NEWS.com.au Network
news.com.au |
Fox Sports |
Newspapers |
CareerOne |
carsguide |
TrueLocal |
Real Estate |
previous pause next Network Highlights:
NEWS.com.au - home

Women on Men

Would you have a long distance relationship?

Emma-Kate Dobbin

Thursday, August 26, 2010 at 01:25pm
 

The concepts of space and time and how they work together are mind-boggling to most of us. The theories of space, time and travel even harder to understand…

And that’s without trying to throw human beings into the mix.

The long distance relationship involves all of the above and yet many smart men and women keep trying to make them work! Because for every epic fail, there have also been tales of amazing success - thanks largely to modern aviation.

I started thinking about all this as I was watching Drew Barrymore and Justin Long in their new romantic comedy Going the Distance about two people who try to make it work despite living in opposite ends of America.

For many of us these days - while we may be geographically miles apart – we are all connected by technology now, so London can feel like Sydney.

But can it really compensate for being in the same place as someone? Is space and time still impossible for real love to get around?

“As soon as I move, I break up with who I am dating,” said Julian, 32. “I will not date someone who isn’t near me. No way!”

I have moved for love. I have travelled for lust. Do I still love or lust after these people now? No. Would I move for someone again? It depends. Not on the geographical distance – but the distance they would travel for me emotionally.

Many a long distance relationship has been started – and many long distance booty calls have gone wrong.

But space between you and time apart become irrelevant if the connection between two people is strong enough. In some ways it is true that love knows no space or time. Think about how long you can feel something – about something, no longer relevant to the time you are in.

The difference between dating and really being with someone is reality. Relationships need two people to be real with each other – and that is hard for a lot of people in the flesh no matter where they are located.

If someone can’t go the distance with you emotionally – through life, which is often the road less travelled – if you can’t laugh through that you’ll always have a gap between you that is too big to cross.

So all in all – the only person you could really move with or for – is someone who would go the distance with you and for you emotionally. As you would for them.

The reality of relationships is - you can be a world apart from someone you are in the same room with!

So to me the reasons some geographical differences don’t work out is just like any other relationship where people can’t go the distance with or for each other – because something gets in the way. Otherwise, they just make it happen!

What do you think of long distance relationships? Are you in one and how does it work for you? Are they any easier these days? Does love know no geographic boundary? Would you travel for someone? Do you have any travel/romance horror stories?



..

Have Your Say

Show Oldest | Newest first    Page 1 of 3      1 2 3 >

Personally I find it pain in the ass being with someone on the other side of the city. Having to drive over all the time through peak hour gives me the shits. If ultra long distances (like what EK is talkin about) don’t work on the sexual level so whats the point? I don’t think I could muster up any sort of feelings for someone through a relationship on facebook. Might as well just make sweet love to a porn mag. Besides how are you suppose to police whether the other person is cheating on you? I can sort of understand it, if it was temporary work thing, but 3-6months tops girls. I figure there are only a few girls in this world special enough for me to do that for. Chances are I won’t find them.

potatoes (Reply)
Thu 26 Aug 10 (01:45pm)
World Prophet replied to potatoes
Thu 26 Aug 10 (04:41pm)

“how are you supposed to police whether the other person is cheating on you?” What a wanker. “chances are I won’t find them” - yep, you got that right.  And if you do, they’d probably run a mile.  Repeat after me: “I’m not worthy” Commitment, trust, fidelity, joy, love, fun, etc. all make up a relationship - long distance is just logistics - solve it, but in the meantime enjoy the ride.  Was a rep for many, many years, away from home all week.  But when I cam home, boy oh boy!!  And you know what?  It’s still like that thirty-five years on when I’ve been away (and even when I’ve not...) If the person is right, there’s nothing that’ll stand in the way.

potatoes replied to potatoes
Thu 26 Aug 10 (09:40pm)

Well world prophet I beg to differ. I live in the now not the future with marty mcfly. So I beleive it is pointless to have a long distance relationship for extended periods of time when the end result in the future could be, ‘oh this isn’t working out’. When I want a relationship to end I want it to be because ‘we find the sex boring’, or ‘my girlfriend is sick of my drinking’ rather than ‘oh we are really far apart this sux’. Like use your brain man. Sex is a commodity. You can give it, buy it, take it, steal it like a car. So yeah all you people who are ‘spiritually into each other’ enjoy your long distance stuff. When my um friend goes back to the UK Im straight back to the valley to find another one. People I’ve known who’ve had long distance relationships, I find, are just as weird as the people I know who use phone sex lines. And I garantee, when I go to Vegas (the real one, not the shitty brisvegas) next year, I not going to have some chick here back in Australia holding me back whether she likes it or not. I’m going big time old mate. And Im not talking about just hanging around in DOSAs to pick up either. American chicks love our accents, just like Im a sucker for any chick with a pommy accent. It just sounds so promiscuous.

All a long distance relationship offers is long pointless conversations and infrequent sex. There’s no point in that. All you get is the worst of relationships without the good parts to counter it.

It’s not 1993 anymore and phone sex became a waste of time after the internet became popular.

Harry the Hobo replied to Charlie Harper
Thu 26 Aug 10 (02:59pm)

Sounds like good practice for marriage.

eviljoy replied to Charlie Harper
Thu 26 Aug 10 (04:21pm)

Long pointless conversations and infrequent sex.  Doesn’t that describe most long term relationships anyway.

I dunno, but at least I am first to post LOL

James of brisbane (Reply)
Thu 26 Aug 10 (01:57pm)
Haha replied to James
Thu 26 Aug 10 (02:10pm)

Fail

thursday replied to James
Thu 26 Aug 10 (02:27pm)

except you werent…

James replied to James
Thu 26 Aug 10 (02:42pm)

Ahhh bugger - not my fault. I live much further from the Courier Mail offices than everyone else, so my comment takes longer to get there.
tongue wink

potatoes replied to James
Thu 26 Aug 10 (09:42pm)

Excuse FAIL.

Im in brissy to bro.

My idiot of an ex husband is having a long distance relationship with a woman he met over the internet.

She lives in the Philippines-in a condo that he bought for her. In her name.

He sends her money weekly as she doesn’t work.

They’ve known each other for three months.

And he can’t afford to by his children a pair of shoes.

And when the money dries up, he’ll have nothing…

Mistral of Sydney (Reply)
Thu 26 Aug 10 (02:04pm)
Fluffy replied to Mistral
Thu 26 Aug 10 (03:04pm)

Yes, but let us never forget that the advantage Asian women home over Western women is that they’re submissive. Western women will screw you over, take your house, leave you with nothing whereas Asian women… wait, where was I going with that?  I think I was heading towards some sweet, sweet irony.

queen of green replied to Mistral
Thu 26 Aug 10 (11:44pm)

Yes, but let us never forget that the advantage Asian women home over Western women is that they’re submissive.

Don’t forget not materialistic as alot seem to think, which is quite the laugh, seeing that if they were not, they would not be marrying out of the third world poverty they were born into.A lot of them leave the men soon as they get their green card or leave to stay and bring over their real boyfriend from their own country.

Plenty of men getting ripped off and conned. Serves the stupid bastards right

LOL

Shane replied to Mistral
Fri 27 Aug 10 (11:09am)

Wow, he’s a keeper, I bet you’re devastated he’s not coming home any more.

Fools and their money.

I have been in one, and still with the girl, though we now live… in the same house. It was very hard and i think the only way for them to work is if there is light at the end of the tunnel, I.E. if at some point not too far away, you will be together. That said it did take 2 years but we are very happy… NOW!

Been there! (Reply)
Thu 26 Aug 10 (02:06pm)
Mary Jane replied to Been there!
Thu 26 Aug 10 (02:22pm)

Great! Good to hear as i’m one year in with another year to go.

What doesn’t break it only makes it stronger and I also think you weed out all the bullsh*t that comes with relationships.

You learn not to fight over the petty stuff and you see what actually matters.

Because you have fought harder for each other I think you feel stronger.. or something along those lines?!

SaZz replied to Been there!
Thu 26 Aug 10 (03:12pm)

Been there! - I’m in the same boat as you. I was in a long distance realtionship with my man for 18 months before he moved back to Sydney. I think you are right about the light at the end of the tunnel! I think it also helped that we were great friends beforehand so we didn’t have to do the getting to know you thing long distance.

Mary - Hang in there! You are totally right about it making you stronger - we very rarely fight and I think we appreciate having each other around a lot more than some other couples I know.

Flowers replied to Been there!
Thu 26 Aug 10 (11:19pm)

My now husband and I were in a long distance relationship from both ends of the globe and we pulled through. We met when he was an exchange student in Melbourne. Eventually I moved to the US to be with him. We’re now happily married but I can see why most long distance relationships don’t work. There’s a lot of tears and heartache but I don’t regret for one moment having made the effort to make it all work.

Long distance works as long as you both remain on the same page and are honest with each other.

When one person begins to feel differently, it needs to be dealt with properly or you’ll drift apart. And an understanding that you may both drift in out and out but that doesn’t mean its over and can’t be repaired.

You need set times to see each other, an end in sight and most importantly realise that a long distance relationship ISN’T a normal relationship, so dont try to make it. It is a different kind of relationship with its own unique set of rules.

Mary Jane (Reply)
Thu 26 Aug 10 (02:08pm)

EK,
I lived with a woman I loved for two years, then we were forced to try the long distance thing.  We weren’t too far separated, 650km, but work and distance conspired against us.
At least, that’s how it is fondly remembered.  The reality is completely different.
I loved the benefits of being in a relationship, I loved talking about the future with her, but the first time I cheated on her was the toughest.  After that first time it became easy.
I remember driving to see her after spending the previous night with a good-looking, easy pick-up.  Wondering where the guilt was, I found none, so it made our long-distance relationship easier.  I went overseas, interstate and lived the dream.
When I got rid of her, I didn’t question why or lay any unnecessary blame - it was all my fault.
Since then, I’ve seen a few long-distance women, but they were nothing but booty calls, meaningless.
So, no, I wouldn’t get involved in a long distance relationship again, it’d be too easy to take advantage of it…

ironmike of brisbane (Reply)
Thu 26 Aug 10 (02:09pm)
Bear replied to ironmike
Thu 26 Aug 10 (02:35pm)

Typically provocative and boring, ironmike.

Shell replied to ironmike
Thu 26 Aug 10 (02:36pm)

Hence why long distance relationships never work out.  It’s too hard for men (and some women to be fair) to stay faithful in normal circumstances, so what hope is there when you are 650k’s apart. Way too easy to cheat. 

Ironmike, you make me sick yet you intrigue me at the same time.

ironmike replied to ironmike
Thu 26 Aug 10 (03:53pm)

Shell,
Blame the duplicity on my honesty…
I used to take advantage but I learned I didn’t have to remember anything if I told the truth.
Ironmike = guilt free

Disgusted replied to ironmike
Thu 26 Aug 10 (04:27pm)

@Shell, I tend to agree with your last comment. IM, I personally think you sound like a pig, only initially having read the first few lines of your spiel. And yet, I felt compelled to read the rest. What an idiot I was to bother.

Sam replied to ironmike
Thu 26 Aug 10 (06:39pm)

Ironmike = guilt free
No.
Ironmike = troll

I’ve never had anything but long distance relationships.

Even when I’ve been ‘near’ a guy, there’s been long periods of time when I’ve been away from him so it’s turned into a 40% time with the person, 60% away from the person.

It’s incredibly difficult.

I think the key, is to always be connected and able to communicate to that person in some way. The real problem I’ve found is the distance you cause emotionally with someone else.

If you fight, you can’t heal it with a cuddle and a nice sit down dinner. You have to work through it and you have to heal yourself, in place of them doing it for you. Your time with that person is finite, it ENDS when you disconnect from the Internet or hang up the phone.

My partner and I have been long distance for a few years now. It gets harder and harder every day and sometimes, I wonder if I made the right choice to be involved with someone knowing this could happen. We certainly didn’t plan to be apart for this long.

However, we make the choice each day to be together. It’s difficult and we certainly don’t make it easy on one another (me especially, I can be very jealous). But we didn’t ‘fall into’ the relationship, we’re not just doing what’s easiest, we’re doing what we have to, to be with the person we want....Even if that means not being ‘with’ them.

It won’t last forever, we’ll either have to be together soon or face a break up. But at least, while I’m with him, I can really appreciate the good times because they’re fleeting. A lot of people take holding hands, watching TV together, even just knowing that they will see that person the next day, all for granted. I can’t. The fleeting nature of the ‘normal’ times causes a lot of problems too. But when I really look at it, I’d much rather have savoured the simple day to day acts, than not noticed them because they were simple day to day acts.

Holding hands with the wind (Reply)
Thu 26 Aug 10 (02:11pm)

I have done it for 18months me in the middle of nowhere and her in a country town at uni. it sucked a bit for a the first 3-6months then it wasn’t to bad seeing each other for 4-5days once a month or once every two months it is just something you adapt to. you also have to have a fair bit of trust. the other advantage is that you can do what you want when you want where you are currently living (as in drinking stubbies and the like). I have sinse moved back to be with my now Fiance.

I wouldn’t say it is easy but it does deffinatley test you.

be there done that of melbourne (Reply)
Thu 26 Aug 10 (02:29pm)

I was in a long distance relationship for 3 of the 4 years that I was with my ex. When I finished uni, we agreed that we’d both move to Canberra where I had a graduate job. In the end though, I couldn’t let him follow me - he would have hated it, and resented the move to a ‘city’ he didn’t like. Furthermore, I’d started to realise that we worked too well in a long distance relationship. I realised that I handled only seeing him every 6-8 weeks, with just a bit too much ease, which probably isn’t a good sign about the strength of the relationship.

Bear (Reply)
Thu 26 Aug 10 (02:32pm)
Lala replied to Bear
Fri 27 Aug 10 (07:06am)

Totally know what you mean.. I was in a long distance relationship for a year with the guy in Australia - I live in New Zealand. We starting going out before he left and saw each other every couple of months.

He came back for 3 months after a year to see if we could make it work… we couldn’t. We were so used to having a relationship over the phone and internet we couldn’t adjust to being together 24/7. I was used to living my life as a single person (minus seeing other guys - was always faithfu). I was used to doing what I wanted when I wanted and spending lots of time with my friends. He was the same.

We had every intention to get married and be together forever but in reality we had got to know each other over the phone and internet it didnt translate into a good face to face relationship long term.

Don’t regret for a second giving it a go after only being together for a couple of months.. but I would never do it again.

To Mistral of Sydney,

I agree when you called your ex an idiot!!! Seriously 3 months? Bought her a condo too wow LOL. It just shows he doesn’t know his priorities if he can’t even buy his own kids shoes. Yeah just send money to my gf she loves me. Yeah right!!! And I am imagining she is younger than him too?

was in one (Reply)
Thu 26 Aug 10 (02:45pm)
Mistral replied to was in one
Thu 26 Aug 10 (03:34pm)

By 12 years…

I don’t get it. Seriously.

I hope so, my partner of 1 year has just been deployed for six months....so I am very optimistic...3 weeks down...23 to go…

Fingers crossed of ACT (Reply)
Thu 26 Aug 10 (02:46pm)
Sarah replied to Fingers crossed
Fri 27 Aug 10 (11:29am)

FYI - I was with my partner for just 14months when he was deployed to east timor. 2 days before he left our son was born. Towards the end of the deployment we fought like the devil and when he got back from his 6 months and we lived together it was really hard for us both to adjust at first. That was 2 years ago still happily living together with baby number two on the way.

All will be ok smile

I did it and it was the best thing as it allowed us not to rush into the relationship and allowed for us to have that break and then be refreshed and excited for when we saw each other on the weekend.

It’s hard! But as long as you are on the same page with regards to the future and the things you want to achieve then it will ok. It’s not all hunky dory, communication is the key!

I have since moved and we couldn’t be happier as we have found it easier to save together and work as a team together on building our lives smile. Long distance isn’t for everyone, but it does and can work if you want the same things and are committed to making it work.

Moved for love (Reply)
Thu 26 Aug 10 (02:50pm)

It makes no difference to me as I can’t get any relationship. Shyness is a curse!

Steve (Reply)
Thu 26 Aug 10 (03:02pm)

Yes I am in a long distance relationship and I have just turned 57! I am in Australia and he is in America.  Sure it has its challenges but that is the same for any relationship.  We make it work because we choose to make it work.  Open, honest communication is a key.  Knowing what each others expectations and goals for the relationship is also part of what makes it work.  Travel these days is not that difficult and Skype, emails, txting and phone calls means what we often speak to each other more than couples would who were together!  Like everything in life; it is a decision isn’t it?

AR of Brisbane (Reply)
Thu 26 Aug 10 (03:05pm)

If you asked our grandparents the answer would be a resounding “yes, long distance relationships can work” this is because many of them experienced long distance relationships, however this was also in the era before sex before marriage was acceptable and people happily lived on the anticipation.

In todays day of instant gratification it is harder as many people seem to believe that it isnt a relationship if you are not having sex on a very regularly basis.

I believe it can still work but it takes a lot of honest communication and can only survive if you are not the jealous/suspicous type.

If you can not accept that their life is continueing and they will socialise with those of the opposite sex, and trust them enough to not be jealous of that socialising, then it can work, but that is the same if the person is in the next room.

Jealousy knows no distance and its jealousy that kills a lot of relationships.

Jane (Reply)
Thu 26 Aug 10 (03:11pm)

You are right, long distance relationships never work, atleast not for me.

My long-distance girlfriend of 2 years in Oz dumped me for a guy she recently met.God knows why she did that, may be for physical relationship/sex.

I am 24, a virgin who believes in true love that happens once in a lifetime.

Life’s a pain, it’s so hard to move on

Muzzamil of Bangalore, India (Reply)
Thu 26 Aug 10 (03:17pm)
EU Girl replied to Muzzamil
Thu 26 Aug 10 (11:14pm)

Don’t give up mate!
You will find a true love!
You are only 24:)

No way would I ever be in a long distance ! I am already a nutcase why would I put the added stress on myself and worry about what they are doing, miss a call and get an abusive text, go out and have them constantly check up through calls texts.
There are plenty of men in the world, I would move closer or make them move to me.
Hey ironmike.

jenn of melbs (Reply)
Thu 26 Aug 10 (03:23pm)

I’ve been forced into a long distance relationship as my g/f is doing 8-12 in the Silverwater Correctional Centre for manslaughter. Its not easy, thank the lord for internet porn!

Gazza of Botany (Reply)
Thu 26 Aug 10 (03:26pm)
lala replied to Gazza
Fri 27 Aug 10 (07:08am)

Wow… just wow

I’ve had two periods of long-distance relationships with the same person. First was for 6 months, after we’d been together for 18 months, when I was in England and he was in Africa.

Second was for a year living three hours apart, after we’d been together for 3 years.
The first one was definately harder because could only email and call about once a week and were often in completely different emotional spaces.

But over all, it was quite a good thing - allowed us to be a bit more independent and self relient and grow up as a couple.
Second one was much easier because we were more secure, could call all the time, see each other more often and skype the other times.
We got engaged in this period and are now married - and in the same place.

Long distance can be heaps hard, but for us, think it was actually really healthy - taught us to work at communication etc, rather than just expect it would happen.

Dani (Reply)
Thu 26 Aug 10 (03:51pm)

I think it’s the only way it can work—is to have this kind of outlook. People need freedom, if you are living apart. You can’t stay stuck to the phone—or it just gets strange. All the people I know, that it’s worked for, have had an attitude simillar to this. If it ends up working—then great. 

Emma-Kate Dobbin
Thu 26 Aug 10 (04:19pm)

Show Oldest | Newest first    Page 1 of 3      1 2 3 >


Comments are submitted for possible publication on the condition that they may be edited. Please provide a name, you may use a screen name – this will be published with your comment, and a working email address – not for publication, but for verification. The suburb/location field is optional.
( Read our publication guidelines ).


Submit your comments here:

   
 

How to add a link: Enter the text you wish to be clickable, select it and click the 'Link' button to enter the link details in the popup box. Maximum of 2 links.


* Required Fields

 

Insert an emoticon Insert an emoticon



 

Profile

Emma-Kate Dobbin

Emma-Kate Dobbin

Journalist Emma-Kate Dobbin tells you what she’s learned about the workings of the male mind and the opposite sex.

Advertisement

Latest Articles

Article Icon - Comments
Would you have a long distance relationship? 69
How much does love really cost? 126
Is he nervous or not interested? 99
Are men as insecure as women? 82
Facing The Breakup: Should you stay “friends” with an ex on Facebook? 64
On Holidays 0
What’s the kiss of death in dating? 162
Can men and women just be friends? 128
Does flirtexting lead to successful dating? 95
Back next Week 0

Recently Popular

Article Icon - Comments
How much does love really cost? 126
Is he nervous or not interested? 99
Are men as insecure as women? 83
Would you have a long distance relationship? 69

View Entries by Date

August 2010
S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30 31        

Monthly Archives

Subscribe

RSS Feed of all the latest Women on Men articles ATOM Feed of all the latest Women on Men articles
Subscribe to receive the latest from Women on Men

Related Links

Tools


News.com.au Blogs

Latest Icon - Comments
Meet The Chinstroker
I want to get a tattoo with my boyfriends name but he…
The adventures of Bob and Bill.
The privatisation of politics
They ate more...why should I pay?
My flatmates made racist comments; is this normal?
My friend has made an awful confession and I don’t know what…
Most Commented Icon - Comments
The adventures of Bob and Bill.
I want to get a tattoo with my boyfriends name but he…
Meet The Chinstroker
Reader Comments Icon - Comments

Jimbo says: Here’s the problem right here, Jack: Many years ago a conference was held in Paris with 2,000 scientists from all…

The privatisation of politics

Callum says: “The best argument against democracy is a five minute conversation with the average voter.” -Winston Churchill

The privatisation of politics

From around the News Blog Network

Latest Icon - Comments
Wallaby jersey handover is a sacred duty - Brendan Cannon’s live chat
SYDNEY FIXED
CASH FOR GAS
PREPARE YOUR HANDBAGS
Fire in Darwin detention centre
The Daicos of Australian politics
Blog readers are a week ahead of The Age
Most Commented Icon - Comments
Why would Abbott trust Labor’s Treasury?
Labor most likely
Tips for Saturday, August 28
Maverick three fall for Labor’s spin doctor
Three years of Katter as king?
Tips for Thursday, August 26
Column - Raining on the alarmists’ crusade
Reader Comments Icon - Comments

Grambo says: The AEC has ‘allocated’ 73 seats to the coalition and 72 to Labor on a ‘preliminary’ basis.  Those two words…

Hitting the Mark, and the Karl

echofox says: PTOM, Who encouraged Julia Gillard to tap Rudd, a softer version of stabbing, to contest the leadership ballot? Was it…

Hitting the Mark, and the Karl

Email a friend

To email this article to a friend, fill in the form below

Message:

close  x