Enemies of Reason Poundshop potshots at the media moral maze.

23Oct/100

A victory for greed

WILL YOU WIN £50? WILL YOU? MIGHT YOU WIN £50? THINK ABOUT IT. FIFTY POUNDS IS A LOT OF MONEY TO YOU.

GREED. GREEDY. DO YOU WANT THE MONEY? DO YOU? DO YOU WANT IT? IT MIGHT BE INSIDE. DON'T BE BAD GREEDY LIKE THE BAD GREEDY MAN. BE GOOD GREEDY. TAKE THE MONEY. MONEY. FIFTY POUNDS. THINK OF ALL THE CORNED BEEF YOU CAN HAVE WITH THAT. MONEY. REAL MONEY. IS REAL MONEY INSIDE? MONEY. COLD, HARD CASH. FIFTY POUNDS WILL BUY YOU AN AWFUL LOT OF DAILY MAILS. WHY NOT BUY MORE DAILY MAILS WITH THE FIFTY POUNDS YOU FIND INSIDE THE DAILY MAIL? WALLPAPER THE WHOLE HOUSE WITH IT. USE IT TO STOP LEAKS IN THE BATHROOM. LINE THE BUDGIE'S CAGE. GO ON. FIFTY QUID. FIFTY WHOLE BRITISH POUNDS. GREEDY. GO ON, GREEDY. THERE MIGHT BE MONEY IN THE PAPER. GO ON. YOU LOVE IT. YOU BLOODY LOVE IT. GO ON. BUY THE PAPER. BUY IT. THERE MIGHT BE MONEY INSIDE. REAL, CRISP, LOVELY MONEY. MONEY. YOU LOVE MONEY, DON'T YOU? I THINK YOU DO. I THINK YOU LOVE IT. DO YOU LOVE IT? YOU LOVE IT. HAVE THE MONEY. GO ON. ENJOY THE MONEY. MM, LOVELY MONEY. YOU COULD BUY A WHOLE BOX OF TWIXES, JUST FOR A LAUGH, AND THEN THROW THEM AT DUCKS ALL DAY. WHY DON'T YOU DO THAT? YOU WANT TO REALLY. BUT YOU CAN DO ANYTHING WITH MONEY. REAL MONEY. LOVELY MONEY. GORGEOUS, BEAUTIFUL, POUTING CASH. MONEY. YOUR MONEY. MONEY FOR YOU. MONEY THAT'S YOURS. FEEL IT CRINKLING IN YOUR FINGERTIPS. OH YES. MONEY. THE LOOK OF IT. THE FEEL OF IT. THE SMELL OF IT. OH YES. THAT'S THE SMELL OF MONEY ALL RIGHT. THE MONEY YOU WANT. THE MONEY WE'RE GOING TO GIVE YOU. BECAUSE WE WANT YOU NOT TO BE GREEDY. NOT GREEDY LIKE THE BAD MAN AND THE OTHER BAD MAN DOWN THERE. NO, YOU'RE NOT GREEDY LIKE THEM. YOU JUST WANT SOME MONEY. WHAT'S WRONG WITH THAT? NOTHING, I'LL TELL YOU WHAT'S WRONG WITH THAT. NOTHING AT ALL. GO ON, BUY THE PAPER AND GET ANGRY AT THE GREEDY MAN. AND YOU MIGHT GET SOME MONEY. PROPER MONEY. MONEY YOU MIGHT ENJOY. MONEY YOU CAN HAVE ALL FOR YOURSELF. MONEY. HAVE THE MONEY.

Filed under: Uncategorized No Comments
22Oct/105

Nadine Dorries and blogging

You can call Nadine Dorries a blogger in the same way that you can call me an artist because I once did a colouring-in book when I was a kid. (And, unlike her, I didn't cross any lines.) But finally, I think that everything's come home to roost with Dorries. Now is the time for anyone with any sense to realise that she is not to be trusted, and cannot be trusted. We are talking about a self-confessed maker-up of facts who admits to her blog being 70 per cent fiction and 30 per cent fact.

There is, of course, an alternative reason as to why she might say that - she might be using the '70 per cent fiction' story as a way of avoiding closer scrutiny for what she's written on her blog. But then that would mean she's fabricating the truth. So she is either making stuff up, or making stuff up about making stuff up. This is an elected representative who breezily admits that the things she tells her constituents are not the whole truth. Not even mainly the whole truth - mainly not the truth.

Props to Tim Ireland for clinging on like a barnacle to the Nadine Dorries story, despite all the disgraceful abuse he has received in that time. You should read his post here for a comprehensive descriptions of the layers of deception and intrigue that have been going on for so long, and which are now without question laid open for all to see. Read the backstory and judge for yourself.

But the key thing is this: when you admit to making stuff up, you're going to have to realise that your reputation, such that it is, is going to take a huge dent. You're going to have to face facts and admit that people aren't going to trust you as much as they previously might have done, even those who have been your backers when all seemed set against you. Everything you have ever said is going to be called into question. What was part of the 70 per cent fiction, and what was part of the 30 per cent fact?

But then, that's the thing about admitting to making stuff up. Is the 70 per cent claim just another made-up claim? Is that worth trusting either? Is anything worth trusting any more?

Again, it's worth remembering that this is an MP with constituents. Someone whose previous behaviour - gleefully calling Dr Evan Harris 'Dr Death' at the last general election - should have been warning enough. But will it be? Will Nadine Dorries still be wheeled in by the BBC when they need a Tory spokesperson, despite her admission of fiction? How can we trust anything she says, when she herself admits that what went on the blog was likely not to be true than it was to be true?

It's sad because this is the kind of thing that drags all bloggers down. But I would urge you not to look at the likes of Dorries as examples of bloggers, but the likes of Tim instead. I do wonder, though, whether people will or not.

21Oct/1016

Why I don’t want Thatcher to die

It's funny, but the feeling that's crept across me over the past few days, upon hearing that Margaret Thatcher is ill and might not make it, is not one of joy. I thought it would be, but it isn't. No, the overwhelming feeling is something approaching disappointment, and sadness.

Sure, if you'd asked me a week or so ago whether I'd be happy at the imminent death of someone whose entire worldview and actions I find despicable, I'd have said yes. I'd have said more than yes; I'd have been dancing through the streets in a giant sombrero, shooting fireworks into the night sky, singing Ding Dong The Witch Is Dead. I'd have been delighted at the thought of Thatcher finally getting in a grave so we could all piss on it.

Not now.

Maybe I'm getting more mature in my 30s than I was when I was younger. Maybe I don't find the idea of an elderly lady snuffing it all that appealing. But I don't think that it's that, either. I still do wish ill and death upon people that I don't like, and I don't see anything tremendously wrong with that, and I don't think that's going to change. I've wished her, and others, ill in the past, and I don't really regret it, though that nastiness seems to be going away a little, the older I get, the closer I get to snuffing it myself, the nearer me and my friends and family get to an appointment with a furnace.

But there's more to it than that.

The reason why I feel sad is that I want Margaret Thatcher to live a long and healthy life - and I think all self-respecting lefties should, as well. And I'll tell you why. I want her to live, to see a day when the things she believes in are not just discredited, and despised, but overturned, and consigned to the wreckage of history.

I want her to live, to see a day when she is rightly regarded as a poisonous and terrible influence on Britain and the world - not just by the usual suspects, or by those who suffered at her hands and those of her friends Botha, Reagan and Pinochet, but by the vast majority of people.

I want her to live a long and full and healthy life where she can see that the things she did were truly disastrous - and, while, I don't wish ill upon the country and I hope that I'm wrong about the effect of her heirs' cuts on the country, I want her to live to see the day that her brand of me-first neoliberalism is shown to be a horrific stain upon the world, and not a solution to anything at all.

You might say I'm naive. I'm used to being called that. But I do think that, regardless of what I think of the vile woman, she believed she was doing the right thing. You might argue against that, and I don't mind, but if I'm right, and she did, and she could live long enough to be shown that everything she believed in was wrong, that would be better than her dying now, frail and old, in a hospital somewhere, to the ringing endorsements of right-wingers everywhere.

If she dies now, it's perfect timing, in a way. You can see David Cameron carrying on the torch from her at her deathbed. The cry of "Let's do it for Maggie!" will go up. The obituaries will be glowing towards the 'Iron Lady' and her legacy - I have a feeling they always will be, I'm afraid - in the newspapers who eagerly enjoyed her policies then, and who eagerly enjoy her successors' policies today.

No. I don't want her to die and I don't want her to suffer. I want her to live. I want her to live to see the day when she's proved wrong. I want her to suffer remorse and regret for the things she has done, not slip away from this life feeling free, with a sense of righteousness and vindication. I know that's probably a stupid thought, and one which is ridiculously doomed, but I don't care. I don't want her to suffer, and I don't want her to die. Not until the day she's shown to be wrong and acknowledged to be wrong by the vast majority of people.

And then she can go to hell.

Filed under: Uncategorized 16 Comments
21Oct/1019

The gifts that Santa forgot

Dear Santa,

It's October, and a lot of people will be thinking that it's too early to be thinking about Christmas. Not me. I'm always thinking about Christmas. Where Eagles Dare, tins of Quality Street, watching the tinsel spin around the room after a gallon of eggnog... you know the kind of thing. Who wouldn't want that every day? Roy Wood was fucking well right. And besides, I've been down the Co-op. It's fucking well full of the shit. After Eights... Roses... Turkish Delight... Matchmakers... you know, all those things with which we celebrate the birth of Jesus Christ and our eventual path to eternal life.

Anyway, I'm rambling a bit. Look, I write to you every year, and every year I have one, very simple request. Bring me a fucking Scalextric. I don't ask for much. Really, I don't. Sure, I'm 35 years old and supposedly nowadays I'm meant to be getting grown-up presents, like Drakkar Noir, or hygienic nasal clippers, or a pair of bloody novelty socks that have got lights on the side and play Jingle Fucking Bells or We Wish You A Merry Cunting Christmas, about ten times, before you stick them in the wash or smash them with a toffee hammer after a couple of cans of McEwan's on Boxing Day. I know that's what I am meant to ask you for, nowadays.

But I want a fucking Scalextric.

Don't fuck around with some sort of generic plastic model racing cars on a track, either. Oh no. My grandparents tried that back in 1983, and they soon found out just how wrong they could be. It's a fucking Scalextric or nothing, all right? With decent cars. Formula One cars, or banger racers, or something. Don't fuck about. Just give me the fucking Scalextric. All right?

I feel that, on this occasion, my tone may have strayed somewhat from my normal friendly words of pleading, and this is a lapse for which I can only apologise. On the other hand, if you'd fucking well brought me a fucking Scalextric, I wouldn't have to be so nasty, would I? I'd have my Scalextric, and I'd be happy, and I'd just be asking for other things, like the bloody Dunlop Bridge, or a grandstand full of shit looking spectators that you have to spend hours painting with Humbrol, which ends up running onto the newspaper, and then it gets stuck and you rip it off, and then the paint comes off with it, and you start crying and throw the whole lot against the wall, and it stains, and you cry even more at the hopelessness of it all, and... I appear to have wandered from my main point. But you get the general idea.

Much love and kisses at this special time of year. And yes, I have been a good boy this year. Well, apart from that. But could you blame me?

Love,

Anton Vowl.

For some of us it was the Scalextric; for others, the Star Wars figures or the Mr Frosty. Funnily enough I did have the Mr Frosty, and he was ruddy brilliant! But I know that must be a cold steel knife to the heart for those of you who didn't get one. I know how much it must hurt. Well, let's see this as some kind of group therapy for us all. Is there something that Santa never brought you, which you still haven't got, all these years later as a grown-up? Do you flick through the kids' section of the Argos catalogue with a wistful sigh and a tear in your eye? If so, confess it below, and perhaps through sharing the pain we can get through all of this.

Filed under: Uncategorized 19 Comments
20Oct/1022

Austerity cuts new age of misery meltdown drinking game special

How are we going to get through the next few hours, then? Not just the impending doom, of course - though the shock-doctrine flamethrower that's about to be taken to the public sector is going to be pretty strong meat - but the television and radio coverage of it. As is I believe traditional in these times, I think a gentle drinking game could be in order. Let's get the gallows humour and bunker mentality right to the fore. Think Dad's Army defending the pier. Think Mike Morris in the final days of TV-AM. Think Titus Bramble attempting to stop someone quite good from getting past him. Yes, we all know it's hopeless, and we're doomed, but let's try and get through it somehow... with a campfire, a sing-song, and by getting wrecked together.

So, scrape out the last dregs of booze from the cupboard that will soon be bare, set them up in front of your television, and let's make this all pass as painlessly as possible. While the small-state fatcats go around spraying champagne today, let's actually drink something. See you in the morning, with a massive hangover, on the way to the job club.

Patronising analogy from Government minister about debt - TAKE A DRINK. "Let's say, for example, you borrowed something on your credit card, you would have to pay that back, wouldn't you? This is about MONEY which you have, but if you OWE someone else MONEY then you are in DEBT. And it's like someone having DEBTS and then going out SHOPPING. I am trying to make it EASY for plebs like you to understand because you are THICK."

"This is all Labour's fault" - TAKE A DRINK. Phrases like 'our hands are tied by Labour', 'we inherited this mess from Gordon Brown' and 'this crisis is Labour's legacy' certainly count.You might find this is the killer by the end of the day.

Nick Robinson looking/sounding smug - TAKE A DRINK. As you know, I'm no fan of Robinson, but he has a chance to redeem himself today by being something other than smug. In the unlikely event that he can't manage that, though, you must take a drink. And it's going to be pretty hard to avoid him during the course of the day - he's going to pop up everywhere. Jumping down from the ceiling, leaping out of the fridge - "Not now, Robbo!" - he's going to be everywhere, whether you like it or not.

Pointless graphic that tells you nothing about anything - TAKE A DRINK. You'll be comatose at a bus stop by noon if you're watching Sky News. Yesterday's analysis of defence cuts, including whizzy graphics of giant boats and planes flying past the presenter was so crushingly poor that you ended up hoping that one of the Tornados would spear him in the nuts. But no, he just kept on wittering away.

Vox pop of 'ordinary' people who all hate the public sector - TAKE TWO DRINKS. "We asked this family of ordinary folk what they thought. John, you work in the public sector and you'd be on the dole tomorrow if this happened, what do you think?" - "Oh, this is all Labour's fault, I'm glad they're cutting back the public sector, they're all chancers, I can't stand them, I'm glad I'll be down the Job Club, I deserve it..."

Inane comparison of private and public - TAKE TWO DRINKS. "I have a small business and treat my staff really badly, but people are allowed to have holidays and take time off sick in the public sector, almost as if they care about staff or something. They're not living in the real world..."

"They're not living in the real world..." - TAKE TWO DRINKS.

Complaint from Government spokesman/shill about how the evil media are all secret lefties by daring to say anything about cuts being possibly anything other than wonderful - TAKE THREE DRINKS. I fear we may hear a lot, especially on the BBC, about how the dreadful state-funded scum would be bound to complain about their gravy train ending up in the sidings, or how they're all dirty Trots anyway. "Oh well of course the BBC would say that" - charge your glasses.

Andrew Neil with barely concealed erection - TAKE FOUR DRINKS. If only to wash away the memory.

Robert Peston growling like Chewbacca - TAKE FOUR DRINKS. Just for the hell of it.

Shoe-horning-in of immigration - TAKE FIVE DRINKS. "Of course this crisis wouldn't be so bad if we had control of our borders, and why can't we just sack them if jobs need to go?" - it always amazes me at the creativity of xenophobes, but they won't be resting today. You'll see them turning up.

Depiction of anyone on benefits as a 'scrounger' - JUST DOWN THE WHOLE BLOODY BOTTLE. Yes, there's someone somewhere who gets ten billion billion pounds from the taxpayer and lives in a 93-room mansion with a trillion kids, so that means everyone's on the take, especially the evil disabled, who are all probably all right to pop down the coal mine anyway, malingering scum.

Lots of middle-aged fat white men who are all going to be completely untouched by the cuts, sitting around in a nice warm studio talking about why everyone else needs to be dumped out on the scrapheap as if they really do share the pain of it all - HIT SELF IN FACE WITH BOTTLE, COLLAPSE IN HEAP ON BLOODSTAINED CARPET, SOBBING ABOUT GENERAL ELECTION RESULT, WAKE UP AT 3AM, HATE SELF, REPEAT.

Filed under: Uncategorized 22 Comments
19Oct/1013

Humankind’s greatest achievement

Throughout history, we mud-chucking barbarians have waited in the shadows for quantum leaps of science to lift us out of our ignorance. The wheel, the telescope, the jet engine... and now, I'm here to tell you that I have experienced the latest leap in human understanding, one that will propel us out of the dark ages and into a glorious future.

This is our Icarus moment. This is what science is actually for. Forget twatting around with microscopes or launching rockets into space, and all of that shit; here's something that genuinely benefits us all - something we can be proud of. When our grandchildren look at us and ask what contribution our generation made to the world we live in, we can smile, and simply point at this:

Just take it in for a moment. Your eyes are probably telling you that you're not seeing what you're seeing. "What trickery is this?" you're probably saying to yourself, as your brain refuses to process what your eyes are seeing. But it is true. I am here to bear witness to what I have seen - but not just seen. I've tasted it, on my recent holiday. I have tasted science. I have tasted the fruits (and nuts) of the land beyond the scientific stratosphere. And let me tell you, the blueberry and hazelnut Pringle is Neil Armstrong. It is Darwin and Wallace. It is everything that we as a species have ever achieved, and perhaps ever achieve.

Sure, it's a crisp, but it's a fucking fruit and nut crisp. Fuck yeah! Straw for your poetry, your prose, your works of art; this is science, people. This is what science should be doing. Not fooling around with planets or tinkering with bacteria; oh no. When the world comes up with fruit and nut crisps, then you can truly say, yes, this is the 21st century, at last. Sure, I appear not to be hovering to work on a jetpack just yet - a horrific lapse from those so-called 'scientists' who rule our lives and who lied to us via nice old Raymond Baxter and Maggie Philbin on Tomorrow's world - but I can forgive science for that, so long as there are wonders such as fruit & nut crisps.

I have never seen such delights in this country, however. Perhaps Pringles think that British people are sawdust-tongued fools who aren't ready for the joys of fruit and nut crisps. Perhaps they think we'd go mad if we were exposed to such heights of flavour. Maybe they think we'd go giddy and start rioting in the streets - and maybe they'd be right. Maybe we don't deserve fruit & nut Pringles. Maybe they're too good for the likes of us. Can we be trusted? Would we burn people in wicker Pringles tubes? We very well might. But should we be denied the chance to reach for the stars? Who has the right to stop us? It's a poser.

All I do know is, they are fucking delicious.

Filed under: Uncategorized 13 Comments
19Oct/1013

Marr’s attacks

I'm back. I had a great holiday. England is cold and dank and slate-grey and full of grumpy people. I knew I was home when I saw a miserable-looking old lady in a cyan coat at a bus stop with a tartan shopping trolley. And then I read about Andrew Marr saying that bloggers are 'inadequate, pimpled and single' while I was away.

Sigh.

It's tempting, isn't it, to start off by saying "Ooh Andrew Marr, who the hell is that fuck-ugly Michael Gove doppelganger to judge others by their physical appearance, the weedy little runt; is he just getting back at others for the repeat bullyings he inevitably endured at school?" - but that would be the lazy blogging of crude stereotype; that would play into his hands and go some way towards proving his point. One could even bring up that thing about Andrew Marr; but again, that would be wrong too (so don't do it in the comments, please); that would be exactly the kind of nasty blogging that he's obviously read, and didn't like, so why go and confirm his prejudices by playing up to them?

No. And besides, Andrew Marr does have a point. A lot of bloggers are inadequate fools, let's not deny that. I'm paraphrasing here, but someone (I think it was Suzanne Moore) said they'd been to a blogging event and it hadn't dispelled the notion of bloggers as sad men masturbating in the spare bedroom. Well, that's kind of what a lot of us are: tragic loners tapping away at a keyboard; losers who blame their own failures and misery on the shortcomings of others, and transform that supposedly righteous anger into swearing and abuse; anonymous cowards who wouldn't squeak at anyone 'in real life' but who develop an online persona that's crusading, powerful and mighty, all the things they in reality lack.

It's a fair cop. And Marr was only having a dig to raise a chortle at some literary event; you can see why someone might be a bit sneery about the online world as opposed to the printed one at such a thing, and maybe he was just playing to the gallery. I don't think he's sly enough, either, to have made the comments hoping for a wave of disapproval that would have made his point more elegantly than he could ever have done. No, he just said what he said, and that's fair enough. I don't mind at all.

The only thing I would say is that there isn't a taxonomy of bloggers, just as there isn't an easy way to spot a journalist, for example - though you can always have a bash at the latter. (Do they wear corduroy? Do they smell of booze at 8am as if they might have slept in a skip? Do they look a bit shy, and are overcompensating by shouting on the telephone? If they weren't in a newsroom, would they look out of place shuffling around a library all day in soiled, crumpled clothing? Are they driving a really rubbish car? Do they look like they got dressed in the dark, and yet somehow seem proud of the fact? And so on...) But just as not all journos are like that, not all bloggers are scratchy, marginal characters, 40-year-old virgins or pissant keyboard warriors; some of us actually have lives, and are reasonably ordinary, even pleasant, in real life. No, really.

And Marr is wrong, mind you, to bring up the hoary old 'blogging will never replace journalism' silliness. At the risk of setting up a strawman, since (as someone pointed out to me a while ago) accusing someone of setting up a strawman is becoming something of, er, a strawman, it's a bit of a strawman. I've probably mentioned before I'm doing this thing on Friday, where me and other sad pimpled inadequates will be discussing blogging and journalism and that; can I say now and give fair warning that anyone who says 'blogging will never replace journalism' will get a slap round the face with a dirty, oily old salmon from me? Because that's not the point and it's never the point. No-one wants blogging to replace journalism or supersede it; no-one seriously thinks it will, completely, either. Good blogging can and will complement good journalism, while bad blogging, like bad journalism, drags everyone down. And it's healthy to have some of the old guard challenged by new writers - they'll either up their game or get washed away with the tide. Competition is good for all of us, rubbish amateurs like me and established silky craftsmen like Marr.

So while it's tempting to stick two fingers up to someone like Marr, he's a mainly harmless cove really. He's got a bit of a point, as well. Though it's not true of all of us. I think. Hope. Something.

1Oct/109

See you in a bit

There will be a bit of a lull for a couple of weeks, as I'm off somewhere nicer. Just as it was getting interesting, as well. Never mind, I'll pick up where we left off.

In the meantime, let's celebrate the holiday season!

Oh, sorry David.

Tagged as: 9 Comments