Kick him honey

Written by Ben on October 29th, 2010

Besides the interview below, Jedidiah Ayres was nice enough to review Pike for Ransom Notes: The BN Mystery Blog. Believe it or not, I’ve never met Mr. Ayres. I’ve never cleaned out his gutters, fed his dog, washed his car, gotten him drunk on expensive Scotch, or thrown a pig roast in his honor. But, yeah, I certainly would do all those things.

Pike, the new novel from Benjamin Whitmer is the most exciting debut of the year. It is a relentlessly violent tale of revenge and redemption that amount to too little, too late and features one of the most compelling protagonists this side of Charles Willeford. When we first meet Douglas Pike, he is having his twelve-year-old granddaughter, whom he’s never met, pawned off on him by his estranged and deceased daughter’s friend. He argues that he’s unfit to care for anyone, let alone a bereaved little girl, to no avail. There is no one else to do it.

Derrick Kreiger is a dirty cop with a brutally competent streak, who shoots a teenager on the streets of Cincinnati—an act that starts a riot—and is suspended pending an investigation. He won’t spend his down time idly. He’s got debts to collect on, favors to call in and loose ends to tie up in order to save his career and life.

With Rory, an amateur fighter he represents, in tow, Pike sets out to uncover the truth behind his daughter’s demise. The sad story of her life is revealed in layers that point him toward dark corners of the Kentucky/Ohio region. He may not have killed her, but he never helped her either. If Pike had a conscience, this would bother him.

The rest.

 

Pike’s peak

Written by Ben on October 29th, 2010

Jedidiah Ayres has posted an interview with yours truly over at Hardboiled Wonderland.  As you’d expect from Jedidiah, his questions were really smart; I just tried to keep up.

Benjamin Whitmer’s novel Pike is the most exciting, kick ass debut of the year. There, I said it, the book backs me up. Set in the harsh wilds of rural Kentucky, Ohio and on the streets of Cincinatti, Pike bristles with danger, menace and mortal volatility. The bleak, rugged physical terrain mirrors the psychic and emotional interiors of each character who have been put through hells as diverse as the intentions that paved the way.

At the book’s opening: Douglas Pike is a hard bitten old timer who grudgingly takes custody of the twelve year old granddaughter he’s never met on occasion of her mother’s death. The girl is as hesitant to go with him as he is to take her, but neither has many options in life. A bent cop named Derrick Kreiger murders a kid in broad daylight and incites a riot on the streets of Cincinatti. When he’s suspended from the force, he goes on an end fastening mission that leaves more than a couple bodies in its wake.

The characters Whitmer assumes you’ll love as much as he does, do awful things. They have terrible lives and bloody comeuppance, but his skill and compassion as a writer wont let you dismiss them as irredeemable. The ferocity of this book is something special and signifies the arrival of a major new talent and voice in fiction. Put Whitmer’s next one, whatever it may be, squarely at the top of my anticipation list.

The rest.

 

Small town hell

Written by Ben on October 28th, 2010

From a great piece about noir in small towns by Paul D. Brazill, posted on Day Labor, CRIMEFACTORY’s new blog.

And look at Frank Capra’s terrifying noir classic ‘It’s A Wonderful Life’ Poor George Bailey has plans the see the world and have adventures. But will those resentful hicks of Bedford Falls let him go? No! So, he tops himself. But even in death he can’t escape. A supernatural creature appears and drags him back ‘home’! It’s like that Sartre play where hell is other people, it really is.

And scariest of all, Bill Murray starts Groundhog Day as a funny and intelligent man but after being tortured by repeating the humdrum routine of a uber-bland town he loses his spark and his wit so much that he even fancies Ali Macdowal, or whatever she’s called. Now that is chilling!

The rest.

Speaking of which, CRIMEFACTORY #5 is available as .pdf, for Kindle, or in print. I’m about halfway through, and it’s fucking fantastic.

 

Denver crime blotter

Written by Ben on October 27th, 2010

For awhile there We Heart Denver was retweeting everything I posted, so I was doing this on Twitter. But they’ve gone under and I don’t bother with Twitter much anymore, so I’m back to doing it this way.

My favorites in recent Denver crime, mostly taken from West Denver Copwatch and ‘Til it Breaks.

 

More tools

Written by Ben on October 26th, 2010

Another question about the novelist’s tools posed to Faulkner during one of his University of Virginia lectures:

Unidentified participant: Sir, do you look at your humor as a—with the same inspiration as you do a serious thing, or is it more a relaxing kind of work?

William Faulkner: No, no, it’s a part of man, too. It’s a part of life. That people are—there’s not too fine a distinction between humor and tragedy, that even tragedy is—is in a way walking a tightrope between the ridiculous—between the bizarre and the—and the terrible. That it’s—possibly the writer uses humor as a tool, that he’s still trying to—to write about people, to write about man, about the human heart in some moving way, and so he uses whatever tool that he thinks will do most to finish the—the picture which at the moment he is—he is trying to paint, of man. That he will use humor, tragedy, just as he uses violence. They are tools, but an ineradicable part of life, humor is.

 

Dancing with myself

Written by Ben on October 23rd, 2010

Nigel Bird’s been doing a great series of interviews with crime writers where they ask themselves ten questions, and he was kind enough to ask me to join in. (I cheated a little bit, I’ll admit, and solicited some of the questions from folks on Facebook.)

I’m just back from the Lake District. For those who haven’t been there, it’s a truly beautiful part of the world and it rains a lot.

On the motorway, just before our final turn off, the last services available were at a place called Killington Lake. I like the idea of using that for a name of a character at some point, but if you want to get there first, go ahead – just make sure I get to read the tale.

Being with the family has been a real treat and there’s also been something of marathon running in there (now I know how the bloke who walks it wearing a deep-sea divers suit feels). Great to go, great to be back.

I’ve missed posting interviews very much.

Delighted then that, as I come up for a lungful of air, tonight I can put up this piece by Benjamin Whitmer. The air around him smells fresher and cleaner than the Lakes, at least that’s the way I imagine it from all the way over here.

Here’s something about his novel that I ripped from the ever reliable Spinetingler:

“This is nightmare, hunker-down-in-your-soul, how-deep-can-you-dig, release-the-fucking-bats territory.”

If that isn’t enough for you, read the rest of the review at:

http://www.spinetinglermag.com/2010/07/22/pike-by-benjamin-whitmer-review/

Dig the cover, dig the title and dig the interview:

Benjamin Whitmer one and all…

The rest.

 

Appeal

Written by Ben on October 21st, 2010

I’m late on this one, having been out of town, but Ward Churchill’s attorney David Lane made his appeal yesterday to overturn Judge Naves’ overturning of a jury verdict that found that the University of Colorado had fired Professor Churchill for exercising his Constitutionally protected free speech. Which, of course, they did. There was nothing quite so validating as watching Colorado regents and politicians slide to the stand like pigs down a chute and then get butchered by David Lane. You couldn’t even count the number of times they perjured themselves.

Here’s David Lane, from a Westword piece:

“There’s no doubt about it — Judge Naves’s decision was a politically motivated decision,” he maintains. “And if it’s left to stand, then academic freedom and tenure mean absolutely nothing in any public university.”

In his address before the court of appeals, Lane says he argued that “the judge erred in vacating the jury’s verdict and granting immunity to the regents — and he also erred in dismissing our claim that the investigation launched by the regents to study every word ever written or spoken by Ward Churchill was a violation of the First Amendment separate and apart from the termination.”

CU’s regents “targeted him because they didn’t like his 9/11 essay, which is what the jury concluded,” Lane continues. “But the judge gave them immunity after the jury basically convicted them — and that has huge First Amendment implications. That means the regents could stand on the front steps of Regent Hall and say, ‘We’re firing the following 25 professors because we disagree with their politics’ and they’d have as much immunity from lawsuits under the ruling as a judge does.”

Regarding CU’s side of the story, Lane says, “They basically recycled the same argument they made to Judge Naves — that Ward Churchill got fired for plagiarism and fraud, and the university gets to decide if people violate their rules.” But in Lane’s view, the regents “are convicted civil rights violators, and the jury already rejected that very argument.”

There’s no time frame on when the court of appeals will issue a ruling — and if the decision goes against Churchill, he won’t meekly accept it, Lane says: “The remaining steps in this case for whichever party loses is to ask the Colorado Supreme Court to review it, and Ward Churchill is ready to go there. And we can also ask the U.S. Supreme Court to review it, and he’s willing to do that.”

Lane adds that he’s received friends of the court briefs from “many organizations that are extremely interested in seeing that the Constitution is protected here, including the Society of American Law Teachers, the American Association of University Professors, the ACLU, the National Lawyers Guild. That’s very unusual.”

The rest.

Here’s video of David Lane and Ward Churchill:


Also here’s complete audio of David Lane’s arguments.

I’ll have more in a few days, when I’ve had some time to listen to the audio and think about it. At first blush, it seems obvious: CU’s argument is that CU is not answerable to the United States Constitution, and can violate it at will. Hell, as determined by a jury, they’ve already done so: now they want the right to do so with impunity.

I always kind of wonder where the local Constitution Party is when this issue comes up. Or the Tea Party. Of course, for all their horseshit, they’re not really too up on what the Constitution actually says, anyway.

Here’s the thing: if you’re a writer, your agin’ this shit. You don’t have a choice. You can dislike what Ward Churchill said — I don’t, but you can — but when it comes to the First Amendment, you protect it if you’re a writer. This particular freedom is the water you swim through. It’s your entire environment. Only the most feeble-minded or cynical kind of hack could reserve the First Amendment for only certain kinds of speech.

Unfortunately, of course, as I’ve been learning my entire adult life, there are lots of feeble-minded and cynical hacks out there.

 

My first (and probably only?) reading review

Written by Ben on October 20th, 2010

Maybe I’m just naive, but it’s actually nice to know such things exist, media folks attending book readings. And, of course, I couldn’t help but love the following from the Daily Californian:

Five authors from PM Press‘ ”Switchblade Series” of socially-conscious potboilers presented on Friday night, including Benjamin Whitmer, Summer Brenner, Gary Phillips, Michael Harris, and Kenneth Wishnia. Particularly notable where the excerpts from Whitmer’s gritty Appalachian whodunit “Pike,” which sounded something like a prose-ified version of a Nick Cave Murder Ballad.

So what else could I do but post this?


 

Just in case I didn’t express clearly enough what Bouchercon meant for my liver

Written by Ben on October 19th, 2010

I believe the expression for my eyes at this stage of the night would be, “like two piss-holes in a snowbank.”

Stole the snapshot from Cameron Ashley. Hope he doesn’t mind.

 

Bouchercon wrap

Written by Ben on October 18th, 2010

Bouchercon was a gas, even the parts of it that were very much just another convention. I loved all the panels I saw and I loved talking to the readers. There was some of the expected horseshit, where writers griped about their panels and whined about their sales, but whatever, somebody’s gotta do it.  Talking business bores me fucking senseless, but then, that might be just me.

If I had gripes, the first would be that I don’t understand some of the animosity aimed at literary writers. It came up over and over again, how crime writers never get taken seriously as literature, and how literature is bullshit anyway, because it isn’t written for the reader. No matter what the tag, I assume we’re all doing the best we can to write the best book we can when we’re writing it. I got real tired of hearing about how all the literary writers get all the credit. I know a bunch of wonderful literary writers who don’t nearly get the credit the deserve, just like I know a bunch of literary writers who don’t make any sense to me at all. But if you’re doing the best work you can — if you are, to paraphrase James Lee Burke, leaving hair on the walls — then I don’t understand what the hell the complaint is.

The second gripe would be hearing the constant admonition that you’ve gotta make sure your stuff’s commercial above all else — that one should never question the editor/publisher/publicist, that your only obligation is to the market. If there was one thing that made me furious, it was hearing folks get bashed, and I mean absolutely eviscerated, from the podiums for daring to think that they should follow their own vision when writing a book.

If all you do is write fantasies for some reader dreamed up in somebody else’s mind, then God bless you. I don’t see a thing in the world wrong with that. But for those of us trying to do something different, back off. My only criteria is that I’m writing the best book I can when I’m writing it, and that it’s got something to say about the things I’m thinking. That doesn’t mean I don’t take feedback, but it’s my name going on the book, and if I’m not proud of it as the best book I possibly write at the time, then what the fuck is the point? (And if there was ever a need for a musical interlude, it’s now.)

That said, I had a ball. You couldn’t imagine a more inclusive and helpful crowd. I didn’t meet a single person face to face who wasn’t gracious and wonderful. As a first time novelist, it was pretty daunting to be kicking around a convention with a bunch of, y’know, real writers. But not only did nobody call me out as a fraud and beat me with anything, everybody was incredibly nice.

A real high point for me was getting to meet a gang of crime writers and readers I’ve just been discovering on the internet. Hopefully Greg Bardsley doesn’t mind, but I stole this picture from him.

On the left is Cameron Ashley, the mastermind of Crimefactory, who flew in from Melbourne, Australia. To the right of him is the mighty Jimmy Callaway, known as “Jimmy the Worm,” who had the distinction of putting Lee Child in a headlock at some point during Child’s annual Reacher Creature cocktail party. (I didn’t see it, but I had the honor of drinking with the gentleman afterwards.) Then, the guy with the goofy grin and the deer in headlights look, that’s me. But after that is Jason Duke, known to his friends as “Sarge,” and worthy of the title. And last, but certainly not least, was Greg Bardsley, who I would trust to lead me pretty much anywhere in San Francisco.

There are also a couple of people who weren’t in the picture that I wish were: Matt Funk, who’s writing the kind of stuff that I have the feeling is gonna be everywhere in a couple of years; and Kieran Shea, the patron saint of Bouchercon cut-ups.

I’ll have more about the brilliant series of readings set up by PM Press and all the incredible people I got to meet on those soon. When they end, that is. I’m on the Ramsey Kanaan road show, so I’ve still got two nights left. (Not that that’s a complaint. It’s a hell of a road show, and if there’s anybody in the publishing world working harder than Ramsey I don’t know who the fuck it is.)