Those delegates from Labor and the Coalition who are hoping to win over Bob Katter ought to make sure they enter his personal space equipped not just with mouthguard and groin protection but a powerful sense of the past.

You say redneck as if it was bad… Katter at Mt Isa Airport. Photo: Eddie Safarik

Nothing matters more to Katter than history. It is the key to his heart. He speaks of events that happened more than a century ago as though they occurred only yesterday – and as if he himself was there.

Katter talks of two photographs that hang in the Civic Club in his hometown of Charters Towers, in the Queensland hinterland. “One is of the mine managers in 1899 in Charters Towers,” he says. “They’re all there in their hats and three-piece suits and gold fob pocket watches. Those bastards drove us down in the mines and one in 31 of us never came back up again.” Us.

In 1999, Katter organised for another photo to be taken which could hang next to the historical shot. It is of the modern breed mine managers from the Charters Towers area. It shows that we have become, for the most part, a country of equals. “They just look like the workers in their work boots and khaki shirts. That’s what we’ve achieved in this country. But the pain, the misery and the suffering in the battle to get justice…”

He trails off, caught up in not what we have become, but the struggle to get there.

The federal Member for Kennedy is one of three crucial independents who’ve currently got the country over a barrel. At this moment, we as a nation are not unlike Marsellus Wallace, the gang boss in Pulp Fiction who finds himself hogtied in the basement of a redneck’s pawn shop while the Gimp is giving him a going over.

Says Katter: “My son in law has a t-shirt which says: ‘You say redneck as if it was bad.’”

People would like to know what role Katter is playing. Is he the Gimp, or is he Bruce Willis to the rescue?

Katter lives in a part of Australia which he considers the major parties have forgotten. His personal crusade in Kennedy, which takes in the huge geographical heart of Queensland, from Normanton and Mt Isa and Innisfail and Atherton, is to do better for miners and farmers.

When he sees a small town dying, he sees a failure by Australia to honour the pioneers who opened up the north. Katter mentions the names of two boys in his classroom at Cloncurry whose fathers died of what they then called “the miner’s titus”. The gravest sin he could commit would be to forget the contribution of men like these.

It is personal to Katter because his great-grandfather Richard Arida was a wealthy north Queensland draper of Lebanese heritage who had a strong hatred of the mistreatment of workers.

According to the Australian Dictionary of Biography, two brothers, Joseph and Richard Arida (originally Yusef and Rachid Lahoud), were from a prominent Maronite-Catholic family which left Lebanon (then Syria) and found their way to north Queensland, where they became successful drapers and bootmakers. From their base in Charters Towers they became very wealthy.

Says the dictionary: “The Aridas were deeply committed to the labour movement and Richard was a trustee of a branch of the Australian Workers’ Union. They saw no contradiction between their status as wealthy businessmen and their support for a movement which they regarded as fundamentally humanitarian and consistent with their involvement in the Catholic Church.”

Katter says a person’s power and wealth need not separate him or her from the workers. “I’m not working class, far from it,” he says. “My great-granddad (Richard Arida) put 3000 pounds behind the miner’s strike. He went into bat for the union movement and the Labor Party. In terms of today’s money that was about a million dollars. He supported workers’ rights.”

Katter has been returned to Kennedy seven times since 1980. He started out with the National Party but quit in 2001 after the person he perhaps detests more than any other in politics, then National Party leader and Deputy PM John Anderson, supported the Liberals in the deregulation of the sugar and dairy industries, which damaged farmers in his electorate. Katter became an independent.

Why is it that Katter hates the Nationals for deregulating sugar and dairy, but not John Howard’s Liberals who, as the stronger Coalition force, had the deciding hand? That is Katter all over. He didn’t agree with the Liberals, but he respected their conviction. What he hated was what he saw as the weak-kneed acquiescence of his Nationals, who should have put a fight.

Katter will be using this moment not just to get a better deal for his electorate, but will also have an eye to how history will remember him at this moment 100 years from now. It should be taken as read that there are limits to how much personal compromise Katter can stand in the coming days.

The three-man independent bloc is just a temporary force, designed to get some explanatory notes on the thoughts of the two main parties. If Katter stayed with the bloc, or gave his seat to Labor, I would be very surprised. His electorate very clearly wants him to support the Coalition (the LNP came second in Kennedy, with Labor dragging their knuckles into a distant third place).   

None of the independents can afford a second election. They know if there was another poll, their respective electorates might well decide to vote Coalition in order to allow it to form government.

Katter’s not yet saying which way he’ll go - he’s enjoying this too much to bring it to a premature end. Presuming his allegiance is still needed after the final counts are in, it is Abbott who will most likely win Katter over. And he will need to give Katter something very substantial to pull out of his big hat and show to the people of Kennedy.

Katter’s heroes are those who tried to help farmers in times of depression or advocated high tarrifs on imports. They are long-gone men like Country Party leader Black Jack McEwen; Queensland premier and federal Labor treasurer, Ted Theodore; Louisiana politician Huey Long; and Queensland premier Joh Bjelke-Petersen, under whom he served at state level and whom he thinks is grossly misunderstood.   

He says Long, who advocated strongly for farmers throughout his career, did “everything humanly possible to promote himself as a country hick and a buffoon. And same for Bjelke-Peterson. I don’t know whether he cultivated it, but he certainly looked like a hick. He was very unlike (Katter pauses, and introduces a sneer to his voice) the cosmopolitan and erudite Gough Whitlam, who called Bjelke-Petersen a troglodyte.

“Which, by the way, is a term I don’t mind for myself.”

He gets upset – actually upset – at the way Australian soldiers were sent underequipped to World War II. “They sent up us to stop the Japanese with .303 rifles and one Bren gun to stop the greatest military machine the world had ever seen. And we did. Just ordinary blokes who went up there, not rich or powerful.”

Katter judges everything by what has gone before. Of the value of the current war in Afghanistan, he says: “You would know that Alexander the Great said, ‘No I’m not going up there, I’m going home.’ Genghis Khan said, ‘No, I think I’ll take Europe instead.’ The British sent up a 55,000-man army and in every sense of the word none of them came back. The Russian communist empire collapsed in Afghanistan. I mean, just leave the Afghans alone to kill each other.”

You expect he’s about to advocate a withdrawal from Afghanistan. But Katter pulls up short. “But we don’t want to be trifling with the American alliance. If anyone has a go at us all we can do is throw rocks at them. We have no defence force. We have no ability to defend the nation whatsoever.”

This shows that Katter does permit himself an element of compromise, even in the face of history’s argument that Afghanistan cannot be won.

He’s proud of the great uncle who died at Gallipoli and Bert Henley, on his mother’s side, who died soon after returning from Changi. His dad, a Queensland state and then federal politician with the Country Party, died in office at the age of 72.

Katter Sr held Kennedy which, for a brief intermission after his death was held by the ALP. Katter Jr reclaimed it in the family name. 

He says his dad was “easily the most brilliant man that Queensland will ever see”. Early on, Katter Sr was a Cloncurry councillor who taught his son about the grassroots. He used council money to build old people homes and says he got everyone in town, rich or poor, a fridge.

“So whilst all our cousins in Brisbane still had ice boxes, we had refrigerators in Cloncurry. You repaid the loan when you paid your rates. It was quite brilliant. When he went into federal politics he was in the same process of delivering an air-conditioner under the same scheme to every house. Now, maybe he didn’t do as much in federal parliament but he had leaders like Jack McEwen and Doug Anthony. There wasn’t as much to do.”

Katter adds with disgust: “I had the likes of John Anderson.”

Much has been made of the Mad Katter. Paul Sheehan said it well in a report for Fairfax on Monday: “It is widely reported that Katter is mad. He is mad, but there is method to his madness, and he is mad only by the sensibilities of inner urban Australia. In his own element, Katter is the Prime Minister of the Gulf country. He is what all politicians would like to be, unassailable and unmistakable.”

Katter demands of himself an absolute adherence to conviction, which is admirable, but he knows that he is not the prime minister or even the leader of a party. He’s just an independent.

I talked with some Innisfail cane farmers who support Katter for his courage and integrity. But they have thought things through carefully. As Katter enjoys a brief window of real power, it has perversely reminded them how his isolation in the federal parliament has not returned great benefits to them.

They point out that the Bruce Highway – part of National Highway No.1 – is still just a one-lane road. They desperately want better roads. They desperately believe their role is to grow food for Australia, without being undermined by cheap foreign imports.

Influential Innisfail cane farmer Joe Marano says that Katter has only been able to do so much: “We’ve just missed out on things having an independent. Neither leader came to Kennedy during the campaign, but they went to Leichhardt (the seat north of Cairns which was recaptured the Liberals’ Warren Entsch).”

And that is why the independents don’t want another election. People might love them on a personal level, but election 2010 has, in a bizarre way, despite the deadlock, no matter the Green vote, reinforced the relevance of the two fattest pigs guzzling from the trough.

Katter has written as as-yet unpublished history of Australia. It will no doubt be a searing, screaming, passionate account seen through the eyes of men who fought for the bush. Tony Abbott could do worse than ask Bob Katter if he could read the manuscript, and launch the book.

Don’t miss: Get The Punch in your inbox every day

Get The Punch on Facebook

80 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • Eric says:

      06:11am | 01/09/10

      Thanks for this in-depth and reasonably balanced view. I was getting tired of the cartoonish nonsense from much of the media.

    • Tom says:

      09:18am | 01/09/10

      “People would like to know what role Katter is playing. Is he the Gimp, or is he Bruce Willis to the rescue?”

      perhaps the best line to come out of the billions of words written post election

    • ZSRenn says:

      07:04am | 01/09/10

      People like Bob Katter reminds me of the Australia of the 60’s when giving a bloke a fair go was all the rage and you could leave your door open for a week while you went on holidays Where people did remember the past and it wasn’t just something we could feel all fluffy inside on ANZAC day

      I say we could do a lot worse and wish him all the best

    • tuccaboy says:

      07:26am | 01/09/10

      I think the problem with Bob Katter is that he now has the power he always dreamed of, but he doesn’t know how to handle it.  It is something completely foreign to him, and whilst he undoubtedly works hard for his electorate, now it is being played on a grand scale that has different rules and bigger players.

    • Pollyanna says:

      01:27pm | 01/09/10

      I don’t agree, entirely.  Bob has always been Bob, but it suits the media and politicians to focus on him, currently.  I find his forthrightness, integrity and ability to remain uncowed in the face of a media onslaught to be quite refreshing, even as I remain unconvinced by some of his further out proposals.  At least he is familiar with the words “Yes” and “No” and is not afraid to utter them, unlike Rudd, Gillard, Swan, et al.

    • Phil says:

      07:40am | 01/09/10

      I am a strong Liberal Voter who whilst wishing for a victory didnt think they could regain power at this election, but go very close and Labor would be terribly weakened and Ms Gillard would ultimately suffer a similar fate to that of KRudd. Even Labor voters would agree Abbott has done a fantastic job at getting the party in a position pending independents support to form government. The deadlock is not a bad thing for Australia to get good government.

      I am actually glad for the Bob Katters of trhis world. You at least know where he stands on issues. He doesnt give a flying fig what opinion poles say. He speaks with conviction, and whether you love or hate the bloke (and I am sure there are plenty on both sides, just not in his electorate) I dont think you can buy him off. Yes he wants justice for his electorate, so does Abbott for Warringah, and Gillard for Lalor.

      His first statement when the result looked like a hung parliment was that he would support the party which would allow people in his electorate to survive, where someone every 4 days doesnt shoot themselves, they dont go broke, banks dont repossess the farms etc.

      Pretty simply stuff. Yes he might be a little mad, deep down we all are if we are passionate for a cause. If KRudd and the labor machine had the same conviction about some issues the last election would have delivered a different result, but they flip flopped depending on what Sussex Street and the Powerbrokers said.

      Farmers in his electorate are being screwed, by the Woolworths/Coles factor.

      They now have water for a while, but we need to correctly harvest it. Spend 43 Billion on piping the excess water from the north down the counrty so we can feed ourselves better. If we are going to borrow money it needs to be for a good rather than a luxury that we already have. (Its like borrowing money for a new Porsche when the old Porsche is still running good and the Mechanics are constantly making it better. Yes the new one would be technically better and have some upsides but by the time we order it and its 6 year delievery occurs, technology on our old one will be just as good or better at a fraction of the cost.  As a Liberal Voter I dont mind borrowings, I just dont like wastage. Imagine getting pumps, pipes and sending water down the East, West and Central parts of Australia. They get so much rain up there we wouldnt need Desal plants, just pumps to send them down. It would be a massive project but the economic benefits far outweigh fast porn or facebook.

      The Katters, Oakshots and Windsors are actually doing what we would like all our elected representatives to do for us. Drive a hard bargain in our electorates. When a major party does what these three are doing and puts a real proposal to Australia to move us forward, then they will be in power for a long time.

      Think of the benefits of getting the Greens involved in rolling out Abbotts real action on climate change. It is far from perfect but better than just raising the prices for FA benefit. See how it goes then get them to rewqork policies in this area.

      Get the Rural Independants to be on committees for Rural and Regional Australia. Give them a few billion to spend wisely in this area. if it works then the economic benefits will flow for all, if it doesnt then we have only wasted what we did with pink batts, and probably didnt kill anyone in the process.

    • TheRealDave says:

      09:37am | 01/09/10

      The main problem I see with that is if we spend $43 billion putting water pipes all over the place its still far cheaper to import our fruit and veg from overseas - I am not saying thats a good thing mind you, just reality. Like manufacturing - its just too hard to compete with other countries with far poorer wages and conditions and much higher populations. Add to that the way we have allowed the likes of Woolworths and Coles to dominate the market and extort farmers with their ‘at the gate’ pricing demands.

      Where do we draw the line? Throw $43 billion into a loss making enterprise in order to be seen doing ‘something’ for the ‘bush’ and prop up farmers who will keep going broke anyway when we did nothing when the manufacturing sector disintegrated in this country or put it into future proofing our tech infrastructure that will be used to many generations into the future - including the ‘bush’.

      Saying $43 billion is gong to be wasted on ‘fast porn and facebook’ illustrates you have a very poor grasp on what the NBN is and what it will do for ALL of us.

    • Phil says:

      11:32am | 01/09/10

      Dave, Dave, Dave.

      I am wondering what type of industry you are employed in. If we took that scenario, we would simply be the white trash of asia, being a holiday hotspot the place for the worlds minerals and F all extra.

      Farmers do a pretty good job given that they export to many markets which have huge tarrif protections. I am not a farmer, nor do I have any desire to move in that way, but we get so much rain up north which is wasted, yet we spend billions to build power intensive desal plants the country over when the answer is to pump water from the north.

      I try and buy Australian at all every turn unless a better product comes from overseas. But food, I would not buy imported food nor feed it to my children even if it was half price.

      As for comptition laws, currently the ACCC is a toothless tiger. Just like other government agencies they would rather go after the Paul Hogan’s etc than go after the predatory pricing by the big chains who ultimately drive out competition then increase their prices. The TPA needs amending including truth in advertising for political parties. If you say something which is later proved wrong, or you mislead the counrty then you should be prosecuted the same way that a director of a company is.

      So tell me Dave, as for the NBN, if it were not for wealthy tax payers putting thir excess taxes towards this type of white elephant, would you pay the $ 5-8,000 for your house and at each home you lived at. Of course you would not.

      Business can get fast internet with fibre now, many schools in fact have fibre without the NBN, 20 mb up and 20mb down now, and I am sure faster speeds are available if required and you have the cash to pay for it, so its complete bullshit to say that only the NBN will work. Would love all you labor voters to stump up your private cash for all these grandeous social changes you desire. Just like I would like a new Ferrari in the garage, right now I cant afford it, so I will wait. The country cannot afford this.

      Of interest, do you currently have the fastest internet. If so who is it with and what are the speeds? How much do you pay a month andhow much do you use?

    • Northern Steve says:

      12:40pm | 01/09/10

      I honestly don’t see many farmers benefiting from the NBN.  Personally, I live 10km out of town, 2km from the local exchange, and I can’t even get ADSL.  There will be massive pressure (legislative and financial) now on Telstra not to upgrade small local exchanges like mine.
      I can see a lot of people like me, including farmers, most of whom live even further away from centres than I do, see our tax dollars being spent on something that will not benefit us.  If city and town businesses want it, then it is available now from existing networks.  If high speed internet is such a boon for businesses, why aren’t they forking out their own dollars for it?

    • john Williams says:

      01:58pm | 01/09/10

      Quite right to bag Dave, Phil.
      i too would like to know the stats on his current connection.
      I can tell you mine…$79.95/month / ADSL2+ 24 Mbps / which means I can download (have downloaded recently, like last week) a 100Mb file in 2 mins 57 secs.)
      That is way WAY faster than most people want or need, apart from Gamers and people who want to download movies.
      The idea that a 100Mbps - 1000Mbps device would not cost many times more is absurd.
      The Labor spin merchants (read liars) quite deliberately introduced it FREE to the start-up in Tasmania to instil in people’s minds that it was a free service, when it is anything but free.

    • Gregg says:

      02:26pm | 01/09/10

      Yes Phil, the benefits of the NBN are grossly overstated as is the total ultimate cost greatly unknown and yet there is new wire less technolgy that can see even higher speeds than claimed will be available with NBN, the service people will get and pay for being ultimately determined by ISPs.
      AAPT, a sizable ISP have just come out opposing the NBN.

      On the water side, I have posted often myself on the extensive works that should be thoroughly investigated that could benefit the whole country and not just rural regions.
      Something like a decades if not centuries long project for the future is a possibility and as with the Snowy Mountains Hydro, it needs to look at the potential for encapsulating the concept of harvesting the New England ranges rainfalls that cause regular flooding on the coastal side and channelling that via existing water ways and reservoirs, new dams and artificial channels where necessary to lik up with the Murrumbidgee or one of its more northern/eastern tributaries.

      That will be a start to supplementing irrigation capacity for the whole Murumbidgee and Murray basin as well as better sustaining of the Murray and natural wetlands.
      You move further north bit by bit adding to the system and it could be that there’ll even be applications for solar power development.

      It is also possible that more localised developments could be developed in tandem for other regions to attain water security via the northern gulf water harvesting and with flood mitigation works and eventually see a massive east coast inland water grid.

      The ranges water control management will also see a need for and provide for additional rural development, enlarging regional cities and the diversification which is crucial to resolving population crushes.

    • The Badger says:

      03:05pm | 01/09/10

      It gives me great amusement to see vision-less luddites debate the NBN and other topics like global warming based on a liberal policy manual and an Andrew Bolt fairytale article.

      You have no idea how stupid you sound.


      Blindly accept

    • TimB says:

      04:04pm | 01/09/10

      @ Badger

      It gives me great amusement to see gullible lemmings debate the NBN and other topics like global warming based on the Labor party policy manual and an IPCC fairytale.

      You have no idea how stupid you sound.

      Blindly accept .....

      .....whatever the government tells you. No need to do strain yourself with questions or independent thought.

      At least you’ve stopped the quotes Badger, +1 for you.

    • The Badger says:

      05:11pm | 01/09/10

      Timb
      Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery.
      Charles Caleb Colton

    • TimB says:

      05:59pm | 01/09/10

      Alas I spoke too soon it seems.

      And Colton obviously never encountered the concept of mockery.

    • Northern Steve says:

      08:05pm | 01/09/10

      Badger,
      I’m a degree qualified Telecommunications Engineer. I’ve got a reasonable idea behind the technology and the capabilities of the NBN and alternative technologies.

    • The Badger says:

      09:01pm | 01/09/10

      Northern Steve
      and your point is?

    • farkurnell says:

      10:00pm | 01/09/10

      calm down fellas ,your burnin up all that copperwire.Remind me never to join a Telco social club.

    • Sherekahn says:

      08:04am | 01/09/10

      Independence in a future Government is a very powerful position.  He will get a double lane Bruce Highway and just about anything, he sensibly asks for.
      I trust he has the wisdom to go with the ALP adding his name to the history books of the future by voting with the First Female Prime Minister of Australia.
      Bob, It was the women of the Bush who also forged the outback.

    • BT says:

      10:52am | 01/09/10

      Well said. It would be interesting to see what Bob has ever done for the women of his electorate.

    • Andrew says:

      11:35am | 01/09/10

      Um, what the?

      “the wisdom to go with the ALP adding his name to the history books of the future by voting with the First Female Prime Minister of Australia.”

      Firstly, he can hardly add his name to the history books of the past now can he?

      Secondly, suggesting that it is wise to go with the ALP because they would have the first female prime minister is tantamount to saying it is wise to side with a frog because the frog would be the first ever frog prime minister of Australia.

      Finally, lets not eulogise Julia Gillard, she was part of a government that was so useless that it knived a first term PM and then tried to ride a honeymoon period into a second term. It backfired, a signifcant majority was lost and she is now looking likely to be a trivia question. I can see it now, 100 years from now the question in pub trivia:
      Who was the first female prime minister of Australia?

      Team gets together and says wasn’t it so-and-so in 2000 and whatever, then the smarty at the back says ‘no, no, it was Julia Gillard”
      “Who?” says everyone.
      Smarty says “yeah she was PM for about six weeks in 2010, leader of the ALP.”
      Collectively “The AL who?”
      Heeheeheeheehee

    • Northern Steve says:

      12:49pm | 01/09/10

      Sherekahn and BT, very backhanded and sly way of calling Katter a chauvinist.  Do you have any evidence that he treats women any differently from the men?  Being a country Qlder myself, I know very well that if you tried to treat women in the bush and on the farms as different from the men, it wouldn’t go down well.The fact that he consistently receives more than 50% of the primary vote obviously proves he’s liked by the women as well as the men.

    • Anthony says:

      04:29pm | 01/09/10

      I do like the idea of the First Frog Prime Minister that Andrew suggests…

    • farkurnell says:

      08:53pm | 01/09/10

      Gee Andrew I haven’t seen the frog mentioned .in the Canberra farm yard..We ‘ve had the Ranga ,the cut snake,the swan , Mr Rabbot,,the devil,the Barnaby but now we have the frog.

    • Jamers Hunter says:

      08:24am | 01/09/10

      reminds me a bit of Tom Euren, Love him or hate him you knew that he ment what he said and stood up for what he believes.

    • Rosie says:

      08:32am | 01/09/10

      I like the man!

      No doubt Katter’s strong beliefs is tied to his identity. Take away his old fashion beliefs and Katter is lost. His beliefs drives him and do not change, however will compromise if necessary. Like Katter I think our soldiers should come home from Afghanistan but like he says; “we don’t want to be trifling with the American alliance.”

      Katter sees the world in black & white so very easy to know where you stand with him.

      I am certain he will do the right for his country and his electorate of Kennedy. I just wish the other Independents were like him. It really scares me because I still haven’t been able to work out the mindset of the others especially Bob Oakeshott.

      Thanks Paul great reading - a nice change!

    • Nicole says:

      08:34am | 01/09/10

      I really do believe Katter means well, but I still think he’s a nutter. He’s on this major power trip and really needs to get back down to earth. I’m sick to death of all this shit. These independents need to pick a side and just get on with it !

    • Edward James says:

      08:35am | 01/09/10

      After reading this I wonder if we are witnessing the first cracks appearing in the now unacceptable system where the two parties not much preferred have taken their parties turn to ride on the backs of workers.  @tuccaboy points out Bob Katter (and the others too) need to catch up on how to exercise power as independents, power which may open a third way for grass roots voters to break apart those factions which make up a time sharing alliance which has grown lazy, self serving, unpopular and become known nationally as “the two parties not much preferred”. Edward James

    • rod sexton says:

      08:37am | 01/09/10

      Good on Katter - reminds me of a bloke called Bolte, more radical maybe. Katter speaks his mind - no slogans, no cliches.
      Abbott will become PM and then we can have some fun going back over all the rubbish that has poured out of the Gillardine’s spout.

    • RB2010 says:

      08:39am | 01/09/10

      Good piece. One factual error. Katter was elected to the Federal seat of Kennedy in 1993, not 1980. Prior to his election to Federal Parliament, he was the State Member for Flinders - again as a Nat. He was a Minister in the National Party State Govt.

    • Bald Eagle says:

      08:52am | 01/09/10

      Hell, why don’t we just give Kennedy 43 billion dollars and be done with it.
      We could prop up plenty of farmers and their families living on marginal lands and keep them in golden ale for the rest of their lives.
      We could buy them dual carriageways so they could drive their herds more efficiently to market.
      We could buy them Coles and Woolworths, so the rest of Australia could get screwed by some new faces under big hats.
      It’s all just so dreamy and romantic, let’s just do it for Bob and his mates.

    • Mick In The Hills says:

      09:22am | 01/09/10

      Katter makes a lot of sense when he talks about how stupid we are to be leading the free trade tariff reductions.  It’s a great concept when everyone is participating, but when we offer 6% subsidy to our primary production and all our trading partners are applying 46% to their own, it’s a case of “can we have some vaseline to go with that?”

    • Zaf says:

      10:41am | 01/09/10

      Actually it’s a case of our trading partners subsidising our consumption by essentially paying for a part of any of their primary products that we buy - which they can only afford to do because secondary and tertiary production is so much larger a proportion of their economies than ours is of ours.  Geddit?

    • Troy says:

      10:56am | 01/09/10

      @Zaf, decimated primary industries in exhange for cheaper consumer goods.  The ol’ USA game-winning strategy.  Jobs?  Who needs jobs when you can buy kiwifruit and mandarins all year round!

    • Muttley says:

      11:34am | 01/09/10

      Wrong Zaf. Sooo wrong. Our trading partners are propping up failing enterprises. Then our industries need to try to compete with other players that are being held up by protectionism that is done for politcial purposes. You really dont have a strong grasp of this do you?

    • Zaf says:

      12:00pm | 01/09/10

      Troy – why is it that Australia competes very well when it comes to the production of wheat, rice and cotton, but is not competitive when it comes to kiwifruit and mandarins?  Doesn’t it make more sense (and is more respectful, in fact) to help people currently working in areas that are not competitive to move into areas that are competitive, rather than permanently propping up industries that will never be able to stand on their own two feet, leaving these people permanently vulnerable to political whim?  And you don’t address my point that North America, Europe and Japan can afford to subsidise farmers because their secondary and tertiary production is relatively so much larger a part of their economy.  Australia can’t afford to do it because agriculture is a big part of our economy – it has to be efficient or the country suffers as a whole.

    • Zaf says:

      12:44pm | 01/09/10

      @Muttley - our trading partners can afford to do it, we can’t.

    • Troy says:

      03:24pm | 01/09/10

      @Zaf - Free Trade has been one of the biggest furphies going for the last 30 years.  When will you economic-types get it: it’s not all about short term competitiveness.  It’s about diversity.  It’s about being able to play the entire field, not just having one or two star players.  Sure, it all looks great on paper, in the classroom, but then you see it play out in the real world and find out that, hey, guess what, we used to have lots of jobs and happy people and now we have a lot of unemployment and masses of wealth disparity.  But, wow, I can buy a Wii for only $99 so yay for me!  Just put it on my credit card.

    • Zaf says:

      05:10pm | 01/09/10

      Peace Troy.  Once Australia lost privileged access to Commonwealth Markets (basically the UK), it was free trade or economic reversal.  I agree, it is less easy for people than it used to be, but without a single big market to hook into, it’s more or less what Australia has to do.  There don’t seem to be a lot of other options.  Also - I don’t doubt that raising the price of food and banning imports would support Australian farmers, but it would would be experienced as hardship by poor Australians.  What our farmers would do if other farmers banned our exports in return…well.  We can huff and we can puff, but the world is as it is.  Regards

    • Rene says:

      09:25am | 01/09/10

      The best and most interesting small biography of any politician to date.  Do not actually agree with all Katter has done and stands for but you have an interesting profile of a unique person.  Hope he goes with Tony who has similarities to him.  It is not the workers, the unions or the parliamentarians that have made this country what it is but the individuals out in the bush, pioneering against all odds, the Aussie soldier, the battling mums, yes, even the swaggies and, whether you agree or not, church people.  My departed hubbie was one on the Kokoda Trail against those ahem, fiendish Japs.  He told his boys how eighteen year olds off the streets of Sydney, crying for their Mums in the night, not knowing how to shoot properly, scared to death enough to shoot off at any sound.  He removed their cartridges while they slept!  Such bravery, mateship and Gggive it a go, Mate’ even with the Katters of this world, have made us what we are.  Please save us from going Radically Left and Green, Bob!  That would be our downfall.

    • Polly says:

      10:08am | 01/09/10

      Rene, your post was beautifully ’ written’ and I agree with all you say.
      Bob Katter is one of our Nation Builders and with him, what you see is what you get and that’s not a bad thing. Tony Abbott would do well to have him on his team.

    • Reg says:

      10:10am | 01/09/10

      Rene the world has changed since we were kids. Sure the swaggies and the squatters did their bit and the soldiers came from all walks of life, but look around, now we could feed all of Australia from the production capacity of Victoria and NZ alone, and still have lots to spare.

      If you’re in beef, you know that the poms used us as a cheap source of food and troops and dumped us like a s**** rag when it suited them. The Americans won’t let our beef in because they still have the memory of how dreadful their troops found it in 1942. Believe me, this is TRUE.

      I just find it difficult to accommodate your collective outlook with your support of a narrow based Liberal philosophy. Unlike you, I believe that following the narrow myopic agenda of the Liberals and the unimaginative Nationals will be our downfall. Bob is OK which-ever way he goes.

    • TheRealDave says:

      10:49am | 01/09/10

      @Reg - The Yanks won’t import Aussie beef because of troops in WW2? What the?

      @Rene waxing lyrical about the bush then talking about kids dragged off the streets of Sydney and crying in the jungle - i fail to see the point here. Further - the ‘workers’ never built this country but it was ‘the bush’ ?? Given that there’s always been millions of more ‘workers’ who built the cities and the countries infrastructure than the far smaller numbers of ‘rural’ people who’ve fed us I think you do a grave misrepresentation of the history of this country.

    • Reg says:

      01:05pm | 01/09/10

      RD, the story is passed down father to son in the US based on the grisly crap the soldiers were fed in Australia during the war. A retired mink farmer standing beside me in Tacoma passed on this little snippet. Naturally the US farmer being the most subsidized in the world might have something to do with it.

      Even at the height of the exports of beef at 23 pence a pound to GB, they preferred Argentinean beef and it takes a long time to repair such a bad reputation.

    • farkurnell says:

      06:41pm | 01/09/10

      Rene dont worry ,Bob’s National mates will save you.

    • David Lowe says:

      09:29am | 01/09/10

      Katter = how you look after your constituents, comrades.  Unlike those who get voted in by constituents and then convert to looking after their “party’s” interests and the big business interests of their “party”; like the current mob of Bligh’s puppets in northern Queensland.

    • Clem says:

      09:42am | 01/09/10

      One of the best reads I’ve had on The Punch since it’s launched. Nice work.

    • Chewy says:

      10:03am | 01/09/10

      Co sign,  I was just thinking with out a doubt that was the best piece on The Punch to date.

    • A Bob says:

      12:17pm | 01/09/10

      Ditto from me. I made mention of lazy media about the indpenedants yesterday, great to see an exception to the rule.

    • John L says:

      01:31pm | 01/09/10

      Agreed. It is an excellent insight into Katter’s thinking - far better than the one on The Age

    • John L says:

      01:31pm | 01/09/10

      Agreed. It is an excellent insight into Katter’s thinking - far better than the one on The Age

    • john Williams says:

      04:01pm | 01/09/10

      @Rene and @ Clem :  I will happily add my name to that.
      The Press have seriously let the public down on so many occasions, and without exception all my letters to the Punch have had that theme.
      I can now open with : The Press have ..generally.. let us down.
      Paul Toohey…Ta

    • Reg says:

      09:42am | 01/09/10

      The guy’s a political novice compared to the well remembered Rex Pilbeam. He knew how to switch sides and keep them hopping. He also had something in common with Huey Long.

      I agree with Katter, Queenslanders are misunderstood because they have a broader outlook than most Southerners. Maybe the Liberals should offer to publish his script of the History of Australia. At least it would take the light off that other idiot that ponces around as a journalist for Channel 9.

      I’m not looking forward one bit, to the International article that takes a look at our current elections and the clowns who drifted across the foot-lights.

    • Kris says:

      10:32am | 01/09/10

      About time someone actually helped Australia understand where Katter is coming from.  He and his family have been in politics for many years.  Don’t be so foolish as to say ‘he doesn’t know what he is doing’ and he ‘just needs to pick a side’, do you really think that politics is that easy? These people need to make sure that every agreement is written in stone before they make any decisions, if they don’t, they will get bent over by the big parties at the first oppertunity.  ‘Just get on with it’ is a very ignorant and dangerous point of view and the major parties are perpetuating that sentiment in the hope that it will swing the populations opinion against the minority parties and push them into a decision to support one or the other before any solid agreements are made.  I’ve got an idea, how about we all shut up and LET them get on with it!?  THIS IS POLITICS! THIS IS OUR SYSTEM!

      Katter obviously see’s that there is an oppertunity here for reform and he is in the drivers seat.  I am glad that there is someone in that position with integrity and honour.

    • Chip Carden says:

      10:50am | 01/09/10

      This election has revealed a rich vein of deluded Australians who thought it smart to use their vote to protest or just to negligently waste. You reap what you sow. And now these hapless dustbowl amigos have to make some awful choices that will please around 50.1% of the adult population - never really thought that one through, did you folks? the election has revealed there are many of us who believe the answer to our apparent woes is to promote a bunch of egotistical independents with a confused approach to nanny-state rural welfare, who question our nationalism if we fail to support an unsustainable rural fantasy, who tattoo their creaking xenophobia on their RM Williams garb, and who promote a fawning, embarrassing and incredibly selective nostalgia for an Australia that never really was.  Thanks to you, folks, we are going to get the sort of hamstrung, hapless, paralysed, directionless, faithless and cowardly government that you deserve, characterised by populist inconsistencies, unchecked conspiracy theories and egged on by tabloid cheer squads selling advertising space and made permissible by a people profligate with their democratic right.
      And yes, I do say that as if it is a bad thing.

    • Who says:

      12:10pm | 01/09/10

      In your vision of democracy does everybody do exactly as you say?

    • Peter Oataway, Hay, NSW says:

      10:52am | 01/09/10

      Having spent most of my life selling agricultural supplies, it has defied logic too me that Australian farmers undertake fairly expensive strict quality assurance methods growing meat and food, yet Coles and Woolies import cheap food grown under far less scrutiny or expence.

    • Johnno says:

      10:54am | 01/09/10

      Before we get too worked up with romantic notions of the bush and the characters it contains, let’s remember how Bob’s pride in being a redneck manifests itself.

      Back in 1989 Bob declared there were no homosexuals in Queensland. He voted against the decriminalisation of homosexuality in Tasmania and against the Same-Sex Relationships Act 2008, which removed discrimination against same-sex couples under Commonwealth law.

      In 1996 Bob,while supporting National Party colleague Bob Burgess’s comments that Australian citizenship ceremonies were about “dewogging”, described critics of Burgess as “little slanty-eyed idealogues who persecute ordinary average Australians.” Two weeks later, Katter complained that it was “nigh on impossible” to send children from his area to boarding schools “unless you’re rich or unless you happen to be of Aboriginal descent”.

      These pearls of wisdom led to Pauline Hanson inviting Katter to join her One Nation party if he wanted to leave the Coalition.

      And why does Punch regular Eric like Katter so much? More than likely because of Katter’s comments in 1997. Katter advocated changing the Child Support Scheme to lessen the financial maintenance obligations for non-custodial parents. Bob claimed “anti-male bias” in the scheme, and that “in 90 per cent of cases the bloke has done nothing wrong the woman was at fault”. (Sound familiar?)

      Next to these, his climate change skepticism seems relatively moderate.

      So, celebrate Bob’s ascension and eccentricity, but remember what this guy actually stands for.

    • Kris says:

      11:17am | 01/09/10

      What you are saying may well be true but unlike the rest of the politicians, you do actually know what he is thinking don’t you? You can have a conversation with Bob about what he thinks and you may even be able to change his mind, but try having that conversation with other politicians, you wont know what they think when you enter the conversation and you wont know what they think after either.  You certainly wont know what they will be fighting for in parliament because they don’t care about you, their constituent or their Country, they only care about their political alliances…I know who I would prefer.

    • Peter Oataway, Hay, NSW says:

      11:33am | 01/09/10

      So are you have a go at Bob Katter with your post or are you trying associate everyone that lives outside an urban area with those extreme statements ?
      Have you opinions remained static over the past 2-3 decades ?

    • Johnno says:

      01:32pm | 01/09/10

      Peter, I’m just adding some more detail to the story. Sweeping statements are great, but sometimes detail is needed to fill things out.

      As far as I know, Bob hasn’t retracted anything he’s said on these matters. I would like these things to be put to him and see if he remains as “authentic” and strident in his views.

      On an unrelated point; if I chose to start a business in a location I’ve been told won’t get any customers, where there is no passing trade, where it’s likely natural disaster will put me out of business, and where competition from overseas could send me broke, should I expect the government to bail me out when things go wrong?

      “No”, you say? Unless I’m a farmer ...

    • Peter Oataway, Hay, NSW says:

      02:56pm | 01/09/10

      @“Johnno” I’m struggling to see the relevance of you opening up a business with no passing trade has to this discussion, unless your trying to assert all rural towns should die..perhaps rather than stopping the boats try stopping our utes we could be “utepeople”

    • Reg says:

      05:52pm | 01/09/10

      Peter, if the supporters of the National Party wish to adopt the Liberal platform of their partners, which includes the right to succeed or fail, why do they expect government support at every passing misadventure? Does that help?

      A rather irrational expectation perhaps, not to say something worse.

    • Aussie Wazza says:

      11:00am | 01/09/10

      Bob is a true representative for his electorate unlike most polies today who represent their own interests and rely on smoke and mirrors to flim flam us suckers into voting for them.

    • Shawn says:

      12:22pm | 01/09/10

      Correction: The Gimp doesnt give Marsellus Wallace a going over in Pulp Fiction. He is tied up in an adjacent room of the basement.

      “At this moment, we as a nation are not unlike Marsellus Wallace, the gang boss in Pulp Fiction who finds himself hogtied in the basement of a redneck’s pawn shop while the Gimp is giving him a going over.”

    • farkurnell says:

      07:35pm | 01/09/10

      guys, just remind me with this analogy,who’‘s the Gimp , who’s Marsellus and who’s Bruce the boxer suppose to be.

    • Luke says:

      01:14pm | 01/09/10

      The electorate of Kennedy will really love dear Bob if he signs on with Labor, now that it’s “official” we have a new Coalition of the Labor/Greens. His electorate detest the Greens. I bet Gillard wishes she never had to bend and bowe to Bob Brown and his loony Greens to retain her Prime Ministership. At least at the next election it will be very clear, voting Green is not a vote against Labor but a vote endorsing the Labor/Green Coalition.

    • Jane says:

      01:59pm | 01/09/10

      Oh well the Greens gave Gillard a way of dumping her citzen assembly commitment. Gee Labor are good at breaking and dumping commitments. Now she will have another reason to get out of the Timor solution too I guess. Power to the Greens by the looks of it. God help Australia!

    • Jacquie Butterfield says:

      01:15pm | 01/09/10

      Katter is the only visibly real person in the entire Federal House of Representatives.

    • Adrian says:

      02:12pm | 01/09/10

      Wow! This is a man to reckon with and one who I am so very proud to know exists still in this country.
      It is ironic how this column is filled with American references to help explain to Australian readers, but then Katter is dinky di from the country, and the news organisations are centered in the most “wannabee talk, act and dress american” part of Australia.
      Not that it is necessarily bad, as i like americans, but it is an interesting observance as to how much we are separated among ourselves culturally.

    • Ron says:

      02:24pm | 01/09/10

      Katter is supposed to take into account the historical events in Australian politics. He and the other two twits must have forgotten what has happened over the past two years. Where have they been?. And surely Katter must ask the PM what arrangements she has with the Greens. Make no mistake, we should all be frightened of the next three years. The greens are dangerous.
      Ron

    • Sven Gali says:

      04:22pm | 01/09/10

      It’s been a fun few days, and Bob’s done a fair impression of sounding indignant about the conservatives, but he’s overplayed his hand by not bothering to meet with Garnaut and Stern today.

      http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2010/09/01/2999212.htm

      He’ll get diddly squat from Abbott now that he’s in the bag.

    • Simon says says:

      04:43pm | 01/09/10

      Agree.

      Stern is here now on a private visit, as he explained in his opening, which gives him a deep Australian connection which I’d not realised.

      He’s also made the time to talk, in a private capacity, to various people
      incl The National Press Club today.  If you didn’t get a chance to see it
      today, ABC rebroadcasts are
        a.. 3:00am Thu, September 02 on ABC1
        b.. 12:30pm Wed, September 08 on ABC1
        c.. 12:30pm Wed, September 08 on ABC News 24
        d.. 3:00am Thu, September 09 on ABC1
      May eventually appear on I-view here
      http://www.abc.net.au/iview/#/news

      Stern gave an engaging, relaxed and masterly presentation on progress and possibilities for climate policy and action - carbon tax, commercial advantages, tech change, will to act and even at last a sensible view of what Copenhagen was and wasn’t.

      Overall, he left me feeling optimistic. As the commercial world sees the
      advantage of a carbon price and new tech, and we match that with what we can already do on energy use, deforestation and population, the next 20 years should see some real positive global change.

      It was really quite refreshing, especially the entirely genuine widespread laughter at Katter’s shoot-in-the-foot dismissal of him as a “lightweight”. 

      Though I guess you could have said that of the media presence on the day - pretty lacklustre.  Remaining polite and cheerfully to the point, he didn’t let ‘em get away with any of the usual tripe.

      If Labor over the last 6 months had come out with just half of what he
      covered in a bare 40 minutes, they’d have romped home.

    • Peter says:

      04:27pm | 01/09/10

      “Troglodyte” Good one. How many people know what it means?
      Write sense, if you want to use a word that nobody understands, EXPLAIN!!
      Sheer ignorance cave dweller!!

    • farkurnell says:

      09:46pm | 01/09/10

      Peter a troglodyte is a person who uses a big word that nobody understands,but gee it sounds impresive.Actually it’ s kind of like a
      paradigmian

    • Ken says:

      04:29pm | 01/09/10

      When I saw the title “Inside the mind of Bob Katter” I was expecting to find a blank page.  It probably says more about the Australian voter than it does about Katter that a fool like this can be elected to the Australian parliament. IQ tests as part of the pre-selection process could only benefit us all. It certainly would have saved us from people like Bob Katter, Steve Fielding and Barnaby Joyce.

    • The Badger says:

      05:24pm | 01/09/10

      Don’t forget Ironbar Tuckey

      He voiced what the rest of the Liberals were saying amongst themselves. 
      He was the ideal liberal dog whistler
      They could claim he was the mad uncle and allow him to say whatever they thought.
      Thankfully he can whistle the liberal misoginistic, xenophobic, homophobic messages into the cold night wind of the desert where only the other reptiles can hear him.

      Wonder who’ll be the next mad uncle for the Liberals now that he’s gone?

      Some cause happiness wherever they go; others whenever they go.
      Oscar Wilde

    • Jose says:

      04:52pm | 01/09/10

      A parody on the State of the world. The only thing holding us all back from a bright new future of cooperative freedom are the minds of those glued to the past, the way it was and the glorification of the battle scars.

    • Farkurnell says:

      06:50pm | 01/09/10

      I say Bob for PM .Then all the Paradigmians will come out of the closet.Bob will throw a Barbie at the Lodge ,all his old mates will come over and reminisce about the good old days at the National party.

    • Robert Smissen, rural SA, God's own country says:

      11:48pm | 01/09/10

      Bob is my hero

 

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

The national policy agenda which nobody voted for

The national policy agenda which nobody voted for

Well silly old me. There I was thinking the 2010 federal election was about economic management, border…

Enough with all the meat eating all ready

Enough with all the meat eating all ready

People are discovering that food costs are soaring, electricity and government charges including water…

We need to get over our poll addiction

We need to get over our poll addiction

Australia really needs to do something about its addiction to opinion polls. The week following the election,…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: Enough with all the meat eating all ready

Edward James says:

Reducing the consumption of meat and sea food by 15%. What about the world population is it not increasing each year by the same or greater percentage? Those extra people are not all vegatarian they are eating meat and fish too. There is something strange about the maths message in your story. Our world… [read more]

From: The national policy agenda which nobody voted for

thatmosis says:

This whole process has gone from the sublime to the ridiculous. Here we have a Nation held captive by independants and a so called independant party called the Greens, aka the Raving Looney Party, whilst money is being wasted daily on public servants doing their usual thing, nothing but with bells on.… [read more]

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

David Penberthy

Sugar tariffs, light rail for Hobart, ETS...the national policy agenda no-one voted for. My punch piece http://tinyurl.com/2739y8o#ausvotes

Paul Colgan

@sallyloane Wouldn't Mexico be great right now? Alas the scorpion was in a NSW pub.

Paul Colgan

FFS. Is this #blackhole $860m, $1bn, $10bn or $11bn? New demand for Independents: addition and subtraction classes for everyone #auswaits

Lucy Kippist

@Alex_Carlton this is late but I raise you Beastie Boys Remote Control ...

Gentle jabs to the ribs

Gillard and Abbott get a digital makeover

Gillard and Abbott get a digital makeover

Warning: this has nothing to do with politics. We thought we’d see how the Prime Minister and Opposition… Read more

25 comments

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free daily Punch newsletter