Chilean miner Florencio Avalos is embraced by President Sebastian Pinera after he reached the surface as the first of the 33 trapped miners to be hoisted to safety, at the San Jose mine in Copiapo in this October 12, 2010 handout photo. The 33 trapped miners began the trip of nearly half a mile through solid rock in a shaft just wider than a man's shoulders on Tuesday night, as their two month ordeal after a cave-in draws to an end. REUTERS/Jose Manuel de la Maza-Chilean Presidency/Handout

Editor's choice

A selection of our best pictures from the past 24 hours.  Full Article 


    Iran blasts World Bank for refusing loans

    Related Topics

    WASHINGTON | Fri Oct 8, 2010 5:32pm EDT

    WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Iran on Friday accused the World Bank of "discriminatory behavior" for refusing to authorize new development assistance to the country.

    Iran's Economy Minister Shamseddin Hosseini, in a speech to the World Bank and International Monetary Fund plenary session, said development and humanitarian assistance was not part of U.N. sanctions, imposed by major powers on Iran to curb its nuclear development.

    He said the refusal by the global lender since 2005 to consider a new lending strategy, known as the Country Assistance Strategy (CAS), for Iran went against the Bank's articles of agreement.

    He said the World Bank's actions were depriving a member country of developmental resources.

    "The shocking point is that, based on inquiry made from the legal department of the World Bank, the developmental and humanitarian projects are excluded from the imposed sanctions on Iran," Hosseini said, "in no section of the legal opinion reasons can be found to reduce relations and not financing such new projects."

    U.S. lawmakers have pressured the World Bank led by Robert Zoellick, an American, not to lend to Iran and have threatened to withhold U.S. funding to the poverty-fighting institution if it approves new lending.

    According to the World Bank's website, the global lender has not approved new lending to Iran since 2005. It said that Security Council resolution 1737 (March 2007) on Iran, while calling on member states and global organizations to refrain from making new financing available to Iran, exempts humanitarian and development activities conducted by international financial institutions.

    "As we have informed the (Iranian) authorities, because of recent sanctions and uncertainty surrounding individual banks, we are reviewing all our disbursement arrangements," a World Bank official told Reuters.

    Hosseini said in his meetings with the World Bank, officials had cited U.N. sanctions and "negative opinion of some countries" as reasons for not lending to Iran.

    "My core question is whether these behavior is based upon good governance or political observations?" Hosseini said.

    Citing specific clauses in the Bank's articles of agreement, Hosseini said the World Bank was "forbidden to have any kind of interference with the political affairs of the member countries nor can be influenced by the political inclination of members countries".

    He said even though the Bank had halted disbursement of already approved loans to Iran, it continued to charge interest and other fees.

    (Reporting by Lesley Wroughton; Editing by Andrea Ricci)

    Comments

    Oct 08, 2010 6:08pm EDT

    Surely if Iran can spend $$$BILLIONS$$$ on nuclear development and receive $$$BILLIONS$$$ from the sale of its OIL, it doesn’t need money from any outside source, for development. Have Iran spend its OWN MONEY; instead of getting loans from the World Bank or IMF, that it refuses
    to repay. And that money will go to development of a nuclear BOMB. We aren’t all stupid.

    burkes Report As Abusive
     
     
    Oct 08, 2010 7:08pm EDT

    The people of Iran really need a regime change.

    Nobody likes that little dictator.

    BR7 Report As Abusive
     
     
    Oct 08, 2010 8:01pm EDT

    Iran is much more democratic than many countries financed by the World Bank. Its current policy is unfair and plainly illegal.

    Heretic1 Report As Abusive
     
     
    Oct 09, 2010 2:43am EDT

    didn’t Ahmadinejad just recently say in a speech that Iran was doing fine and didn’t need anyones help and the sanctions didn’t effect Iran? Whatever happened to that?

    SonOfUSA Report As Abusive
     
     
    Oct 09, 2010 3:04am EDT

    I personally feel that there is mutual distrust between USA and Iran. Both the countries need to respect each other, sit together and share their respective concerns. The only common goal should be the welfare of the international community. None of them should behave in a partial manner or should have ulterior motives. Can they do this?

    I am sure that there will definitely be peace, if they follow the above principles.

    anjaligeetha Report As Abusive
     
     
    Oct 10, 2010 2:21am EDT

    anjaligeetha..how in the world can you write those words and keep a straight face. The Iranian government is among the most oppressive on the planet. Sanctions are finally starting to get the attention of their leaders. The words that come out of Mahmoud Ahmadinejad are offensive to practically everyone on then planet. They have isolated themselves. Stoning a women for adultery? These leaders need to go away. Who’s welfare do you think the Iranian leaders are looking out for. God bless the U.S. for keeping the heat on these small minded men.

    xyz2055 Report As Abusive
     
     

     

     
     
     
    Add a Comment
    *We welcome comments that advance the story directly or with relevant tangential information. We try to block comments that use offensive language or appear to be spam and review comments frequently to ensure they meet our standards. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters.