Bilderberg 2009 attendees
The Corporation (Bit Torrent)
Chomsky Bit Torrent
Deaths in Iraq: Brussels Tribunal
Recommended Sources
Wikileaks
Wikileaks - Cablegate
Wikileaks - Twitter
Wikileaks Mirrors
Z Net
The Renegade Economist (Finance)
The Real News
Information Clearing House
Architects & Engineers 9/11 Truth
World Press News Links
Green Left Weekly
Human Rights Watch
The Peter Schiff Show (Finance)
The Schiff Report (Finance)
The Keiser Report (Finance)
Global Research
David Degraw.org (Finance)
CSPER.org (Finance)
Zero Hedge (Finance)
Rick Ackerman (Finance)
Mosaic TV - Mosaic Report
Analysis
Mosaic Report
Videos
Money as debt
Video Dossier
No End in Sight
Pilger: Death of a Nation
The Israeli Lobby
Zeitgeist
Pilger: New Rulers of the World

Why I'm Posting Bail Money for Julian Assange

By Michael Moore December 14, 2010 "Information Clearing House" Yesterday, in the Westminster Magistrates Court in London, the lawyers for WikiLeaks co-founder Julian Assange presented to the judge a document from me stating that I have put up $20,000 of my own money to help bail Mr. Assange out of jail. Furthermore, I am publicly offering the assistance of my website, my servers, my domain names and anything else I can do to keep WikiLeaks alive and thriving as it continues its work to expose the crimes that were concocted in secret and carried out in our name and with our tax dollars. We were taken to war in Iraq on a lie. Hundreds of thousands are now dead. Just imagine if the men who planned this war crime back in 2002 had had a WikiLeaks to deal with. They might not have been able to pull it off. The only reason they thought they could get away with it was because they had a guaranteed cloak of secrecy. That guarantee has now been ripped from them, and I hope they are never able to operate in secret again. So why is WikiLeaks, after performing such an important public service, under such vicious attack? Because they have outed and embarrassed those who have covered up the truth. The assault on them has been over the top: **Sen. Joe Lieberman says WikiLeaks "has violated the Espionage Act." **The New Yorker's George Packer calls Assange "super-secretive, thin-skinned, [and] megalomaniacal." **Sarah Palin claims he's "an anti-American operative with blood on his hands" whom we should pursue "with the same urgency we pursue al Qaeda and Taliban leaders." **Democrat Bob Beckel (Walter Mondale's 1984 campaign manager) said about Assange on Fox: "A dead man can't leak stuff ... there's only one way to do it: illegally shoot the son of a bitch." **Republican Mary Matalin says "he's a psychopath, a sociopath ... He's a terrorist." **Rep. Peter A. King calls WikiLeaks a "terrorist organization." And indeed they are! They exist to terrorize the liars and warmongers who have brought ruin to our nation and to others. Perhaps the next war won't be so easy because the tables have been turned -- and now it's Big Brother who's being watched ... by us! WikiLeaks deserves our thanks for shining a huge spotlight on all this. But some in the corporate-owned press have dismissed the importance of WikiLeaks ("they've released little that's new!") or have painted them as simple anarchists ("WikiLeaks just releases everything without any editorial control!"). WikiLeaks exists, in part, because the mainstream media has failed to live up to its responsibility. The corporate owners have decimated newsrooms, making it impossible for good journalists to do their job. There's no time or money anymore for investigative journalism. Simply put, investors don't want those stories exposed. They like their secrets kept ... as secrets. I ask you to imagine how much different our world would be if WikiLeaks had existed 10 years ago. Take a look at this photo. That's Mr. Bush about to be handed a "secret" document on August 6th, 2001. Its heading read: "Bin Ladin Determined To Strike in US." And on those pages it said the FBI had discovered "patterns of suspicious activity in this country consistent with preparations for hijackings." Mr. Bush decided to ignore it and went fishing for the next four weeks. But if that document had been leaked, how would you or I have reacted? What would Congress or the FAA have done? Was there not a greater chance that someone, somewhere would have done something if all of us knew about bin Laden's impending attack using hijacked planes? But back then only a few people had access to that document. Because the secret was kept, a flight school instructor in San Diego who noticed that two Saudi students took no interest in takeoffs or landings, did nothing. Had he read about the bin Laden threat in the paper, might he have called the FBI? (Please read this essay by former FBI Agent Coleen Rowley, Time's 2002 co-Person of the Year, about her belief that had WikiLeaks been around in 2001, 9/11 might have been prevented.) Or what if the public in 2003 had been able to read "secret" memos from Dick Cheney as he pressured the CIA to give him the "facts" he wanted in order to build his false case for war? If a WikiLeaks had revealed at that time that there were, in fact, no weapons of mass destruction, do you think that the war would have been launched -- or rather, wouldn't there have been calls for Cheney's arrest? Openness, transparency -- these are among the few weapons the citizenry has to protect itself from the powerful and the corrupt. What if within days of August 4th, 1964 -- after the Pentagon had made up the lie that our ship was attacked by the North Vietnamese in the Gulf of Tonkin -- there had been a WikiLeaks to tell the American people that the whole thing was made up? I guess 58,000 of our soldiers (and 2 million Vietnamese) might be alive today. Instead, secrets killed them. For those of you who think it's wrong to support Julian Assange because of the sexual assault allegations he's being held for, all I ask is that you not be naive about how the government works when it decides to go after its prey. Please -- never, ever believe the "official story." And regardless of Assange's guilt or innocence (see the strange nature of the allegations here), this man has the right to have bail posted and to defend himself. I have joined with filmmakers Ken Loach and John Pilger and writer Jemima Khan in putting up the bail money -- and we hope the judge will accept this and grant his release today. Might WikiLeaks cause some unintended harm to diplomatic negotiations and U.S. interests around the world? Perhaps. But that's the price you pay when you and your government take us into a war based on a lie. Your punishment for misbehaving is that someone has to turn on all the lights in the room so that we can see what you're up to. You simply can't be trusted. So every cable, every email you write is now fair game. Sorry, but you brought this upon yourself. No one can hide from the truth now. No one can plot the next Big Lie if they know that they might be exposed. And that is the best thing that WikiLeaks has done. WikiLeaks, God bless them, will save lives as a result of their actions. And any of you who join me in supporting them are committing a true act of patriotism. Period. I stand today in absentia with Julian Assange in London and I ask the judge to grant him his release. I am willing to guarantee his return to court with the bail money I have wired to said court. I will not allow this injustice to continue unchallenged. P.S. You can read the statement I filed today in the London court here. http://www.michaelmoore.com

news alternative alternativee alternative newsnews alternative alternative newsnews alternative alternative newsnews alternative alternative newsnews alternative alternative newsnews alternative alternative newsnews alternative alternative newsnews alternative alternative newsnews alternative alternative newsnews alternative alternative newsnews alternative alternative newsnews alternative alternative newsnews alternative alternative newsnews alternative alternative newsnews alternative alternative newsnews alternative alternative newsnews alternative alternative newsnews alternative alternative newsnews alternative alternative newsnews alternative alternative newsnews alternative alternative newsnews alternative alternative newsnews alternative alternative newsnews alternative alternative newsnews alternative alternative newsnews alternative alternative newsnews alternative alternative newsnews alternative alternative newsnews alternative alternative newsnews alternative alternative newsnews alternative alternative newsnews alternative alternative newsnews alternative alternative newsnews alternative alternative newsnews alternative alternative newsnews alternative alternative newsnews alternative alternative newsnews alternative alternative newsnews alternative alternative newsnews alternative alternative newsnews alternative alternative newsnews alternative alternative news

Don't Shoot Messenger for Revealing Uncomfortable Truths

WIKILEAKS deserves protection, not threats and attacks.

By Julian Assange 

December 07, 2010 "The Australian" --IN 
1958 a young Rupert Murdoch, then owner and editor of Adelaide's The News, wrote: "In the race between secrecy and truth, it seems inevitable that truth will always win."

His observation perhaps reflected his father Keith Murdoch's expose that Australian troops were being needlessly sacrificed by incompetent British commanders on the shores of Gallipoli. The British tried to shut him up but Keith Murdoch would not be silenced and his efforts led to the termination of the disastrous Gallipoli campaign.

Nearly a century later, WikiLeaks is also fearlessly publishing facts that need to be made public.

I grew up in a Queensland country town where people spoke their minds bluntly. They distrusted big government as something that could be corrupted if not watched carefully. The dark days of corruption in the Queensland government before the Fitzgerald inquiry are testimony to what happens when the politicians gag the media from reporting the truth.

These things have stayed with me. WikiLeaks was created around these core values. The idea, conceived in Australia, was to use internet technologies in new ways to report the truth.

WikiLeaks coined a new type of journalism: scientific journalism. We work with other media outlets to bring people the news, but also to prove it is true. Scientific journalism allows you to read a news story, then to click online to see the original document it is based on. That way you can judge for yourself: Is the story true? Did the journalist report it accurately?

Democratic societies need a strong media and WikiLeaks is part of that media. The media helps keep government honest. WikiLeaks has revealed some hard truths about the Iraq and Afghan wars, and broken stories about corporate corruption.

People have said I am anti-war: for the record, I am not. Sometimes nations need to go to war, and there are just wars. But there is nothing more wrong than a government lying to its people about those wars, then asking these same citizens to put their lives and their taxes on the line for those lies. If a war is justified, then tell the truth and the people will decide whether to support it.

If you have read any of the Afghan or Iraq war logs, any of the US embassy cables or any of the stories about the things WikiLeaks has reported, consider how important it is for all media to be able to report these things freely.

WikiLeaks is not the only publisher of the US embassy cables. Other media outlets, including Britain's The Guardian, The New York Times, El Pais in Spain and Der Spiegel in Germany have published the same redacted cables.

Yet it is WikiLeaks, as the co-ordinator of these other groups, that has copped the most vicious attacks and accusations from the US government and its acolytes. I have been accused of treason, even though I am an Australian, not a US, citizen. There have been dozens of serious calls in the US for me to be "taken out" by US special forces. Sarah Palin says I should be "hunted down like Osama bin Laden", a Republican bill sits before the US Senate seeking to have me declared a "transnational threat" and disposed of accordingly. An adviser to the Canadian Prime Minister's office has called on national television for me to be assassinated. An American blogger has called for my 20-year-old son, here in Australia, to be kidnapped and harmed for no other reason than to get at me.

And Australians should observe with no pride the disgraceful pandering to these sentiments by Julia Gillard and her government. The powers of the Australian government appear to be fully at the disposal of the US as to whether to cancel my Australian passport, or to spy on or harass WikiLeaks supporters. The Australian Attorney-General is doing everything he can to help a US investigation clearly directed at framing Australian citizens and shipping them to the US.

Prime Minister Gillard and US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton have not had a word of criticism for the other media organisations. That is because The Guardian, The New York Times and Der Spiegel are old and large, while WikiLeaks is as yet young and small.

We are the underdogs. The Gillard government is trying to shoot the messenger because it doesn't want the truth revealed, including information about its own diplomatic and political dealings.

Has there been any response from the Australian government to the numerous public threats of violence against me and other WikiLeaks personnel? One might have thought an Australian prime minister would be defending her citizens against such things, but there have only been wholly unsubstantiated claims of illegality. The Prime Minister and especially the Attorney-General are meant to carry out their duties with dignity and above the fray. Rest assured, these two mean to save their own skins. They will not.

Every time WikiLeaks publishes the truth about abuses committed by US agencies, Australian politicians chant a provably false chorus with the State Department: "You'll risk lives! National security! You'll endanger troops!" Then they say there is nothing of importance in what WikiLeaks publishes. It can't be both. Which is it?

It is neither. WikiLeaks has a four-year publishing history. During that time we have changed whole governments, but not a single person, as far as anyone is aware, has been harmed. But the US, with Australian government connivance, has killed thousands in the past few months alone.

US Secretary of Defence Robert Gates admitted in a letter to the US congress that no sensitive intelligence sources or methods had been compromised by the Afghan war logs disclosure. The Pentagon stated there was no evidence the WikiLeaks reports had led to anyone being harmed in Afghanistan. NATO in Kabul told CNN it couldn't find a single person who needed protecting. The Australian Department of Defence said the same. No Australian troops or sources have been hurt by anything we have published.

But our publications have been far from unimportant. The US diplomatic cables reveal some startling facts:

? The US asked its diplomats to steal personal human material and information from UN officials and human rights groups, including DNA, fingerprints, iris scans, credit card numbers, internet passwords and ID photos, in violation of international treaties. Presumably Australian UN diplomats may be targeted, too.

? King Abdullah of Saudi Arabia asked the US to attack Iran.

? Officials in Jordan and Bahrain want Iran's nuclear program stopped by any means available.

? Britain's Iraq inquiry was fixed to protect "US interests".

? Sweden is a covert member of NATO and US intelligence sharing is kept from parliament.

? The US is playing hardball to get other countries to take freed detainees from Guantanamo Bay. Barack Obama agreed to meet the Slovenian President only if Slovenia took a prisoner. Our Pacific neighbour Kiribati was offered millions of dollars to accept detainees.

In its landmark ruling in the Pentagon Papers case, the US Supreme Court said "only a free and unrestrained press can effectively expose deception in government". The swirling storm around WikiLeaks today reinforces the need to defend the right of all media to reveal the truth.

Julian Assange is the editor-in-chief of WikiLeaks.

 

Cablegate Wikileaks Link

Cablegate Wikileaks Mirrors


Alternative News & Other Links
   

Al Bawaba

Al Jazeera

Middle East Info Center

Amnesty News Update

Common Dreams

Iraq War (RU)

Big Eye

Wiki Law 3K

Counterpunch

Democracy Now

PINR

Electronic Intifada

Socialist Worker Online

Human Rights Watch

Truth Out

UN News Centre

Independent Media Center

World Press Review  

International Court of Justice

World Socialist Website

IRNA News Wire (Iran)

Z Magazine

 


Other Organizations

Media Watch

 

 

Arab Media Watch

Arms Sales Monitoring

Asia-Pacific Action

Corporate Watch

Democratic Media

Camp. Ban Landmines

IPA

Int. Criminal Court

Media Channel

Media Owneship Search

Int. Peace Brigade

Media Monitors

Middle East Research & Information Project

Media Research Center

Palestinian HR Monitor Grp.

Crisis Forums

SPIRI

1

1

1

1

1

World Citizen

1


Other Related Sites

 

   

 

Adbusters

Internatonal Press Service

Alternet

Amanecer (Spain)

Jihad Unspun

Labour's militant voice

AWOL Bush

Lyndon Larouche

BBC Monitoring Service

Liberal Slant

Lobster Magazine

Boycott Israel

Brain Shrub

Mideast.org

Bilderberg.org

Moderate Observer

Breaking all the rules

Mother Jones

Bushwatch

Muslim Assoc. of GB

IMEMC

News Undergound

Int. Action Center

Not In Our Name

Objector

Center for Democratic Media

One World

Column Left

Open Secrets

Conceptual Guerilla

Palestine Media Center

Prisoner of West

Crimes of War (Chechnya)

Prison Planet

Cyber Journal

Propaganda Matrix

Defy ID Cards

Project Censored

Democracy Now

Democratic Underground

Rational Enquirer

Dissident's Report

Reporters Without Borders

Edward Said

Electronic Iraq

Schnews

Estimated Profit

Ethical Consumer

Secular Humanism

Ethical Treatment of Animals

Why War?

Support The Truth

Freespeech

The Prospect

Freespeech News

The Progressive

Free North Korea

Third Way

Friends of Liberty

Third World Traveler

From The Wilderness

Truth Seeker

George Monbiot

tvnewslies.org

Ghostwriter

Tokyo Progressive

Global Elite

Tom Paine

Global Ethics Monitor

UK Today

Global Issues

Uri Avnery

Globalism News

Voxfux

Green Left Weekly

What Really Happened?

Globalist,The

William Bowles

Gush Shalom

Workers World

Here in reality

Project Cnesored

Howard Zinn

1

How You Can Change The World

 

Humor is dead

1

Human Rights Violations in Chechnya

1

Human Rights First

1

If Americans Knew

1

Ind. Progressive Politics Net.

1

Information Times

1

In these times

1
Non Mainstream News
 
  Caijing (China)

  US Treasury Yields

Noam Chomsky
Robert Fisk
Mainstream & Corporate Media
Email Servers
1
Search Engines
 
Steel Prices China
h
Other Alternative Media
 
Information Resources

 
A wide range of news links has been included in order to reflect as much as possible the varying narratives of current events taking place around the world, from North Korea's KCNA to Rupert Murdoch's Fox News. The links available do not necessarily reflect the editorial policies of News Alternative. All links are there as a resource for the reader.
 

This site is maintained and updated by R W M Lim, Editor, News Alternative. Location: TOKYO, JAPAN

Contact: rwmlim@yahoo.com