native Americans serve on that board, Peters says it's especially difficult for them to serve both the county and their tribal governments.

"It's something that's really hard for them to do and hard for us to accept, I guess. Because whenever they put land up for trust, we oppose it for obvious reasons. We're going to lose tax revenue," Peters says.

Winnebago tribe member Danelle Smith is one of those Native Americans on the board. She's also a partner in a law firm handling Native American cases around the country, including the Winnebago's.

"There's a lot of biases and assumptions, I guess, about what one or the other will or won't do or whatever. And in my view, we're all neighbors," she says, laughing. "We all live there. Everybody has the same interests in having a good, safe, healthy community. We want economic development activities like anyone else wants for their hometown."

But when some neighbors pay taxes on their land and others don't, tensions arise -- especially when tribal issues come before the county board.

Smith says the tribal and county governments can work together to provide services to the county. And in some counties, the two governments work closely together to bolster economic development.

This scene is playing out across the country as municipalities worry about tax revenue, and Native Americans seek to reclaim their land.

Labels: , , ,