Thursday, October 14, 2010

Family of slain Detroit cleric is 'hurt' by probe

By JEFF KAROUB The Associated Press
Thursday, October 14, 2010

DETROIT -- The son of a Detroit mosque leader killed during a shootout with the FBI said Thursday he and his family are disappointed and hurt by a U.S. Justice Department report clearing agents of any wrongdoing.

Omar Regan said the federal review into the death last October of his father, Imam Luqman Ameen Abdullah, lacked sufficient evidence to prove his father's death was justified. He hoped the report released Wednesday would reveal violations by FBI agents during the raid in a Dearborn warehouse that included dozens of federal, state and local law enforcement officers.

"We hurt - we really hurt, and we're disappointed in the Department of Justice," said Regan, who was joined at a news conference by Christian, Muslim and civil-rights leaders. "It's been nearly a year. I honestly had high hopes that they would honestly see injustice. It's clear to everybody on the ground level that it was not legitimate."

Abdullah's widow, Amina Abdullah, also attended but declined to speak on advice from her attorneys.

Regan and others at the meeting said there's no additional audio, video, ballistics or other evidence to support the FBI's claim that his father shot or even possessed a gun. Abdullah was shot 20 times when agents tried to arrest him on stolen-goods charges.

The report concludes that "the evidence indicates that each of the FBI agents who fired his weapon had a legitimate reason to believe that deadly force was necessary and reasonable in order to prevent Imam Abdullah from shooting agents with a handgun that he brandished and fired."

The report also concluded it was not unreasonable for other agents to release a dog to help subdue Abdullah as he resisted. And it said that the agents who handcuffed and searched him once he was subdued neither injured him nor used unreasonable force.

The assistant attorney general for civil rights, Thomas E. Perez, met with Abdullah's family in Detroit on Wednesday and later with representatives of interested local groups to explain the department's findings.

The agents were previously cleared by Michigan Attorney General Mike Cox, and a 300-page report from the Dearborn Police Department backed up that decision.

Lena Masri, attorney for the Council on American-Islamic Relations' Michigan chapter who also is representing Abdullah's family, said the federal report's findings are based on interviews with four agents who fired weapons and they were conducted seven months after the shooting. She said the report lacked statements from other agents and nongovernmental witnesses.

"They're asking us to accept the statements of four shooters," she said.

Masri said the family is reviewing reports and documents and seeking more information from various law enforcement agencies. It will consider filing a wrongful death lawsuit later.

Dawud Walid, executive director of the council's Michigan chapter, said his group and others continue to call for the Justice Department to review the FBI's use of informants in mosques. He said the government failed to probe the potential misuse of informants "acting as agent-provocateurs in this case."

Federal authorities have described Abdullah as the leader of a radical Sunni group that aims to create an Islamic state within the U.S. Authorities say Abdullah preached hate for the government and encouraged followers to commit violence, especially against police and federal agents. According to court records, Abdullah had even warned that "it will be straight-up war" if the government engaged with him.

Abdullah's family has denied that he was a radical cleric.

"I know who my father was," Regan said.

New Orleans Judge May Limit Defense Options in Glover Case

The burnt-out car on a Mississippi River levee in which Henry Glover's remains were found.

The New Orleans police officers charged with shooting Henry Glover and burning his body might not be allowed to use the defense that they were just following orders if federal prosecutors get their way.

Our partners over at the New Orleans Times-Picayune have the details here.

Five current or former officers -- David Warren, Gregory McRae, Lt. Dwayne Scheuermann, Lt. Travis McCabe, and Lt. Robert Italiano -- are charged with playing roles in Glover’s death, as well as the beating of two men who attempted to rescue him and the subsequent cover-up.

Following a report from ProPublica, PBS "Frontline" and the Times-Picayune that high-ranking officers in the NOPD issued orders authorizing police to shoot looters in the days after Hurricane Katrina, prosecutors asked U.S. District Court Judge Lance Africk to ban the defense from using that argument.

Lawyers for the officers have argued that orders from NOPD commanders -- including the order about looters -- illustrate the environment police were operating in.

Though the prosecution has argued that the defense should not be able to employ the "following orders" argument, prosecutors plan to use it themselves, the Times-Picayune points out. Prosecutors have said they will argue that McCabe told federal investigators that he acted on orders from supervisors when he drafted a false report about the Glover incident.

Henry Glover was shot on Sept. 2, 2005, near a strip mall in the Algiers neighborhood of New Orleans. According to his friend, Bernard Calloway, who was with Glover that day, they were there to pick up some stolen goods. Glover's brother and a neighbor, Will Tanner, took Glover to a nearby police compound, hoping to get help. Instead, they were beaten by police while Glover remained in the car. Glover's remains were later found in a burnt-out car on a Mississippi River levee. See our original reporting on the story here.

Warren, McRae, Scheuermann, McCabe and Italiano were indicted in June.

Doing Exactly As They Have Been Trained

by Abby Zimet Common Dreams.org

Disturbing videos of detainee abuse - subtle, mental and degrading, not Abu-Ghraib-brutal - has been released by Ethan McCord, the veteran who wrote the "Open Letter of Reconciliation & Responsibility to the Iraqi People" after his Bravo Company's actions were captured in Wikileaks' "Collateral Murder" video. Their behavior, he stresses, is the norm.

"While your anger may initially be placed with the soldiers in the videos, I think your anger should be directed towards the system that trained them."

Brutal repression in the Acropolis as riot police attack workers

Libcom.org Oct 14 2010

Riot police beat and tear-gas workers within the Acropolis, one journalist injured.

The moment was acutely symbolic for a country that brags about itself as the cradle of democracy and indicative of the Greek government's loss of measure in face of the popular discontent over its austerity measures.

Contract workers of the Ministry of Culture were staging a protest since yesterday inside the Acropolis demanding no less than their wages, a demand which is becoming increasingly utopian in the current economic reality of Greece. The state owes them 24 months of worked wages and seems in no hurry to having its debt settled. The workers also demand the cancellation of 350 lay offs planned for the end of the month.

Instead, the Greek satrapy decided to pay back with force. Living up to the standards of the fastest growing tyranny in Europe, the Greek government sent its praetorian guard, the MAT forces to deal with the workers. The riot police entered the space of the Sacred Rock by a back door, effectively desecrating the asylum for the first time since the Nazi occupation.

The riot police forces threw tear gas at the workers beating them back with batons and handcuffing anyone who tried to stay in their working space. One Associated Press journalist has been injured due to the habitual police brutality whose wanton ferocity is evident in the videos below.

The Association of Archaeologists announced: "It is a dishonor for our country that its image of civilisation is the MAT inside the Acropolis using tear gas against workers who have been for years offering their services for the promotion and protection of civilisation, staying often for many months unpaid. The Association of Archaeologists supports its contract based colleagues of the Ministry of Culture in their just demands. It condemns the raw use of violence within a space which is a symbol of civilisation, and demands by the Home Office to intervene and guarantee the abolition of the 24months unpaid labour and the resolution of the burning issues of the Ministry of Culture employees who have led the workers to a blind end"

The attack of the MAT seen from the main entrance of the Acropolis can be seen here:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1dC18rUCNhw&feature=player_embedded

and

http://www.youtube.com/verify_age?next_url=http%3A//www.youtube.com/watch%3Fv%3D6_Ru3oiLyHc%26feature%3Dplayer_embedded

Strange Bedfellows: The Death Penalty, Mumia Abu-Jamal and the European Parliament

Berlin -- What do the USA, China, Iran, Iraq, Saudi Arabia and North Korea have in common?

The answer may surprise you.

The European Parliament answered this question on October 2nd with passage of a resolution singling out that seemingly disparate list for criticism.

The embarrassing common thread among these six countries: an obsession with putting lots of people to death. The US, its key oil ally Saudi Arabia, its major trading partner China, its targeted enemies of Iran and North Korea, and its puppet ally Iraq all endorse the barbaric state-sanctioned practice of the death penalty, and lead the world in applying that terrible and irreversable sanction.

In a long, detailed EU Parliament resolution, approved almost unanimously by 574 members (only 25 opposed and 39 abstained), the members from all over Europe named people languishing on death rows and threatened with execution in several countries.

That EU resolution specifically highlighted two American death row inmates: Mumia Abu-Jamal in Pennsylvania and Troy Davis in Georgia. Both of these black men were convicted of killing white police officers in trials marred by ineffective defense and gross misconduct by police and prosecutors. The twin defects of ineffectiveness and misconduct are a common feature in many of the three-thousand-plus persons on death rows across America, and especially in the nearly 140 cases that have been overturned thanks to DNA testing or other belatedly discovered proof of innocence.

In the Abu-Jamal and Davis cases, federal and state appeals courts in America have dismissed compelling new evidence of innocence and documented legal improprieties violating the constitutional rights of these two inmates.

In the Davis case, a federal judge in June 2010 rejected professions from four persons who said they lied during Davis’ 1991 trial and also rejected testimony from three witnesses who named the real killer, including one witness who testified to seeing the real killer shoot the policeman.

Both Abu-Jamal and Davis has consistently maintained their innocence.

True, as this EU resolution pointed out, the USA cannot match China, which killed about 5000 inmates last year, but it is was still near the top behind Iran, with 402, Iraq at least 77 and Saudi Arabia with at least 69. In the USA the number executed was 52. The EU delegates also voiced regret at the recent executions of Holly Wood in Alabama and Teresa Lewis in Virginia despite both women being mentally retarded.

It was noted that 154 countries have abolished the death penalty completely or almost completely (with occasional exceptions such as for wartime treason). In Europe only Belarus has failed to do so, while the new constitution of far-off Kyrgyzstan just joined the ranks of those countries which generally agree, as the resolution points out, that “the death penalty is the ultimate cruel and inhuman and degrading punishment, which violates the right to life as enshrined in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights”, and “detention conditions created by the death penalty decision amount to torture that is unacceptable to states respecting human rights.”

The EU Parliament resolution reports that “various studies have shown that the death penalty has no effect on trends in violent crime…whereas evidence shows that the death penalty affects first and foremost underprivileged people.”

That conclusion in the EU resolution concerning the class nature of the death penalty mirrors findings of a study on death penalty practices in the USA released in April 1932. This study by then noted statistician Dr. Frederick Hoffman documented how capital punishment was “enforced chiefly against Negroes, aliens and the poor, while the rich and influential succeed for the most part in escaping” execution. Not much has changed since then, with 35% of the 3260 people currently on death row in the US being black and 7% percent being Latino, while nearly all, regardless of race, are from low-income backgrounds.

The EU delegates, after listing cases in other countries where pressure is needed, noted that “35 states in the USA still have the death penalty, although 4 of them have not held executions since 1976” and that while executions increased to 52 in 2009, “some states have moved against the death penalty through measures including a moratorium on executions or its abolition”.

The gradual abolition of the death penalty in the USA relates more to money than morality, as cash-starved states can no longer afford the enormous cost of capital prosecutions and specialized death row prison units. The state of New Jersey, for example, halted death penalty proceedings in 2007 upon discovering that it cost $253 million dollars to secure 60 death sentences, fifty of which were later reversed by courts due to various improprieties.

The double reference to the case of Mumia Abu-Jamal indicates the level of concern in many European countries about his case, considered typical for many others. Abu-Jamal’s case, now 29 years old, is nearing some kind of decision, possibly a fatal one. On November 9, 2010 the federal Third Circuit Court of Appeals will conduct a hearing to determine if Abu-Jamal will again face execution or will spend the rest of his life in prison. The court system has already rejected all of Abu-Jamal’s appeals seeking to overturn his conviction.

A delegate of Germany’s LEFT party, Sabine Loesing, who was particularly active in getting this resolution passed, told how happy she was that so many from a wide range of political parties had voted for the resolution and added that she would see to it that the pressure on Catherine Ashton, foreign minister of the European body, would not let up so that she raises the position of the resolution whenever she meets with leaders of states – like the USA – where capital punishment still prevails.

VICTOR GROSSMAN is an American expatriat living in Germany. He contributes occasionally to ThisCantBeHappening!

Struggle to Free Mumia: EU Asked to Address PP's Plight

From: Pan-African News Wire
------------

International Struggle to Free Mumia Abu-Jamal: EU Asked to Address
Political Prisoner’s Plight

Hearing set for November 9 while supporters remain on world-wide alert

By Abayomi Azikiwe
Editor, Pan-African News Wire
News Analysis

On November 9, 2010 a critical hearing is scheduled in the nearly
three decade-old case of journalist and activist Mumia Abu-Jamal, who
still sits on death row in the state of Pennsylvania. Mumia was
severely wounded and arrested on December 9, 1981 in Philadelphia and
was later charged, tried and convicted of the murder of police officer
Daniel Faulkner.

A grossly unjust prosecution was carried out against Mumia in 1982 and
he was convicted of murder and given the death penalty. His case has
been appealed over the years, where although the death sentence was
overturned, repeated efforts by the prosecution have attempted to
re-institute the penalty and carry out an execution.

Resulting from a January 19, 2010 ruling by the U.S. Supreme Court,
the U.S. Court of Appeals in the Third Circuit was ordered to
reconsider the 2001 and 2008 decisions that rescinded the death
penalty in Abu-Jamal’s case. There is an ongoing campaign by
law-enforcement agencies across the country to pressure the court
system into carrying out the execution of Mumia.

An international defense campaign for both the freedom of Abu-Jamal
and for the elimination of the death penalty in the United States has
grown since the early 1980s. The International Concerned Family and
Friends of Mumia Abu-Jamal, MOVE and other organizations have been
consistent over the years in not only saving the life of this
award-winning writer and hero to millions around the globe, but in
raising the profile of other political prisoners incarcerated in the
U.S.

There were two death warrants signed against Mumia: one in 1995 and
another in 1999. Both warrants were stayed by the courts after both
national and international campaigns were waged to save the life of
this former Black Panther Party leader and supporter of the MOVE
organization.

During the struggle to stop the execution of Mumia in 1995 and 1999
people were mobilized in his defense from all over the U.S. and the
world. A key element in building massive support for overturning the
death sentence and demanding his release was the role played by
activists, journalists, trade unionists, intellectuals and political
officials in Western Europe, Africa, Japan and other parts of the
globe.

Leading figures such as former South African President Nelson Mandela
and his ruling African National Congress, along with former Archbishop
Desmond Tutu, came out in support of Mumia and demanded that the
scheduled execution be stopped. These developments took place in the
immediate aftermath of the defeat of the racist apartheid systems in
South Africa and Namibia in which people in the U.S. and all over the
world had participated.

Mumia’s articles, interviews and books were published in numerous
countries and served to win further support for his release as well as
the abolition of the death penalty in the United States, which has for
over a century been implemented in a racist and class-oriented manner.
In specific reference to Mumia’s case, the fact that he had been a
leading member of the Black Panther Party in Philadelphia was used in
the penalty phase of his trial in order to place him on death row in
Pennsylvania.

Mumia had also been a staunch critic of the police in Philadelphia
where numerous complaints of brutality and misconduct were leveled
over the years. On August 8, 1978, when the MOVE organization was
attacked at their residence, he sought through his journalism to
vindicate the 9 members who had been arrested, charged and convicted
in the murder of a police officer killed in the law-enforcement
operation.

European Union Discusses Mumia’s Case

The death penalty in the United States has gained attention in recent
weeks due to the execution of two mentally-disabled inmates Teresa
Lewis of Virginia and Holly Wood of Alabama. At present 35 states in
the U.S. still have the death penalty, although 4 have not carried out
any executions since 1976 when the practice was re-instituted after it
was overturned in 1972.

In 2009 there was an increase in executions in the U.S. to 52 persons
killed by the state through capital punishment. The Obama
administration is not opposed to the death penalty and has not spoken
out in regard to the most recent executions in Alabama and Virginia.

The European Union foreign affairs head Catherine Ashton was urged
recently to raise the death penalty in the United States along with
the current plight of Mumia Abu-Jamal. In a European Parliamentary
debate on October 6, Danish MEP Soren Sondergaard stated that he
“deplored “ the execution of defenseless inmates including Mumia
Abu-Jamal.

Sondergaard also noted that “The death penalty itself is a crime. But
it is often more than that; waiting on death row in miserable
conditions for years is torture. Capital punishment is also a form of
terror, used to frighten people from resisting oppression and
dictatorship.”

The European Parliament member went on to say that “African-American
journalist Mumia Abu-Jamal--the voice of the voiceless—is a key symbol
of struggle against the death penalty. For nearly 30 years he has sat
on death row, convicted in a trial notable for its errors and racism.

“High representative Ashton should raise the case with U.S.
authorities—in the fight against the death penalty there is no room
for double standards. In the fight against the death penalty there
applies only one standard: unconditional rejection.” (Article by
Martin Banks, October 7)

In a resolution that had already passed on October 2, the European
Parliament went on record opposing the executions of both Mumia
Abu-Jamal and Troy Davis of Georgia. Davis’ case has also won
international support. Nonetheless, Davis too remains on death row for
a crime he did not commit.

German Left Party delegate Sabine Loesing, who was active in passing
the October 2 resolution opposing the death penalty and specifically
mentioning Mumia Abu-Jamal and Troy Davis, was pleased that the
document was adopted with broad support. Losesing also said that she
would make sure that adequate pressure be placed on the EU foreign
affairs office of Catherine Ashton to raise this issue during meetings
with the Obama administration.
-----------------------------------------------------------
Distributed By: THE PAN-AFRICAN RESEARCH AND DOCUMENTATION PROJECT--
E MAIL: panafnewswire@gmail.com

NYPD Paid Nearly $1 Billion To Settle Lawsuits

October 14, 2010 10:26

New York City Police Commissioner Ray Kelly - File / Photo: Joe Raedle/Getty Images

New York City Police Commissioner Ray Kelly – File / Photo: Joe Raedle/Getty Images

NEW YORK (AP / CBS 2) - The fiancee and friends of an unarmed man killed in a 50-bullet police shooting on his wedding day said they wanted justice. The legal system gave them money - more than $7 million.

The city did what it has done time and time again: pay.

Nearly $1 billion has been paid over the past decade to resolve claims against the nation’s largest police department, according to an investigation by The Associated Press. Some smaller departments also shell out tens of millions a year in payouts, but New York’s spending on police claims dwarfs that of any other U.S. city.

Taxpayers foot the bill - New York officials say the payments cost less than insurance would, and officers themselves don’t usually bear personal responsibility.

The $964 million in payouts covers everything from brutality cases to patrol-car wrecks to stationhouse accidents, and it includes settlements and trial awards. Some police officers have been sued again and again - including one officer at least seven times on excessive force and brutality claims. Some law firms have made it their primary business to sue the city.

City lawyers call the payouts a hard-fought cost of policing a metropolis of 8.3 million people - a price officials work to minimize through officer training and discipline. And the city has prevailed in thousands of cases, including some deadly shootings.

“We’re not pushovers,” said Fay Leoussis, one of the city’s chief lawyers.

But the city is literally paying for police mistakes without learning from them, critics say. In cases like the 50-bullet shooting, the city pays even when officers are acquitted of criminal charges and don’t admit wrongdoing.

“Right now it’s open season against the city. Just file a lawsuit, and you’re going to get money,” said City Council member Peter Vallone, who has sponsored a bill he hopes will make it impossible to pay out dubious claims. “Everyone makes out - except the taxpayer.”

Lawsuits against police are inevitable, some experts say - police interact with millions of citizens a year, confronting criminal suspects and the mentally ill, as well as the angry, opportunistic and litigious. A 2005 federal Bureau of Justice Statistics survey found that 90 percent of people say officers act properly, but other studies estimate about 30,000 lawsuits are filed against them a year.

To some who have sued and won, payouts don’t amount to true compensation.

“You can sue New York City, but it’s not really justifying what happened,” says Charles Shepherd, who spent about 14 years in prison on a murder conviction that hinged on the testimony of a witness who eventually admitted she’d lied; another man later confessed to the crime.

Shepherd settled in 2005 for $370,000 from the city and $1.65 million from the state.

“The city feels they can give you X amount of money” to make up for injustice, said Shepherd, 45, now a counselor for children with HIV. “It’s not fair whatsoever.”

Comparing cities’ payouts is complicated because of differences in record-keeping, the time frames of data available and the fact that the 35,000-officer NYPD is more than twice as big as any other U.S. police department.

But some rough comparisons can be made, using recent data several cities provided to the AP.

Chicago, with about a third of New York’s population, paid out an average of $39.1 million a year over the past six fiscal years; New York paid $96.4 million a year on average from 1999 to 2008, the most recent years available.

Chicago’s figures include a nearly $21 million payment in 2008 to a driver paralyzed when police slammed into his car while chasing someone else.

In Los Angeles, with less than half New York’s population, police paid an average of nearly $21.4 million a year in the past seven fiscal years.

Philadelphia, with less than a fifth of New York’s population, spent only about one-tenth as much as New York in payouts, averaging $9.2 million a year on payouts from 2005 to 2009. Philadelphia police track “problem” officers but through internal investigations, not lawsuits.

New York’s data don’t detail the nature of the police cases. But research into just some of the biggest payouts shows car accidents alone cost more than $30 million in those 10 years. Some multimillion-dollar settlements have gone to officers themselves for on-the-job injuries.

More than $23 million was spent to compensate for police bullets or brutality, millions more to settle claims of unjustified arrests and wrongful convictions.

Some officers are sued multiple times: In the past three years, one Brooklyn precinct sergeant has been sued at least seven times on excessive force and brutality claims, costing the city at least $188,250. A narcotics detective was the target of at least six suits that spurred $103,000 in payouts. The city has paid $171,500 to settle four suits against one plainclothes detective; another case against him is pending.

The city did not admit wrongdoing. Two of the officers are still on the force; one retired. None was charged criminally or disciplined, though the sergeant was later monitored for use of force.

Most departments don’t do much, if anything, with information from lawsuits; to them, if no wrongdoing is admitted, why bother tracking the cases?

But some experts believe mining the cases could lead to fewer suits.

Even if (officials) tracked the information just to decrease liability, isn’t that a good idea?” said Cynthia Conti-Cook of Stoll, Glickman and Bellina, a Brooklyn firm that has sued officers.

Last year, Vallone proposed tracking the city’s settlements to ensure it pays out only when liable and learns from the cases it does pay. The NYPD assigned a committee to look at the more costly payouts for evidence of perjury, corruption and other wrongdoing.

City lawyers say they do weigh claims with an eye on potential costs.

“Even though the facts may all be pointing to a justification of what you did, and no liability, if it’s going to a jury, then it’s always a question,” Leoussis said of the city law department. “You can’t afford to take that kind of risk.”

The nearly $7.2 million settlement in the Sean Bell case was the city’s largest settlement ever in a fatal police shooting.

Three officers opened fire on a car carrying the unarmed Bell, 23, and two friends. The officers said they thought the men were armed, and the men had ignored orders to stop. Bell died in a hail of 50 bullets around the corner from a Queens topless bar where he had just had a bachelor party.

The officers were acquitted of manslaughter in the 2006 shooting in state court; federal prosecutors declined to charge them with civil rights crimes.

The shooting led to police reforms ranging from added firearms training to rule changes for undercover work. The officers still face disciplinary proceedings that could cost them their jobs.

Bell’s friend Joseph Guzman, shot 17 times, ended up with $3 million.

But, he said, “nobody wins in this.”

New York’s top 10 payouts on claims against police, for the decade ending June 30, 2008:
- Franklyn Waldron: $8 million to a man shot and paralyzed by a police officer.
- Abner Louima: $7.125 million to a man brutally attacked by officers in a police station.
- Kiros Berhe: $4.25 million to a man hit by a squad car.
- Sueli Pereira: $3.5 million to a woman who lost a leg after a school safety officer’s car hit her.
- Sami Leka: $3.1 million to a man who spent more than 11 years in prison before his murder conviction was overturned and prosecutors dropped charges.
- Salimata Sanfo: $3 million to a woman whose husband, Ousmane Zongo, was shot and killed by a police officer during a storage warehouse raid.
- Joseph Coviello: $2.75 million to a police officer hurt in a collision between two patrol cars.
- Carol Ann Jones: $2.5 million to a woman whose knee was fractured when a police car hit her.
- Richard Bolds: $2.25 million to a man hurt in an encounter with police.
- Family of Patrick Dorismond: $2.25 million to the family of an unarmed security guard shot dead during a scuffle with an undercover detective.

Several major payouts have been approved since July 2008. Among them:
- Barry Gibbs: $9.9 million to a man who was wrongfully convicted of murder and spent 19 years behind bars after a police detective framed him.
- Estate of Sean Bell: $3.25 million to the family of an unarmed man shot dead by police on his wedding day. Separately, the city paid a total of $3.9 million to two of Bell’s friends who were wounded in the 50-bullet police barrage.
- Wilson Ramos: $6 million to a bystander who was shot in the head and partially paralyzed by police who were in a gunfight with a suspect.

Sources: New York City Comptroller’s Office, New York City Law Department, court records, news accounts.

Mobilize Now For Nov 9th in Philly For Mumia's hearing


URGENT UPDATES - STAY TUNED - CHECK OUT
WWW.FREEMUMIA.COM REGULARLY

MOBILIZE NOW FOR NOVEMBER 9TH IN PHILADELPHIA!
RALLY AT 12 NOON AT 6TH AND MARKET STS.

MUMIA'S HEARING IS AT 2PM AT 601 N. MARKET ST. AND THE STREETS MUST BE
PACKED WITH SUPPORTERS!!

D.A. SETH WILLIAMS STATED VERY CLEARLY THAT WHEN THE TIME COMES, HE
WILL DEFINITELY ASK FOR THE DEATH SENTENCE FOR MUMIA.

THAT TIME IS HERE -- NOVEMBER 9!

We have very few days to do what is necessary to bring thousands of people to the streets of Philly. People must begin organizing NOW to get there -- schools,
colleges, labor unions, churches, mosques, temples and every group and individual that can be reached.

As part of the organizing efforts, Johanna Fernandez is working to
get her brilliiant film "Justice on Trial,' which premiered the same day as the FOP
propaganda hit piece on Mumia, shown in colleges and by organizers everywhere on NOVEMBER 2 so that people can understand the importance of being in Philadelphia on November 9.

CONTACT JOHANNA AT
johanna.fernandez@baruch.cuny.edu
ASAP!

WE NEED ORGANIZING ON A MASSIVE LEVEL, ALL HANDS PULLING TOGETHER! - DARBY TILLIS AND LAWRENCE HAYES, DEATH ROW EXONEREES were present on October 9 and are organizing within the anti-death penalty movement to educate them as to what is really going on with Mumia and to try and get as many exonerees as possible to Philadelphia on NOVEMBER 9, along with DR. SANDY JONES, who also presented at the program.

- THE UNIA HELPED ORGANIZE TO GET PEOPLE THERE
- THE IAC HELPED ORGANIZE TO GET PEOPLE THERE
- THE JERICHO MOVEMENT HELPED ORGANIZE TO GET PEOPLE THERE
- HAKIM FROM CHANNEL LIVE OUT OF NEW YORK IS HELPING ORGANIZE THE HIP HOP GENERATION TO GET ON BOARD
- ORGANIZERS IN FRANCE AND LONDON WERE THERE ON OCTOBER 9TH AND ARE ORGANIZING TO RETURN ON NOVEMBER 9TH
... AND THAT'S JUST TO NAME A FEW, SO EACH AND EVERYBODY CAN DO
EVERYTHING THAT THEY CAN DO!
- CALL-IN ON RADIO STATIONS!
- CALL D.A. SETH WILLIAMS' OFFICE AT 215-686-8000 AND TELL HIM HANDS
OFF MUMIA!!
- CALL/FAX/E-MAIL THE NEWS MEDIA ABOUT THE NEW EVIDENCE W/THE
PICTURES (see http://www.freemumia.com)

PAM AFRICA ADDS: "COME IN AND SPEND THE WEEKEND OF NOVEMBER 9TH AND HELP ORGANIZE TO GET PEOPLE OUT ON NOVEMBER 9 DURING MUMIA'S HEARING, THIS IS CRUCIAL. THESE PEOPLE ARE PLANNING TO COMMIT COLD-BLOODED, PREMEDITATED MURDER. WE ALSO NEED TO GET WITH THE POLITICIANS WHO ARE RUNNING FOR OFFICE, THEY NEED TO TALK ABOUT HOW PHILADELPHIA IS PLANNING TO KILL AN INNOCENT MAN WHO DIDN'T HAVE A FAIR TRIAL."

WE NEED TO KNOW WHAT YOU'RE DOING SO LET US KNOW -- WE'LL KEEP PUTTING OUT UPDATES EVERY FEW DAYS.

ALSO, IF YOU HAVEN'T BY NOW...

Please download the EXCELLENT Abu-Jamal News Newsletter at
http://abu-jamal-news.com/docs/proof.pdf,
which includes Mumia - MOVE 9 Parole - Mumia Legal Update nn
Washington Jr - Kiilu Nyasha - Safiya Bukhari -
Fred Hampton- Educators for Mumia - The Polakoff Photos - Justice on
Trial - Mumia writes about Lynne Stewart,
Oscar Grant, Marilyn Buck, and more!

Wednesday, October 13, 2010

LA-ABCF Statement on Victor Herrera Govea

The Los Angeles Anarchist Black Cross wishes to express our outrage over the
recent conviction of our comrade Victor Herrera Govea. On October 6, 2009, a
Mexican court sentenced Victor to two years and nine months in prison (plus an
additional 3 months), along with over a thousand dollars in fines.

While we have never met Victor face-to-face, nor have we ever exchanged words,
we count him as our brother and are dedicated to his freedom. We send our love
to him, his friends, and most of all his family during these difficult times.
Victor’s conviction was in relation to his arrest over one year ago on October
2, 2009. Victor was participating in a march commemorating the slaughter of
hundreds during the Tlatelolco massacre in Mexico City in 1968. Police
surrounded an anarchist contingent under the pretext that the group allegedly
attacked a convenience store called, OXXO. While attempting to arrest the
contingent en masse, police began to assault the crowd.

Despite being brutally beaten, Victor managed to break free and escaped arrest.
The affects of the attack were noticed by human right groups and other
individuals who recorded the assault. As Victor and friends attempted to leave
the rally, police captured him, severely beating him once again, including
putting a cigarette out on his face! Attempts to stop the attack resulted in a
friend, Angel Fonseca, also being arrested.

Victor Herrera had to be hospitalized because of the heavy beatings. He was
charged with gang activity to commit aggravated robbery and property damage.
However, no charges were filed against the police who brutalized Victor.
For over one year, Victor sat in prison awaiting his fate. On October 6th, the
courts illustrated the fact that justice has no meaning in the Mexican judicial
system. Based on the fabricated testimony and a turning of a blind eye to
evidence of innocence, the courts declared Victor, “Guilty.”
However, guilt does not lie with Victor Herrera Govea. It is not our comrade who
is guilty of any crime. It is the Mexican government that is guilty; guilty of
showing that it is no stranger to brutality and injustice. It has illustrated
this fact 42 years ago, as well as, one year ago. It has proven its inhumanity
in the States of Oaxaca and Chiapas. And we have seen what Mexico calls justice
with its imprisonment and raping of the people of Atenco. After centuries of
crimes against humanity, the government of Mexico has no right to state that
Victor Herrera Govea is guilty of any crime. We feel this sentencing is a
travesty and the Mexican government are fools to attempt to call this justice.
We call on all lovers of freedom and liberty to join in unison to demand the
freedom of Victor Herrera Govea and all political prisoners incarcerated in
Mexican prisons. We ask that our comrades stand in solidarity with Victor and
his family.

The Los Angeles chapter of the Anarchist Black Cross Federation


La Cruz Negra Anarquista Los Ángeles (CNA-LA) desea expresar indignación sobre
el recién convicción de nuestro compañero Víctor Herrera Govea. El día 6 de
octubre de 2009, la jueza Celia Marín Sasaki condenó a Víctor Herrera Govea a
dos años 9 meses de cárcel y 90 días de multa equivalentes a $4932, además se
establece que debe pagar $6500 por los daños a la tienda Oxxo y $2002 por el
valor de los objetos “robados.”

Aunque nunca hemos encontrado cara a cara ni hemos intercambiado
palabras, lo contamos como nuestro hermano y estamos dedicados a su libertad.
Enviamos nuestro amor a él, sus amigos, y sobre todo su familia durante estos
momentos difíciles.
La convicción de Víctor fue en relación a su arresto hace más de un
año, en el día2 de octubre de 2009. Víctor estaba participando en una marcha
para conmemorar la matanza de cientos durante la masacre de Tlatelolco en la
Ciudad de México en 1968. La policía rodeó un anarquista contingente bajo el
pretexto de que el grupo presuntamente atacaron una tienda OXXO. Al intentar
detener al contingente, la policía inició el asalto a la multitud.
A pesar de haber sido brutalmente golpeado, Víctor escapó. Los
efectos del ataque fueron notados por grupos de derechos humanos y otras
personas que grabaron el asalto. Mientras Víctor y amigos trataron de salir de
la manifestación, la policía lo capturó, lo golpeó severamente, una vez más,
incluso poniendo un cigarrillo en la cara! Los intentos de detener el ataque
dieron lugar al arresto de su amigo Ángel Fonseca.
Víctor Herrera tuvo que ser hospitalizado a causa de los golpes fuertes. Fue
acusado de actividades de pandillas para cometer un robo agravado y daños a la
propiedad. Sin embargo, no se presentaron cargos contra los policías que
brutalmente golpearon a Víctor.
Por más de un año, Víctor se sentó en la cárcel a la espera de su destino. El 6
de octubre, los tribunales ilustraron el hecho de que la justicia no tiene
ningún significado en el sistema judicial mexicano. Basándose en el testimonio
fabricado y haciendo la vista gorda a la evidencia de la inocencia, declararon a
Víctor, "Culpable".
Sin embargo, la culpa no recae en Víctor Herrera Govea. No es nuestro compañero
que es culpable de ningún delito. Es el gobierno de México que es culpable,
culpable de mostrar que no es ajeno a la brutalidad y la injusticia. Ilustró
este hecho hace 42 años, así como, hace un año. Se ha demostrado su falta de
humanidad en los estados de Oaxaca y Chiapas. Y hemos visto lo que el gobierno
de México considera justicia con su encarcelamiento y violación de la gente de
Atenco. Después de siglos de crímenes contra humanidad, el gobierno de México no
tiene derecho a decir que Víctor Herrera Govea es culpable de ningún delito.
Creemos que esta sentencia judicial es un crimen y el gobierno mexicano son
tontos para tratar de llamar a esta la justicia.
Hacemos un llamamiento a todos los amantes de la libertad para unirse para
exigir la libertad de Víctor Herrera Govea y todos los presos políticos
encarcelados en las prisiones mexicanas. Pedimos que nuestros compañeros estén
en solidaridad con Víctor y su familia.

La Cruz Negra Anarquista Los Ángeles (CNA-LA)

Victor Herrera Govea found Guilty

This message was sent by our comrades in Mexico - we ask for people to support
Victor. Protests in the Los Angeles will soon be announced.


"In this place where sadness reigns, crime is not punished, poverty is
punished."

....And condemned as well is truth, the denunciation of injustice, remembrance,
the cry of 'Enough!' in the face of the abuses/crimes of a government.

After a year of lengthy legal process had passed, on October 6, 2009, Judge
Celia Marín Sasaki sentenced Victor Herrera Govea to two years and nine months
of jail and a 90 day fine equivalent to $4,932.00, furthermore she determined
that he must pay $6,500.00 in punitive damages to the Oxxo store and $2,002.00
for the value of the "stolen" items. [The amount is in pesos, the total in
dollar will be like $1,200.]
He is accused of "harm to others' property" and "gang robbery" against an Oxxo
[store]. The only argument offered against him is the testimony of two judicial
figures (?), which from the beginning appears to be planned and, furthermore, is
at all times contradictory.
The first question that often springs to mind is, "Why?", "Can it be the judge
doesn't know how to read nor listen?"
Well it seems illogical; as if the judge had never taken into account the videos
and photos, the witnesses, the national and international letters of
protest...And that is how it happened, she didn't have to take them into
account, because she doesn't govern justice, she's in charge of sentencing a
youth who goes out to march on October 2nd, of condemning remembrance, social
protest; her duty was to follow the orders of a government that ever more
cynically has devoted itself to dispossessing, repressing, massacring and
imprisoning the people it supposedly governs.
Everything began on October 2, 2009, during the march commemorating the 1968
massacre when the anarchist contingent was surrounded by riot police under the
pretext that a group of idiots had robbed an Oxxo. Victor Herrera Govea who was
marching among this contingent was brutally beaten by riot police. Thanks to
pressure from the rest of the protesters and the presence of a camera that gave
testimony to the illicit act, he avoided being detained. Nevertheless, on the
way home he was beaten again, this time by plainclothes policemen who in the end
loaded him into a car with no license plates.
October 2, 2010, Victor finished a year in prison.
Now he has a conviction, the sentence can be substituted for community service.
Alternatively he can be granted a conditional suspended sentence through a
secured bond for the amount of $15,000.00. On the other hand, the fight can
continue to obtain his acquittal, but taking this road implies waiting some
months longer.
Given this situation, as family members, we are weighing a decision, awaiting
the opinion of Victor and other comrades.

Freedom to all!!!