Front Page    

Hour.ca
 
Ottawa XPress
 
Voir.ca
 
Classifieds


 





News Front
 

Babylon, P.Q.
 

Explainer
 

Three Dollar Bill
 
 

March 11th, 2004
Panhandling Union
Write a comment on this article !
Read members’ comments [20]

Handle with care
Stuart Trew
 


Busted, Again: Sandra stands at King Edward and Murray after getting yet another ticket from Ottawa police for panhandling
photo: Stuart Trew

Union backing emerges to help the helpless navigate the Safe Streets Act

I saw Sandra by the Shepherds of Good Hope on King Edward, standing next to a patrol car and speaking to the police officer at the wheel. He drove away and she answered my question - she'd just been issued another ticket for panhandling that she can't afford to pay.

Sandra sometimes heads into the street to ask stopped cars for change, something the nearby Shepherds felt was dangerous enough to warrant putting up a no-panhandling sign. Later on, I was able to ask the cop why he'd issued Sandra a ticket. He told me panhandling was illegal and that the area had been drawing a lot of complaints.

It happens every day. Panhandlers around Ottawa are stopped by police and ticketed. Sometimes it's warranted - it's illegal under the Safe Streets Act of 1999. Sometimes it's not, like when the police indulge the terms "aggressive manner," and "obstructing the path." The cops don't pay much attention to the rules, said homelessness activist Jane Scharf when I talked to her last week. That's why she's gone and done something monumental for the city's downtrodden. She got them a union.

"I believe that panhandling is a necessity right now because of the inadequacy of social services and the Safe Streets Act is an unconstitutional piece of legislation as well," said Scharf, explaining some of the reasoning behind the union.

Not only that but sometimes "the police get even more overzealous with their application of [the Act]. They would get rough with the individuals or they will impose it beyond the restrictions
that are contained in it."

Readers might remember Scharf from last summer's Safe Streets Act protest under the Colonel By underpass across from the Rideau Centre. She slept there with the group until August when the police charged her with mischief before the City could clean the area after complaints it was unsanitary. Scharf said the police tried everything to get them to move, including calling their "The Ritz Under the Bridge" sign a business advertisement. Police still haven't returned it to Scharf.

"If we get panhandlers organized we can start to address the misapplication at least for the immediate future and also we can help reduce the vulnerability of the panhandlers by getting them hooked up with members of the community that want to help to defend them and support them in what they're doing."

All of which is to say that Ottawa panhandlers got their first union on March 8 through the Ottawa branch of the Industrial Workers of the World. Union delegate Braden Cannon admitted it was a strange notion considering there's no employers involved, but said the IWW supports Scharf's idea of hooking up panhandlers with three community members in case they want to file a complaint against the police or contest a ticket they've been issued.

"This is our first foray into panhandling, at least in Ottawa," said Cannon, but it's not without precedent. The IWW in Vancouver recently unionized squeegee kids, and organizations of the unemployed were fairly common during the Great Depression, he said.

Currently, Scharf and the IWW are looking for volunteers who will agree to put their name and phone numbers on a card that can be handed out to panhandlers who can then call one of three people for help navigating the legal system. The main hope, said Cannon, is that by stirring things up in police stations and courtrooms, the law might back off a bit.

Paul Smith knows that this mentality is accurate. He's been with the Ticket Defence Program since last summer. It aims not so much to contest the legality of fines against panhandling but to "clog up the system.

"Once the pressure is there on the police, from the courts, to stop wasting their time, that's when you'll see a change in strategy," said Smith in a phone interview. Since the group set up, the police have withdrawn most of the tickets, he said.

"I've been in court a lot, that's my legal background," admitted Smith, who got his first courtroom experience after becoming an environmental activist in 1989. "Being in the courts you see a lot of policemen lie, a lot of miscarriage of justice," he said, emphasizing that you don't need a legal background to represent people fined under the Safe Streets Act.

"I don't think it's going to last ... it's a heinous piece of legislation. If you really wanted to endorse it you'd have to stop all these shineramas," he said, referring to university fundraisers during frosh week.

Scharf downplayed the irony in a panhandling union. "I actually don't find the panhandlers and homeless people in general to be people who are thumbing their nose at society. I believe they've been systematically excluded by a series of neglectful and/or abusive treatment from their families and communities."

She saw more irony in the fact that a "no panhandling" sign sparked the idea for a panhandling union. She told X Press that it will be difficult to organize this group because of they live on the edge without appointment calendars, so she'll be circulating among panhandlers to listen to them and pass on info about what's happening in the courts.

The Safe Streets Act was upheld as constitutional by the Ontario Court of Justice in December 2001 but that decision is being appealed and will likely end up at the Supreme Court of Canada.


 
 



Write your comment on this article!


Wrong Direction!  
 
I think that Scharf is approaching this problem in a very wrong manner. All what she is doing is putting bandage on a greater problem for the homeless. If you look at the underlying issues for panhandling one can see that it is an avenue for the homeless to earn money.

For what the money is used is far ranging, but from my own experience with the homeless people that I have encountered in giving money to them is that it is used on booze, which obviously is not a life sustaining item. I think in my view the problem is not the "Safe Streets Act of 1999", which is draconian in nature, but our social welfare net that helps homeless people and other individuals who have to resort to measures such as panhandling.

Society should be working to eradicate homelessness from our city by setting housing facilities and offering job training programs to make these people productive members of society by forcing them to not to live off taxpayers. Now this may seem to be a bit harsh in nature, but you must face the reality that all members of society must contribute to make our city greater and panhandling is not a solution, but part of the problem. I am bothered by people asking me for money and I bet many of you are also. It harms the integrity of our city and not to mention the tourism that our city receives year round. In the end the homeless our streets have to go and the only way is through better social programs.

Shawn De-Silva
{8 votes}
March 14th, 2004

Get the Liberals to donate to Panhandlers  
 
Hmm... there are two sides to this debate... both have what sound like valid points, and they're likely both right. Panhandlers shouldn't be persecuted and need support on their side because they are the voiceless, the invisible, the powerless. On the other hand, the debate rages on. A handout or a hand up?

I'll avoid both questions and just, tongue in cheek, say that perhaps those Liberal cronies involved in the sponsorship scandal... you know... the cronies that stole 250 million dollars of taxpayer money... perhaps they should be sent down to the market to donate to the Shepherds, The Mission, Ottawa Inner City Ministries, and maybe they could even toss a few bucks to the panhandlers too. Why do I say that? I find it the ultimate in hypocrisy for a government to steal millions of dollars out of our pockets and then complain, whine and persecute people asking if you can spare a loonie near the Rideau Centre. Yuck! I mean... come on... at least the panhandler doesn't grab the change right out of my purse. I have the decision to give it or not. The government just takes what they want when they want and leaves me wanting. Give my portion of the money you stole to help the homeless, Mr. Martin.

Hazel May Lebrun
{3 votes}
March 14th, 2004

Would You Hire Them?  
 
I would like to give Jane and all of the others involved with these initiatives a great big hug! I know from my life in foster care, and from my work as the Executive Director of The Foster Care Council Of Canada, that many innocent children who get apprehended into the system because their parents have physical or mental disabilities, have asked the Children's Aid Society for some form of assistance, and even the few children whose parents actually did abuse their children, end up being shipped through dozens of foster homes, get separated from their parents, friends and siblings, often end up suffering from post-trauma as a result, far too often find themselves living in the streets because of the extreme emotional destruction that is caused to them from the foster care system.

So it is not their fault that many end up not fitting into society as it is structured. I ask the critics of the homeless this. Next time you see a person asking for help, why not offer them a job, instead of telling them to get one. Your incredible hate for these victims of abuse and neglect by the system is blinding you to the following question.

Would you hire this person to work with you? If you say no, then think twice about who else is going to hire that person. Do they really have a choice? Offer some suggestions please.

John Dunn
{8 votes}
March 12th, 2004

Panhandlers get voice in XPRESS  
 
Thanks Stewart the article was very well put together and I am getting very positive feed back about it. You will certainly get a vote of confidence from me for future interview.

Jane Scharf
{2 votes}
March 11th, 2004

Victims of Panhandling  
 
This comment is in regards to the recent tragic death of Ross Hammond in Toronto who was viciously stabbed to death by a gang of societal castoffs. As a full-time University Student I find myself harangued by panhandlers on a daily basis; I would like to know what the mayor of Toronto is going to do about this social deplore. Former mayoral candidate Jane Pitfield set-forth a very progressive and appropriate plan to banish such acts of aggressive panhandling. I want to know how many more people have to become victims of panhandling before something is done. Panhandling is one of the leading causes of social angst and antipathy, and consequently should be fully outlawed and criminalized.

Andrew Lauren

August 12th, 2007

Have a Heart  
 
I give to panhandlers and even those who look like they are on drugs. I know far too well what it is to be alone and poor. I count myself lucky that I'm not addicted to drugs. I had a daughter that was hooked on heroin and people helped her. Today she is on the methadone program. I will forever be grateful that my daughter is still with me. I wish we could find some kind of program that could help these people get off crack like we did for heroin. Their is strength in numbers and I commend you Jane Scarf. Thank you.

Diane Berube

May 7th, 2007

Panhandling For Food.  
 
I want to tell you most of the people on the street have some form of disability. I have a son who is bi poloar.
We need a way to help these people get the help they need, housing, food, cloths, mediction, and training how to take care of themselfs. Most of them don't know how to read and write.some are throw aways that family have given up on and or don't know how to help. them.There are all kinds of help the this and help that...but do you see any help the street people
donations or marathons...or movie stars donting to the homeless and menteltly ill???I am going to think of some way, some how to get more people aware of these people, because they are all not drug users or lazy or crazy...they need the right help. It will take
a lot but it can be done...it has to be done...more and more people are on the streets.This is not what the USA is...we are better then that!

Barbara Wedmore

November 14th, 2006

Panning for drugs  
 
I worked at shepherds of good hope for 6 years up until July 206. The people that are doing the panhandling some are clients ,some are ex-clients but the common denominator is drugs. Most of the panhandlers are making money for crack cocaine: some for morphine. The very odd person does it for wine. If people would not give money then the problem would hopefully be eliminated.

Wayne Bright

October 14th, 2006

Defending the Homeless  
 
It should be criminal to clog up the court system with ticketing the homeless who're just going to wind up in going to jail because they have no money to pay the fines in the first place. If there were plenty of decent paying jobs out here the homelessness of our society would not be so out of control like it is today. Sure, you are always going to have your un-functional alcoholics but the amount of people that are homeless these days is at an all time high and it's getting worse. Punishing these people for simply trying to get a little money together so they can eat, wash clothes,and even to engage a drink or two every now and then is not the right approach. It should not be a criminal offense to be homeless and merely asking people for money. If the people don't want to give to these people then that is their option. These draconian laws need to be repealed all-together!

Sebastian Stevens

February 13th, 2006

Pfft Union!  
 
Come on... a Union for panhandlers? How about some old fashion care. These people don't need the advice and ongoings of a union...do they want to be bothered with all the mumbo jumbo? I think not. Panhandlers live the way they do for some unseen reasons we may not be aware of. They have chosen to live that way and a union is not what they need. They need compassion, a little help from attentive people, a hand to shake, a hand out and most of all to be left alone. If panhandling is what they want to do...so be it. It is their lives they are risking not yours or mine. If safety is an issue...they are old enough to walk into traffic and out.

Why not let them do odd jobs for the city...with all that money the city wastes...why not hand it out and keep the panhandlers off the street. If the panhandlers really want money..do you not think they would clean the streets, remove graffiti or make the nations capital presentable to tourists..as the maintianing of the grounds has gone downhill over the years.

A union...this just makes me laugh. Donate and have a little heart for these people..you never know they might surprise you. They live the hardship as many of us don't.

Give a little!

Jennifer Berardini
{2 votes}
March 18th, 2004

Fundraising Not Fun Faising  
 
I was disturbed and confused by a comment made by Paul Smith in this weeks article "Handle With Care". How is it that Panhandling can be compared to the Shrinerama Fundraising? As I see it these students are out helping to raise funds and awarness in our community whereas a panhandler is only providing a service to them selves.
This particular article reminded me of a comment I read in the XPress during the summer regarding the "Ritz Under the Bridge". An activist involved in that situation stated that many people on the street would rather panhandle because they make more money than they would working because minimum wage is so low. I work for less than minimum wage (as a server) and rely heavily on tips to make ends meat. Often when I am leaving work I am accosted by panhandlers on the street and find myself thinking wouldn't it be nice to not have to go to work, deal with rude customers or pay taxes.
I understand that it is a common misconception that people who panhandle spend my earnings on alcohol and drugs though living on near Bank St has forced me to see that it is more of a reality than most would like us to think.
Perhaps these people helping the homeless should direct their energy away from harassing our courts and police officers and provide programs that deal with the root of most of the panhandlers problems mental problems or drug and alcohol abuse. If the homeless were offered more programs in combating their addictions or mental illness they surely would be able to get and maintain jobs in our community instead of relying on people like myself to contribute to their situation.
I also have a suggestion for the city why not hand out manditory community service as opposed to fines. This may help these people to recognize the value of a hard earned dollar and the rewards of a job well done.

Franki Mc Andrew

March 17th, 2004

Panhandling  
 
I really think that homeless people should try and find work not only to better themselves but so they will have everyday skills that they learn and they will have money in there pocket.
and i am sure they will feel much better about themselves. if it's a personal issue keeping them from finding employment they could always talk to someone that will listen and help them out.

Stephanie Woodward
{1 vote}
March 15th, 2004

From Austin, Texas  
 
We're used to hate filled "I've got mine, now get out of my way" mentality in George Bush's home state. It's sad to see so many similar comments from Canada. We do look to you all to give us some rational, sane answers to societal problems.

Best of luck to IWW with your efforts to help the most down and outs - now that you have started an effort, don't let them down.

Harvey Davis

March 13th, 2004

Some missed Information  
 
Although i respect the actions of Ms. Scharf, it has been noticeably left out that through her actions of last summer many of the individuals under that bridge were part of a number of robberies of tourists as well as threats and fights under the Colonel By bridge. Once the police had successfully removed the individuals involved in the protest, they found syringes and crack pipes galore and had at least 2 police officers attacked over the course of the long drawn out "protest".
I am familiar personally with several of the panhandlers downtown and agree that there should be some protection for them, but all sides need to be looked at and I feel that this article is unfairly biased against a police force who are already over worked and run ragged chasing around a bunch of 17 year old petty thugs trying to get them off the streets before they turn on each other again as we all saw this week when a 17 year old was stabbed in front of Rideau. If you offer this protection to those who genuinely need it, there needs to be some form of committee who can decide on a case for case basis who should be getting help and who are just in it to break the dulldrum of selling pot and being harrased by the police.
I am all for protecting the rights of the downtrodden however, if it's going to be done, shouldn't it be done right?

Doireann Fitzpatrick
{2 votes}
March 12th, 2004

Now, what about those union dues...  
 
Interesting, the idea of panhandlers forming a union. good luck.

activist jane scharf should be commended, but perhaps i might suggest an alternative.
Get a buskers license. wait! there is no such thing! imagine that. being able to sit on the
sidewalk with your hand out, playing your instrument. visions of the ukelele (sp?) lady spring to mind as she used to stand on corners in my neighourhood strumming out anthems only she cud hear, on her woefully out-of-tune ukelele, all the while legally collecting compensation for her efforts. so, get out your flute, your recorder, your tambourine, and make beautiful music.

no union dues, no license required, (i know, i'm soon to be busking myself this summer and have checked the legal requirements) and the cops can't technically bother. i.e. as long as you are busking on city owned sidewalks and not -literally- on the doorstep of private entereprenuer, you are free, yes free, to busk anywhere you please in the nation's capital. (please keep in mind that the Byward market is the ONLY public area in Canada's Capital City that some restrictions on your busking locale are applied- the produce producers and the merchandise vendors, all who have PAID for their right to sell and their designated sidewalk spot have first dibs over buskers)


let the Canada's Capital come alive with music from the streets.

Thomas J. Martin
{1 vote}
March 12th, 2004

The other side  
 
If these people were selling insurance, everybody would complain, and rightly so.
There are poor people in our society, and this is a bad thing. Allowing people to go onto busy roadways to collect change does not help them.
A chap I often see has a sign reading: 'Hungry and Broke'. So I made up a lunch bag full of goodies for him. You can guess the rest. My offer was sneered at. He wasn't that hungry, he said. He wanted cash only.

Brian Newman
{4 votes}
March 11th, 2004

Everybody has the right to identification. Why not start there?  
 
Approaching vehicles at intersections and stop lights is dangerous, whether you're asking for directions, pan-handling or squeegeeing. However, I have to agree that it would be a waste of time charging people who are doing it for a living. I can think of other things that our local police can be doing with their days.
What I have trouble digesting is that Scharf thinks a union will help the street situation. What good is a union to someone that does not even have a valid id or a place to live? I think a more pressing issue for homeless would be a lack of identification. To qualify for identification, you need a residence. So, really the issue is that these people do not necessarily have a place of residence. Having identification can get you a social insurance number, a health card and open up a lot of other basic freedoms. I believe that no matter how bad someone's situation is, there is always hope for something better. I am sure that everyone can agree with me on that point.
Getting homeless people in the downtown core interested in politics and joining a union does not really help their situation, what it does is enable panhandling. I will not pretend to understand everyone's individual situations that led them to our streets. I will say, however, that by disagreeing with Scharf I may have targeted myself for criticism!
I believe that lobbying employment agencies and other large organisations that exist in the Ottawa area may help fund real programs for people. I think Scharf would be better off talking to homeless people to figure out their more pressing needs. In short, why not listen to what they have to say about their individual situations in general instead of pinning their hopes on a useless union?
My little opine aside, I have to commend Scharf for her compassion and understanding for our city's homeless.

Mel Vermeersch
{1 vote}
March 11th, 2004

Too much panhandling  
 
I don't agree that there should be a union for panhandlers. When I see young kids out on the road panhandling, I get upset because I think they should get a job. Why should I donate my hardworking money to someone else who refuses to earn their own living.

On occasion, I have given money to panhandlers, but they have provided a service, like a song, or playing an instrument. They are not just holding out their little cup and asking for a "freebie".

In some corporations unions are beneficial, but for panhandlers, GIVE ME A BREAK.

What's next, we should put all panhandlers on social assistance???

Sue Dodds
{2 votes}
March 11th, 2004

Beggars Inc.  
 
There really is no way of me saying this without getting crucified or painted into a corner by my politically correct, big-hearted/soft-headed, ultra-liberal friends out there so I'm just gonna go for broke, prepare for the backlash and just say it...

Panhandlers need to get their crap together and get a life.

Well, I'm sure the fallout of that statement is gonna be swift and brutal but let me elaborate before any of you decide to tear me a new one.

First off, panhandlers, bums, derelicts, beggars or whatever you choose to call them are a sad fact of life. They've always existed and they probably always will. Some people were born into it, some people fell into it despite themselves and some people make a living off of it. Tragedy, abuse, disease, addiction and poverty play key parts in this phenomenon and although I greatly appreciate this fundamental truth I can't cast aside the simple fact that some people aren't victims of fate or circumstance but willing participant in their marginalization.

I've seen healthy panhandlers of all ages with the audacity to tell me they need money for beer and drugs. Look, I know that the odds of them using the money that they've collected for something other than illicit substances is next to nil. It's entirely possible that they will buy some food and blankets for themselves but I'm simply not that naive. I suppose I should applaud the ones who tell me outright that they intend to get hammered, laid or high because at least they're being honest but somehow that's a small comfort.

I've known a few that have come back from the other side to tell the tale and these people have my utmost respect but there are more than a few who choose to languish in oblivion when they can easily drag themselves from the muck. So when I say that panhandlers need to get their crap together and get a life...this is who I mean. A union is a nice idea but not my idea of a solution.

Pedro Eggers
{9 votes}
March 11th, 2004

Misplaced Energy...  
 
Knowing Miss Scharf from many of her "acts" I have to say that this woman has a lot of energy. Unfortunately, I think that this energy is spent wisely.

Why put all this work into forming a Union for panhandlers and not into more interesting solutions to poverty. I have to admit that I never give to panhandlers but I do give a lot to buskers. When someone plays the violin at a bus stop I fing that he helps the community, by making the bus stop more enjoyable.

Why not put all that energy into setting up a business. Maybe have the panhandlers learn new skills that they could put in practice. Instead of being expert pnahandlers they could be painters, carpenters or anything!

Maybe the reason why they care so much for panhandling is because it's a lot more lucrative than working for the minimum salary....

Perhaps we should find other ways to deal with problems than throwing money at them...

Marie-Claude Chénier
{3 votes}
March 11th, 2004


Write your comment!
please follow these guidelines

Information requested in blue will remain confidential   [privacy policy]
Please indicate your real first and last names.

First name : 
 
Last name : 
 
Your email : 
 
Confirm your email : 


Title of your comment (max. 150 characters)

 
Your comment (max. 2000 characters)

 characters remaining


 
 
 
LIMIT PER PERSON : one comment per article per member. Thank you.

Your comment will be read by our approval team and, if it is approved, will be posted on the website within 24 hours. It could also be published, along with your name, in the printed version of Hour magazine and on any of our partner websites. In order to present the highest quality of comments, Hour reserves the right to refuse certain submissions. Any plagiarism will entail the entire removal of the member’s profile. Hour is not responsible for the opinions expressed by the members.


 


Subscribe
 
Report a mistake
 
Classifieds
 
Jobs at Hour
 
Contact us
 
Advertise with us
© 2006, Communications Voir inc. All rights reserved.