Feeds:
Posts
Comments

This is the annual refresher training for response police officers at F Division, Ruralshire Constabulary:

Officer Safety Training (Self Defence, Restraint, Conflict Resolution) – 1 day.

Emergency First Aid – 0 days.

Emergency/ Duty Driving training – 0 days.

Mass Casualty/ Major Incident training – 0 days.

New legislation/ law training – 0 days.

Contrast this with the following, also for response police officers here in Ruraltown:

Diversity Training (organised on the Division) – 1 day.

Diversity Training (organised by the force) – 4 days, 1 e learning package and 1 ‘workshop’.

Health & Safety in the workplace (in the office more like) – 2 days, 1 workbook, 1 e learning package.

Crime Performance training – numerous ‘input’ sessions, daily ‘briefing slides’ and weekly begging emails.

Having listened to the harrowing accounts from the 7/7 inquest, bearing in mind the fact that officers from this Division are assaulted on a weekly basis, considering that most of the people we arrest are drunk and don’t want to be arrested and thinking of the death or serious injury that can occur if a police vehicle crashed at high speed; why on earth do we keep training for things which rarely if ever happen (I can’t think of a single complaint by a member of a minority group against any of my officers ever) and blatantly ignore the basic policing skills we need?

The answer is simple. No prospective senior officer ever lost a promotion over a Constable being battered on the street. Police traffic accidents can blamed on the driver (even if they were desperately trying to meet the allegedly scrapped ‘policing pledge’ response times).

As for major disasters; an officer using the term ‘manhole cover’ is their definition of a major disaster these days. That, and a failure to meet the targets which the Government ‘scrapped’ 4 months ago.

Announced today for serious criminals; a further discount on any prison sentence for pleading guilty, and no more recall to prison if they break their licence conditions once they have been released early (unless it is a serious breach, whatever that means).

We already know that you can get as little as four years for stabbing a man to death, or nothing at all for the assault and torture of a child with autism.

I had to laugh when I heard a minister explain that scrapping policing targets would also save some of the money needed from the criminal justice sector. I laughed because today, almost at the same time as that statement was being made, I was looking at a ‘performance pack’ consisting of no less than twelve separate ‘public confidence’ measures. You remember, the public confidence we scrapped. The ‘public confidence’, the scrapping of which will save money?

As one reader has commented ‘we could lose 4% without blinking’ if they cut the right teams, but they won’t.

And despite the hand wringing over future budgets, still no sign of any depreciation in the value or quality of German engineering in the SMT parking spaces.

Some people complain that police stations are closed after ‘office hours’ and even when they are open, there are no staff to see callers at the front office. Also, people complain that no one answers the phones at local police stations.

A good few years ago, Front Counter duty was a regular feature for probationer constables. Recently my team had to cover the front counter at one of our rural police stations for a week. We saw a total of three people in five days, two of whom were criminals ‘signing on’ as part of their bail conditions and one of whom was a Polish truck driver, lost in the lanes around the town.

National Response Times have forced everyone out of the nick into fast cars, so there is no one left to answer the phone. It’s best to call the county police call centre.

The force recently spent the equivalent of Rooney’s wages on a complete ‘make over’ of all the front offices in the Shire. This was part of some American corporate nonsense called ‘improving our outward facing presence’ and was part of the now-scrapped-but-not-scrapped Public Confidence agenda.

The staff still attend the desk all day seeing no one and the public still prefer to use the telephone and internet to contact us. Having said that, if you do have to sit around on your own all day it is nice to have brand new surroundings. I wish all police stations were open all the time, but there simply is not the demand. A&E would never stay open with only three casualties a week.

Policing minister Nick Herbert’s article in the Sunday Telegraph would be more helpful if his assertions were not based, yet again, on a terrible misunderstanding.

His insistence that targets have been abolished.

He writes ‘So we have scrapped national targets and the policing pledge’ and then ‘We are cutting out unnecessary forms’. Nothing could be further from the truth. Since the new government took the reigns we have been burdened with more red tape and targets. Chief Constables have simply renamed the national targets and adopted them locally. Herbert then writes about ‘a risk averse internal culture’ but fails to realise that this is caused by the very targets he claims we no longer have.

Risk Aversion is mainly caused by the ‘public confidence’ agenda; when ‘bad news’ stories damage confidence, they damage our ability to meet public confidence targets. ‘Media Strategy’ is now a major priority in the decision making process for any incident. Officers will now routinely build risk averse tactics in to their operational plans to avoid what we call ‘damaging public confidence’.

If Nick Herbert is going to insist that ‘it matters what people think’ of what the police do, then the police will do what they think the people believe matters, not what may be operationally necessary. Hence; risk aversion.

In the same newspaper this Sunday, Jan Berry is quoted as reporting that ‘Performance culture is huge and while the government has rightly removed a lot of the targets, at a local level targets are alive and well’. I hope they speak to each other.

Gadget Note: We still have a team on this Division alone, who spend their day auditing, monitoring and administering the policing pledge and public confidence targets Herbert thinks he has scrapped. If it is happening here in Ruralshire, it is happening everywhere.

I think it is probably well known  by now that here in Ruralshire, you need to virtually kill someone to go to prison for more than a few weeks. I have also been banging on (for what seems like far too long) about the uselessness or the so-called community sentences, fines and early release programmes for violent prisoners.

While we are on the subject, it’s probably worth my mentioning that the various drug and alcohol treatment programmes are also a waste of time, with over 80% of criminals (because that is what they are) re-offending either during the programme, or shortly afterwards.

I have never claimed to be a psychologist, I have no idea and little interest in why these things don’t work, I just know that they don’t. And we have to support the victim’s shattered lives, take the blame for crime in Ruraltown and quite often get a good kicking in the process of arresting these people. I know it’s my job to deal with these things, but when I joined the police I had no idea that I would have to deal with the same offenders time and time again.

I had no idea that such hateful people could cause so much damage to so many victims and continually get away with it. I had no idea that the powerful liberal elites would take us to a place where these people are regarded as victims themselves in some way, not just the first time or the second time, but in a huge number of cases hundreds of times.

Once again, after highlighting issues in the Shire, readers have sent in information which shows that we are not alone:

Are we supposed to feel some sympathy for Luton’s Judge Richard Foster?

Poor Judge Foster feels that he has been “pushed into a corner” by the fact that he must now send Danny Baker to prison for a few weeks (he will not serve the whole 12 weeks sentence; they never do) after an incident in July 2008 at the Old Oak pub in Arlesey during which he punched a man in the face, fracturing his eye socket. Baker (with a previous record as long as your arm) could have been dealt with at the time of course, but he wasn’t. He was given a a 12-month community order, 80 hours unpaid work and a three month nighttime curfew. He was also ordered to pay £200 compensation.

Baker failed to attend for the work in June after already having been being given a second chance. He had only completed seven hours out of the 80 hour order.

Or what about the case of Jack Bolton, Andrew Griffin, and Nathan Marshall (all with previous criminal records) who used a mobile phone to film themselves carrying out depraved assaults on their 17-year-old victim. The terrified teenager – who suffers from Asperger’s syndrome, a form of autism – was also pelted with dog mess, had his limbs scratched with sandpaper and was forced to drink vodka and gin until he passed out.

Mobile phone footage showed the yobs laughing and joking as they made him endure other abuse and, in a final humiliating assault, they applied adhesive tape to his genital area before ripping the tape off. Judge Jonathan Geake imposed three-month curfews on them and ordered them to carry out 80 hours’ unpaid community work as ‘an intensive alternative to custody’. When exactly did it become acceptable for a non-custodial sentence to be handed out to people like these?

And what of Frederick Doe, Michael Tebbutt and Samantha Vander, who subjected a fellow train passenger to a ‘volley of punches and kicks’ and repeatedly stamped on his head after he asked them to keep the noise down.

Captured on CCTV, the trio were then seen laughing and celebrating – apparently revelling in the violence. The assault continued for several minutes before another passenger came to the victim’s aid and separated the group.

On Friday, each defendant was handed a four-month suspended sentence and 300 hours’ community service by St Albans Crown Court, in Hertfordshire.

Apart from the empowerment of criminal attitudes and the moral argument of leaving these sociopaths unpunished, showing them that they are stronger than us and free from any real danger of consequences, I have three main issues with this lack of proper sentencing. First, it makes society a really dangerous place to be. Second, it creates real and unnecessary suffering for victims. Thirdly, it makes it impossible for police forces to effectively deal with crime. I hope the new elected police chiefs realise that it doesn’t really matter what they think they can do with a police force to make things better; as long as these thugs and criminals carry on, free to carry out their grisly and sinister business, we will always be at their mercy.

I know personally of criminals with records of violence and dishonesty going back several decades who are still escaping custody today. Every police officer in the land knows of people like this.

 

 

 

Older Posts »