In the NFL, the Violence Comes to a Head

With each passing week, I hear from football fans saying that it's getting harder to like the game they love. They've spent years reveling in the intense competition and violent collisions so central to the sport, but this is the first time these NFL diehards feel conscious about what happens to players when they become unconscious.

 

In August, to much fanfare, NFL owners finally acknowledged that football-related concussions cause depression, dementia, memory loss and the early onset of Alzheimer's disease. Now that they've opened the door, this concussion discussion is starting to shape how we understand what were previously seen as the NFL's typical helping of off-field controversy and tragedy. When Denver Bronco wide receiver Kenny McKinley committed suicide, the first questions were about whether football-related head injuries led to the depression that took his life. When the recently retired Junior Seau drove his car off of a cliff the day after being arrested for spousal abuse, questions about whether head injuries sustained during a twenty-year career affected his actions, soon followed. Such conjecture is not only legitimate; it's necessary and urgent.

 

This season a typical NFL game is starting to look like a triage center. On concussions alone, a reader at deadspin.com compiled the following list of players who have borne the brunt of a brain bruise in 2010:

 

Pre-Season: Ryan Grant, Hunter Hillenmeyer, Joseph Addai, Mark Clayton, Nick Sorensen, Aaron Curry, DJ Ware, Louis Murphy, Scott Sicko, Mike Furrey, Darnell Bing, Freddy Keiaho

Week 1: Kevin Kolb, Stewart Bradley, Matt Moore, Kevin Boss, Charly Martin

Week 2: Clifton Ryan, Jason Witten, Randall Gay, Craig Dahl, Zack Follett, Evan Moore

Week 3: Anthony Bryant, Cory Redding, Jason Trusnik

Week 4: Jordan Shipley, Willis McGahee, Jay Cutler, Asante Samuel, Riley Cooper, Sherrod Martin

Week 5: Aaron Rodgers, Darcy Johnson, Jacob Bell, Landon Johnson, Demaryius Thomas, Rocky McIntosh

Week 6: Josh Cribbs, Desean Jackson, Mohamed Massaquoi, Zack Follett, Chris Cooley

 

In assessing the list, the most striking aspect is its randomness. There is a mix of star quarterbacks, shifty running backs, burly tight ends and anonymous linemen. All play different roles in the game, and all wear different kinds of equipment. Sports Illustrated writer Peter King, after a weekend where he says he saw "six or eight shots where you wondered, ‘Is that guy getting up,' "proposed some solutions: "It's time to start ejecting and suspending players for flagrant hits…. Don't tell me this is the culture we want. It might be the culture kids are used to in video games, but the NFL has to draw a line in the sand right here, right now, and insist that the forearm shivers and leading with the helmet and launching into unprotected receivers will be dealt with severely. Six-figure fines. Suspensions. Ejections.

 

King's suggestions are not unlike those who told 1950s children to hide under their desks case of nuclear attack. The hits that cause concussions aren't just the kind of helmet-to-helmet collisions that make King shudder but often come from routine tackles. Frequently, brain bruises aren't even diagnosed until the game has ended. In other words the most devastating hits are often the most pedestrian. This was seen in utterly tragic fashion during Saturday's college contest between Rutgers University and Army. Rutgers linebacker Eric LeGrand was paralyzed from the waste down on a play described as a "violent collision." But if you look at the replay, the only thing "violent" about the play is its horrific outcome.

 

It's also not, as King writes, "the culture" that celebrates this violence. It's the NFL itself. The video games that the NFL promotes and sponsors deliriously dramatize brutal tackles. Highlight shows on the NFL Network relish the moments when players get "jacked up." Anyone who saw HBO's Hard Knocks, their behind-the-scenes look at the New York Jets preseason, heard it loud and clear. Whenever a player would "jack-up" the opposition, Coach Rex Ryan would whoop and yell, "That's a guy who wants to make this team!"

 

Here's the reality check to Peter King and all who want their violence safely commoditized for Sunday: there is no making football safer. There is no amount of suspensions, fines or ejections that will change the fundamental nature of a sport built on violent collisions. It doesn't matter if players have better mouth guards, better helmets or better pads. Anytime you have a sport that turns the poor into millionaires and dangles violence as an incentive, well, you reap what you sow. It is what it is. I think it's a waste of time to feel "guilty" about being a football fan. If people are disgusted by the violence visited on these players, they should vote with their feet and stop watching.

 

If people are at peace with the fact that they are enjoying something that wrecks people's bodies, then that's their business as well. But for goodness sakes: if you are to remain a football fan, at least support the players in their upcoming negotiations with ownership. Reject the idea of an eighteen-game season as "good for the game." Reject the idea that players need to have their pay cut for the league's "financial health." Reject the idea that owners shouldn't have to contribute to the medical well-being of players after they retire. Recognize the humanity of the carnage on the field so you can do something to support the humanity of players when the pads come off. That's what I pledge to do… for now. But in the interests of full disclosure: I might be a Desean Jackson-Dunta Robinson moment away from ditching the game for good.

10 Reader Comments | Add a comment

comment

what i have to say is the redskins sucks and its funny that one of your players got hit hard to get unconscious. the redskins will never make it to the supuerbull. the redskins got lucky that greenbay missed the fiedgoal kick in over time but next time the greenbay will smack the redskins ant time any where.

Re: Comment

Justin,

Your dizzying grasp of the language makes me wonder how many times you've been concussed. Then again, if you are from Wisconsin, that explains everything.

Oh, and I am no Redskins fan, but you should probably know Washington has been to the Super Bowl five times -- and won three of them.

Injuries Galore

I agree with DZ that the proposed 18 game schedule will only increase the amount of injuries to an unknown level. I do have reservations about the "culture" question DZ raises. The NFL violence of the game because the public is turned on by it. Do you the fan would watch flag football with the same intensity/or numbers?

The media also share responsibility. I'm reminded of my local TV sports anchors complaining of too much fighting in the NHL, and yet what do they show on their sports segments? You guessed it: hockey players fighting.

Another issue that needs to be addressed is the players themselves. I've heard players talk about the violence in condoning ways. One player stated that nobody put a gun to his head and forced him to play. I'd be interested to see what the players" views are on this issue.

With respect to poor players turned into millionaires by such a violent game that is just DZ being DZ.

James Harrison

http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/10293/1096626-100.stm

Personally, I don't blame Harrison at all if he retires. If I was Dan Rooney, I would make it perfectly clear to my players, as well as the league, that I will personally pay every fine that my players receive for excessive tackling. I agree with you Dave: If you don't like it then don't watch.

Players' Fault?

Football has always been my Sunday ritual, wherein I excuse myself from observances of the Sabbath to watch hulking menaces collide with one another. I watch boxing, too. I do enjoy the contact nature of the game, but I don't enjoy the injuries; I find it hard to believe that NASCAR fans watch races just for the accidents, or even in large part for them. What can be said about soccer applies to football; I watch football to see a beautiful play.

Back in 2009, the NFLPA was already investigating means to avoid the incidence of concussions and their later in life repercussions. Jump to 2010, and the happy commish and his cronies are foisting onto players' backs a decision to suspend and fine players for violent and in their words, "devastating hits", completely disregarding the cult of violence associated with the game, which owners and the NFL have profited from, taking the lion's share. They have co-opted the ends of the NFLPA, and embedded a punishment in their decision. Will fans still enjoy the bad-boys, the Chad Ochocinco's of devastating hits, or will they fall in line, too? Just as the Pink Campaign shifts into overdrive, so too will Operation Blame the Players. Dubiously, this radically strengthened approach to the game occurred weeks before bargaining starts between the owners and the NFLPA.

I was watching the post-game report on Monday night, where Steve Young debated with the Dilf, among others, about the consequences of this rule change. I was incensed over the Dilf's questioning as to whether this ruling changes football as we know it, but then I thought more about his comments. Players know that their careers are on the line, that their money comes from big hits, and the commish has saddled the players with the threat of punishment without acknowledging the hidden hand of the NFL in guiding a game, that, each Sunday reinforces a repetitive culture of concussions.

save me

Oh Zirin save me please.Tell me how to live my life..You as a concerned liberal can run my life better then I could.Please dont MAKE me play the game of football.Evil,mean spirited game that it is.Guarentee my health Zirin please.Save me from me....

This is your concern

If the recent spate of concussions is what makes you wonder, then your concerns for the players is pretty small. We know that concussive impacts are horrible and sub-concsussive impacts are pretty awful as well. To say that the next big hit is what may drive you from the game is no better than Peter King.

poor players?

Racist Moi: Poor players rarely become millionaires because they never make it to the big leagues in any sport. However, there are many fine players from impoverished backgrounds, including some from our colonies, that do make it to the big time. I think 18 games is overkill in all meanings of that term. The players already do a minimum of 19 games, not to mention full dress practices. The lucky ones add on two more plus a pro-bowl.

To Dennis

Thanks for the correction. I'm still curious to find out what the current players' views are toward the violence of the game. Would there be a split between offensive and defensive players. Just asking.

To Dennis

Thanks for the correction. I'm still curious to find out what the current players' views are toward the violence of the game. Would there be a split between offensive and defensive players. Just asking.

10 Reader Comments | Add a comment

PLEASE NOTE: This forum is for dialog between Edge of Sports readers. Discuss!

Submit your comment below:

Your Name

Email

(Only if we need to contact you—not for advertising purposes)

Subject

Message

Dave Zirin is the author of the book: "Welcome to the Terrordome: The Pain, Politics and Promise of Sports" (Haymarket). You can receive his column Edge of Sports, every week by going to dave@edgeofsports.com.


Please become an Edge of Sports Sustainer (Click Here)


Contact him at edgeofsports@gmail.com