Cheap imports not so cheap

April 9, 2008

Rent, bills, services, fuel and medical bills may be steadily rising for the western consumer, but there’s aways ever cheapening Asian goods to look forward to isn’t there?

Well maybe not for much longer.

The question now is whether China will revalue its currency to compensate for inflation.


Culture chasm over treatment of animals

January 12, 2008

While I get a bit sick of the lurid, unimaginative emphasis on big carnivores on television channels like Animal Planet (whatever happened to David Attenborough and the subtler approach to nature documentaries?) I haven’t seem anyone in western zoos feeding live goats to big cats, as in this story from the Daily Mail (hat tip: Audacious Epigone).

The difference in attitudes to animal rights between China and the West appears to be a lot bigger than most westerners realise. It’s no wonder the New Zealand Green Party isn’t too keen on a free trade deal with the People’s Republic.


When China Wakes Up

September 11, 2007

How much longer will China be happy making cheap goods for the West?

Vdare columnist Paul Craig Roberts points out that once a particular industry is moved to China, research and development in that industry is also likely to move there. This could have dire consequences for western economies.

At the moment China is quite happy pandering to the needs of western consumers. The Yuan is pegged to the dollar at an artificially low rate, while the US dollar is propped up by East Asian investors. This is increasing the competitiveness of Chinese manufacturers and boosting the purchasing power of American consumers.

Since the mid 1990s, low and middle-income westerners have become dependent on cheap Chinese imports to offset stagnating wages and rising costs for services. A pricey ticket to a football game is still affordable when a new toaster or kettle only costs $20.

However, two things are starting to change:

1. China is now producing more sophisticated, better quality goods

2. Chinese domestic demand is rapidly expanding.

In the early stages of industrialisation, capital starved industrialists make sure that their workers produce significantly more than they consume, but as productivity picks up, a surplus of goods accumulates and employers increase wages so that workers can consume the surplus.

Chinese firms are now buying up unprofitable western manufacturers, such as the UK car manufacturer Rover, and shifting the capital equipment back to China. Soon component manufacturers will also have to move due to transport and communication issues and it will become impractical to maintain research and development facilities back in the home country.

Furthermore, the Chinese will be able to study how the blue prints of the capital equipment and set up their own industries for building capital equipment. At this point China won’t really need to subsidise western consumers since they will have control over the whole production process.

The Chinese will then be able to float the Yuan and charge western consumers higher prices for their products. The West won’t be able to respond by moving production to cheaper countries, such as Bangladesh and Pakistan, because the West won’t own the patents for the products or the capital equipment needed to produce them.

Two other factors may also serve to increase the price of Chinese goods:

1. The cost of raw materials, such as oil, copper and wheat, are likely to increase considerably in the next 10-20 years

2. The aging of the Chinese population will put upward pressure on wages and the Yuan.

Prices for oil and gas, as well as farm products such as wheat and beef, are likely to increase and China will need a stronger currency to pay for these essential imports. At that point it won’t make sense for China to compete solely in low wage manufacturing.

The Indian sub-continent, with a much younger population than China, will then take over a lot of the world’s low wage production. Although, most western economists seem to hate the term “strategic industries” the West is going to have to identify essential industries that it won’t surrender to China.

The fact that Chinese companies are already producing aircraft components for a strategic firm like Boeing, suggests that this is not yet happening.


Climate Change and China

November 19, 2006

In a Southland community newspaper Invercargill MP Eric Roy highlights one of the crucial flaws in the Kyoto protocol – its failure to take account of industrial pollution in China.

Since 1990, Southland’s Tiwai Point Aluminium Smelter has managed to reduce its CO2 emissions by 40 percent. As Mr Roy points out:

“For every ton of aluminium that is produced there is two tons of greenhouse gases, but in China it is eight and half tons of greenhouse gases per ton (of aluminium produced) ” .

He then states that: “In the last 15 years China has opened 15 new smelters”.

In New Zealand, many on the left believe that the Tiwai smelter should be closed so that emissions can be reduced to 1990 levels. It doesn’t seem to dawn on these softheaded do-gooders that closing the smelter would actually lead to increased CO2 emissions at the global level.

Population growth and easy credit that are the main factors behind New Zealand’s increasing CO2 emissions, not industrial activity. Either rapidly developing countries should be compelled to comply with the Kyoto Protocol, or it should be replaced with something else.

At present all it seems to be doing is accelerating western de-industrialisation.


When China Wakes Up

September 19, 2006

How much longer will China be happy making cheap goods for the West?

Vdare columnist Paul Craig Roberts argues that once a particular industry is moved to China, research and development in that industry will also be moved there – this could have dire consequences for western economies.

At the moment China is quite happy pandering to the needs of western consumers.The Yuan is pegged to the US dollar at an artificially low rate, while the dollar is propped up by Chinese investors. This is increasing the competitiveness of Chinese manufacturers and boosting the purchasing power of American consumers.

Since the mid 1990s working class westerners have became dependent on cheap Chinese imports to offside stagnating wages and rising costs in services. A pricey ticket to a football game is still affordable because a new toaster only cost 20 dollars.

However, two things are starting to change:

1. China is now producing more sophisticated, better quality goods

2. Chinese domestic demand is rapidly expanding.

In the early stages of industrialisation, capital starved industrialists make sure that their workers produce significantly more than they consume. However, as productivity picks up, a surplus of goods accumulates and employers increase wages so that workers can consume more of the surplus.

Chinese firms are now buying up unprofitable western manufacturers, such as the UK car manufacturer Rover, and shifting the capital equipment back to China. Soon component manufacturers will also have to move and it will become impractical to maintain research and development facilities back in the home country.

Furthermore, the Chinese will be able to study how the blue prints of the capital equipment and set up their own industries for building capital equipment.

At this China won’t really need to subsidise western consumers since they will control production. The Chinese will then be able to float the Yuan and charge western consumers higher prices for their products.

The West won’t be able to respond by moving production to cheaper countries, such as Bangladesh and Pakistan, because the West won’t own the patents for the products or the capital equipment needed to produce them.

Two other factors will also serve to increase the price of Chinese goods:

1. the cost of raw materials, such as oil and wheat, will also increase in the coming decades

2. the aging of the Chinese population will put upward pressure on wages.

Prices for oil and gas, as well as farm products such as wheat and beef, are likely to increase and China will need a stronger currency to pay for these essential imports. At that point it won’t make sense for China to compete in low wage manufacturing. The Indian sub-continent, with a much younger population than China, will then take over a lot of low wage manufacturing.

Although, many western economists hate the term ‘strategic industries’, the West is going to have to identify essential industries that it won’t surrender to China. The fact that Chinese companies are already producing aircraft components for a strategic firm like Boeing, suggests that this is not yet happening.